MBB haters have gotten an early start
I was surprised that this was the landing page provided by the MBB twitter account, but the content doesn't surprise me at all. Not sure how so many are passing such negative judgement having not seen a single shot from the three games.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:16 PM ^
Also, they're playing professional teams.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:29 PM ^
That's a tough piece! It's not going to be an easy season - a fact that Beilein knows well - but I think it's great to get the youngsters some good, off-the-record competition. At least expectations are low. I'm still happy to keep hope alive!
August 25th, 2010 at 8:31 PM ^
...says:
dariusmorris1 I hear a lot of BS but I never sweat it
August 25th, 2010 at 8:37 PM ^
That article does at least serve a purpose - how bad should we be losing to pro european teams?
I mean, the only thing I have to go off is baseball. During pre-season a pro team (scaled back) will play college teams and those college teams typically get shellacked. And that's baseball - where if October has taught us anything - any team can win.
But is there anything in the recent past (since college players began to play pro ball in Europe) that suggests a 30 point loss to a pro team is a really bad sign?
[EDIT: I find it really hurts the article's credibility when at the end he states that Huggins' squad barely relied on JB's recruits to get to the final four. DButler was a JB guy and the team's best player by far.]
August 25th, 2010 at 8:39 PM ^
Well, they usually have older players from the NCAA that couldn't catch on to a US team. They're a step below NBA talent (i'm not sure, but probably in the same vein as D-league)
So its not like MBB is getting shellacked by the new Miami Heat, but its probably better than most college upper major teams.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:40 PM ^
Yeah, I have no idea.
I know Dylan over at umhoop.com sent a tweet asking if anyone had recent history on college teams visiting Europe. If anyone does lets hear it, I would be interested in a historical comparison.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:14 PM ^
Tennessee went 4-1 on an August 2007 trip that included games against teams in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Austria. But that was a Tennessee team that went to the Sweet 16 in the 2008 NCAA tourney and had a third-team All-American (Chris Lofton) and a honorable mention All-American (Tyler Smith) on its roster.
I have no clue how those central European teams would compare to the Belgian squads that Michigan is facing. But a poster at umhoops.com said the Belgian league was at least an average or even a bit above-average European league.
For press releases on the Tennessee trip, see http://www.utsports.com/sports/m-baskbl/archive/tenn-m-baskbl-2007.html
August 25th, 2010 at 9:39 PM ^
I think USC's football dominance might be a good example. Your average European basketball team includes a number of players who played in college, so it has at least college talent. However these players are more mature and have no restrictions on how much coaching they can have.
USC football had college level talent and extra coaching and they basically ran over almost everyone they played for a good stretch. So our guys getting run over by players who have spent years working with pro coaches and learning a system isn't really all that shocking.
August 25th, 2010 at 10:11 PM ^
How about the fact that more than half the Michigan roster is playing in their first games as Wolverines?
So, here you have a very young collegiate team trying to gel together for the first time in actual game compeitiion versus established professional teams with players who presumably have played together for x number of years and who have vastly greater experience and are much more physically mature.
Were there people actually expecting Michigan to go 4-0 on this trip? That article is idiotic.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:42 PM ^
for the European trip is nothing more than a side trip to Dumbfuckistan.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:42 PM ^
Rough piece. So let's get this straight. Beilein is dismissed for getting to the NCAAs with two of Amaker's players, but Huggins doing the same with Beilein's players is great coaching. Give me a break. We have good players coming up.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:44 PM ^
Followed by an overseas trip where they play four games in a week, and everyone is getting playing time. There is a shorter shot clock, and a deeper three line, plus playing quarters like the pros. If anyone thinks they had a serious chance at winning games, they are delusional. This is about seeing what they need to work on before the season starts. If nothing else, the posts are making me like this team as much as the one two years ago.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:49 PM ^
Keep in mind in Europe:
24s shot clock, not 35.
Wide lane.
Nearly NBA distance 3 pt.
Our team is full of 18 and 19 year old players. European teams likely full of 23 - 30 year old men.
I withhold all judgement until we play games that actually count. Until then, I'm happy that the players and the coaches get to enjoy a trip overseas and play some prime competition. Most importantly extra practice sessions where we're breaking in several new players and new coaches. Hopefully that translates to "hitting the ground running" when season practice begins.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:29 PM ^
I agree with most of your post, but didn't the move of the men's college line make it equal to the international line?
I could look this up in probably 30 seconds...
