Hoops Hello: Eli Brooks
[Photo: GametimePA.com]
Spring Grove (PA) point guard Eli Brooks grew up a Villanova fan and picked up an offer from the defending national champions last week, one of a handful of high-level offers Brooks added during the July evaluation period. Michigan, in need of a 2017 point guard, also offered during that time, and despite not having homecourt advantage, they landed a commitment from Brooks last night.
“(Villanova) was his dream school ever since he was a little boy,” said Brooks’ AAU coach Tony Sagona. “He just felt a better feeling about Michigan. He really loved Coach Beilein.”
...
“He picked up the offer probably about two weeks ago,” said Sagona. “He was up there a month ago and he loved the school, loved Coach Beilein. I’ve known coach a long time. I’ve been doing this 35 years, so I’ve had dealing with coach… his honesty, his integrity, and his reputation. Also his assistant coach (Billy Donlon) did a great job. "
Brooks is the second commit in the 2017, joining shooting guard Jordan Poole. His commitment leaves Michigan with two open scholarships for the 2017-18 season. As Brendan Quinn covers at MLive, this is Billy Donlan's first major recruiting win as an assistant at Michigan.
GURU RATINGS
Scout | Rivals | ESPN | 247 | 247 Comp |
NR PG | NR PG | NR PG |
4*, 90, #23 PG, #112 Ovr |
NR PG |
Based on the recent influx of offers, Brooks shouldn't be mostly unranked for long. Thus far, 247 is the only site that's rated Brooks, placing him on the lower end of the four-star spectrum—notably, two spots in the PG rankings behind offeree and recent Wisconsin commit Brad Davison. Meanwhile, ESPN has yet to even give Brooks a profile.
Rivals, Scout, and 247 all list Brooks at 6'1" and 165-175 pounds.
SCOUTING
Brian posted this when Brooks committmed last night but it remains the most comprehensive bit of scouting on him—here's a full eval from City of Basketball Love:
Strengths: In his area, Brooks is known as a scorer, putting up over 25 ppg for Spring Grove High School as a junior. However, his biggest strength is his ability to run a team. Brooks plays the game at a great pace. He never allows the defense to speed him up, and makes his teammates better every time he touches the floor. His jump shot has continued to improve and he his now knocking down outside shots on a consistent basis.
Weaknesses: One concern for Brooks heading into the summer will be his lateral quickness. During the high school season he is not challenged to defend on a consistent basis; it will be interesting to see during the AAU season how he keeps more athletic guards in front of him.
Overall: A super-stock riser over the last few months, Brooks' amazing 2016 summer was capped off with a commitment to Michigan. But he's proven he's a true high-major guard of late -- he's completely unflappable, limits his mistakes as well as anybody around, and is a knockdown shooter from all over the court who also makes his teammates better both in his style of play and his leadership. Has been a winner at every level and will only make a program better at the high-major level, even if he's not a four-year starter.
While Brooks's high school competition isn't top-notch, he performs like you'd expect from a high-major prospect at that level:
“He’s very smooth,” PennLIve.com’s Patrick Strohecker told TheWolverine.com last month. “He’s not physically imposing, but he’s very quick and, at least locally, he dominates games, as he should be doing. He’ll need to put some weight on at the D-I level, but right now, he has no problem taking over games and dominating them.”
The rest of what's out there on Brooks comes from his coaches. His AAU coach gave a nice overview of his game to Sam Webb:
What had the coaches buzzing most about Brooks is ability to score, but desire to get others involved first. In other words he is the quintessential pass first, shoot second point guard.
“He has a great control of the game,” Sagona said. “He does nothing that he shouldn’t do as a point guard. No extra dribbles, no toying with the ball, goes by people, plays defense, can shoot… tremendously athletic.”
Brooks's father is his high school coach, and they've worked together to develop his scoring ability on multiple levels:
“He’s a 41 percent three-point shooter, 79 in 29 games, but his midrange game is where we start,” his dad said. “He has a nice 15-foot pull-up. We knew his scoring had to be at three levels, so he can pull up, hit the three and get to the free throw line. He’s an 82 percent free throw shooter and shot over 150 free throws, and he averaged a double double with rebounds. Coach Beilein actually asked if he could dunk, and he said, ‘coach, that’s not a problem.’ He’s athletic. Coach Beilein was surprised by that.
“When you’re not on the [high level] AAU circuit there’s little time for people to really see you, but when they do … he’s not always the flashiest, but he’s making everybody better every time out there. We won’t rely on him shooting 25 jumpers, but he’ll make a mediocre kid a good player.”
Brooks has a pretty midrange floater that shows up several times in his highlights; it's a shot that could become a major weapon as he encounters defenses that provide more resistance at the rim.
