You are the coach now. "Fix" M football

Submitted by Mgoczar on

Just getting around to all threads from the weekend, Brian's surrender cobra take on podcast and national media pundits (hell even Joel Klatt is having doubts on Michigan)

I am no coach (but hey would love to hear from Magnus, coyote etc). We all love M football. Besides the overriding sentiment (possibly factual) that LT is the reason we are struggling - mind you I am not sold that an even adequate LT just gives us auto wins - if you are the coach how would you go about "fixing" M football (let's not talk about recruiting here, I'm talking more tactical here)

Genesis of the post is the turnaround pen state did MIDSEASON after getting destroyed by Michigan. Their Oline ducked and yet they became better. Did they coach jump balls? Changed scheme to something unique ?? 

Thoughts?

bluewings

September 5th, 2018 at 9:13 AM ^

I'm finally getting paid! I'd do the best I can until I get fired. After a year or two I'd have more money than I ever thought possible. 

Buy 200 acres in the UP and live the rest of my life. 

LickReach

September 5th, 2018 at 9:20 AM ^

Honest opinion:  Win a damn marquee game at all [expletive] costs.  Recruits and media notice that.  That's what Bo did his first year.  While it was a different era it made a huge difference.  JH's has had some tough breaks.  Certainly the first 5 mins of the ND game seemed like a perfect storm of errors, frustrating penalties and bad breaks.  We have 5 marquee games (yes I am including Northwestern bc they are likely to be ranked or undefeated).  5 chances to get some positive attention.  

Space Coyote

September 5th, 2018 at 9:33 AM ^

Edit: this wasn't a response to your post, must have clicked the wrong button. Was supposed to be a response to the OP.

My personal take for what I would do differently, or at least try (without insight into what has been repped and practiced and done well/poorly during camp, etc.)

I would get under center more. Not like 2017, but nearer to 50-50 under center and shotgun. I think Michigan is more comfortable with a more diverse run game under center and like the more down hill attack. I think that helps the RBs and helps the OL because the RB's hit the LOS harder. This forces the defensive front to play the run more, which hopefully helps pass pro a little.

I would really limit empty formations. Michigan was very successful with empty with Speight in 2016, but it looked very bad against ND. Part of that is because the defensive front knows they are going to get 1-on-1 blocking, they can press on the outside, they can push LBs up to the LOS, and then they can drop underneath. And while Patterson is good at getting the ball out fast, he does struggle a little to read defenses and he tends to fade against pressure. I don't think the offense's strength is in empty. At least keep in a TE or RB.

Strategically, you have to try to get the ball downfield more. This is a risk/reward thing, but is where getting under center and getting a little more comfortable running the ball can help your pass pro and give you the time to do this. You're going to take sacks. You're going to run 7/8 man protections and eat incompletions when your guy gets doubled. But you have to do it at least a handful of times because the offense isn't going to function without getting the safeties to play honest. If UM can hit over the top 3 more times against ND, the rest of the offense opens up. The offense as it was run wasn't unsound, it was that they couldn't get the safeties to ever move backward. Get those guys not playing flat footed and the inside zone gets better because you don't have safeties meeting RBs at 3-5 yards and the run game starts getting chunks instead of cut down for efficient but short gains. You don't have safeties cutting down the WR screen game at the same distance as part of the RPO package. Get them back, even if it means taking a few sacks in order to do so. This is going to sound a lot like 2013 Borges, who continued to try to take shots despite poor pass pro. To a degree, yes. But I think Michigan can run block better than that team, and I trust Harbaugh and Co. to better dial in a mix between shots and efficiency. But they have to take a step or two that direction in order to open up their base offense.

Once you get that, then you can start attacking the short/intermediate voids in the defense. Because then you have LBs creeping up on the run but the safeties staying back and you aren't getting killed in pass pro. And that's what allows you to get YAC. Now you've spread out the defense horizontally and vertically. But to get to that point, you have to condense some formations sometimes and get under center sometimes and then maintain that personnel in the spread looks when you go there (which Michigan did against ND), then that opens up what you really want to do (which I think is close to what Michigan ran against ND, but they have to add some things to get back to that and be successful with it).