EDIT:
College: 20'9"
Internat'l: 20'9"
However, beginning Oct 1 FIBA is moving the 3pt line to 22'9" for international competitions. So I'm guessing they are playing on 20'9".
August 25th, 2010 at 9:36 PM ^
I thought I had read the Europe one was moved out. Using the fantastically reliable source, wikipedia looks like:
NBA: 23' 9", with 22' in the corners
College: 20' 9"
FIBA: Extending to 22' 2" but it says not until October 2010. I swear I heard somebody mention somehwere that the European lines were moved out already. Maybe on one of the coaches' twitter feeds? Maybe I'm just hallucinating from football deprivation.
EDIT: Haha, you were posting your edit as I was posting. Maybe the 3 point isn't effecting them much then. I guarantee the age difference makes a huge difference. 20-something men being paid to professionally work out and play basketball 24/7 vs a bunch of 19 year old kids who just had two week of organized practice going into this trip.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:45 PM ^
...torrents of tweets, either Andrew Beilein or Bacari Alexander said that the 3-pt line was at the new intl distance for the Ghent game. I'm going to assume that the rest of the courts are already marked that way. I'll go out on a limb and guess that Oct 2010 is the start of EuroLeague play, so it would make sense that the courts were already modified in preparation for the upcoming season.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:49 PM ^
Ah so I'm not completely crazy.... Thank you.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:49 PM ^
Double Post.... What does it mean??????
August 25th, 2010 at 8:49 PM ^
August 25th, 2010 at 8:53 PM ^
if he's related to another Snyder that we are familiar with?
August 25th, 2010 at 8:49 PM ^
This is pre-season play. I think Snyder is being way to hard on these kids. Not to say they arent playing hard but I'm sure they arent playing at mid season form either. If we use Snyders metric to measure teams abilities based on pre-season success then the Detroit Lions should have won the Super Bowl in 2008, and we all know how that season turned out.
August 25th, 2010 at 8:53 PM ^
...but it is an interesting question. How much time does JB have left? For my money you've got to give him to Smotrycz's Junior year, right? But the question is at that point what is good enough? NCAA berth, Sweet 16, more?
What I would really like in 3 years is a team that has a shot at the Big Ten regular season title. Michigan hasn't really competed in conference for years. I would like that to change.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:04 PM ^
Through the 2015-2016 season, unless you plan to give the AD the money for his buy-out, you'd best be giving him five years.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:07 PM ^
Everybody's been focusing on the article itself, and we're missing out on an additional wrinkle that HHW mentioned: this article was linked to by the UM Basketball Twitter account. What the hell?
August 25th, 2010 at 9:11 PM ^
I thought I was the only one who screwed up bit.ly URLs and sent embarrassing stuff around.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:13 PM ^
...mistake. They meant to link to this page. Reply to the tweet and let them know they made an error. Not hard to accidentally paste one link into your shortened URL generator when you meant to paste another.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:48 PM ^
It's too early to draw any conclusions on Beilein.
In his first season, he played with 0 of his recruits.
In his 2nd season, he played with his first class - a class that he had literally 25 days to assemble.
Last year was his first real class, and he landed 2 top 100 players (Morris, Vogrich) and a somewhat well-thought of PF (Morgan). Morris showed promise as a ball-handler and defensive player, Vogrich wasn't quite ready.
This year's class has a top 100 player (Smotrycz) a fringe top 100 player (Hardaway) and a third guy with 2 NBA players in his immediate family (Horford)
Next year, he has another top 100 player (Brundidge) and a guy CLOSE to the top 100 who could very well slide in (Burke).
In other words, he's barely had a chance to to play with the "talent" he's recruited, He deserves to get that chance.
August 25th, 2010 at 10:53 PM ^
My expectations for this year are definitely modest, but it's beginning to sound like Hardaway is going to be a real player. I remember reading the other day that he's grown a lot over the past year, and that his wingspan just got measured at 6'10". That's enormous for a college wing and, combined with good athleticism, an understanding of the game, and a nice shooting stroke, makes me think that he could be a legit all-American type player in a couple years. He and Darius locking down wings and in the 1-3-1 could be stifling.
August 25th, 2010 at 9:43 PM ^
It's Burke BTW, and don't forget Mclimans, maybe you didn't, but he looks to be one of 4 or 5 freshman getting significant minutes this year.
August 25th, 2010 at 10:24 PM ^
Stupid piece to write. These games might as well not have a score associated with them. They are great experience, plain and simple.
August 25th, 2010 at 10:39 PM ^
Well, they are called "exhibition games" for a reason.
August 26th, 2010 at 12:19 AM ^