November 30th, 2013 at 3:55 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 3:59 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 4:00 PM ^
So that's Borges third or fourth good game in three years. Kudos.
Glad we got the return of aggressive, gambler Brady Hoke. That makes me feel better about things.
If they get that fucking review right...
November 30th, 2013 at 6:42 PM ^
and maybe Minnesota? That's this year, and ohio 2011 was brilliant....
November 30th, 2013 at 4:01 PM ^
Considering that our main field goal kicker was out, and that we couldn't stop OSU's offense toward the end of the game, on balance I have to think that the 2 point conversion was the right call.
Might as well go for the win in regulation.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:01 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 4:06 PM ^
OK, but no more "experimental" games next year. They all count. Be a mad scientist in practice.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:40 PM ^
This is Division I College Football. Not high school spring practice. You play to win all the games. Experimenting? Are you kidding me? That's an excuse for you?
November 30th, 2013 at 5:58 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 4:06 PM ^
Great game by the coaches. While the youthfulness on offense has been exposed all year, this game it was on defense. It's not just starters,. but a lack of experienced depth, too. The future looks bright for Michigan football.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:09 PM ^
On the 2 pt conversion - Perry is not a good linebacker, especially so on coverage. Devin has struggled with that sort of route all year long. I think OSU had a pretty good idea where that was going, and wouldn't have made that play otherwise. Liked the playcalling on the whole, but didn't like that one.
Draining the clock when your QB is playing one of his best games of the year - probably the best - was a terrible decision. Turned out to mean a lot in this game.
On Al Borges - No one has ever really questioned that Al could call a good game if everything goes his way. Understanding what he has and building a coherent offense that maintains competency. Now we probably have to suffer through a half decade of missing the B1G Championship.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:16 PM ^
itll be a lot of "wait till next years" under brady Hoke
November 30th, 2013 at 6:39 PM ^
This ^^^^^
Can we please not forget what program this is? Who we are? What our standards are (or should be)?
November 30th, 2013 at 4:12 PM ^
Wish we had played like this all year on offense. It'll be interesting to see what he has to say as to why we haven't been running plays like this all year.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:15 PM ^
to Ohio 12 of 14yrs...I dont care about the rest of you this is UNACCETABLE and Hoke is not the man to change this....next year...next year..next year....its always the same TIRE thing..LOSING
November 30th, 2013 at 4:22 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 5:20 PM ^
Please go root for another team.
Signed, EVERYONE
November 30th, 2013 at 4:18 PM ^
Also, can somebody please explain to me why you'd clock the ball on first down @ the 3 with plenty of time left?
November 30th, 2013 at 4:23 PM ^
Because preserving a timeout means you still have the option of running or throwing.
There's an old saying in chess, "the threat is stronger than the execution." It doesn't matter if you're planning to run or not, the defense has to defend it.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:25 PM ^
In that situation just burn the 10 or so extra seconds and run a play. You only have 3 more plays you can possibly run and a timeout, so why waste the play?
November 30th, 2013 at 4:21 PM ^
F Jackson needs to retire. The team played well today, like this one mattered. It begs the question, what the hell were they doing against Akron, UConn, PSU, Nebraska, NW and Iowa?
This game proves OSU isn't as good as everyone thinks and that BOrges can't be very good because it only called three good games all season.
Credit to the kids! They played hard and executed very well. They played toe to toe with a senior laden team that the media thinks is a top 5 team.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:26 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 4:32 PM ^
What are the games we won that we shouldn't have? I can count three we lost that we shoudln't have, and two more that were almost spectacular losses. Sorry, but we're not that youthful.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:27 PM ^
I'm against the grain on this one. The same plays have been called most of the season. The offensive line played well today. Gave DG time. When DG has time he executes more than not. Thought the game was called well start to finish. Agree with going for the 4th and 2 the first time. Agree with going for 2. Think the 2 pt call was fine. DG didn't read the defense. That's on him not Borges. Defense has to play better. 400 rushing yards is unacceptable. The future is bright. I'm on the fence about firing Borges. Funk yes still. Borges, I'll let you know if people open up. I would take Lane Kiffin given the chance. Either way, it's been a long season but I still love Michigan and every player on this team. Brady Hoke is our coach and should be. He's not Lloyd Carr 2.0. He was aggressive today and i loved it.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:34 PM ^
Lane Kiffin? Really? Did you see how much his players haaaaaaaaaaaaated him and suddenly played hard when Ed Orgeron took over? And it's not like Ed Orgeron is a good coach.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:45 PM ^
I think he knows offense because I've seen his offenses. He's not a good head coach but i think he's a great offensive coordinator and play caller. He's a pro-style guy. He can recruit his ass off. If he gains his player's respect he'll be fine. I don't think he will be here I'm just saying. Depending on the bowl game playcalling I'd like Borges to stay another year
November 30th, 2013 at 4:51 PM ^
Period
November 30th, 2013 at 6:13 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 4:53 PM ^
Overall I thought it was a well coached game.