So, in summary, get under center a little more, mix in more gap schemes again, help the pass pro with a more confident run game so you can take a handful more shots over the top to get the safeties honest, and then the offense opens up.

Space Coyote

September 5th, 2018 at 10:08 AM ^

Yeah, but Wynn was a stud. I think he can eventually be an NFL LT, he's that good. Long arms, but just great technically and athletically, so that's a rarity.

JRJ is on the shorter end, but that's not an end-all for a college OT. You can get by at his height. His issues go well beyond that. Now, it might have just snowballed on him on Saturday, I don't know. But basically once he saw a counter move he got beat (his lack of height didn't help him in that regard, guys were getting into his body quite a bit). 

Average pass pro? That'll be difficult. I think they can clean things up. I was actually quite happy with the interior. I think they had two busts on twists, but if the OTs are average, then people chalk that up to "sometimes you lose one, that's why defenses run them". They gave a little more push sometimes than desired, but you could really get by with the way the interior protected. It really is about the OTs in my mind. They blew a lot of twists and also got beat straight up a lot. I don't know how you get significantly better with them getting beat straight up, other than to try to give them more help or at least force the defense to respect more that you're giving them help. The protection schemes were pretty simple, it was mostly just a fact of getting beat. Twists, well, sometimes the light turns on sometimes it doesn't. Hard to say if that can get cleaned up. Certainly Saturday should have been an eye-opener.

So average? Probably not. I do think they can improve a lot off of what they showed Saturday, if only because that was a complete collapse. But it was also clear the coaches were game planning around it, meaning it wasn't just an anomaly. 

JFW

September 5th, 2018 at 10:34 AM ^

Is it the LT's that are causing the majority of our issues? We seemed to have more success in '15/16 and that line wasn't 'good', but maybe the tackles were just serviceable enough? Is incompetence at one spot enough to torpedo a team? How did PSU turn things around with their wretched line? Was it because Barkley was able to bail them out? 

I suppose my biggest disappointment in the Harbaugh era is our inability to get tackles. As you mentioned, the interior line seems good. 

My hope is that they can improve to 'good enough' to let the offense have a pulse, even if that's not 'average'. My fear is that they won't, and MSU and OSU just murder us because we can't score. 

Space Coyote

September 5th, 2018 at 11:13 AM ^

I'd say it's both OTs. JBB wasn't great either.

OL is a weakest link position. Recall 2013, two pro OTs, bad interior. I think the '15/'16 OLs get way too much flack. They didn't dominate but they were a good OL. They couldn't take over a game, that's why they weren't elite, but they were consistent in pass pro at all 5 positions and solid in the run. 

And yeah, PSU did a few things to mitigate the OL, a lot of the same stuff UM did against ND (RPOs, roll outs, etc.). Barkley also mitigated a ton, but there was a reason he had an excessive large percentage of zero to negative plays.

JFW

September 7th, 2018 at 9:44 AM ^

"OL is a weakest link position. Recall 2013, two pro OTs, bad interior. I think the '15/'16 OLs get way too much flack. They didn't dominate but they were a good OL."

Yeah. I wish when I see a guy play not up to expectations, but still good enough, I remember next time to mitigate my internal criticism (I don't Braylon tweet people...). I'd take that line in a heart beat. 

Also, man, I was at Michigan in the early-mid 90's. I now really appreciate the recruiting and coaching job Hanlon did. 

Mongo

September 5th, 2018 at 1:20 PM ^

This take from SC is right on.  The shotgun doesn't necessarily solve pass pro weaknesses.  Plus, our personnel is best suited for under-center power plays with play action. Then mix it up by motioning into some pro style sets from the gun with TEs up the seam and Evans flaring into the flat.  Get those SS and OLBs into some major trouble matchups and out of the box. Then take at least 4 deep shots a game to hit Nico or DPJ on the post to burn that free safety who is cheating in to help.

