15% of Heisman Voters Voted Before Conference Champ Games
"We have to get this right!" -- @joelklatt frustrated that 15% of voters voted before the final game. #Heisman https://t.co/wQHtUTzotB
— FOX Sports Live (@FOXSportsLive) December 13, 2015
December 13th, 2015 at 3:32 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 7:59 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 5:54 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 6:44 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 8:04 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 9:07 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 10:13 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 10:34 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 10:40 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 2:19 PM ^
Reggie bush was the number 2 pick in the draft and has less than 5500 yards in his career. Eddie George had over 10000 yards. He was a very good back at the time, was a critical player for his teams. Desmond Howard was a stud on special teams. He retired tied for 3rd in punt return tds and 6th in yards/return. He was by far the best of his generation in that latter category as all the players on that list are either recent or from decades before Desmond. He wasn't a great receiver, but he still won a super bowl MVP as a return man. Not a bust IMO, but they're all just my opinion. I could be wrong.
Regardless, I still think the Heisman sucks at finding the best player in college and while NFL performance is a little different, the fact is that it's one metric that indicates they suck.
December 13th, 2015 at 12:32 PM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 1:37 PM ^
NFL success is not the barometer of a great college football player. Nor is the Heisman an award forecasting professional success. Red herring.
December 13th, 2015 at 2:22 PM ^
I agree with you for any one year. But they consistently suck at it. So you could say the heisman goes to the best player in college who will suck in the pros. If Pro success had no correlation with college success, then it would be a red herring, but there's a strong correlation. Therefore I think the Heisman isn't a good indicator of the best player in college.
December 13th, 2015 at 7:15 AM ^
Maybe 15% of voters want to evaluate players on an equal number of games? Makes sense....
December 13th, 2015 at 9:46 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 7:27 AM ^
Now Henry will go pro, gain 30 LB's, and be out of the league in a few years.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 7:51 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 7:36 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 9:22 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 7:44 AM ^
You can argue it either way.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 8:05 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 11:15 AM ^
Similarly, MVP voting ends before pros start the post season.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 7:54 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 8:05 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 8:43 AM ^
December 13th, 2015 at 9:36 AM ^
the heisman is becoming a joke. It's stupid for them to even allow early voting. Ridiculous
December 13th, 2015 at 10:52 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
December 13th, 2015 at 12:13 PM ^
Those that have the honor of voting for the Heisman include a large group of people who don't even bother to turn into w.coast games. He, and I agree, don't think its too much to ask for these voters to at least using the recording option on their televisions to watch at more convenient times. Many use it for nothing more that bragging rights, i.e., "I'm a Heisman voter." If they don't wish to carry out the responsibilities of being a voter there are many more informed that would be happy to take their place for the sole purpose of voting for the best candidate, regardless of what time his team kicks off. Like most SEC accomplishmets, they seem to want to separte it from the rest of cfb. So he breaks Hershel and Bo's records. Solid accomplishments and a man who definitely had a great season. McCafferty breaks Barry's record, the greatest runner in cfb and pro history. Which is more impressive? If it goes to the best player in cfb, you would have to measure it much like you would Harmon's, who did it all. And he wasn't too far behind Henry from the RB position either.
All one has to do is take a look at ND winner to see how flawed the voting really is. Hornung over Jim Brown? C'mon Man. And that is, perhaps, not the most glaring Catholic loaded voting of all time.
December 13th, 2015 at 12:43 PM ^
In 2003, Jason White won the Heisman over Larry Fitzgerald, Eli Manning, and Chris Perry.
Oklahoma got stomped by Kansas State in the Big 12 Championship game and Jason White barely completed 50% of his passes with no TDs and 2 picks, he got pulled in the 2nd half, and his team got stomped 35-7.
He still won the Heisman though, largely because of early voting.
This problem's existed for years.
December 13th, 2015 at 12:54 PM ^
If Peppers had the same exact season/stats as McCaffrey this entire board would lose their shit that Henry won it behind that offensive line and so many 5-star teammates. I'm surprised so many agree that it was the right decision to give it to yet another "insert name here" RB on a great team as opposed to something unique that we don't see that often.
Too many voters seem to pull the part line lever when it comes to this, but thank god that didn't happen in 1997.
December 13th, 2015 at 2:55 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad