College Basketball Open Thread: Miami Upset by Georgia Tech

Submitted by MichiganMan2424 on

Thought I'd create a thread for the rest of the action tonight. #6 Miami just lost at home to Georgia Tech which should help Michigan for seeding.

#5 Georgetown and #13 OK State already went down.

EDIT: And #23 UCLA goes down by 12. Another one bites the dust.

EDIT: It's done, #12 New Mexico wins by 13. No upset here.

EDIT: It's over, Xavier beats #16 St. Louis 11 in OT. MOAR UPSETS!!!!!

The upsets keep coming.

MGlobules

March 7th, 2013 at 8:25 AM ^

I'm still not sure I get why. They've had several bad home losses and our record matches theirs. I think they may pass the eye test for some onlookers a little more fully than we do--lot of talent on the roster, and when they're good they're ferocious. But we played them very tough at their house, and I don't see that they have the single leader or dependable scorer that we have in Trey.

Beat them on Sunday, of course, and if they're still seeded ahead of us, we can really complain. 

not TOM BRADY

March 6th, 2013 at 11:34 PM ^

We're talking being a potential one seed right now. And at 8:15 in the Michigan Purdue game thread people were firing Bielien. Amazing how things change with a comeback W.

MGlobules

March 7th, 2013 at 8:30 AM ^

that or the mods need to intervene a bit more.

SO many times here--football or bball--you have fans LITERALLY saying "we've lost the game" after a quarter or before halftime. (What if the players did that; where the heck would we be?) I understand that it's in the nature of fandom to wring your hands, but when it becomes hostility to your own team. . . 

LSAClassOf2000

March 6th, 2013 at 11:35 PM ^

Amazingly, if you did not see it in some form, this game was won on a last-second tip shot, which made what seemed like an interminable tie in the last few minutes rather exciting at the end. For the record, Georgia Tech outshot Miami in terms of effective FG% by a margin of about 4.5%, but it would not have been possible if the Miami offense had missed nearly everything they tossed up in the last several minutes of the second half. 

snarling wolverine

March 6th, 2013 at 11:42 PM ^

I think tonight's action solidifies a #2 seed for us.  We have a chance to move up to #1, but I don't think we're likely to drop down to a #3 now.  And we're definitely headed to Auburn Hills for the first two rounds now, which is huge.

dc22

March 6th, 2013 at 11:44 PM ^

Before the Penn State game, I believed that we needed 5 wins to be in a very good position for a 1 seed. We need 3 more wins - beat IU and get to the finals of the BTT or Win the BTT if we fall short on Sunday.

B-Nut-GoBlue

March 7th, 2013 at 2:52 AM ^

Good stuff!  I do remember him.  The team(s) they had there during those years were actually pretty good squads.  That Kansas game was incredible; Ali Farokhmanesh pulled up for three on a fast break with ~35 seconds, and sinks it, slaying Big Bad KU! 

My girlfriend and I then bought tickets to the Sweet 16 games down in St. Louis and followed them down there for that.  Yeah, they did play Sparty pretty well.  They had their chances to pull it off but the shots weren't quite falling down the stretch.  (We saw the Ohio State-Tennessee game too, for that section of games)

smwilliams

March 7th, 2013 at 12:13 AM ^

If we beat Indiana, I think a 1 seed comes down to who wins the tournament from us, Indiana, or Sparty. If its Ohio, then It's a tossup.

That assumes that Gonzaga wins out, Duke beats UNC and makes it to the ACC title game, either Louisville or Georgetown wins the Big East tourney title, and Kansas wins out.

None of these things is even remotely guaranteed. Quality of wins and losses is going to play a huge part this year is determining number one seeds. I think you end up with...

Gonzaga, two of Indiana, us, and Sparty, and either Duke, Kansas, or Louisville depending on who loses in their tourneys or final regular season game. The 2 seeds would be the odd Big 10 team, two of Duke, Kansas, Louisville, and either Georgetown, Miami, or Florida.


Perkis-Size Me

March 7th, 2013 at 12:17 AM ^

Figures about Miami. This was a typical "hangover game" for them after a losing a close one at Duke. But whatever helps us as far as seeding goes.

Even if we don't ultimately earn a one seed, this certainly helps us towards a two seed and hopefully being placed at Auburn Hills for the first two rounds. I'd be happy with virtual home-court advantage at any stage of the tournament.

Cali Wolverine

March 7th, 2013 at 12:42 AM ^

...Ohio State fans and Michigan State fans (or Wisconsin fans if the Badgers can actually win a meaningful came outside of Madison) will both be rooting for Michigan to beat IU on Sunday for share of BIG title...that will be a first! Edit: Tough crowd tonight.

ryanlove12

March 7th, 2013 at 1:28 AM ^

It's that time of year again. Brackets will be out soon. I am very worried this year. I have not seen a PAC 12 team play all year other than Arizona in the non conference. Anybody have good info on some if these teams? I do think I will be able to see most if their conference tourney.

tbeindit

March 7th, 2013 at 1:39 AM ^

Oregon has put together a good slate.  A lot of people were talking about Cal as a potential sleeper, but they were embarrassed by Stanford at home tonight.  Don't put any faith into UCLA.  They are a fringe tourney team at best that is getting attention because they are UCLA.  Way too inconsistent.  The only other teams getting attention are Colorado and Arizona State.  Colorado is a Minnesota-like team that gets up for big games.  They are a darkhorse, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were bounced early.  Arizona State is like Iowa:  don't have the marquee wins, but pretty consistent.  Overall, unless they is a bracket buster, I wouldn't put much faith in any Pac 12 teams this year.

Michigan4Life

March 7th, 2013 at 7:57 AM ^

is a random generator because every team beat up on each other.  So many medicore teams have a shot of winning the title like Cal(but they blew it last night).  Oregon may get into NCAA tourney by default if they win Pac-12, otherwise they have zero quality wins except for Arizona.  Arizona should be in but isn't a lock.  UCLA is a bubble team with zero quality wins except maybe Mizzou and Arizona.

 

Honestly, I can see Pac-12 a 2 bid league because they're a jumbled mess with Arizona in and whoever wins the Pac-12 tourney.

buddhafrog

March 7th, 2013 at 3:20 AM ^

If we win, then whoever wins the BTT (if it's one of the the season co-champs), should, and in my opinion, will be the #1 overall.  If we beat Ind Sunday, but lose in the BTT, we might get the 2nd B1G #1 seed, but very likely, we'll be the top #2 seed.  We will be ranked top 4, but it will depend whether they want to put two B1G teams as #1 seeds.