MaizeMN

March 16th, 2017 at 12:49 AM ^

I can't believe this thread has survived multiple incursions into the forbidden zones, but I've gained some insight based on your various perspectives. The only thing I have to add is, I hope G,she,they is happy and successful with her/their performance in the pool. My interests beyond that (at least within the confines of this blog) are singularly Maize and Blue

Qmatic

March 16th, 2017 at 12:58 AM ^

We as a society have begun to understand more about Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual issues and discrimination. But there is a lot more on the spectrum that needs education and understanding p. LGBTQIAPKD. It's a spectrum that needs more understanding.

pugboy

March 16th, 2017 at 3:59 AM ^

People working so hard defending spiritual blindness and moral bankruptcy, so much for M being leaders and best.

Ali G Bomaye

March 16th, 2017 at 9:50 AM ^

The team Ryan swims on is commonly referred to as "Team 42" rather than the women's team (it is the 42nd edition of the "women's" team), and emails are addressed using gender-inclusive language such as "Blue" or "All Michigan athletes."

Politics aside, I think it's really cool how the team was able to make very slight changes to make one of its members significantly more comfortable.

Wendyk5

March 16th, 2017 at 9:56 AM ^

I am a "Live and let live" person. As long as issues don't impede my own freedom, I don't care what people do. As long as you don't force me to become you, I'm good.

We know a person who is genderqueer and I support their right to identify with whomever they choose. But I am uncomfortable with the pronoun "they." This isn't a judgment on their identity; it's a grammatical peeve. I wish there was a different pronoun that adequately represented their identity. "They/them" is plural. Does that mean they see themselves as more than one person because they're not one or the other? Was "they/them" a conscious choice, or was it a default choice because there was nothing else? 

 

This thread, and my difficulty with the plural pronoun, made me think about being judgmental and labelling. We have to judge (nicer term: evaluate) to make sense of things. We label for the same reason. On top of that, our country is a binary place: liberals vs democrats; good vs. evil; right vs. wrong. It's so deeply ingrained in us to be "either/or" and with the current political climate, we're becoming more and more entrenched in that way of thinking.

 

It must be very difficult for a person to not be binary in our society. I hope G finds success in their endeavors. 

Wendyk5

March 16th, 2017 at 4:06 PM ^

Possibly. But when I read articles about this issue, i have no real reaction until I read the word "they." Then, I bristle. I'm a writer, so I'm acutely aware of things like verb tenses and using the correct pronouns. I understand the dilemma they have, but I can't stop focusing on "they." What happens when there is more than one genderqueer person? How does one pluralize the genderqueer "they?" It's not an issue with being genderqueer; it's co-opting a word whose meaning is universally agreed upon and giving it a new meaning. 

ST3

March 16th, 2017 at 2:35 PM ^

I'm not a fan of using "they" because that's too confusing. There are other attempts at inventing gender neutral pronouns. I'm probably too old to start using Ne, Ve, or Ze.

(see: https://genderneutralpronoun.wordpress.com/)

I have the opposite problem. My wife and her parents are Chinese. They don't have gender-specific pronouns in their native language, so they are constantly mixing up "he" and "she" when they speak English.

Pepto Bismol

March 16th, 2017 at 11:10 AM ^

I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful.  I have nothing against G.  They are free to live their life as they wish.  It will never impact me one way or another.  If I ever meet them on the street, I will happily shake their hand and offer a hearty Go Blue. 

But the article states G was born as a female.  The end.  You are biologically a female.  You swim with the females.  I don't understand the problem. 

If G doesn't feel they are a woman, then I feel for them.  That's different from my human experience.  I don't understand it and I can't imagine feeling as though you do not fit within the established gender definitions.  They have my sympathy.

But the fact is they do fit as it relates to sport.  G is a female anatomically.  G swims with females. 

Trying to turn this into a complex issue of non-defined sporting gender is a futile exercise, one with no solution because the problem you are trying to solve has no definition. 

Transgender or non-binary or however you want to label people experiencing this gender confusion are asking society to be more tolerant and accepting, and we should be.  But they also need to realize the very simple truth that Mens and Womens sports are segregated to prevent the inherent competitive advantage that a male body has over a female body.  It's very simple and straightforward and G should also be accepting of what that binary sporting separation is trying to accomplish.

G can call "men" Gender 1 and "women" Gender A if they want.  I don't care what non-traditional labels you want to assign to make G feel comfortable that they aren't being shoehorned into rigid gender definitions.  At the end of the day, Mens and Womens sports are perfectly fine as-is.  There is no problem with this binary separation.  I have no desire to abolish mens and womens sports because G has a mental dilemma.  G is a female as it relates to sports.  Compete as a female. 

 

Lee Everett

March 16th, 2017 at 6:02 PM ^

I agree with you, and I doubt much will come from any activism mentioned in the article.  From a competitive standpoint, exploring intersex leagues is full of holes.  

For example: If I'm XY but I do not identify as male nor female, I'll have an inherent advantage against the XX people that do not identify themselves binarily, because I'm genetically and phenotypically "male" and they are genetically and phenotypically "female".  Then you'd have to create separate leagues for XY intersex people and XX intersex people.  

It would theoretically stop there, as XY people wouldnt be taking estrogen to transition (there's nothing to transition to) and XX people wouldn't be taking testosterone in theirs, but it's just not feasible to create two extra leagues for people who mentally and emotionally differ from their counterparts but are similar physiologically.

Our student-athlete doesn't have a physiological competitive advantage by not identifying as a female.  I'm sure the girls swimming with her and against her can just write it off as her being "butch" or "masculine" or "tomboy" and be done with it, not seeing any unfairness in her being grouped with women athletically.

I'm all for championing the acceptance of people as they are, whatever their sexual orientation or gender identity happens to be, but I don't think creating new athletic divisions is the way to go, here.