Mr. Elbel

July 27th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^

Generally, making a post with a title and lack of info that make me nervous to click on your link in the first place isn't going to get you far in life.

Wolverine In Iowa 68

July 27th, 2017 at 3:59 PM ^

don't know how to make an informative title, you don't know how to structure a good intro...basically, the title should be " you don't know how to make an appropriate post in any way shape or form".

FIFY

Blueblood2991

July 27th, 2017 at 4:05 PM ^

I don't know who Tyler Duffy is, but he's not internet-ing correctly. Rational thoughts and stats are no way to drive up clicks and become a famous "personality".

I love the way he ends the article though

 

This should be reiterated. Harbaugh is not looking up to James Franklin. He beat Franklin by 39 points last season (could have been worse if Michigan had not let up). Franklin was so desperate in that game he kicked a field goal down 28-0 in the third quarter, to ensure that his team scored points.

GnuBlue

July 27th, 2017 at 4:41 PM ^

...and that JH has a warming seat when the team performs poorly..It will make the victories all the more sweet, especially at Penn State. PSU reminds me of the soft spread teams like Oregon that got repeatedly overpowered by strong defenses like Stanford, OSU, and LSU..I'm hoping the James Franklin hype train continues until the Michigan game.

Boulderine

July 27th, 2017 at 4:55 PM ^

Whoever thinks Harbaugh is (or could be) "wearing thin" with fans is a fool. He's put Michigan back in the upper echelon of CFB! He'll face criticism when it's due (e.g., put in a goddamn punt protect against MSU in 2015!), but most fans know he's far and away the best option available.

dipshit moron

July 27th, 2017 at 5:32 PM ^

see you did it to. repeating what others have said instead of coming to your own conclusion. msu would have never came close to blocking that punt if the punter doesnt drop the snap. they blocked it fine. watch it again.

Boulderine

July 27th, 2017 at 6:29 PM ^

What do you mean, "I did it [too]"? Just pause the video at six seconds using the youtube link below and tell me who the Michigan guy at the top of the screen is blocking. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7vsJYe7kwM.

I agree it wouldn't have mattered if Blake hadn't dropped the snap, but he would have had a better chance to get it off after the drop with better blocking. 

That IS my own conclusion. 

XiX

July 27th, 2017 at 7:05 PM ^

If the punt was blocked without the drop I would agree but there was plenty of time to get the punt away even with the extra rusher. He could have even got it away with a bobbled snap but he dropped it and it bounced forward towards the rush.

If you want to lay blame on the staff in any way it's that O'Neil may not have been properly instructed on what to do in that situation (fall on it) but, then again, you never really know how a guy will respond in that situation.

H8anythingState

July 27th, 2017 at 8:43 PM ^

I thorough believe once they saw MSU's formation to block the punt it was too late to change our formation. Could not switch to max protection because of lack of time outs. Jim would have called one.

dipshit moron

July 27th, 2017 at 7:30 PM ^

nobody for msu on that side of the ball comes close to blocking that kick. and by the way only two michigan players released down field, somebody has to cover the kick, dont they?

Blueblood2991

July 27th, 2017 at 7:39 PM ^

Not in that situation. MSU didn't have anyone back to return it. Just about every other coach would've done a max protect punt. Get the punt off, then release and go chase the ball. Or just kick it out of bounds. 

Boulderine

July 27th, 2017 at 7:56 PM ^

You initially attacked my opinion as simply parroting somebody else's. You are definitively wrong on that account given that I came to that opinion on my own. If you don't think putting more bodies in front of MSU's bullrush would have helped Blake even marginally, that is your opinion. Again, it's ok to disagree about the play, but don't assume you know the basis for my argument.

Larry Appleton

July 27th, 2017 at 5:11 PM ^

Is there ANY evidence that Harbaugh's relationship with Stanford was anything but fine throughout his tenure there?

Albatross

July 27th, 2017 at 10:59 PM ^

Thames stated future predictions as fact and based his conclusions on his own level of tolerance for Harbaugh and his antics. Duffy uses the Hoke era as a barameter on how Michigan coaches should be measured moving forward. He forgot to mention Hoke was a terrible coach who got the least out of the considerable talent he amassed. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Harbaugh will be measured on his own results. In the end, a 3-loss season, third place finish in your division, and a loss to OSU should be the floor at Michigan. Where Harbaugh takes Michigan from the baseline of the last two seasons is what will define his legacy.

Stringer Bell

July 27th, 2017 at 11:06 PM ^

He wasn't really using Hoke as the standard, just putting Harbaugh's results in the context of the aftermath of the Hoke era.  Harbaugh had to completely change the trajectory of the program that had been going downwards for 4 straight years, while simultaneously changing the culture.  That he did this with immediate results in the form of back to back seasons with double digit wins shows that he's doing a fantastic job and any journalist questioning the job he's doing is merely doing so to provide hot takes and generate clicks.  It's sad but articles like Thamel's are what most journalism has come to these days, just a bunch of baseless speculation meant to elicit a strong reaction with no actual analysis or reporting.

nerv

July 27th, 2017 at 11:24 PM ^

That was a good read and a great article. It is pretty easy to get over the title of the post. But hey, mgoblog's gotta mgoblog.