Webber Takes Shot at Rose Over Fab Five Doc

Submitted by Geaux_Blue on
Interviewed on Dan Patrick, he was asked if he liked it. He intimated he wasn't asked to be a part of the doc until a week left to finish it and found that the focus lingered a bit too heavily on (not a direct quote) "people looking to regain their importance" with highlights that embellished certain players' scoring, etc. Noted he didn't want to be above the group but intimates "somebody wanted to be Hollywood and make it about them." That the team never wanted to be loved but the doc seemed to be focused on winning that love and how someone is now trying to be a martyr and get glory. Left Golden State to be with Howard on the worst team in the league due to a contract dispute with Golden State.

He's writing a book (which includes a significant portion on Izzo interestingly enough, and credits him for recruiting his brother and used the word "love" to describe him) but this definitely shifts the focus off of Webber and on to Rose if you take him at his word. Also states Izzo is one of the best men he knows. Was asked if he had a do-over he refused to answer due to the lack of interest in "answering honestly in the mood he's in." Sounds like Webber may even have regrets going Blue.

This could be a big topic moving forward

NYWolverine

May 13th, 2015 at 12:31 PM ^

I wish people would stop focusing so heavily on the Fab 5. Had there never been the fiasco, the best case scenario would have been an elevation of the program, not of 5 individuals. Possibly a sustained legacy of tournament appearances; or it may have been very short-lived. But the Fab 5 would have been remembered as nothing more and nothing short of a great team of young stars who made it to the Final Four and came real close. Period. 

Unfortunately, it's just not a legacy that should be prominently elevated under the circumstances. Just my opinion, but it's too muddy. You can't crystalize it. It's marred by contraversy. It's marketable only to a select group; a documentary legend, but not a triumph. It creates polarity, which isn't good for Michigan. Ergo, it should not be a focus.

To some, it will simply prompt the same response as when someone offers a conversation about the Bonds/McGuire/Sosa HR record march; or whether Pete Rose should be in the Hall of Fame; or whether Joe Paterno's statue should be returned to a place of prominence; or whether USC's 2003 football program deserves more recognition. 

Do these conversations invoke a sense of nostalgia? Sure. But in much the same way a married man or woman recalls a girl or guy (s)he once dated, had some fun with, and then moved on from. Right? You're either with someone for a season, for a reason, or for life. The Fab 5 was that truly hot mate you dated for a season.

"Yea, we dated for a few years in the 90s. It was cool; we started a few trends, did some great things together, some things we regretted later. I'm better for it, and I hope they can say the same. If you see them, tell them I say hi. And Go Blue".

Blueverine

May 13th, 2015 at 2:02 PM ^

an apology from Webber.  Until that happens, not really interested in this guy's beefs about anything having to do with Michigan or his teammates. He has never felt inclined to own up to his indiscretions. No matter how much he and thousands of other top athletes were exploited by the NCAA and regardless of his need for Ed Martin's cash, I would think he'd have gottenr some perspective and wisdom over time and cleared the air.

Sorry, Chris. No sympathy here.

RoseBowlBound

May 13th, 2015 at 12:48 PM ^

People disagree all the time.  I think they are still pretty civil about it, even though they clearly aren't budging regarding their points of view.  There are some extremely polarizing events that affected both of them over the years (cough, cough...Ed Martin).  And I could see Weber not wanted to touch that issue in the documentary based on how Jalen was going to film his point of view on it.

AlwaysBlue

May 13th, 2015 at 1:01 PM ^

charismatic, smart man. He also is willing to disassociate himself from himself if it means saving face or manipulating his audience. It's always about being taken advantage of...Martin was about his inner city background (which he embellishes), Ann Arbor was about the school making money off of him while he didn't have any, the documentary was about another player promoting himself. Jalen is a self promoter in a way but he owns the biography Webber advertises. Jalen also owns the rules of the street when it comes to standing with your gang.

Gobgoblue

May 13th, 2015 at 1:17 PM ^

I'm too young to remember the Fab 5 and I don't know much about Webber. Jalen just annoys me because he's constantly talking about the Fab 5 on ESPN even when it doesn't relate to the topic.

CR7

May 13th, 2015 at 1:35 PM ^

For a team and a group of players that won absolutely fuck all, they're in the news far too much. Are they still going to 'feuding' in their sixties about this irrelevant bullshit?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ST3

May 13th, 2015 at 2:10 PM ^

Most of it, anyways. It was very interesting to me to the point that I stayed in the car listening to another five minutes after I arrived at work this morning. What Geaux_Blue left out of his recap was a section of the interview where Patrick is asking Webber about the documentary and he says, "Clown..." He pauses, and then starts a new thought. Normally Patrick follows up on that kind of stuff, but it was more of a softball type interview. Dan just had to ask the questions and let Chris take it from there. I can't remember the exact context and phrasing, but it was clear he was referring to Jalen as a clown, and that image of Jalen with his Wolverine hat (that plastic wolverine thing he wears) and baseball bat popped into my mind. It's clear they don't get along, but I don't have to tell you all that.

MGlobules

May 13th, 2015 at 4:39 PM ^

Anyone that wants to be wowed should go look at some youtube highlights of the guy. Bright person, wonderful interview. But he is digging himself a hole by not just letting some of this stuff go.

And intimating that you might rather have gone to State? Already too many haters out there. . . won't go over well.

pdgoblue25

May 13th, 2015 at 4:01 PM ^

The National Championship game in a Michigan hat?

I can't deny his business strategy, be vague or say nothing at all, and then make people buy the book.

Doughboy1917

May 13th, 2015 at 5:50 PM ^

After reading that, like Webber, I too wish he'd gone to State.  

I can't forget watching him lie to a room full of people while we were both students at Michigan. He noted that kids were paying good money to buy replicas of his jersey while he couldn't afford to eat at McDonalds. We later learned that wasn't true. Ed Martin was giving him $500 (or more) handshakes.

Webber embarrassed himself and the University. He's refused to acknowledge it and refused to apologize. Now he hints that he might have prefered to have attended MSU? I don't know what to say other than, "I wish you had, Chris."

BayWolves

May 13th, 2015 at 7:18 PM ^

Dude is bitter and the Izzo shit seems ridiculous. I still like him though. It was awesome watching him play.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Seth

May 14th, 2015 at 12:17 AM ^

Because we were doing HTTV with that group I was asked to participate in the advance conversations that led to Webber's book. It's going to rival Pete Rose for most fictional biography in sports. You'll note nobody would publish it except the creep who promised to get HTTV in every store to get us to print way too many copies, then let your books sit on the shelves for weeks and sold diddly shit.

Webber is going to end up with a lot of boxes of unsold books at his own expense. The two deserve each other.