There was execution on offense, and that helped Devin last a little longer.
Some of the personel in the defensive secondary was frustrating, as was the open field tackling of Miller on particular.
Another suggestion I might have is that Hoke needs to politic the officials a little more. They killed a few drives, and arguably cost us the game. Maybe its just random, and what goes around comes around, but I think a little more emotion might get the officials thinking twice.
November 30th, 2013 at 4:56 PM ^
On evaluating Borges until the UFR. I want to know if he really broke through or if it was our players making incredible plays. It's a little bit of both.
I love the fact that he used many more screens and hitches. Clearly did his homework on OSU. FInally using bubble screens was a good sign.
I don't know what to think. Borges has called some good games, and then he has called some atrocious games. Even in this one, he wasn't perfect. Smarter football people than myself say that his offense is more grab bag than conceptually linked. If that's the case I guess he should go.
I want to see some more intelligent football people evaluate this game and tell me if it was an anomaly or a sign of progress from Borges.
November 30th, 2013 at 5:18 PM ^
November 30th, 2013 at 6:36 PM ^
Going for 2 was the right call. The play call to get 2, not so much.
Execution was an issue this game, and all season. But that buck stops at Borges. He is the coach of the offense.
I think Borges still has to go. Michigan should be winning some of these games. The program needs to make a change for that to happen.
November 30th, 2013 at 6:38 PM ^
cool down and what not, the dumbest coaching decision today by far that should be talked about is the decision to not go for a field goal at the end of the first half. We had a minute, a time-out and a first down at what the 30 or something? 40 yards gets you a field goal and they really screwed that up, and it's happened a lot that Hoke makes terrible time decisions before the first half.
Borges called a great game if you consider how bad the o-line has played in the past 4 weeks and how well the offense did against ohio. Mattison looked bad, but I'm sure a lot of that was talent/scheme from ohio.
The go for 2 decision was a great call in my opinion, but how big would a field goal been before the half?
November 30th, 2013 at 6:42 PM ^
Something clicked today on offense, obviously. I am not sure what it was. It might have been the fact that it was The Game, but the execution was by far and away the offense has displayed since the ND. To my eye, it was mostly the OL actually blocking and giving the RB's some creases to run through. Ohio's defense had to respect the run, and the play-action passes were that much more effective.
All season long Borges has been preaching execution and the effect it has on play calling. It doesn't take much, just a decent runs on first down, and the flow of the offense is totally different. I thought Borges called some great screens, especially late in the game. I've been saying for a while now that I think the coaching staff took a dogmatic approach to play-calling and scheme in the hope that the young OL would finally "get it" against a good defense. Today, I think they "got it" and hopefully have turned the corner against a very good OSU defense, and I think the staff's willingness to keep grinding payed off.
This game went about how I expected, except our offense kept pace with their offense. I was very dissappointed in the defense's inability to stop their run, but then, with that OL (notice they had 100+ collective starts?), Braxton, and of course Hyde, it's not surprising.
I've very proud of Team 134, and I think the staff did a great job getting them ready to play.
Go Blue!
November 30th, 2013 at 8:27 PM ^
December 1st, 2013 at 11:57 AM ^
Coaches did good - except that last playcall.
On a side note - the announcers & refs were f-en horrible.
December 1st, 2013 at 12:38 PM ^
I agree ford, the refs were pathetic and gutless. I saw uncalled holding several times on OSU's front 7. Realize this happens every game, yada yada yada but
Also, consider:
1. Frank Clark gets an "unsportsmanlike" penalty of 15 yards for getting in Miller's face, briefly, after a tackle. DID ANYONE NOTICE THAT MILLER'S HAND made contact with Clark's face mask? What the heck was that call? Because you want to "calm down" the game post-fight?
2. Multiple times, Hyde gets big gainers up the middle and he clearly gets up and hovers over our guys after the play and talks smack. Where is the call there??? Clearly unsportsmanlike conduct if we're going by the precedent set by a 15-yarder on Clark.
3. Late hits on Gardner, resulting in no flag: there is just one that really sticks out, in my mind. Third quarter (I believe) Gardner had released it right before the lineman crashes into his mid-section. Now, I realize physics etc etc but if you watch the play, the lineman clearly pauses, then proceeds to send Gardner harder to the turf. This pause by the lineman makes it more then likely it should have been a penalty.