OT: Nike changes Purdue's logo

Submitted by FabFiver5 on

In the wake of my earlier board post about Northwestern getting Under Armour-ized, Purdue's student newspaper has published a story about how Nike has issued the university a new logo.

"It's really a Nike driven initiative," Associate Athletics Director Tom Schott said.

I had no idea that Nike and possibly other apparel companies were at liberty to up and change a university's logo. Apparently Phil Knight rules all.

http://www.purdueexponent.org/sports/article_0c4eceea-8f01-11e1-bbe0-00…

go16blue

April 25th, 2012 at 4:12 PM ^

Interesting. I don't like it, but don't hate it. Considering changes like this generally get a negative reception at first that's probably a good thing.

Also, for anyone still wondering, the full MMB will be going to Dallas. I know I read in the mgoboard update that they were unsure, but MMB's facebook page now says they will all be going.

French West Indian

April 25th, 2012 at 4:14 PM ^

...sucks.  If I wasn't already familiar with Purdue, I don't think I would make out that it was a chugging train at all.  Instead it has more the feel of looking down the smoking barrel of a gun or cannon.

Definitely not an improvement.

MGoRyan

April 25th, 2012 at 4:16 PM ^

It looks like a dial lock that is lying at the bottom of a staircase whilst stuck in a glob of cu...gum...

I hate it.

SamirCM

April 25th, 2012 at 4:18 PM ^

Doesn't matter so long as Purdue stays irrelevant in every meaningful sports. Can't wait for B10 hockey, so that they will have another thing that they will be irrelevant at.

wile_e8

April 25th, 2012 at 4:21 PM ^

 

I had no idea that Nike and possibly other apparel companies were at liberty to up and change a university's logo. Apparently Phil Knight rules all.

 

It's been done before

Whether it sticks depends on the volume of fan complaints. But this Purdue update similarly seems to accomplish nothing besides enticing fans to buy new apparel without the old logo.

Moleskyn

April 25th, 2012 at 4:26 PM ^

As a reference point, I believe this was their logo before Nike re-did it:

Definitely like this one better.

EDIT: Just saw Turd's post. Guess this is still their primary logo?

mgowill

April 25th, 2012 at 4:33 PM ^

 

“It’s really a Nike driven initiative,” Associate Athletics Director Tom Schott said. “Nike had come to us a while back with some suggestions. Nike said the train logo we used was not good on apparel. The smoke didn’t work on shirts and hats. They recommended this slight revision.”

http://btn.com/2012/04/25/nike-tweaks-purdues-logo/ 

 

TrppWlbrnID

April 25th, 2012 at 4:35 PM ^

i would guess that the P is still the primary logo and that the revised train replaces this one.

i rather like Purdue's athletic identity, the jerseys and field printing are set in something modern like Futura (its not technically...) while the P remains typical block lettering.

jocular_jock

April 25th, 2012 at 4:30 PM ^

Purdue grad here... seriously I think the train looked dumb to begin with. Now it looks dumb in a different way. I am a bigger fan of the motion P myself. Unfortunately we cant have a timeless logo like the block M.

To the colors, it reminds me of the color creep mentioned on an earlier wall post. We are all witnesses of Michigan's migration from a deeper maize color to a more highlighter yellow color. This is accentuated by the more navy and less royal blue color of the uni's. Same thing happening here, no more Old Gold and Black, now it is Hollywood Gold and Black.

jtmc33

April 25th, 2012 at 4:47 PM ^

No one outside of the Big 10 will know what that thing is supposed to be.

If you look at it a certain way it looks like the top-view of a cannon that was just shot with smoke coming out of the barrell.

Or some sort of metal object wearing a British Judge's wig.

UM Indy

April 25th, 2012 at 4:50 PM ^

What's wrong with just sticking with one of the Purdue Petes? In one incarnation, he's built like a brick shit house with kind of a creepy smile. In the other, he's a slimmed down version, but a fighter with both dukes up. Either is better than this.

hart4eva

April 25th, 2012 at 6:43 PM ^

The old logo is clearly better looking. This new one is some graphic artist totally phoning it in. You can't even really tell what that's supposed to be. Is that a train engine with smoke behind or it? Or is it a personalized Masterlock for Purdue fans? Or is it the bad guy from Fern Gully "riding' the top of that giant logging machine? Who knows and Nike probably doesn't care.