chunkums

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:36 PM ^

What mental gymnastics do you think I'm employing? Do you think Pete Carroll's historic USC death machine is the same thing as Clay Helton's clown car? Chip Kelly's perennial juggernaut is the same as Mark Helfrich's 4-8 implosion or Willie Taggart's 7-5 team with a losing conference record? That's what Petersen beat out when he went to the playoffs and conference championship.  His Pac 12 championships all culminated in bowl losses. Two of them were to the Big Ten champions.

UM_Ftown

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:52 PM ^

You can’t say “Harbaugh would have done this if” because it’s not a fact and a wishful thinking opinion. 

Facts are Harbaugh was in the Pac and didn’t win anything, he’s now at Michigan and hasn’t won anything. So yes Petersen has accomplished more. Keep rearranging that bar all over the place. 

chunkums

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:59 PM ^

Again, Petersen is a good coach. I was replying to cube's post because cube simultaneously rants about Harbaugh being terrible while calling Petersen great, when he would be the first person shrieking for Petersen to be fired after going 7-5 if it was his team. 

Facts are, this is a message board and most posts are opinions/speculation based on the data we have. The data we have is that the Pac 12 has been awful for almost all of Petersen's tenure. USC and Oregon have been straight up bad. Gushing over Petersen while criticizing Harbaugh when not considering the context is dumb. Harbaugh coached at a historically dreadful program when Oregon and USC simultaneously had their best coaches of all time.

bronxblue

December 2nd, 2019 at 3:30 PM ^

You're being intentionally dense, but just for fun I decided to look up the Pac-12 for the past 3 years (during which Peterson won his 2 conference titles).  In 2016 there were...5 teams that finished in the top 25, two in the top 10 (USC and Washington), which Washington having lost to USC.  In 2017 (a year Washington went 10-3 and didn't win the conference) 3 teams finished in the top 25 (including UW) and none in the top 10.  2018 the same story; Washington finished 10-4 and two teams finished in the top-25, WSU (10) and UW (13).  So that's 3 teams total over 3 years in the final top 10.

In Harbaugh's last 3 years at Michigan, the conference has had 14 teams finish in the top 25, including 7 top-10 finishes.  

It's always fun when people complain about bar because it's almost always because they don't spend any time thinking about what it's measuring.

Newton Gimmick

December 2nd, 2019 at 4:00 PM ^

The Valentian grass-is-greener hot takes on this board are way way up after any Michigan loss.

One of those broad strokes is treating all divisions in college football equally.  Petersen's main rivals were a gimmicky Wazoo team with no defense, and an Oregon team that had cratered by 2016.

Hire Bronco Mendenhall!  At least he won a division!

chunkums

December 2nd, 2019 at 4:02 PM ^

Let's not pretend all ranked teams have the same worth. Ohio State has been one of the top 3-4 programs since Meyer arrived at Ohio State. That's the obstacle to winning a B1G championship for Michigan. If you don't beat Ohio State, you don't win the Big Ten. Period.

Also, I'm not sure why you think your argument is helping you. You keep including Washington when you're counting ranked teams as if beating Washington is something Washington had to overcome. What I'm seeing is a conference that had one other ranked team in 2017 and one other ranked team in 2018. Neither team even cracked the top 15 SP+. The Pac 12 has been very weak. Here are the final AP rankings that came out after the bowl games, with SP+ added to show the weakness of the conference.

2016-2017: This was a solid season

USC (#3 AP and #8 SP+) - This was a loss

Stanford (#12 AP and #14 SP+)

Colorado (#17 AP and #53 SP+)

Utah (#12 AP and #35 SP+)

 

2017-2018

USC (#12 AP and #17 SP+) - Never played

Lost to B1G champion in the bowl

 

2018-2019

Wazzu (#10 AP and #31 SP+)

Lost to B1G champion in the bowl

 

 

iMBlue2

December 2nd, 2019 at 6:01 PM ^

Not for nothing it was he did it at Washington which isn’t a perennial superpower with a great recruiting base.   I’d say Michigan has much more in the way of brand name and facilities.  I’m a Jim Harbaugh fan and he’s done well to bring the program back from where it had fallen to.  I’d rather be worrying about how they’re going to beat oSU than how are they going to beat Indiana, Purdue, and Illinois.  

MDwolverine

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:48 PM ^

His Final Stanford team finished the regular season 5th with 1 loss @ #2 Oregon and were ranked behind a 2-loss Wisconsin team. It's really not that inconceivable to think a committee would have voted them in.

What I find astounding is how simple-minded some people are when it comes to analyzing performance. You act like every program is on an equal playing field and therefore context doesn't matter.

KO Stradivarius

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:55 PM ^

Mike, I've read many of your posts which are right up there with the lowest form of pathetic douchebag trolling that ever existed.  May you find peace in your life, possibly rethink your priorities maybe, just a bit?  God Bless your cotton-picking maize and blue heart.  

RGard

December 2nd, 2019 at 3:29 PM ^

No worries.  I just have fun pointing it out to folks here and then reading Mikey's witty ripostes for being called out for his duplicity.  

Now he has to google 'ripostes' and 'duplicity' in order to figure out which misogynist, homophobic or transphobic response to use.

Jmer

December 2nd, 2019 at 2:02 PM ^

Only 55 years old. Which is fairly young in the coaching world. Will coach through the bowl game but they have already announced that their D coordinator will be their head coach for next year.