OT: Harvard Bans Team Captains From Greek Life
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/5/6/college-sanctions-clubs-gree…
Although the fraternities, sororities, and final clubs are not formally recognized by the College, they play an unmistakable and growing role in student life, in many cases enacting forms of privilege and exclusion at odds with our deepest values
-Harvard
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
As usual.
All I will say is that I've never seen the comment section on a Harvard Crimson article devolve into a slightly more upscale version of MLive in some instances that quickly. Whatever your opinion of what Harvard is doing here, some of the comments are perhaps a product of one or two of the issues in the campus culture they seem to be attempting to address with this policy, assuming some of those people are or were in fact Harvard students.
Parts of that read like an onion article
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
want to go to harvard. but once they get there, they are at a disadvantage to the best of the rich, who may not be there based on merit alone.
there's no cardale jones walking around harvard...
And the best of the best who want to go to Harvard are at a disadvantage to those who are there because of affirmative action or athletics and definitely aren't there on merit alone.
three of my buddies went to great schools (harvard, stanford, chicago) and i was butthurt for a little while because their academics were not really on the same level as mine. but, at the end of the day, they were all great athletes in their respective sports, with pretty good academics. i'm not really going to get upset at well-rounded scholars going to the top schools.
Athletes bother me less at the Ivies, since they are most likely pretty smart. It's the affirmative action that really bothers me.
that the brightest minority students in the country are just as smart as my three buddies that got into those schools because of athletics.
Eh, I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on the basis the issue is much more complex than that. But, this is a sports blog, and a political debate is not proper in this setting.
So how about Michigan softball!? Harbaugh!?
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
According to wikipedia, white students are about 1/3 of Caltech. That's not 'hardly any.'
Harvard undergrads are 46% Caucasian. Caltech undergrads are 28% Caucasian. I would call that a pretty significant difference.
Caltech is one of the few universities with race-blind admissions. MIT is another that weighs race much less in their admissions process. And both those universities have around double the percentage of Asian undergraduate students compared to Harvard and other Ivies. Caltech is one of the few (if only) private universities in the country where Asian undergrads outnumber Caucasians. MIT has almost reached that point now as well.
Studies have shown that an Asian student has to score 200 points higher than a African-American student and around 100 points higher than a Caucasian student on the SAT (with a similar pattern with respect to H.S. grades as well) to gain admission due to race quotas. This was actually part of an interesting essay on race on campus in this weekend's WSJ:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hard-truths-about-race-on-campus-1462544543
Oh, I'm not arguing that. I am well aware of the fact that race quotas are buoying white, black, and other numbers at the expense of Asian numbers. Sorry if it sounded like I was arguing against that. I was just pointing out that it wasn't 'hardly any.' Students in grad school - the new college, let's be honest - are nearly 40% at Caltech according to wikipedia. But yeah, at other places, race-based admissions standards are crushing to Asian students. I've been saying for decades - along with many, many other people - that demanding race quotas in college admissions is not in general a good strategy for minorities because quotas based on the general population by definition favor the majority.
lol anyone at harvard is pretty smart.
gluck with the banhammer
As it turns out, athletes tend to do worse than the underrepresented minorities at academics.
"merit alone." That's a valuable concept.
yeah good point, most of those jocks are there at drastically lower credentials than everyone else. So just by taking up space at harvard they're denying opportunities to a couple hundred others, whether in a fraternity or not
the same can be said about UM too, but hard work alone can usually gain admission here, even from poor communities. Harvard is about who you know and the resources you have
There will never be a level playing field in life. And the rich aren't the only people at Harvard who may not be there based on merit alone.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Don't you see the hypocrisy in the statement about "merit?" On one hand, these rich students have advantages and are not there based on merit alone. But you ignore the other hand where African-American and Hispanic students have admission advantages and some of them are also not there based on merit alone either. Aren't affirmative action and race quotas advantages as well? Do the "best of the best" even get into Harvard in an equitable manner in the first place? And consider the exclusive club of being a Harvard alum--the irony the OP was talking about. Putting Harvard on your resume confers graduate school and job applicants the same advantages without respect to merit that these fraternities and exclusive clubs offer.
Like I posted above, Asian students have to score 200 points higher on their SAT with a similar pattern in high school grades compared to African-Americans and 100 points higher than Caucasians. I am not arguing against affirmative action but making the point there are always going to be inequities in the system. When you stack the deck for one group, there is usually another group that suffers, and often merit is never in the equation.
Harvard would argue that everyone has an opportunity to be admitted. It's just that 90% blow it by 2nd semester of 9th grade. Whereas the fraternities deny opportunity to everyone
Of course, coming from a town of 700 that didn't even offer math beyond 1 semester of trig, science beyond chemistry, or any language beyond 2 semesters, or hell even SAT prep, and i had never heard of SAT II, i know harvard's claims to meritocracy are pure BS
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
That's the hypocrisy in all this...that Harvard feels it's appropriate to draw the line wherever it feels while willfully ignoring the larger point
so why not just ban any student there from joining, or not admitting into its grad programs anyone who was in a frat - expulsions all around like an adult version of dead poet's society
problem with some of those careers you mention is trying to control for personality factors. A lawyer for instance might be more outgoing on average and the extroverted tend to join frats
This ain't going to change a damn thing. It is simply feel good crap as I stated because the SJW's love saying "they did something" even if it doesn't work and pisses everyone off and at times has the opposite or unintended effect. Of course they think they know what's good for us more than we know what's good for ourselves so what do you expect?
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad