Where should the MMB travel now that Notre Dame is off the schedule?

Submitted by ThadMattasagoblin on

With the football team no longer traveling to Notre Dame, and the MSU and Ohio games being moved to the same year, the Michigan Marching Band no longer has a trip on odd years. This got me thinking about a new location that the band should travel to. For me, I believe that the bad should travel to Penn State every odd year. What are your thoughts?

Indiana Blue

March 13th, 2014 at 3:42 PM ^

at State College were all Homecoming games and their Alumni band took 2nd billing.  I really doubt the band would have PSU as an option.  Unfotunately, I was at all 3 of those game - but the drugs I'm taking are starting help me forget the games ... 

It'll probably be Rutgers ... 

Go Blue!

Bando Calrissian

March 13th, 2014 at 8:43 PM ^

State College is tricky because they require the band to actually sit in the stands. In 2006, the MMB was slated to go because the football staff specifically asked for it. The travel and lodging was completely set up, the money was there, everything was all in line. PSU put the kibosh on it because they didn't have seating. If the MMB were to do State College (and it would be tough, considering it's a pretty lengthy drive each way and flying is cost prohibitive), the decision would have to be made quite early so PSU can plan on it.

To give a little background, B1G rules always allow for opposing bands or sanctioned pep bands (i.e., the MMB can't just informally send 15 kids with regular tickets and their instruments--it has to be approved), but it's on the host school to both approve it and have somewhere to put them. No one is ever going to flat-out say no, but there are legitimate reasons why proposed visits don't work out, for one reason or another.

jmblue

March 13th, 2014 at 4:56 PM ^

Yeah, we're basically going to alternate awesome and terrible home schedules every year from here on out, if the Big Ten doesn't somehow rectify this.  I don't understand how they couldn't figure out how to avoid this.  Someone posted earlier pointing out that all they had to do was flip a couple of games (I think involving Indiana and Minnesota) and they could have had us hosting MSU next year.

dahblue

March 13th, 2014 at 5:03 PM ^

Like most things, I blame this on Dave Brandon.  He previously expressed his ability to have input on scheduling (like the OSU game) and yet Michigan is, by far, the biggest loser in the new scheduling.  I think we have two double-road games; maybe one other team has one...and no one is doubled up at a rival.  

jmblue

March 13th, 2014 at 5:21 PM ^

I don't know if Brandon could have done anything.  In the case of the OSU game, both schools were crying foul, and that was the conference's marquee matchup anyway - the media thought it was sacrilege to move the Game, too.  In the case of Michigan-MSU, MSU probably has no problem with the game flipping over like this, and neutral observers probably don't care that much either way.  I don't think the Big Ten intended to screw it up like this, but they probably also didn't really care to rectify it, either.

 

 

Bando Calrissian

March 13th, 2014 at 9:04 PM ^

I'd be inclined to agree, but my impression was he used a lot of his sway in that respect, what, a year before by demanding both that Michigan and Ohio State be in separate divisions and that The Game remain the last week of the season. DB went to bat hard on that. Sure, we're Michigan, but you can only go into the conference meetings swinging your dick around so many times before the other guys really start resenting you more than they already do.

cutter

March 13th, 2014 at 5:08 PM ^

I wouldn't get too upset about having back-to-back games in East Lansing as a byproduct of the confernece realigning and expanding.  How do you make it a non-issue?  Win those games.

Here's a plus side to the conference realignment--annual games with Penn State.  That didn't always happen when the conference was at eleven teams and it certainly wasn't assured when Nebraska joined the conference either.

Michigan's Eastern Division Big Ten games are as follows for odd and even numbered years in the upcoming seasons:

Odd - Ohio State, Michigan State, Rutgers, at Penn State, at Indiana, at Maryland

Even - at Ohio State, at Michigan State, at Rutgers, Penn State, Indiana, Maryland

It's clear the conference ranked Michigan's top two opponents in the Eastern Division as Ohio State and Penn State--that's why those two games are home and away.  I also suspect they wanted UM to play on the East Coast once per year, so that's why Rutgers and Maryland alternate as home and away games.

That left Indiana and Michigan State as the two remaining teams.  I suspect the reason why they opted to have OSU/MSU either both at home or on the road is that it synched up with adding a major Western Division opponent, i.e., Wisconsin or Nebraska to balance out the home/road schedule.  Here's Michigan's conference schedules from 2016 to 2019 when the Big Ten goes to a nine game slate (W stands for Western Division):

2016 (Home) - Penn State, Wisconsin (W), Maryland, Indiana, Illinois (W)

2016 (Away) - at Ohio State, at Michigan State, at Rutgers, at Iowa (W)

2017 (Home) - Ohio State, Michigan State, Rutgers, Minnesota (W)

2017 (Away) - at Penn State, at Wisconsin (W), at Maryland, at Indiana, at Purdue (W)

2018 (Home) - Penn State, Wisconsin (W), Nebraska (W), Maryland, Indiana

2018 (Away) - at Ohio State, at Michigan State, at Rutgers, at Northwestern (W)

2019 (Home) - Ohio State, Michigan State, Rutgers, Iowa (W)

2019 (Away) - at Penn State, at Wisconsin (W), at Maryland, at Indiana, at Illinois (W)

The portion of the schedule that Brandon can control is the non-confernce portion of it.  The 2014 slate doesn't look very impressive and it looks even worse because the home game with Michigan State was moved back to East Lansing.

But from 2015 to 2019, you'll note that there are no MAC teams on the schedule (Ball State was moved to the 2020 season).  UM is moving away from Miami (Ohio) and Bowling Green to play Hawaii, UNLV, Cincinnati, etc.  Competition wise, that's something of a step up for the teams on the lower end of the non-conference schedule scale. 

 

 

 

 

 

M Fanfare

March 13th, 2014 at 2:42 PM ^

The MMB tried to go to Penn State several times in the early '00s. The issue was that PSU wouldn't give them sufficient seating in the stands and wouldn't put them on the field. Maybe with new leadership they'll allow the MMB to go there, though it is a very long trip by bus.

If not PSU they'll probably travel to wherever is closest, since shorter trips are cheaper and the AD foots most of the bill. West Lafayette, Bloomington, and Evanston will be the likely destinations.

M Fanfare

March 13th, 2014 at 2:44 PM ^

I also read somewhere that Maryland doesn't allow opposing bands in their stadium, which is supremely stupid. Maybe the conference will force them to drop that idiocy.

WolverineHistorian

March 13th, 2014 at 2:46 PM ^

I'd be shocked if it weren't Penn State. But Penn State is weird. On two different occasions, the MMB had requested to travel to Beaver Stadium for some huge games and PSU said no both times. They said yes in 1999 and 2001 but no in 1997 and 2006. So I guess it will depend on what mood they are in. They never say no to OSU's band going to their place.

Bando Calrissian

March 13th, 2014 at 8:46 PM ^

2001 was extra messed up because the MMB committed to going, then all of the sudden Athletics agreed to the Cold War on the same day and wanted the whole band there. The MMB had to send a pathetically small pep band to State College, and the rest of the MMB to the Cold War. The only problem was the MMB had agreed to do a fundraiser concert at some high school in Pennsylvania, and the school was really banking on the money it would have brought. The MMB cancelled, they cried foul, and the whole thing turned into a press release crossfire between Michigan and this random high school in Bumblefuck, PA.