OFFERS
Brooks added most of his major offers in the July evaluation period, including those from Kansas State, NC State, Ohio State, Temple, and Villanova. He also held offers from American, Brown, Bucknell, Colgate, Delaware, Drexel, George Mason, High Point, La Salle, Lehigh, Monmouth, Penn, and Rice. The quality of his offers has obviously taken a leap of late.
STATS
Brooks averaged 24.7 points per game as a junior, leading Spring Grove to their first league title since 1971 while shooting 41% on three-pointers and 82% on free throws. I haven't been able to find AAU stats for Brooks, who plays for the Jersey Shore Warriors, a lower-level AAU squad without a shoe partnership that's nonetheless produced some talented players over the years:
“(Brooks is a) character kid,” said Sagona. “He is tremendously happy with his choice. He is ecstatic about his choice. I just think that he is a great character kid and he is a great player. We’ve had some really good players come through our program… Matty Carroll (Notre Dame, 10 years in the NBA), Troy Murphy (Notre Dame, 12 years in the NBA), Kyle McAlarney (Notre Dame, current Euro League player), Darrun Hilliard (Villanova and the Detroit Pistons)… he is right up there with those guys.”
VIDEO
Dylan edited some highlights from the recent evaluation period:
Sophomore Spring Grove highlights:
Interview with some highlights from last summer.
PREDICTION BASED ON FLIMSY EVIDENCE
There's not much projection necessary here: Michigan needed a point guard to join Xavier Simpson at the position following Derrick Walton's graduation, and Brooks fills that need. He's well aware of the situation he's walking into:
In that regard, Brooks said he's comfortable coming in behind Simpson because, at the end of the day, he's comfortable at Michigan.
"I think it's tough to walk in and be a starter at any level, but especially when there's a sophomore guard and you're going to be a freshman," Eli Brooks said. "But I'm not really concerned about starting. I just want to continue to get better and push the guys who are ahead of me."
Unless Simpson fails to live up to expectations, Brooks should be the primary backup at the point for three years before taking over as the starter as a senior. If he proves capable of guarding two-guards—and that should be the case, at least against smaller teams—then he should be able to play alongside Simpson in the same backcourt in certain situations.
UPSHOT FOR THE REST OF THE CLASS
Michigan has their point guard, which likely spells the end of their pursuit of Nojel Eastern. With two scholarship spots remaining, the focus will turn to adding a couple wings, with one of those being a prospect who can play the four in Beilein's system. Four-star OH F Kyle Young and four-star IN F Jaren Jackson both hold offers and could slot in at the four. Five-star wings Brian Bowen and Kris Wilkes are the top overall targets on the board, and three-star in-state wing Jamal Cain also holds an offer.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Recruiting continues to head in the wrong direction. We didn't steal this kid from anyone. He's an upper mid major/lower major talent.
Is a Nova offer, to you, indicative of a "Lower major talent"?
Nova, NC State, and Ohio State are mid majors now?!?!?!
I don't think this is the right attitude to UM hoops recruiting these days. The problem is not so much at guard. Beilein's guard recruiting:
Uhhhh, ya think?
Trey Burke (2011) - top 100 recruit, became Trey Burke, lottery pick
Caris LeVert (2012) - mostly unheralded, late-flier recruit, became Caris LeVert, lottery pick
Nik Stauskas (2012) - top 100 recruit, became Nik Stauskas, lottery pick
Hits
Stu Douglass (2008) - diamond in the rough, steady shot and handle allowed him to play both guard spots, helped transition M into tourney team
Darius Morris (2009) - top 100 recruit, turned into fringe NBA player after a strong sophomore year at M, broke the school single season assist record (Trey Burke claimed it for himself two years later)
Tim Hardaway Jr. (2010) - top 100 recruit, key starter and All-B1G first team on Final Four team as a junior, 1st round NBA draft pick
Spike Albrecht (2012) - mostly unkown recruit was late flier from Beilein, had breakout moment in NCAA title game, otherwise provided steady hand as backup PG before back issues ended career at M
Derrick Walton (2013) - top 50 recruit, became B1G caliber PG despite some struggles with consistency and injuries
MAAR (2014) - under the radar recruit, one of the only players on last years team that could get to the rim, and solid B1G two-way combo guard
Jury's Out
Xavier Simpson (2016) - top 100 recruit, unproven incoming player, but love his potential and alpha-dog attitude. Expect him to be a B1G level PG after a one-year apprenticeship behind Walton
Misses/Busts
Matt Vogrich (2009) - surprisingly was a top 100 recruit, but was a certifiable bust mostly reserved for spot duty, had a few solid offers (ND, Stanford)
Carlton Brundidge (2011) - top 100 recruit, washed out of M and transferred to Detroit where he became a decent rotation player
I'd put MAAR in 'jury's out' and consider Vogrich a wing rather than a guard (he was never a ball-handler). Regardless the success is overwhelming.
Anybody doubting Beilein's ability to find and develop guards has to ignore a mountain of evidence.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
MAAR is a decent contributor, but it's a bit much to call every functional player who had a modest recruiting profile a "hit." By that rationale, everybody in Northwestern's rotation is a hit.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
M fans generally have mixed feelings on Glenn Robinson but loooove Zack Novak. Should it matter that one was a 5-star and the other a 3-star? Robinson was a FAR better player than Novak and Michigan had their 2 best seasons since the early 90s with Robinson. Same thing with Spike and Walton. Walton's clearly a superior player (starting over Spike from Day 1) and the team fell way off when Spike started in place of Walton. Is it reasonable to let recruiting rankings dictate how much you like a guy?
I say no, but even if you disagree it shouldn't matter when you are judging Beilein. He's responsible for production (both in recruiting and development).
The exception would be situations that were out of Beilein's control. When Trey considered leaving after his freshman year Beilein was left scrambling to find any PG that was serviceable very late in the cycle.
He may have exceeded expectations, but we're not grading Beilein on a curve.
We'll see what happens with Rahkman. Right now, he's a one dimensional player that teams don't respect on the outside and who doesn't create for anyone else. He cleaned up his freshman TO issues and his 3% skyrocketed in non-conference player, but he's still a guy who needs to drive to the hole to be effective. That's why I say "jury is out".
Personally, I think he tops out as an excellent 6th man. That's enough to count him has 'hit' for Beilein.
1. I think vogrich was an amaker recruit. So that helps JB.
2. On the other hand, I wouldn't give too much credit for spike. He really didn't do much (stats-wise) beyond a handful of good games. Same for Derrick. He was a top 50 player and is playing nowhere near that level.
Other than that, JB is pretty good with guards that have abilities on the offensive side of the ball.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Spike was a very good pick up when you consider who else was available at the time.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Look at the guys ranked in top 100 in his class For every player you ranked below him who is better, I can name a bust ranked above him. Maybe 2. Alternatively - you can't name 50 better rising seniors.
I don't have the time to do the in depth analysis, but I would suspect a good chunk (but not majority) of the top 50 players from his class are already on the NBA by now. Additionally, he's not even a top 50 player in the nation now, even after 3 years of development with JB (and JB is known for developing players). To put it into perspective, the best post season award he received is third team all big ten (once...last season) by the coaches (honorable mention by the media). Based on that it could be construed that he is not even a top 25 player in the big ten.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
http://247sports.com/Season/2013-Basketball/CompositeRecruitRankings?In…
There are far more busts than NBA guys. Most were elite top 15 recruits (10/15 left for the NBA). There's only a couple legit NBA players (Portis, LaVine) beyond that, plus a handful that left but arguably shouldn't have (Rozier, Wood, Jackson). They aren't necessarily better players than Walton just because they decided to leave and their college performance wasn't necessarily better either.
But fine, take 15 NBA guys. Now find 30 more players in the same class who are better players than Walton (ranked 44th). I bet you can find 15-20 pretty easily. The next 10-15 are going to be legitimate arguments if they are or aren't better than Walton, and you'll be relying on guys ranked outside the top 200 to replace all the busts in the top 100.
Walton was appropriately ranked. He has met expectations for a guy ranked like he was. You talk about guys ranked 40-60 and some of them are going to be studs, some duds, but the median guy is going to be about what Walton is - a high level major conference starter that the NBA ignores and maybe plays in Europe for a while.
If you want to call somebody a dissappointment it's Donnal - he was a top 100 recruit and hasn't played anything like it..
If you are 3rd team all big 10 that makes you one of the 15 best players in the big ten. But that's including 4 classes worth of guys. If you want to go that route you have to divide by 4.
Most of the people above Walton were seniors.
Looking at All Big 10 teams is a weird way to judge this. But if you insist - how many in Walton's class finished above him? Nigel Hayes - Anyone else?
Troy Williams was ranked just below Walton - and it's highly debatable who the better player is. Most of the other top 100 recruits that landed in the Big 10 were total busts.
There were 3 big ten recruits ranked above Walton: Noah Vonleh, Zak Irvin, and Roddy Peters. Vonlah is in the NBA, Irvin/Walton we can debate, Peters is a bust. The only players from the class who have a strong case that they were better are Vonleh and Hayes.
So, again, the rankings look pretty accurate. The only way they don't is if you expect an NBA player from a recruit ranked in the 40s. That's not the norm.
