well that's just, like, your opinion, man
- Member for
- 5 years 28 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|28 weeks 6 days ago||You sir, are an||
You sir, are an idiot.
|39 weeks 4 days ago||Lol back. Top three||
Lol back. Top three companies: Walmart, Exxon, Chevron. The lowest employees in those companies are paid little to nothing. If you think pointing to energy companies will serve your argument, while you're on Google, feel free to search the oil atrocities taking place in Africa. Then come back and tell me that those companies' lowest employees are paid based on the amount of revenue those companies turn.
|39 weeks 4 days ago||No offense, but literally||
No offense, but literally none of that has anything to do with whether or not players should be paid. You don't get paid in this country for being poor. This argument is actually one of my biggest pet peeves about this entire topic. Name me one company in the entire country that makes large profits and whose lowest level workers are not underprivileged, underpaid, and uneducated. That's like saying that McDonald's workers should be paid millions because the product they create is worth billions and they come from underprivileged areas.
|41 weeks 2 days ago||I'm not sure the reason for||
I'm not sure the reason for all these poster's backlash. I agree with her. I understand the "market" economics at hand, but college football and professional football are supposed to exist in separate markets altogether. The more that college athletics increase salaries, publicity, etc., the more that the line between amateur and professional atheltics decreases.
Name another amateur sport that pays its coaches as much as college football. What's more, the salaries beat out most professional sports. Notre Dame's new Showtime series is yet another example of these blurred lines.
Yet people wonder why these high school kids act like divas and celebrities--its because we give them that status. They are surrounded by all the same components that celebrities and professional athletes are surrounded by. In the end, it will be College Football's own fault when the term "amateur" gets removed from its title and it's left paying 17 year old kids millions of dollars.
|42 weeks 6 days ago||Rawls wasn't the issue here.||
Rawls wasn't the issue here. I'm not sure what it was at a threshold level, but ultimately it came down to coaching in some form (whether of the running backs, OL, or both). Our backfield recruits were, IMO, the best in the nation in terms of prospects. We had Justice Hayes (4 star, #3 overall RB), Derrick Green (5 star, #1 overall RB), Dennis Norfleet (4 Star, #5 overall RB) and Fitz (4 Star, #8 overall RB). And who was our best? Deveon. I'm not one of those persons who is all about stars and recruiting, but those numbers tell me that either every analyst got 5 different players wrong, or our coaches couldn't develop talent. I'm going with the latter. Just look at the players that were similarly ranked in their respective classes and how they panned out. Derrick Green is a perfect example. The number 2 RB in his class was Greg Bryant who went to ND (and now left for academic reasons). Bryant is head and shoulders above green in terms of development and play. These aren't coincidences people. There's a common denominator.
|43 weeks 4 days ago||I've posted similar articles||
I've posted similar articles before, but every coach of a physical sport should require the players to do yoga. My rugby team saw a rash of injuries one year and decided to institute yoga the following season. Since then, we've seen our injuries progressively decline by large amounts. Hopefully all of M Football is doing it, not just the O-Line.
|51 weeks 3 days ago||Vivant is the old church||
Vivant is the old church renovated as a brewery in GR. I think I've been to just about every decent brewery in Michigan and that might be my favorite, followed shortly thereafter by Greenbush
|1 year 16 weeks ago||I'm curious if there is any||
I'm curious if there is any cryptic message in this tweet. I think so. He's well known for doing that in the past. This is a rather random thought that doesn't make sense. Think: how does Michigan = Prestige WorldWide? That's not a normal comparison one would make. And why did he capitlize "wide" at the end? If I had to guess, he's sending some sort of message with the use of the word "wide," but I'm not sure what it is exactly.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Mine are||
|1 year 28 weeks ago||Rex Ryan||
|1 year 29 weeks ago||That SF gate writer||
That SF gate writer completely misses the mark in his article. Jim Harbaugh's tweets aren't nonsensensical inner thoughts. In the past, he's actually put cryptic messages regarding the Stanford football program in his tweets. Here's an SI article I remember reading in 2010 about Harbaugh's Twitter account. Those thinking his Twitter account at UM will be pointless to follow should give this article a read:
|1 year 29 weeks ago||One point of disagreement.||
I'm just as psyched for Harbaugh as anyone, but I have to disagree with one point Brian made:
"When Brady Hoke left Ball State after their breakout year, the Cardinals went with an entirely new staff and immediately collapsed back to the pack. When Harbaugh left Stanford, they hired his offensive coordinator, attempted to preserve everything he'd brought the program, and ripped off three consecutive 11-win seasons."
That's not entirely true. Stan Parrish, Hoke's prior OC, became the head coach. After Hoke left, Parrish bumped the running backs coach up to OC and kept the Offensive Tackles and Tight Ends coach as well as the DL coach. Pretty much everyone else left with Hoke to SDSU.
|1 year 30 weeks ago||It's pretty easy. Don't||
It's pretty easy. Don't click.
At the end of the day, reporters are measured by how many views they get. Websites like ESPN, SI, CBSSports, etc., are no different than Facebook. They earn revenue based on advertisements which are priced off of views and clicks.
Don't pander to them by clicking on their articles, now or in the future. They don't care if they are right or wrong. They only care if they get you to read their article, because that determines their value to their employer. Moreover, the more people who click and read these dumb articles only encourage this type of behavior.
Especially when someone posts the article in MgoBlog, just read that person's synopsis or the comments to get a good grasp on the article instead of going to the article directly.
|1 year 30 weeks ago||This.||
We're basically recruiting Harbaugh as our next head coach. Therefore, along the lines of the hundreds of posts I've seen on this site regarding high school recruits, I want a guy who wants to be here. If Harbaugh is taking Michigan by default because the bears or falcons job aren't open, then I'd rather him not come. All in or not at all.
|1 year 31 weeks ago||I imagine it's 49 mill/8yrs||
I imagine it's 49 mill/8yrs and that includes incentives. So in other words, it'll be closer to 5 mill a year with the possibility to make it six depending on performance. That would not only make sense economically, but it would explain the outrageous figure.
|1 year 31 weeks ago||It won't mean anything to||
It won't mean anything to UMHS because the funds are completely separated. No revenue from athletics is ever spent on hospital facilities.
|1 year 32 weeks ago||Urban Meyer to ND||
There was a time during the Weis era where ND fans were obsessed with Urban Meyer going there that was pretty similar. Flight tracking, rumors, etc. I don't know that it was THIS bad or constant, but there also wasn't as much social media or message board fodder back then either.
|1 year 32 weeks ago||This was already posted two||
This was already posted two threads below! Noob.
|1 year 33 weeks ago||Like I said, I don't disagree||
Like I said, I don't disagree with the sentiments. But I also believe that every fan, just like every player, person, alumni, etc., has the right to support the team in whatever way they see fit. I don't think fans need RVB telling them what they do or do not do in terms of supporting certain hires is right or wrong and/or with or against. Supporting be program and supporting a hiring decision are two different things. People always support the program, but do so based on what they believe is best for the program. If you don't believe a coaching hire is in the program's best interest, you don't need to conform our opinion or risk be called a "muggle."
|1 year 33 weeks ago||Then you get the khakis, then||
Then you get the khakis, then you get the girls...
|1 year 33 weeks ago||Personally, I actually don't||
Personally, I actually don't like this letter. For one, because there's no reason this statement can't be made to the players directly versus a social medium. And second, because reading a letter that seems like an "official statement" of sorts on behalf of player alumni, akin to something that would be released by a university department, feels like it continues to drive separation between the program and fans. For me at least. I'm not saying I disagree with the letter's sentiment, or what it asks of fans for the new coaching hire, but just because it feels like something that says "this is the official stance on the coaching search process, and you as a fan have no say in what the proper stance is or should be. If you disagree with this letter, you're in the wrong." Maybe that's just me.
