OT: End of OT is nigh. Get the OT out of your system here

Submitted by JeepinBen on

Saturday and/or Sunday around here means its the start of a Game Week. With previews, actual football games, etc. starting up the board is going to have to get a lot less OT. That said, binge and purge on some OT in this thread. Get it out of your system!

Anyone else hit the Woodward Dream Cruise? I saw a Porsche 550 Spyder in person that I'd trade for a whole bunch of money I dont yet have...

Anyone surprise meet their Korean Inlaws? Have issues with their dogs' anal glands?

We're running out of time, if you've got a question for the board ask it now.

EDIT: here are links to the 2 FAQ pages on the blog as well as Brian's official topic policy

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/mgoboard-faq

http://mgoblog.com/content/mgofaq

What's the offtopic policy?
In the offseason, offtopic posts are tolerated. During football season they are discouraged and may be subject to removal depending on how alert the moderators are.
What counts as on- and off- topic?
ONTOPIC
• Anything Michigan sports related
• Anything related to other Big Ten teams or upcoming opponents
• Stuff about the blog itself
• University of Michigan topics that don't relate to sports
GRAY AREA
• College sports in general
• Ann Arbor
UNWELCOME, KTHX
• Politics
• Drew Sharp, Ace Williams, Mike Valenti. Saying stupid and/or false things about Michigan in order to get Michigan fans upset is a tried and true way to phish for clicks. Let's not feed the trolls.
OFFTOPIC
• Pro sports of any variety
• Everything else We will let pro sports topics slide even during football season but "everything else" posts are likely to get the axe.

Wolverine In Exile

August 19th, 2014 at 10:16 AM ^

The local McDonald's went through a massive renovation and in the ensuing "re-grand opening" they gave the first 50 people in line a gift card for one free Big Mac per week for an entire year. Yep, I got one and every Wednesday at work is "Big Mac Day". It's gonna be a good day scooter.

Logan88

August 19th, 2014 at 9:44 AM ^

I'm thinking about returning to school to study either Engineering (Electrical or Aeronautical) or Computer Science and am having trouble deciding exactly which path to pursue.

I'd like to be in a profession that allows me to make a real contriubtion to society in some way and it seems like Engineering might be a better option to fulfill that goal but I am concerned about a few things re: Engineering: How much of that high-level math (e.g. advanced Calculus, differential equations) is used in an engineer's actual daily work? I have some concerns about my ability/comfort with advanced math and am not sure if that would be an impediment to my success in school or (more importantly) on the job. Secondly, are there positions in engineering that are less reliant on being the "idea guy"? I don't think of myself as a creative or inventive thinker and would prefer to be more of an implementer of other engineer's ideas. Is that feasible?

I know that there are several practicing engineers on this site, so if any of you could offer your perspective, I would appreciate it.

Wolverine In Exile

August 19th, 2014 at 10:22 AM ^

 

Look at Industrial and Operations Engineering. They're more implementers of processes than some other engineering disciplines. Also, if you like making stuff, consider a degree in Engineering technology-- you can specialize in things like metal working / metal shop, electronics design and fabrication. More practical, less theoretical, less math. If you're going after a traditional engineering degree, eventually you'll need high level math- yes even in your day job. Don't let that discourage you though, I'm a PhD engineer and I suck at high level math-- I understand the concepts enough and can perform the calculations, just don't ask me to derive stuff or do a lot of eigenvalue / transformation math... uggh. My PhD advisor told me "you're a horrible mathematician, but a hell of an engineer... take statistics for your math concentration"

JeepinBen

August 19th, 2014 at 10:33 AM ^

I'm with the other posters  in that IOE (what we real engineers call instead of engineering) might be a good spot for you. In terms of the degree and the job, most engineering degrees are amazingly flexible. I got a degree in mechanical engineering and I could work for almost any company in lots of roles.

 I took through Calc 4 and have never ever had to solve a Diff Eq. There are math people for that. The most advanced that I get in math is to set up excel, do algebra, or use minitab for statistics.

I'm an engineer at a major auto supplier and I'm very front end. I would say I get out a pencil and paper about 1-2 hours per month to do "math". I consider my engineering degree had 2 parts (BSME 2009 from Michigan) - the engineering knowledge base and calculations and then part 2 is the engineering thought process/problem solving. I use the stuff from part 2 much more frequently than part 1. I'm happy to answer more questions here

 

BlueMan80

August 19th, 2014 at 1:59 PM ^

and you'll never touch math doing your job.  You will need logic skills.  If you like brain puzzles, programming might be up your alley.  You don't have to be the big idea guy.  You work smaller problems as part of the programming team.  If you like sofware and don't want to deal with hardware, it's a good choice.