Can you even call him a top 50 player now regardless of class? I get that there is a larger pool to compare from, but most seem to emphasize the superior ability for JB to develop talent. With that in mind, as a senior, DW should be ahead of a lot of players younger than him. Which he is not as evidenced by his post season awards. If he was truly a top 50 player, he would:
1. Be in the NBA already
2. Performing much better than being 3rd team all big ten by his senior. Keep in mind is that DW only reviewed this once and only my the coaches.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Top 50 player overall doesn't answer if he was properly rated as a recruit in his class. If you're ranked 45th in the country, you're never SUPPOSED to be a top 50 player in the NCAA.
If you are going "regardless of class" he would just need to be a top 200 player to justify his top 50 ranking, since there are 4+ classes in the NCAA at any time.
As a senior you should be getting close to top 50, but even then there are 10-15 one-and-done guys cycling through every year who are supposed to be better, there is another 5-10 two-and-done guys cycling through, and then there's supposed to be another handful of juniors and probably something like 20 seniors who are supposed to be better than you.
Walton's already a top 200 player. Will he be top 50 as a senior? We'll find. If so, it would mean he did BETTER than his ranking would indicate.
You have unreasonable expectations. I would suggest looking back at recruits ranked 40-60 over the last 5 years or so. Some of them will be better than Walton, most of them won't be.
just don't like math
You can't name 50 better rising seniors because most of the good ones LEAVE college before they become seniors...
Statement still holds.
He's overrated by most M fans but underrated by you. I think it's fair to put him in the "jury's out" category but so far he's had a good career.
Not an NBA player obviously, but he was an excellent backup for 2 years and then a key starter his 3rd year -- on mediocre team, granted. Last year he was hurt - so we'll see what he does at Purdue. I suspect he'll be viewed as an average big ten starter, at worst.
Given Beilein recruited him to fill a backup role with almost no notice, Spike's a significant bullet in Beilein's Guardfinder resume.
...when he has only started a fraction of games he has played in?
At best, I could say he is an average big ten bench player.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
1. He sat behind Walton and Burke who are both above average starters.
2. He was a freshman, sophomore, and junior. I'm talking about him as a 5th year senior. Players tend to improve.
Last I checked, he is NOT expected to start at Purdue (but I could be wrong). So I don't really think your point #2 really stands.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
That's what he was recruited to be -- he was a very good one.
Point #2 is that players tend to improve. That can be true if Spike starts or not. What won't stand is my 'guess' that Spike will be looked at as an average starter. Maybe he'll only be an excellent backup. We'll see. Either way it's a feather in Beilein's cap given the context (late spring panic acquisition when Trey was contemplating going pro 1 year after Morris unexpectedly went pro.
Do you think, a life long Nova fan, one that has stated Nova is his dream school, actually received a commitable Nova offer?
This kid is unranked for a reason. When it's all said and done, he'll end up a 3 star or maybe boarderline 4 star. Not sure why we are going after kids like this, this early in the cycle. Then again, JB is comfy in his job and being a bubble team is clearly the standard.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
'The offer came from Wright via the telephone, while Brooks ate at a McDonald's in Hanover on Sunday evening.
"He explained how he envisioned my career being at Villanova if I went there," Brooks said. "Then he said, ‘you have a full ride to Villanova.'”
http://www.gametimepa.com/story/high-school/york-adams/boys-basketball/…
Please stop drinking and go to bed.
. . . and pick another school to root for
Trey Burke ended up a 3 star or maybe boarderline 4 star.
Except when you are talking about Beilein-recruited guards.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
I don't follow AAU basketball much, but like many of you, I hear how rife with bagmen, "friends", 3rd-cousins, etc all looking for a payday; all this while kids just jack up shots and don't learn the fundamentals.
I have never heard of Brooks' AAU coach, Tony Sagona, but his quote -- about knowing Belein for essentially 35 years -- made me do a quick Google
Here's the lead article:
http://collegebasketball.nbcsports.com/2013/07/24/the-jersey-shore-warr…
This guy sounds like the AAU version of Belein: a guy with ethics beyond reproach who (for better for worse) focuses more on players right for his program rather than sheer athelticism.
Key quote: The Warriors "base their system around playing smart basketball: running an offense, spreading the floor, making the right pass." Based on this, I'm surprised we've never gotten a player from this group before, but it sounds like a) it has a pipeline to Notre Dame and b) doesn't necessarily have multiple Top 150-200 players every year.
In any case, glad to have Eli, and just as important, I'll think he'll stick with UM. He sounds like a Coach Belein kind of player.
If he based his offense around making the wrong pass.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
That wasn't a full post.
I am from this area and coach girls basketball in this same league...
The following article will explain much of why he's "under the radar." Beating out Nova and Ohio State for him is no small accomplishment.
http://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/life/blogs/pure-preps/2016/07/20/blog…;
Comments