February 7th, 2010 at 11:31 PM ^
February 7th, 2010 at 11:35 PM ^
February 7th, 2010 at 11:39 PM ^
February 7th, 2010 at 11:47 PM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:12 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:58 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 1:08 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 11:23 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 6:25 PM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 10:32 AM ^
February 7th, 2010 at 11:50 PM ^
February 7th, 2010 at 11:52 PM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:04 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:11 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:37 AM ^
February 22nd, 2013 at 12:23 PM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:39 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:52 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:26 AM ^
February 22nd, 2013 at 1:31 PM ^
I remember a few years ago a thread of letters to the editor of Michigan Alumni (magazine of the UM Alumni Association) parsing out all the gender distinctions in Latin between Alumni, Alumnae, etc. It was fairly good-natured and ridiculously nerdly and the question was, in essense, whether the magazine and the association were both named so as to exclude the ladies. After much discussion, everyone threw up there hands and concluded it was fine as is.
February 8th, 2010 at 12:11 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 1:16 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 7:05 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 5:00 PM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:16 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:32 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:33 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:34 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 1:22 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 12:36 AM ^
February 8th, 2010 at 2:21 AM ^
mgopoints power up
touche
lover
tate
distant lover
goose
jerking