Computer Engineering gets you closer to hardware/networks.  Like programming devices, designing the computing engine and systems that makes things work, like all the computing that controls the engines in today's cars or drives the nav system or interfaces to the user's smartphone to play music or handle phone calls.  It's amazing the amount of processing power inside of cars these days, but just about everything has a computer in it.  Once again, you don't need to be the big idea guy.  The world needs Computer Engineering majors.  (OK, you probably figured out that was my undergrad major).  You'll make lots of money and be in demand, because U.S. colleges aren't producing enough of them to fill all the job openings and there is a wave of folks my age getting close to retirement age.

Oh yeah, you still have to get through all that math stuff, but it is a foundation skill set.

ZB75

August 19th, 2014 at 9:49 AM ^

Who does everyone think will win the Nascar Chase this year.  I have been a Jeff Gordon fan since his first championship in 95.  He is on a roll right now.  Will he finally get that fifth championship this season?  I want to say yes, but the chase has been so bad to him over the years.  As good as he is doing right now, he was in the same position in 2007, #1 in points all season, then the chase rolls around and of course Mr. Chase himself Jimmy Johnson won it.  I'm afraid that might happen again.  At least my Dad and I got to see him win in person on Sunday for the first time.  Great father son moment!

JeepinBen

August 19th, 2014 at 10:41 AM ^

You're right. Nascar brings almost nothing of value anymore IMO. Autoracing is cool to me when it's the forefront of technology - look at the LeMans series or Formula 1 - DCT gearboxes were prevalent there years ago with shift paddles, and now they're everywhere. Same with turbocharging - Porsche started it in the 70s for racing and now it's everywhere. Nascar still uses carburators - tech that hasn't been in a new car for almost 30 years - and 4 speed manual transmissions - while casr today has 5-6-or even 7 speed manuals.

Want to get Nascar more relevant again? Change the engine to a twin-turbo V6. It just so happens that both Ford and Chevy are marketing the hell out of 3.5L and 3.6L TTV6s respectively. Throw some more gears in the trans and/or make automatics and DCTs available to teams. Use some tech to create some separation in the teams. It's not "Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday" when only 1 manufacturer offers a RWD V8 sedan with a manual trans (as of 2015, it's just the Chevy SS which now gets a manual option). But if the "Ecoboost" V6 is suddenly the Nascar engine? Hooo boy. Ford already markets the shit out of it.

NYC Fan

August 19th, 2014 at 9:52 AM ^

Who would you rather fight: a lion, but you’re armed with a sword; or two bears, but you have a handgun with only two bullets?

MGoNukeE

August 19th, 2014 at 10:13 AM ^

Even if the handgun was powerful enough to kill each bear with one shot, I would need to be trained sufficiently to not miss as two bears are approaching me. I've at least fired a 45-caliber, but I'm certain a more powerful firearm would throw me off. Given that I've at least learned to use an epee, using a sword would be more intuitive, particularly against only one enemy.

yossarians tree

August 19th, 2014 at 1:58 PM ^

Thanks for the condolences. I've had two great dogs. All dogs come from the same Dog Spirit but they all have their little quirks that make them individuals. This dog was a better person than almost all the people I know, including me. My wife is crushed. We probably have to get another one soon.

Committed

August 19th, 2014 at 9:57 AM ^

How do you get Pikachu on a bus??
You Pokemon!

Why don't you let Pikachu in the shower with you?
He'll Pikachu!

What kinda cheese is not yours?
Nacho cheese!

...ok, done, the kids I teach at school love these...laugh, literally, everytime.

Rhino77

August 19th, 2014 at 9:59 AM ^

OT: Incognito passive aggressive political/social issue of the day. Your thoughts? Remember keep politics/beliefs out of the answer I just fished for. Also I will disagree with you just to be disagreeable.

Aaaaaaand GO...

ijohnb

August 19th, 2014 at 10:06 AM ^

civil unrest in this country will continue to grow due to the inevitable irreconciliation of the country's theoretical economic and social aims.  It was always a recipe for disaster, it is just becomming more clear exactly why right now.

Wolverine In Exile

August 19th, 2014 at 10:38 AM ^

I lean toward agreement with you. Formalized Judeo Christian religious beliefs with the structure of the generalized Protestant organized churches tended to provide that initial communal morality the Constitutional framers intended, but the secularization of contemporary society following the normalization of post-1960's radicalism have contributed to a balkanized population without a unifying morality that governed the balance between unbridled captialism and social christian democrat- desires for a quasi-utopian state.

 

(wakes up from trance)

 

Yeah, and I need my free cell phone!

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

August 19th, 2014 at 12:08 PM ^

In my lifetime there will be a 51st state.  In fact it wouldn't surprise me if there were a 52nd at the same time due to some kind of Missouri Compromise kind of deal.  Either Puerto Rico, Washington DC, or the splitting up of a state like California, Maryland, or New York.  Another slim possibility: the combination of Guam with the CNMI and maybe Samoa into a Pacific state. Although in the case of DC, the ideal solution would for Maryland to reclaim most of the district, and carve out a smaller District of Columbia with zero population.