at least it's not just us?
- Member for
- 5 years 24 weeks
|6 days 5 hours ago||I think you had pretty solid reasoning for||
I think you had pretty solid reasoning for everything, nice job. The burned redshirts that are the "easiest" to criticize are that way to us because of information we have now. They were still tough decisions, but would sound way more reasonable without knowing say, how few snaps Morris would get or how much pressure Taco would generate.
|6 days 23 hours ago||Tiberian Sun was my favorite of the Command &||
Tiberian Sun was my favorite of the Command & Conquer series.
....maybe I should just start with "I'm a fan of the Command & Conquer series".
|1 week 1 day ago||Alright my internal debate is settled... and I||
Alright my internal debate is settled... and I would like to see the post that gets that gif as a reaction.
|1 week 1 day ago||Does that little face with the arms up mean||
Does that little face with the arms up mean palms-up or palms-down? Can't tell if it's a guy shrugging or doing a little dance.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||Ace Williams = Ace + A.J.||
Ace Williams = Ace + A.J. Williams
Or at least that's where my brain goes every time I read that name. He is a source of misinformation and tackles for loss?
Is it bad that I cannot look at the gif of Stauskas without focusing on the bottom crawl?
|5 weeks 1 day ago||As an alternative to make Funchess eligible, is||
As an alternative to make Funchess eligible, is there any problem with flipping the outside (x?) receiver to the left side and keeping everything else the same?
|5 weeks 1 day ago||So you're saying Kerridge should have blocked the||
So you're saying Kerridge should have blocked the safety and let that slot LB guy be read?
|7 weeks 15 hours ago||Agreed, even if you don't||
Agreed, even if you don't share his viewpoint, having more knowledgeable folks on the board makes it such a better place. When I read really far down into the comments, it's usually because I'm looking for posts like SC's that give more details about what's going on at an advanced level but understandable to the layman like myself. Now, I think MGrowOld (or MGrowWorld as my brain reads it) raised a fair-seeming question asking if there's anything Borges does that he disagrees with, because everything he said seemed to be a bit one-sided. However, I think that was in response to the situation in which there was a flood of criticism against Borges.
I'd like to keep seeing his posts, but there's always his blog if he's done here.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||41-24 Michigan||
|23 weeks 5 days ago||I think it's a crunch because he's only just||
I think it's a crunch because he's only just barely getting his shoulders(?) off the ground.
|34 weeks 17 hours ago||Seems like this would resolve||
Seems like this would resolve the "send pledges to save seats" issue. Get a ticket for a section. Well.... somewhat. Now that I think about it, I did my fair share of horizontal movement a few years ago.
|47 weeks 1 day ago||Every time a reporter asks||
Every time a reporter asks about a different school, say "I'm 100% leaning their way, probably."
Wait... they might already have that one down.
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Are you blocking Jake Ryan?||
Are you blocking Jake Ryan? Or is Jake Ryan blocking you?
|1 year 6 weeks ago||You mean a key matchup like||
You mean a key matchup like "hold onto the damn ball" or catch the punts, etc?
I wonder how many of these issues, such as the double teaming of DTs can become Heiko questions. I hope the answer is greater than one.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||please delete||
Thought I was responding to a comment, turns out not.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Third that||
Very strange, but after reading that second-last email I worry this is confirmation bias.
|1 year 13 weeks ago||Brink||
I'm confused here:
"Williams(-1) gets shoved back and loses his guy, which picks off Brink and gives Brink's guy an avenue to flow. Toussaint(-1) never actually gets a hat on the contain guy, and these folks combine on Robinson for a short gain."
Brink is in an offensive play? Air force has a guy named Brink? Or Schofield or someone is confused for Brink? Help me out here.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||UM 45 - AF 24 UM 52 -||
UM 45 - AF 24
UM 52 - UMass 13
|1 year 16 weeks ago||A step in the right direction, but....||
They seem to be going pretty far to avoid the reward scheme most of us seem to want. Is recording the time scanned not currently a capability? That seems unlikely, because they do that for basketball right? (Asking because I never got basketball tickets.)
Also, overcrowded data networks before kickoff could make this a pain. People using the location spoofer could have a higher success rate.
|1 year 17 weeks ago||I like this||
I like it...since we havent seen this sort of thing before, and there's no risk (at least right now) of it being over-used. Probably more importantly, I'm one of the people lacking extensive knowledge of players around the conference and find this educational with a good touch of humor (the things I generally come to the site for). But doing this every other year would be often enough.
|1 year 18 weeks ago||Argument||
If the moral argument:
If you would suspend him for a cupcake game, but not for a tough game, you've got the wrong priorities.
Now what I'm wondering is, is this decision really taking the coaching staff so long, or is this just denying information of player availability like with injuries?
|1 year 18 weeks ago||nickname||
I know he already has a nickname, but I wish we could call him "Big O."
|1 year 19 weeks ago||agreed||
I feel the same way about twitter. I like the sound of embedded irc. I don't know how it can do pictures and those polls and such we saw in CIL, but can twitter do it either?
Is CIL worth the money if it comes from kickstarter? Are we depleting funds for other potential mgokickstarters? I fear this.
|1 year 30 weeks ago||This is interesting, but||
This is interesting, but I'mconfused about what you mean when you say "division" a few times (whether you mean conference division or division as it is used by the ncaa now: div I, II, III; which I believe you referred to as "level" at the beginning. )
" If an at-large team is selected for the playoffs from the same conference in one division lower, the worst sixth place team plays the winner from the seventh place game on Thursday..."
That means same conference but one level lower? And this would mean the losers from those 2 games are being replaced by the level 2 conference champ and its at-large friend?
Sorry if I seem slow here, I'm really not familiar with relegation.
|1 year 42 weeks ago||If this was civ 4, I would be||
If this was civ 4, I would be wondering how South Bend was still holding out, did they put the Sistene Chapel there? It's always funny when barbarian cities get wonders.
|2 years 4 weeks ago||
I want to do the hockey version just to be confusing until something better comes along... or "Go Blue," whatever works and keeps Temptation coming.
|2 years 6 weeks ago||
I think you mentioned Drake twice in the intro by mistake instead of a Brother Rice player.
|2 years 7 weeks ago||
I don't know if the official unofficial mgoblog 2 deep has been updated to reflect this (would check if I wasn't on my phone), but I think van Bergen is at SDE and Heininger is at DT. I've been confused about it for a while but one of the pressers this week confirmed it.
|2 years 7 weeks ago||
I want to use something like "It grows the brand" from the episode of futurama with the 80s guy.
|2 years 9 weeks ago||
I believe it's a field position/game theory thing: if you're that far into their territory, the risk of going for it on 4th should be worth it statistically.