|1 year 33 weeks ago||I'll be honest, Cowherd's||
I'll be honest, Cowherd's comments don't make me too excited. First he said the coach would be a great fit. Then when asked if it was Schiano, he said "No, I think he'd also be a great fit, but it's not him." If that's his judgement of "great fit," I seriously hope he's wrong about whoever it is.
|1 year 37 weeks ago||^ This. That's an even||
^ This. That's an even better idea. As I stated below, I think it's ok to ask Harbaugh's input moreso once he's already hired. Hackett could inform him during the interview process that if Harbaugh takes the position, they would include his input on the new AD.
|1 year 37 weeks ago||The best point.||
I actually thought the most persuasive part of this article was the following:
"After all, Harbaugh could reportedly leave San Francisco because of friction with the team general manager Trent Baalke, so putting him at ease that he would not have the same issues in Ann Arbor would be a substantial benefit."
This is important for two reasons. First, it shows that Harbaugh would leave a perfect fit--which San Fran is NFL-wise for him, regardless of success, because of management. Second, if he's willing to leave because of management, he may be willing to commit based on it as well.
With the caveat that the list is narrowed, I think asking him for input isn't all that bad of an idea. The issue is that he's not the coach here yet. So the conversation wouldn't just be "who should we go with?" Instead, it would be "would you come here if we went with X over Y?" There is a very different dynamic between those two questions.
|1 year 38 weeks ago||One thing I've consistently||
One thing I've consistently noticed as becoming progressively worse, which I think can account for TONS of different issues, is angles and form.
Watch the defense try to tackle players. They consistently take the wrong angle, and try to tackle across the body. Not only is it a great way to miss or get beat on a tackle, it's a great way to get injured as well. The only player I saw show good form and angle recognition on Saturday was Lewis, who caused a fumble, by using good form. Other than that, everyone was atrocious. Watch this video with Pete Carroll on proper tackling, then watch Michigan try to tackle, and you'll see what I mean. Michigan constantly tries tackling guys by going high, bear hugging them, and concentrating too much on trying to pull the ball out instead of getting the guy down.
When it comes to the offense, it's the same deal. The running backs consistently take the wrong angles and make the wrong cuts. I can't remember who it was last week, but there was a player that had a wide open path if he would have just run off of his blocker's backside. For some reason, he took the inside instead and was forced out of bounds. The backs just run into holes that aren't there instead of making the proper read as to whether the hole will develop or whether they should bounce outside.
Finally, the offenseive playcalling in the first half of last game was ATROCIOUS. I couldn't believe the commentators were praising Nussmeier towards the end of the game. It was clear early on that Michigan's OLine was not going to put up a lot of protection against MSU. An incredibly easy way out of that situation is to call quick slant routes or WR screens. I don't recall seeing one of those until late in the 4th quarter. Instead, Nussmeier was calling deep plays that took forever to develop, and shockingly, a flea flicker at one point. When the OLine can't protect more than 3 seconds, why in the world are you calling a flea ficker that takes forever to develop? It was infuriating.
|1 year 38 weeks ago||Gary F'in Patterson||
Gary F'in Patterson
|1 year 38 weeks ago||I thought he had some pretty||
I thought he had some pretty good info, actually. People are downplaying his comments on DB's relationship with Harbaugh and Miles. His statement was in fact that he "has it on very high authority" that Harbaugh and Miles would "never" work under Brandon.
|1 year 38 weeks ago||Gary Patterson openly said on||
Gary Patterson openly said on the Dan Patrick show that he would consider the Michigan job if they offered it to him.
|1 year 38 weeks ago||I disagree with the OP...||
I disagree with the OP... BECAUSE you have nothing to lose, all the more reason to fire him. It's sort of like dating a girl even though you know you're going to break up with her down the line... Looking back on it, why put it off?
|1 year 38 weeks ago||Except that nobody knew Ed O||
Except that nobody knew Ed O was Ed O until you got rid of Kiffin... And to answer your question, I think either coordinator could fit the role.