Purdue 70, Michigan 69 Comment Count

Ace


[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Thirty-nine minutes and fifty-four seconds of exquisite basketball ruined by replay.

Michigan and Purdue played an absolute classic tonight. Twice the fifth-ranked Boilermakers stretched their lead to double digits; twice Michigan clawed their way back, finally taking their first lead of the game with under five minutes remaining.

Moe Wagner went toe-to-toe with Isaac Haas in the post. Zavier Simpson hit multiple floaters over seven-footers, including one to beat the first-half buzzer. Charles Matthews hit a couple cold-blooded jab-step threes. Jordan Poole scored eight points in seven minutes. Isaiah Livers was everywhere. Regardless of outcome, it was a game that showed Michigan's present and (especially) future are both bright.

But about that outcome. With under ten seconds on the clock in a 69-69 tie, Matthews came off a Wagner screen, got a step on Dakota Mathias, and drove hard to the basket. Mathias reached through Matthews and poked the ball out from behind, no foul, Michigan ball—as with countless plays before it, the gentleman's agreement to give that play to the offense applied.

Then the refs went to the scorer's table and spent five minutes Zaprudering the play, killing much of the considerable excitement from the wild back-and-forth affair before eventually determining the ball lingered on Matthews's hand for a frame or two after the Mathias poke. Purdue got the ball, Wagner committed a (legitimate) foul on Haas, who made the first of two free throws. A buzzer-beating heave by Matthews took a painful journey around the rim and out.

It's hard not to feel robbed. While it's also hard not to be excited about this team, that rings hollow when a call that's never made in the first 38 minutes of a game costs them a much-needed signature win. The future is bright. The present, for the moment, is stupid.

[Hit THE JUMP for the box score.]


Comments

Hail85

January 10th, 2018 at 8:59 AM ^

Why must the tag line at the top of the page continue to be true?  I hate that the call was overturned but damnit, it was the right call.  Regardless of all the bs calls we've endured recently, at least this one was right in some manner.  I can't fault Beilein for calling timeout because who wouldn't given the circumstances.  I ask however, does that call get reviewed if he doesn't call timeout?  It didn't seem like the refs were immediately going to the table after the call.  Seems like they didn't have anything to do, so why not check the call.  Fiddle Sticks!!!  

Ziff72

January 10th, 2018 at 9:29 AM ^

I don't care who it went off of.  It's clearly off Matthews but if you can replay that then you can replay Matthias hitting Matthews hand.  If you can't change a foul call you can't overturn the change of posession caused by a foul. 

The refs need a lesson in some fucking sense.   At the least if you feel like you had to give the ball to Purdue because the letter of the law you would think you would havve the decency to swallow the whistle on the last 6 seconds to get it to OT.  

In reply to by Tom Snow

mgobaran

January 10th, 2018 at 10:21 AM ^

Both teams were stuck at 69 for a while. We can't ignore both teams defensive efforts down the stretch. Michigan earned the last possession of that game, and the refs took it away. 

In reply to by Tom Snow

SDCran

January 10th, 2018 at 10:55 AM ^

1) Livers with layup, UM’s final points
2) DD called this one bad. Still ended up with Z getting a decent look from 15 feet
3) got exactly what they wanted. 2 man game with Mo and MAAR, MAAR got switched into a big and went 1 v 1.
4) No TO, 2 man with Mo and Matthews. Matthews got a step and went for it. Haarms played it well. He didn’t leave Mo until Matthews committed and he was still there and would have had the block

Michigan’s offense was fine down the stretch. Purdue’s defense was excellent. Same on the other end

In reply to by Blue in PA

Grabelnyc

January 10th, 2018 at 10:44 AM ^

He definitely has the confidence he was lacking last year. There are some things he needs to tighten up. The dribble is haphazard at times. Jb also has to recognize and teach Z how to run your man off a screen. He's not waiting for the pick. Teske got a moving screen against Iowa and is often ineffective getting Z's man off of him because Z takes off early. A la a running back in football waiting for his blocks to develop.

matty blue

January 10th, 2018 at 10:20 AM ^

i hate it, and i always have, without exception.

yes, it ruins game flow.  yes, it changes calls that you know, when you are watching, are correct.  the catch / no catch crap (oh, look, the ball moved by half an inch when he hit the ground, so he didn't 'maintain possession' blah blah blah") is a perfect example, but the call last night is another.  nobody who has ever played the game would look at that and think it was off matthews.  period.  but there we were, waiting for the review of a play that passed the eye test in every regard.

no, what i hate about replay is that it takes away the human element of every game. i guess i'm an old fart (okay i KNOW i'm an old fart), but officials are part of the game, too, and i'd rather have them be 99% correct - and confident in their calls - than get to 100% but have officials not willing to make calls because they know every call is subject to this constant, pointless zaprudering.  i submit that nobody (including purdue fans, if they're being completely honest) could watch that play last night and think "well, at least they got it right, so the game was better."

30-some years ago in baseball, long before there was WAR or ERA+ or defensive zone ratings, there was some dawning realization that computers could not only do some cool stuff to baseball in terms of post-game and -season analysis, but also, maybe, during games.  as in, a computer sitting on the bench, with someone doing...stuff.  whatever.  i think steve boros was managing the a's, and there was chatter about how the a's were at the forefront of computer use in baseball. 

at the time, legendary fellow old fart bill james said to BAN them from the dugout (and i think he, too, used capitals for emphasis) because it took away the human element of the game.  obviously, bill james was a stathead, but he was smart enough to see that the game was fundamentally being played and officiated by humans, and when you take stuff away from the humans, the game gets a little less, you know, HUMAN.

i can't think of too many times i've ever said, "man, thank god for replay."

rant over, and like i said.  old fart.

also, get the hell off my lawn.

L'Carpetron Do…

January 10th, 2018 at 10:33 AM ^

It's also doubly frustrating because this is all moot because if Matthews kicks it back to Wagner he has a WIDE open 3.  Or he can even drive the lane and dunk it because Matthews drove Haas so deep that he was likely out of the play.  Another chance missed.  These are the types of things that this team will learn from though.  And this team is worlds better from just a few weeks ago.

This is actually a good loss.  It was frustrating because they were so close but these are the types of L's I can handle.  They played pretty well and they played hard against a good team.  If this team comes with some fire , not many can step to it.  This performance was the best of the year so far.  

It's good to know they can hang with good teams (man Haas was decent but those guards Matthias and little Edwards were really good too - Dakich couldn't keep it in his pants when Edwards hit like relatively routine shots).  But bring some FIRE to East Lansing this weekend and steal one from those Spartan punks!  GO BLUE!!

TrueBlue2003

January 10th, 2018 at 12:23 PM ^

was right there on Matthews (obviously) and Haarms was trailing between Matthews and Mo, so there were two defenders between them.  Haarms is 7'3.  That's a pretty difficult pass to make make to Mo.  Matthews saw Haarms not hedge out and took it as hard as he could.  I don't have a problem with that. 

Just couldn't beat Mathias by enough. Mathias is a shockingly fast/agile defender considering how dumpy he looks.

Chork

January 10th, 2018 at 10:34 AM ^

I'm not looking at the refs or the outcome of the game.  It's the process of the game that I am focusing upon.  This was a hell of a game.  It could have been a blowout in the first half, but it wasn't.  This game proves that the rest of the season should wind up better than I would have thought at the start of the season.  This team can hang with anybody.  The future is bright.  That's how I see it.

Fezzik

January 10th, 2018 at 11:35 AM ^

I am in the heavy minority but this game is not on the refs. I never heard of a gentlemens agreement in basketball and nor do I believe there should be one. Sports should be black and white with as little grey area as possible.

The dude cleanly swiped all ball downward on Matthews and then Matthews hand pushed the ball sideways out of bounds. You can tell by the direction the ball sails out of bounds it was guided by Matthews hand. It sucked. But it happened. Leaving 6 seconds on the clock in that situation was a basketball sin on our part. Especially with Wagner open at the top of the key here.

We always struggle with inbounds plays and the end of this game was no exception. Zavier got burnt and had to foul a guy all in less than 2 seconds. Then having Wagner in rather than Teske was a questsionable decision. Wagner did foul their center. It was not an incorrect call. He hooked his hip and pulled him back. Huge careless mental mistake. 

Our last few offensive posssesions were terrible. Even immediately after a timeout we didn't set up an offense and chucked up a late shot clock brick.

Overall it was a great game and we have tons to be excited about. The last couple minutes of this game we have no one to blame but ourselves. We need to shoot better from the free throw line and hopefully someone steps up to be the go to guy when the game is on the line.

Canaday_Leverett

January 10th, 2018 at 12:28 PM ^

Painful loss— and some of the foul calls were ticky tack. But I’ve watched and played a lot of basketball and the only rule I’ve ever heard is the “whoever touches it last, doesn’t get the ball” rule. If you knock the ball off the offensive players knee or hand when swatting the ball, good on you defensive player.

vanillacow24

January 10th, 2018 at 4:40 PM ^

I️ believe the foul by Simpson was intentional as Michigan had 1 foul to give. You hope you can set your half court defense and contest the last shot. Unfortunately Mo panicked/gambled, and Haas stepper up and made a pressure FT. Sucks but nothing to hang heads about. Was a great game, great atmosphere and for a young team that lacks senior leadership to take the blows from Purdue and turn around and hit them back was exciting and positive to see.

Warm Cockles

January 10th, 2018 at 11:41 AM ^

Duncan Robinson absolutely lost his starting spot going forward. Maybe he can get his touch back in the role he was meant to play coming of the bench against the opposing teams backup.