Also, what we show prior to the B1G regular season could be a bit of a Trojan horse.  Harbaugh wants a B1G title and probably has a season long plan on how to get that done from a scheme standpoint. This isn't his first rodeo.

Stuck in Lansing

September 5th, 2018 at 9:27 AM ^

1. Discover an NCAA loophole that allows us to bring back Taylor Lewan and Mason Cole.

2. Absent that, Hudson needs to play against some of the lesser competition so we can figure out if he can handle it. With the new redshirt rule Mayfield probably needs some run as well. I am NOT saying this will fix our problems or even be an upgrade in the near term, but we need to figure out NOW what the best option will be from mid October on. 

3. Stop running 5 wide, we are going to kill 3 quarterbacks the way we protect in that situation.

4. Bring back Mgoblog negging in a way that matters so that anyone blaming Shea for this mess can be sent to Bolivia.

Brian Griese

September 5th, 2018 at 9:33 AM ^

  1. Dismiss all members of the offensive staff
  2. Go out and find an offensive coordinator that has had college football success and give them full control.  It would not be a deal breaker for me but with all the high schools running variations of the spread, it is probably time to go to it in some fashion full time.  However, the most important thing is to get a plan and stick with it
  3. Advise Don Brown that some aspects of his play calling could be better.  IMO he's done an A- job but not having any spies on Wimbush (that I noticed) and having McCray cover Barkley last year was embarssing
  4. The last is the most important but probably the most difficult: The arrogance of the program has to go away.  Michigan has tried for too long to to try and re-create a world in which it is 1985 still when they have the best players, the best coaches and the best scheme.  Both the Hoke hire and the Harbaugh hire have both been for this reason.  Now, Harbaugh actually has the skill to possibly make this happen, but with each gut-punching loss it is looking less likely.  Having Hoke ramble on about how "This is Michigan blah blah blah" and Harbaugh's "Who's got it better than us" make me cringe.  Michigan has to find some way to get a massive "chip" on their shoulder.  I know some of you won't like this, but I respect the fact MSU is pissed off 24/7.  Even when they've had far superior teams to Michigan, they still find a way to keep the underdog mentality.  
  5. Lastly, recruiting and development. Sneak in a spy to Wisconsin and find out what their secret is, especially with the Oline.  I suspect it is the fact they have had consistent coaching for years, continue to run the same offense and are not forced to put anyone on the field before they are ready.  It is a bit surprising to see Michigan, throughout the Harbaugh tenure, have to put people on the field (Oline, QB) that have no business being out there, whether it is because they aren't talented enough or should be bulking up.  How you feel about this team if Mason Cole were the LT? That should have been the reality and not wishful thinking.  I understand transfers are going to continue to rise, and you're never going to recruit a team of choir boys, but the focus should be on finding kids in recruiting that are comfortable with buying into the system and being prepared to red-shirt.  Also, too many home run swings in recruiting without a backup plan.  The one thing I actually liked about Hoke was his recruiting philosophy:  If you commit to Michigan, visits to other colleges ends.  This is strict and not everyone will like it, but to me it is a good way to keep from getting left in the dark but late cycle de-commits, which really seems to have hurt Michigan recently.

Just my two cents.  

Perkis-Size Me

September 5th, 2018 at 9:36 AM ^

At the end of the day, I really wouldn't know what to do. I'm no coach, and I sure as hell won't claim to know more about the game than Harbaugh does. 

If it were up to me, though, I'd spend these next few weeks testing out some new faces at left tackle (Hudson, Mayfield, Filagia, etc). Possibly right tackle too. Jon Runyan Jr. has been in the program for several years. At this point, I think what you're seeing from him is what you're going to get. He's not some true freshman who just got over-matched and we can definitively say that better days are ahead. He's an upperclassmen. I'm sure he's a great guy and a hard worker, but I think he's reached whatever ceiling he has. Would love to see him make me look like an idiot and prove me wrong, though.

You've got two weeks against far lesser opponents, and then another week against what should be a pretty bad Nebraska defense. Throw Hudson out there and at least see what you have in him. If this is what Runyan performs like against ND, how do you expect it to get much better, if at all, against Wisconsin, MSU or OSU? All teams with defenses that are probably on par with ND, or arguably better. Nick Bosa vs. Jon Runyan Jr. terrifies me. 

Mpfnfu Ford

September 5th, 2018 at 9:38 AM ^

Dump most of the offensive coaching staff aside from Warriner and the Harbaugh Lad, and replace them with position coaches who are hungry to prove themselves and move up the ladder. If Harbaugh is gonna be the OC, he shouldn't have a bunch of voices in his ear pulling him in wild ass directions, he should have people who teach technique and recruit their butts off. If Harbaugh wants to delegate, find a real OC then.

The pits with this staff of 210989238 OCs who are all too shitty to get proper OC jobs at other places. 

TSimpson77

September 5th, 2018 at 9:42 AM ^

Wishbone, triple option, cut blocks the whole nine yards! It helps the service academies cover their flaws, why not? Also puts Evans and Higdon on the field at the same time, sure you're going to have to pull one of the WRs but when you can't pass block they're rendered almost useless anyway. Also if you're a TE and can't block, hello extra lineman, I'm thinking Hayes. Get Shea working on that pitch!

Jimmyisgod

September 5th, 2018 at 9:43 AM ^

I want to fix it for the long term, that might mean this year will suffer and here's what I mean.

Love adding Warriner, but his effect will take time, leave him in place.  Like that we added Patterson, but let's not add another transfer, let's let our young QBs develop.  Staff continuity is a huge problem IMO, let's try to keep this staff together for a few years.  We might need a big time OC, whatever we're doing right now isn't working, so replacing Pep is the only thing I might consider staff wise.

After we get a new OC, pick an offense and stick with it.  I am stunned people don't think our offense was trying to be too many things at once.  People said it was the same as before, well then where were the FBs?  Who are we on offense, figure that out and stick with it for multiple years, doesn't mean you don't continually tweak and add wrinkles, but let's get these players multiple years in the same system and see how they develop.  Stop with the quick fixes, this isn't easy.

I'm still bullish on this season, I think we lose a few more games, but are competitive in all of them.  Next year we better hope that some of our juniors don't all go pro, because assuming Gary leaves, if Bush, Hill, Long, and Hudson all leave too our defense will be in full rebuild and won't have much at all back.

Culturally, I think the players are getting tougher and tougher due to the negative media attention, thew media loves to hate Michigan.  These players have to be sick of it, hopefully they are using it to get better and prove the haters wrong.

NelzQ

September 5th, 2018 at 9:45 AM ^

Utilize all of your weapons.

Evans could have been the back Notre Dame could not stop. Two carries? Damn shame. Stellar tight ends; throw them the damn ball. Roll out and find your receivers.

Throw everything you have at them. No fear.

MGoMarley

September 5th, 2018 at 10:20 AM ^

Accept that OLine is our weakness, not our strength. Adjust offensive scheme accordingly, spread things out and get the ball out of the QB hands quickly. Hide our deficiencies- not exacerbate them

Mgoczar

September 5th, 2018 at 10:38 AM ^

I would also point out as the OP that looking at the "playmakers" at ND they are from the 2015 class where Michigan got...Peppers? 

Wimbush, their O line, their Jumbotron WR, Tillery...2015 class. 

 

Lets just stick with our coach. I think 2016 and 2017 classes as seniors will pay serious dividends. 

