[Aaron Scott Instagram]

Recruiting Bits Gains Clarity Amid Visit Season Comment Count

Alex.Drain June 22nd, 2023 at 1:44 PM

It's time for another wholesale recruiting update! Three weeks ago I set the stage for all the official visits, now with 3/4 of the big recruiting weekends in June done, I felt it was time to check back in, especially with a handful of more commitments in tow. This time we're not going to do a full position by position breakdown, but merely check in on the big races and talk about various updates across the board that have occurred in the past three weeks. This should quench the thirst of our readers for recruiting content and provide more context for the upcoming commitment dates in early July. 

 

The Aaron Chiles Saga and what it means for LB recruiting 

Let's start with the bad. Saturday night saw the most surprising development of this recruiting cycle, when 4* LB Aaron Chiles, who had long been a strong Michigan lean, committed to Florida while on a visit. Apparently there had been a few murmurs about Chiles and Florida in the days beforehand (I didn't see these until after the fact), but certainly nothing to suggest that anything like this was remotely possible. When I saw the news tweeted out by Chiles, I was completely shocked, and it seems like the coaching staff ($), and by extension the insider class ($), were as well. Even those who were familiar with Chiles' nibbling on what Florida was selling before the visit felt it was extremely unlikely that Chiles would commit on a visit. The surprise was so great that two Rivals national recruiting experts deemed Chiles --> UF the biggest surprise of the 2024 cycle nationally

The experience of Chiles choosing Florida out of the blue seems to have outraged the Michigan staff and inevitably the next question fans had was "will they keep recruiting Chiles?". Not to get too far into the "haha, we'll see what Chiles does when Florida goes 4-8 and fires Napier!! 🤣🤣" discourse, but you have to plan for all contingencies and yes, Florida is not exactly slated to be a juggernaut this fall. A kid who makes a (seemingly) rash decision like that is also one who profiles as likely to reconsider, so there are plenty of reasons to keep poking around, but at this time it's not clear if Michigan will do so. 

[EJ Holland/On3]

Insiders have been divided on what comes next, from some saying that the Chiles decision has burned all bridges and has rendered him persona non grata to the coaching staff ($), while others have said that they may continue to keep an open dialogue ($). Regardless, my reading of the reports makes it clear that they aren't expecting anything and are planning to take the commitment of 4* in-state LB Jeremiah Beasley and then call it a day. Beasley is set to commit next week and all signs are pointing to the Wolverines on this one. He would technically be the only true ILB in the class, but Michigan has a number of LB-ish athletes in this class and theoretically you could move one to ILB.

I wrote in the Cole Sullivan Hello that they plan to start him at MIKE, while I've also heard that Jaden Smith could be an ILB candidate too. Reporting suggests they like these raw balls of clay enough to stick with them + Beasley and wrap it up at LB in '24. It sucks to lose Chiles, because he was an awesome prospect, but given the presumption that a massive NIL offer was what tipped the scales and the manner in which the player conducted that process, perhaps he was not a great fit for Michigan and the culture they're building. Alas, we may never know. 

[AFTER THE JUMP: Happier discussion]

 

RB Pursuit Over?

This will be a bit redundant if you read the Micah Ka'apana Hello on Tuesday, but I wanted to mention it in this piece. The last time I covered recruiting, one of the biggest storylines was the Taylor Tatum vs. Ka'apana/Dupree debate and now we likely have our answer. With Ka'apana in the class, the chance Michigan lands Tatum is now extremely low, mostly because of math. You can only use so many RBs in a game and Michigan took two RBs in 2023 and now have two in 2024. Tatum, being a high level RB, is the sort of player who could easily come in and be a bellcow at most programs in year #1. Is he going to come to a program where he'd be fighting against that many backs on the depth chart, including two his age? Probably not. I'd say this one is likely over. 

USC had begun to pick up steam for Tatum in the last couple weeks, which may have played a role in Mike Hart taking Ka'apana now (also heard Oklahoma for Tatum). Also playing a role is the fact that Michigan really likes Ka'apana and feels he meshes well with Jordan Marshall (something I covered in the Hello). The raw speed is real and he's an underscouted prospect playing on his own loaded depth chart at national power Bishop Gorman. When he's gotten a chance to play, Ka'apana has shown superb raw tools and posted cartoonishly great YPC clips. Michigan feels very comfortable with a Marshall/Ka'apana tandem and so they decided to lock in stability now, rather than fight to the end for Tatum. Is it what I would have done? Not sure, but I'm a blogger, not an RBs coach. Star-gazers may nay-say this choice, but given the track record, we have to trust Hart here, and there's a lot to like with Ka'apana. 

 

[Justin Wells/Inside Texas]

How many OL is Michigan taking???

The question coming out of the most recent recruiting weekend was about whether Michigan could take seven OL in the 2024 recruiting class. As you may recall, the Wolverines already have five committed, all of whom are locked in. Those names are Blake Frazier, Luke Hamilton, Ben Roebuck, Jake Guarnera, and Andrew Sprague. The plan had been to take six, with the sixth being a blue chip prospect. For a while it seemed like Max Anderson would be the guy, but Anderson and Michigan drifted apart, with Anderson now looking at joining the Tennessee class. Instead two new names have appeared, 4* tackles from Texas Bennett Warren and Michael Uini

Prior to this past weekend, Warren seemed like the favorite, with Uini on the backburner. However, Uini's visit reportedly went incredibly well ($) and the crystal balls rolled in. Meanwhile, Michigan still holds the ballz for Warren meaning that yes, as of this moment, Michigan holds commitments from or leads for seven different offensive linemen. Is it possible to take all seven? Some of the rumblings suggest that since Warren and Uini are both such high level prospects, the staff would not say no if both wanted to put their name down to join the class ($). As of this moment Warren is ranked 145th in the composite and Uini is ranked 127th. It's awfully hard to say no to either guy when they would be the two highest rated OL recruits in your class (both Sprague and Frazier are top 200, though slightly lower). 

It also seems that processing one of the five committed is a total no as well, so if you want to take Warren and Uini, you have to take seven. I don't think it's a crazy proposition- you can never have too many OL- and in a world where scholarship limits are seemingly fake thanks to NIL, why not? In theory the biggest impediment would be what I mentioned with the RBs, too many players on a depth chart scaring off future recruits, but if neither Uini nor Warren get scared off, that quiets that concern. Michigan hasn't taken too many OL recruits in recent years either, and some that they've taken are major stabs in the dark like a Connor Jones and a Alessandro Lorenzetti.

After the 2023 season you're looking at Keegan/Zinter/Barnhart/Jones/Nugent/Henderson all possibly leaving. Transfer portal is always a plug and play option, but a lot of your depth will be hollowed out. Replenishing it with arguably the best OL class in the nation, overflowing with players and talent, isn't the worst way to go about things. They've taken just three OL in each of the last two classes, so there's room in '24 to go big... seven OL and five of them being 4* (four in the top 200) is as big as it gets. I still don't think it's likely that they end up with seven OL, but it does seem like a possibility now and if Uini and Warren both want in, it's likely happening. 

 

[EJ Holland/On3]

Clarity on the EDGE board

The other main storyline besides Taylor Tatum from my last recruiting update was the chaos of Michigan's EDGE recruiting, which at the time had zero commits and six prime targets. The board hasn't cleared up too much yet, but we are starting to get a bit more of a cohesive picture of what the path forward is at this positional group. The team picked up its first commitment at EDGE this week in 3* Devon Baxter, who Seth Hello'd on Monday night. Baxter was a player I hadn't heard a ton of recent buzz about before his visit, which went swimmingly and sealed the deal. One down, three to go?

The names from the last update are largely still the names in this update, but we are getting a better idea of who is more likely. 4* Dominic Nichols left his visit with Michigan strongly in command ($), the Wolverines having slingshot back ahead of Wisconsin. There have been a few whispers about Clemson but Michigan still feels very good and are expecting a commitment soon. 4* Elias Rudolph's recruitment had the lingering dark cloud of OSU holding the final visit hovering over it, until we got word earlier this week (from the player himself) that Rudolph is not visiting the Buckeyes. In that case, Michigan should be considered to be the overwhelming favorite ($) for his services when he commits on July 3. 

The fourth-most likely prospect remains 4* Jacob Smith from Connecticut, twin brother of Jerod, a DL commit already in this class. Jacob has been less enthusiastic about Michigan than his brother but the closer we get to commitment day (not set but "around 7/4"), the more likely it seems that Michigan will get this one done. They hold all the predictions for Smith and he will be back on campus this weekend in an unofficial capacity ($). Nebraska and Kentucky have both been poking around, but signs still seem to indicate the Wolverines. 

[Jacob Smith/Twitter]

In all likelihood, those four players will be Michigan's EDGE class for this cycle, a very nice collection of talent. The three names once under discussion have all faded, Brian RobinsonDarien Mayo, and Marquise Lightfoot. Robinson's saga is a strange one and I have little idea what exactly happened there. Robinson visited Michigan a zillion times and all the crystal balls projected Michigan to land him, but the commitment never came. Pressure seemed to be applied to secure a commitment but there was some other element of this recruitment that wasn't made public, hinted at by insiders but never disclosed. Regardless, it seems like it's not happening and both sides have moved on. Huh. 

Mayo was Michigan's top target on the board, a player they regarded as a 5* talent and would hold a spot for regardless of numbers. However, with news of Mayo canceling his visit to Ann Arbor this week ($), it seems that Mayo will be headed to Clemson (or elsewhere) and this one is probably over. Lightfoot is the final name, a player Michigan liked a lot and a teammate for this season with WR commit I'Marion Stewart, but the Wolverines are not at the front of the pack. For now, bet on Baxter, Nichols, Rudolph, and Jacob Smith being the EDGE class, a quality and respectable bunch.

 

[247Sports]

DB Developments 

The final area worth updating is defensive back, where there are no new commitments but some important nuggets to cover. 4* DB Boo Carter picked Tennessee last weekend, which was always the most likely outcome for an in-state kid. This one isn't over, Michigan will continue talking to him up until signing day ($), but it is not something I'd consider likely. Attention has now turned to the pursuit of 4.5* Ohio corners Aaron Scott and Bryce West, both of whom recently visited Ann Arbor. Optimism is high for both coming out of the visits, especially with the rumors of West's reported return visit to Michigan before heading to Columbus. It's not clear if he's actually making it to AA this week ($), so I won't comment too much on that speculation. That the Buckeyes retain the last visit for both still makes this a bit of an uphill climb, but the consensus is that the coaching staff has given it their best shot and have come very far. The feeling remains that Scott is more likely to end up in a winged helmet than West, but the interest from West in Michigan is more real than many have framed it. 

Do I think Michigan is going to get either guy? Probably not, simply because I refuse to believe it until I see it... the ole emotional hedge. But it feels a lot more plausible than it did at any point in the cycle. Someone posited on a message board that it may be more likely that Michigan gets both rather than just one. As in, it could be all or nothing, either both come or neither, simply because landing one (or losing one) will be such a powerful recruiting tool on the other. I'm not sure how much I believe that, but it's definitely worth thinking about. Scott's decision is reported to come sometime in July, while I haven't heard a timetable for West. With both visiting Columbus this weekend, it's officially Grit Your Teeth O'Clock. 

Elsewhere in DB recruiting, Ondre Evans rocketed up the boards since my last update and promptly picked LSU. Oh well. Ohioan Terhyon Nichols (4*) remains a plausible backup option to Scott/West while we wait for more updates in that saga, but I haven't heard too many CB names beyond these four. At safety, Michigan left an official visit with Jordon Johnson-Rubell (4*) feeling surprisingly good ($), but that one remains a tough pull out of Texas. Marquis Gallegos (4*) visited but I haven't heard much about him. If there's one remaining spot in this recruiting class I'd love to get more clarity on, it would be DB. Unfortunately, a big part of that is finding out what happens with West and Scott and for now, we wait. 

 

Three quick final notes

I'll cover these real quick in bullet point fashion: 

  • Nose tackle Deyvid Palepale is set to announce on 7/1 and despite Michigan's long-standing love of him as a prospect relative to his rather low recruiting profile, it seems like PSU's efforts to keep the PA kid at home may be winning it out. The winds are blowing towards the Nittanys and some crystal balls recently flipped to the blue and white. Not sure what comes next if Palepale goes to PSU
  • 5* DT Justin Scott was a big topic of discussion after his visit to Ann Arbor, with the feeling being that things had gone very well. It seems at this time like the question is region: if Scott is willing to leave the Midwest (and right now it seems he is), Miami or UGA are going to win out ($). If he wants to stay closer to his Chicagoland home, then Michigan feels like they can best OSU and Notre Dame. 
  • At the WR position, the insiders continue to feel good about 4* Jordan Shipp, teammate of Channing Goodwin and Jadyn Davis. He's visited several times and the hope is to have him nailed down before the start of his senior season in August. Other WR targets aren't terribly close at this time, but we'll see if that changes.  

Comments

njvictor

June 22nd, 2023 at 2:18 PM ^

Is it just me or did recruiting momentum kinda dip all at once? Obviously we will still have a great class, but this week has been pretty brutal with Brian Dohn changing his Palepale crystal ball to PSU this morning. Hope we can pull that recruitment out because he's a crazy talent

Streetchemist

June 22nd, 2023 at 2:43 PM ^

I would say the momentum is kind of over for right now.  Michigan led or was top 2 for a shit ton of highly rated guys along with several top 300-500 types.  Well, we got the top 300-500 guys but just about every one of the highly rated guys are gone or trending elsewhere.  It's still going to be a nice class, but top 5 seems pretty unlikely at this point.  If you couldn't tell, I'm fully on the Scott and West aren't coming here train.

S.G. Rice

June 22nd, 2023 at 2:45 PM ^

Recruiting momentum is fine.  Been a steady stream of commits.  Class is getting full.  Still room for a few more, there will be a few more.

But most of the news the rest of the way is going to be negative because the later in crootin season it gets the harder it gets.  A lot of the focus is going to be on pie-in-the-sky guys like Justin Scott, the Ohio CBs, Ryan Wingo, etc. ... none of whom are coming to Michigan.

If you want to call that a dip in recruiting momentum, go for it.  Obsess over the lack of five stars.  Or when we go whole days without a new commit.  But the reality is that this is shaping up to be the best class Michigan has had in YEARS.

Grampy

June 22nd, 2023 at 6:18 PM ^

It's like the closing rounds of a high stakes Texas Hold'em game.  The stacks get taller, and the remaining players have a statistical likelyhood of having the size of the stacks offered as their most important selection criteria.  Michigan doesn't play well in that world, at least not this year.  Pay-for-Play has never been a reliable building block for team chemistry, though.

Logan88

June 22nd, 2023 at 2:52 PM ^

Two months ago, I thought UM would finish with the 6th or 7th ranked class but at this point I think they are going to be 10th or 11th. Definitely a disappointment after back to back conference championships and playoff appearances.

I remember when most folks were excited about NIL because they were convinced it would "level the playing field" in recruiting as UM and its "money cannon" would get the program on the same level as UGA, Bama and OSU but, if anything, UM has fallen further behind in the NIL era with several lesser programs buying highly ranked classes. I expect the same will happen in 2024 and the foreseeable future.

S.G. Rice

June 22nd, 2023 at 3:05 PM ^

The jury is very much still out as to whether buying a highly ranked class is worth it.

Best argument that it is not?  Texas A&M.  No more needs to be said.

Harbaugh is going to do things his way, and that way does not appear to include signing guys whose primary motivation is a big up front check.  I'm okay with that, I do not care if we "win" the recruiting rankings as long as the results on the field keep coming.

 

Logan88

June 22nd, 2023 at 3:15 PM ^

I agree with you completely. 

I don't really care that much about how UM finishes in the mythical recruiting championship race but I am still disappointed to see UM getting so few elite players in the class after what they accomplished the last two seasons.

I firmly believe that in order to win National Championships you have to recruit at the Bama/UGA/OSU level. UM can beat OSU (sometimes) and win the Big 10 (sometimes) with their current level of recruiting but winning playoff games and National Championships will probably not happen with their current talent levels.

 

Piston Blue

June 22nd, 2023 at 4:18 PM ^

I think they have the talent level to do it this year though, and it seems as I'm not the only one as most pre-season rankings and oddsmakers have UM in the top 3-4 teams. Obviously they're not the favorites but there is plenty of blue-chip talent to get the job done, IMO.

Another thing about recruiting rankings: I have so much trust in the coaching staff at this point that I've completely checked out on most recruiting news. Someone just posted the re-rank of the class of 2019, where UM finished with the 3rd best class in those rankings but a bit lower in the at the time rankings. I think we have a few years of data now to show that this staff is really good at scouting guys with less attention on them from less notable recruiting regions (Midwest, Northeast as opposed to Southeast) and getting the most out of them. UM was behind only Bama and UGA for most draft picks this year, granted Bama and UGA had bunches of 1-2 round guys.

Just standing there

June 23rd, 2023 at 12:53 PM ^

The Athletic annually does the exercise you referred to, re-ranking classes 4 years after the fact.  The 2018 and 2019 classes both finished 3rd in the re-rankings.  2019's class was initially ranked 8th, and 2018's class had a more dramatic rise, starting at 22nd!  

It's been proven overall that stars do matter, but that doesn't mean that an individual program can't fairly consistently beat the system with high-level scouting and player development.  It's a little early to conclude that we'll be able to do that, but the pattern from 2018-19 suggests that it's possible.

goblue12820

June 22nd, 2023 at 3:55 PM ^

I think buying a class can work, A&M just showed everyone how it doesn't work. Seems to me like they logged on to 247 and threw NIL $$ at any and every top 100 guy who prioritized a signing bonus over all else and then acted surprised when none of these guys were bought into the program halfway through their freshman year. 

JonnyHintz

June 23rd, 2023 at 9:07 AM ^

I do think there’s somewhat of a difference between “buying a class” and being willing to throw some money around to shore things up.
 

Programs like Texas A&M and this year’s version of Florida (heading towards a 4 win season with their coach on the hot seat) have no business recruiting with the elites. The ONLY reason they’re getting these kids is because of their willingness to throw that money around. 
 

Programs like Georgia and Bama however, can promise development. They can promise the chance at titles. They can promise a professional level environment. There is genuine interest from top prospects in programs like this already, and the money being offered is just icing on the cake. 
 

I just see a genuine difference between someone who is torn between a couple schools and the money tipping the scales and someone like Chiles being a hardcore Michigan lean (some have hinted that he was even a silent commit) and all of a sudden he says “$Florida$.” Collins Acheampong (sp?) was an example of that last year. Michigan commit, all in. Miami offers a bag, and he’s gone

dragonchild

June 22nd, 2023 at 3:45 PM ^

That's pretty much where we were going to land, all along.  First, many top recruits aren't worth the trouble.  Second, we were never really in the running for most of them.

The scouting-rating-NIL of "top recruits" is getting more cyclical and cynical.  Kid goes to a scouting camp, gets a gold star, then parades it around for the best offer.  Now, the kids at the top are indeed talented, but this fashion show is skipping over a lot of contestants.  So, the fish's size can be misleading because the pond isn't nearly as big as it's made out to be.  Stars still matter, for now, but not only are they increasingly overpriced, you may not be getting what's advertised.  For example, "fast" usually assumes the player will, you know, run.

Second, sometimes you're a "favorite" just to fuel a bid war.  Michigan's success doesn't make it more appealing to attend as more appealing to exploit.  Make the CFP and every 5-star is going to give you a look, but Michigan generally isn't going to waver on things like roster meritocracy, NIL policy, or (gasp!) being on campus.  The players that like Michigan's culture haven't magically grown more numerous or more talented.  Instead, there was inevitably going to be more flirting from football casanovas using Michigan to make someone else jealous. So, this recent success is going to result in more recruiting "busts", but it's a mirage.

Michigan understands this, or seems to.  If an elite talent even feigns interest they'll play along and see what comes out, but their recent success did not come from this approach.  Instead they've relied on their own sources, pulling who-dats from where-dats because the scouting services are increasingly a hollowed-out scam selling the illusion of comprehensive coverage while doing less and less to actually provide that.  Many M recruits get their ratings bump after committing in a sort of "well we'd better at least look like we're doing our jobs" CYA formality.  But they won't ever anoint those guys as elite, because that would give away the deception.  Hence MGoBlog's "late risers never rise enough".

4th phase

June 22nd, 2023 at 2:53 PM ^

I don't even want them to take 7 OL. I feel like that will make it tough to recruit in 2025. If we remember the situation that led to the great DL desert, it started in 2017 when they took 8 DL in the class, 6 who didn't finish their eligibility at Michigan and then Paye and Jeter. Then in 2018 they got legacy Hutchinson and Upshaw and Welschof.

Scholarship limits don't matter but playing time does, and if they take 7 OL they are going to get negative recruited super hard in 2025.

Blue In NC

June 22nd, 2023 at 3:40 PM ^

It's a valid concern but not sure I agree in this case.  First, depth charts at GA, Bama, OSU, etc. are just as stacked, ever more with 5 star OLs.  Also, OL is a position where almost no one starts in the first year or two so there is time to sort it out plus we have the counter against negative recruiting of the Joe Moore awards.  Obviously you don't do it if it's going to create an issue in this recruiting class but if the only concern is future classes, and you have the chance to take two more top200 guys, it probably makes sense. 

GoBlue1530

June 22nd, 2023 at 6:52 PM ^

Agreed, I don't think turning down Warren or Uini if they both want to come is better off served saving that spot for someone who may or may not be a top 10 OT in 2025. Can also relieve some pressure in '25 to land more than 3-4 high level kids, especially if Sherrone Moore's time is done after this season (please no). 

dragonchild

June 22nd, 2023 at 4:47 PM ^

"Playing time" is a bit of a self-own.  Every player wants to think they're the best, so they can beat out the best.  If you say "well you'd warm the bench at Michigan but you'd start here" you're A) denigrating the recruit's talent and B) admitting your roster has inferior teammates.

It's Michigan that has a disincentive to over-recruit a position, although that's gotten fuzzier in the NIL era.  When a player balks due to roster depth, AFAIK it's not so much Michigan stuffing their cupboards as they likely aren't promising a starting spot, which some recruits feel they're entitled to.  But those sorts tend to be toxic anyway, so good riddance.

There is an exception; I remember meeting a coach many years back while he was on a recruiting trip and he said he was going to make that "playing time" pitch. . . but it was for a kicker, where yeah, you are pretty much the guy or you aren't, as early as your freshman year.

It'sNotAToomer

June 22nd, 2023 at 4:48 PM ^

I'm very okay with taking 7. We're losing a lot of guys to the league next spring, and we've had two tiny OL classes the last two years. You've got el-Hadi, Crippen, and Anderson from 2021 likely to start, but we still don't know what we'll get out of Bounds. The 2022's are both projects. We only took 3 in 2023 and they're unknown commodities. The roster gets scary realreal fast. We don't want to be back in the bad old days when Harbaugh first arrived.

njvictor

June 23rd, 2023 at 7:23 AM ^

If I have one criticism of Coach Clink, it's that I feel like we're in this situation every year. It seems like he recruits a small board then if those fall through, we resort to a few 3.5 star high floor/low ceiling guys. It feels like Clink is a good enough recruiter where he should be a player in more high profile national recruitments

S.G. Rice

June 23rd, 2023 at 10:10 AM ^

FIRE CLINK!

You can put a lot of effort into a few guys, or a little effort into a lot of guys.  When you aren't going to get an easy close with a fat bag, seems to be better to put more effort into fewer guys with the knowledge that plenty of times you are still going to swing and miss.

Skimming the list of 2024 highly rated DBs, it's impressive how ~ none of them are from the Midwest.  You have West and Scott, then a big gap to a S from Cincinnati and then Oden.  And that's pretty much it.  For elite DBs you have to recruit FL, TX and CA.

CaliforniaNobody

June 22nd, 2023 at 4:37 PM ^

Every day I thank god I'm not a college coach having to recruit idiot teenagers. I would not be able to keep a straight face when a kid lies to you and you're expected to just brush it off and keep a good relationship with them, especially with the portal now. 

Grampy

June 22nd, 2023 at 6:24 PM ^

I wouldn't be so hard on the kids, I mean, they are just kids.  Of greater concern to me is the fact that, as the dollar value of the kid goes up, so does the greed of the parties that should be supplying guidance for them.  I know it's not true 100% of the time, but money is a serious temptation for some parents and advisors.

NJblue2

June 22nd, 2023 at 4:47 PM ^

Missing out on Palepale would really suck. He looks like an awesome DT. 

Definitely feel like we are missing out on more higher rated guys, but I feel a lot better about this class than the last one. 

OL just seems awesome. Warren might have a higher ceiling but I feel like those Georgia, Bama offers for Uini make me think he might have the higher ceiling.  Either way, an awesome problem to have. 

The DB recruiting seems like it can be awesome or very meh. I'm surprised we'd only take 1 S and maybe 1 CB if we miss out on Scott/West.

BleedThatBlue

June 23rd, 2023 at 8:31 AM ^

I believe there was a good haul for S position last year so they might be able to choose this cycle and if it’s a bust come swinging next year? CB, sounds like it’s 1A. Scott 1B. West and everyone else. Doesn’t seem like they’re really high on anyone after those two