ST3

September 5th, 2018 at 10:46 AM ^

It should be apparent at this point that we can't count on the offense to get things done, like scoring of the touchdowns through the air or blocking. I think our answer comes from Josh Ross. We must simply instruct the defense to sit down, play, and ball out for all four quarters.

What was the difference between the first half and second half for the defense?

“I just feel like we — first half — we was a little bit too jittery. I feel like second half, we was a little bit more poised, we was in the crowd, we know how the game was going. We just sat down and we played. We balled out.”

jbrandimore

September 5th, 2018 at 10:52 AM ^

One of the things you have to do to address a problem, is to realize what the problem actually is and work on that.

Do not distract  yourself by working on things which are not the problem.

The numbers below are the "problem" with Michigan's offense, but no one seems to realize it.

This also means that no one is working on it.

A bonus if you recognize what these numbers represent. (Answer below)

98

91

89

102

103

59

100

74

58

 

These numbers are Michigan's net rushing yards during the 9 losses in this 9-9 steak.

Think back on any of these games and how they went and ask yourself this - if Michigan had even scraped out even 150 yards rushing in any of these games, do you think we still would have lost?

I would say the only game Michigan would have lost out of all these games with 150 net rushing yards would be PSU last year. All of the other 8 losses are likely wins with 150 net rushing yards.

That my friends is the problem

chunkums

September 5th, 2018 at 11:16 AM ^

Spend all the time and energy I have on Hudson, Steuber, Mayfield, etc. and do everything I can to help them develop to at least a below average level before B1G play starts. By then, we can hopefully replace Runyan full-time and JBB if needed. I still think JBB offers enough in the running game that it might be worthwhile to keep him rather than playing a freshman, but Runyan doesn't give us much of anything. No offense can operate consistently when the quarterback gets annihilated every time he drops back to pass.

I've seen it said that even MAC teams with substantially worse talent than us don't get their QBs killed every play and that's absolutely true. At the same time, those MAC teams have usually have somebody on the roster who is suited to be a tackle. We do not. Our non-freshman tackles are JBB, Runyan, and Ulizio. There is literally nobody else due to a combination of poor recruiting, injuries, and player discipline (LTT). You can't coach JBB and Runyan to have lateral quickness. You can cut down mental mistakes, but they'll still lose on the edge against a speed rush.  

From a scheming standpoint, it seemed like we did what everyone used to clamor for in the Borges years when we had no line. We threw a lot of quick passes out of spread sets and we rolled the pocket frequently. We also routinely got to ND territory (and even outgained them!) before making some backbreaking mistake, which is a risk you take when you have to dink and dunk your way down the field and don't have time to set up long passes. There's only so much you can do immediately to cover for a poor line. It's one thing when you have a single bad tackle. It's another thing when you have two of them.

Based on the second half of last year, we should have a passable rushing offense. We should lean on that as much as possible and get the young guys practice as much as we can. 

UofM626

September 5th, 2018 at 11:17 AM ^

It starts on the line. Especially the O line, we have done a piss poor job at recruiting. We could of had Wynn, Cabral and a few others if Michigan would of recruited them right and didnt slow play them until the BiG BiG so called fish chose another school. I know of at least 3-4 stud lineman we were in on and probably land if we didn’t play games at the beginning when Jim just got here, Drev killed us 

sgtstrykergoblue

September 5th, 2018 at 12:30 PM ^

Bear Bryant said a football game between two good teams will be decided by 5 plays and whoever wins those 5 plays usually wins the game.

1.Hawkins misplays td#2

2.Winovich roughs qb

3.2nd and goal we go playaction get sacked

4.2nd and one we throw a pick instead of getting a first down when we are driving

5.3rd and eighteen,ND gains 22

A1Portable

September 5th, 2018 at 12:47 PM ^

Don Brown's Record Against Good Teams

Don Brown has developed a reputation as a great defensive coach by racking-up impressive statistics against mediocre competition. When Don Brown's defense faces a good football team, more often than not, Michigan loses. Those impressive statistics for yards allowed, sacks, and negative yardage plays are fool's gold. The most important stats are points allowed and games won. This is the record:

2016:

Michigan 20 - OSU 30 
Michigan 32 - Florida State 33

2017:

Michigan 10 - MSU 14 
Michigan 13 - Penn State 42 
Michigan 10 - Wisconsin 24 
Michigan 20 - Ohio State 31 
Michigan 19 - South Carolina 26

2018:

Michigan 17 - Notre Dame 24

Why does Don Brown's defense under-perform against good teams?

There are several reasons.

First, Don Brown's approach is an all-or-nothing, feast-or-famine, one-size-fits-all scheme, but the problem with such a scheme is that an all-out pass rush is not the best defensive scheme in every situation. Don Brown should tailor the defensive line play to the game situation, but Don Brown has shown that he is not good at tailoring the defensive scheme to the game situation or the strengths and weaknesses of the opponent's offense.

Second, Don Brown's defenses do not defend mobile QB's well.

OSU's running QB's beat Michigan's defense last November, and ND's running QB beat Michigan's defense yesterday evening.

When you rush your defensive lineman on every play, your defense is predictable, and opposing offensive coordinators can game-plan to use your over-aggressiveness against you by, for example, letting your defensive ends rush up field past the QB, then having the QB run for easy yards, as OSU did last season and as ND did repeatedly.

Furthermore, when your DL is making an all-out rush on every down, the DL does not set the edge or maintain gap discipline, so it becomes vulnerable to allowing the QB to break contain around end or slip through the line right up the middle, as mobile QB's have been doing to Don Brown's defense these past few seasons.

When Michigan's defense faces a mobile QB, the defensive scheme should account for the quarterback ON EVERY PLAY!

Third, Don Brown's defenses are vulnerable to big plays.

Consider the following:

In the Orange Bowl against Florida State, December 31, 2016:

3rd & 22 at FSU 13 
(14:00 - 4th) Dalvin Cook run for 71 yds to the Mich 16 for a 1ST down

In the Outback Bowl against South Carolina, January 1, 2017:

3rd & 18 at SC 12 
(12:56 - 4th) Jake Bentley pass complete to Hayden Hurst for 23 yds to the SCaro 35 for a 1ST down

Against Notre Dame, September 1, 2018:

3rd & 18 at ND 20 
(6:53 - 3rd) Brandon Wimbush run for 22 yds to the NDame 42 for a 1ST down

In a 3rd and long situation, Michigan's defense does not need a sack. It needs to hold the offense to no more than a modest gain less than the line to gain.  That means playing zone, setting the edge, maintaining gap discipline, containing the QB in the pocket, keeping the play in front of you, and holding the offense to a modest gain to prevent a first down. After Michigan's defense has given up so many very damaging, embarrassing big plays on 3rd and long, why does Don Brown appear not understand these fundamentals of defensive football?

Bill Belichick, one of the greatest coaches in pro football history, says that if you don't set the edge, you don't have anything.

Rob Ninkovich, multiple Super Bowl champion OLB/DE for the New England Patriots, says that the worst place for a DE to be is behind the QB.

In Don Brown's defenses, the DE's frequently fail to set the edge because they are in an all-out pass rush.

In Don Brown's defenses, pass-rushing DE's frequently over-run the QB, so that they end up behind the QB, thereby taking themselves out of the play.

Who knows more about defensive football, Bill Belichick or Don Brown? Bill Belichick.

The honeymoon is over. Don Brown's defenses are chasing the fool's gold of statistics that don't matter instead of the only two statistics that really matter, points allowed and wins.

For all of these reasons, Don Brown's record against good teams is a record of failure.

Don Brown needs to change his approach.

Gr1mlock

September 5th, 2018 at 1:06 PM ^

Step 1 - Bench Runyan and JBB, insert Mayfield at LT and Hudson at RT for the next two games.  I realize games against SMU and Western won't tell us a TON but we'll at least get an idea if either of them are functionalish, and with the new redshirt rules it won't cost us a year with Mayfield.

Step 2 - If they seem great, or at least like Big 10 caliber players, awesome, run them out there against Nebraska.  If not (or if the step up in competition proves that they are not, in fact, Big 10 caliber), move JBB to LG, and move Bredersen to LT.   I think you have to leave Hudson at RT even if he under-performs, we only have so many bodies to throw at the problem.  I'd also be fine with replaying Mayfield with Steuber and keeping JBB on the bench, but I don't know how healthy Steuber is at this point.  This lets us keep redshirts on freshman, maximizes taking advantage of JBB's run blocking while hiding his pass blocking a little, and keeps Hudson on the field.  

Step 3 - That addresses the O Line as much as possible, which is the #1 problem.  Next step would be building in a lot more slants, roll outs, and screens to factor in the fact that even an improved line won't be good.  We won a national title off naked bootleg rollout passes to the TE, and saw it be effective against ND. More of that.  More pass catching out of the backfield.  Let's avoid the "hang out in the pocket and pray" approach, acknowledge that we're not set up optimally to be a dropback team with this line, and find ways to move the ball without.

Step 4 - That covers the offense.  The defense, largely keep being rampant.  Only change would be inserting Solomon over Marshall on a permanent basis (since Solomon has lots of upside, and Marshall is a JAG at this point), and rotating Mone and Dwumfour based on matchups.  I don't think Mone playing a lot against ND was a statement so much as an acknowledgment of "they run a lot, let's have our run dude in instead of our pass rush dude."  

Step 5 - For the love of god, if we're having a LB type person cover a TE or RB in coverage, have it be Hudson.  

Step 6 - Maybe practice a 2 minute drill?  Because that was a hot mess at the end of the game. 

Pelini's Cat

September 5th, 2018 at 1:10 PM ^

In the immediate future:

I think you have to think about this season in terms of competing for the B1G. I know that may sound ridiculous after Saturday, but honestly we may be the second best team in the east after seeing MSU and PSU barely pull it out against bad opponents. Early season grain of salt and everything but you can't honestly tell me our performance was worse than ours. Get lucky and we could find ourselves in the B1G championship game.

That said, Bredeson to left tackle, Spannellis to left guard or right if you want to maximize the power of the left side of the line. He may not be a good pass blocker, but he cannot possibly be worse than Runyan. Now you have left to right Bredeson, Spanellis, Ruiz, Onwenu, JBB. Still weak at the tackles in terms of pass blocking, but with a little luck that could be a really strong run blocking offensive line that is really no worse or a little bit better in terms of pass blocking. 

Go as run heavy as reasonably possible. Passing game mostly based around play action deep balls which is really what this offense should be best at with Shea, the outside receivers, and the tight ends. Basically make it look like last year but with a QB and even better run blocking offensive line. Mix in the spread slide play action type plays and bubble screens from Saturday that actually worked well and do mitigate the tackles's pass blocking. Above all else, lean on the defense. 

Going forward:

Obviously we have to assume that the staff is working hard to address the recruiting needs of DT, OT, and WR. If this class is another dud, or it fails to address those urgent problem areas, I think that's when you start really questioning Harbaugh.

Get Hudson and Steuber as much garbage time this year as possible and get Mayfield his four game redshirt if you think he's ready to see the field. Then you're basically going into camp chosing two from Bredeson, Steuber, Mayfield, and Hudson, with Bredeson obviously sliding back inside if two of the younger players step up. You still have to develop depth with whoever comes in as freshmen, but at least that way you can maximize your "bullets in the chamber" as Brian likes to say.

Hudson and Steuber will be redshirt sophomores which is about when you might expect they'll be ready, and if Mayfield is the stud he's apparently trending towards maybe you get lucky with him too. 

That's the quickest way I see to a functional offense if we assume that Harbaugh is capable of building one. 

Fezzik

September 5th, 2018 at 2:10 PM ^

1. Over recruit offensive tackles for the next 4 years. Take twice as many as you think you need.

2. Goodbye Pep. Pay the buy out. Just get him out the door.

3a. Try to hire Fisch back. He is currently an NFL analyst and may listen to an OC position here. 

3b. If the above fails hire an up and coming college offensive mind. Do not replace Pep with another stale NFL wash out.

3c. McElwain can be interim pass game coordinator until 3a or 3b happen.

4. Try to bring back Wheatley as RB coach. Mike Hart is plan B. Jay Harbaugh can take an analyst role.

5. Install modern day version of west coast offense. Our pass blocking only allows us time for short quick nickel and dime passes so let's take advantage of that rather than hope our offensive tackles magically improve greatly overnight. Notre Dame outside corners played 8 yards+ off the LOS the whole game. That is a free 5 yard minimal hitch all night long. Chris Evans needs to catch tons of passes in the flats. Motion him around, he can be a weapon. He needs more snaps.

I believe our best run blocking plays last year were power sets with a pulling guard and misdirection counters. Where was that vs Notre Dame? We need to know what we are good at and become great at it, and actually call it in games. No more installing NFL'esque spread with zone read/RPO's if we aren't good at it. I'm worried this may be the 2nd straight wasted offseason offensively.

Use play calling to mitigate OL weaknesses, not expose them. Shea's short to medium accuracy, even on the run is elite. Roll him away from pressure. Minimize deep straight drops. Call more RB screens, TE screens, WR screens, more more more. Use lots of misdirection in the run and pass. We are TERRIBLE at pick and rub routes. This should be a staple play. Our pass scheme does not seem to utilize or execute these well.

6. Burn less redshirts. Take advantage of the new 4 game and still redshirt rule but do not waste potentially valuable 5th year seniors with minimal freshmen usage, especially OL!

7. Mix some zone defense, focus on DL controlling rush lanes, and a QB spy against dual threat QBs in 3rd and long and red zone situations. 

8. All our WR and TE need to practice jump balls, high pointing balls, attacking the ball, aggressively fighting thru the defenders, even if occasional offensive pass interference is called. DBs need to practice similarly minus the fighting thru the receiver for the ball. Hawkins cannot lose a jump ball to a player 4-5 inches shorter than him. 

9. We need a multiple snap count or cadence. Even in loud environments. ND's defense timed our snap easily all game long, once again exposing our OL weaknesses rather than mitigating them. 

JDeanAuthor

September 5th, 2018 at 7:04 PM ^

1.) O-line, O-line, O-line

2.) Defense needs to do a bit more practice against assignment football when they're dealing with a dual threat QB.  Especially on 3rd down.  ASSIGNMENT FOOTBALL.

You get those two things fixed, and the rest takes care of itself.

BeatIt

September 5th, 2018 at 7:16 PM ^

Kind of hard to ignore recruiting when UM doesn't have any OT's currently on the roster to do the job needed. 

But i digress. For one, more pass play's on first down. Secondly whats the answer to a aggressive pass rush? The good ole' screen pass where the rush is coming from. If most of the pressure is coming from the middle run a screen pass to the middle. The worst of the pressure sounds like it was coming from the LT spot so set up a screen to left. With a mobile QB like Patterson the option play is an answer as well. The middle screen with a shuttle pass is a good answer as well. As much as Runyon struggled attack the left side head on with a running play with a lead blocker or just punt on first down, hope for turnovers. Kidding if course.

As far back as high school whenever we played a team with a superior game changing player we ran right at him. It worked more than it didn't. 

UM just needs better players or figure out how to develop lower rated players like msu and wisconsin. Really unbelievable how um has struggled since BO. Moeller had it going in the right direction until his unfortunate and untimely demise. For most programs it's really all about the coordinators and position coaches as HC's are more and more like CEO's spending more time @ speaking engagements and recruiting and filling out title IX forms.