Technical Foul on Izzo - why not our ball??

Submitted by Scoman169 on January 5th, 2020 at 4:59 PM

Probably not worthy of its own thread, but we were wondering this at home.  Why no possession after Izzo's T?  DeJulius was fouled on the shot and got his 2 free throws. I believe Wagner shot the technical foul shots.  Anyone know the rule? I've played a lot of ball and know the rules pretty well...but never seen that.

A Lot of Milk

January 5th, 2020 at 5:05 PM ^

Do technicals even award possession? I remember distinctly instances in the past where MSU was on offense, Izzo screamed at a ref and got a tech, we shot free throws, and then MSU inbounded from the sideline to resume their possession

To answer your question, I think because we had possession, even though we were already shooting free throws, you don't get an extra possession

SpartanInA2

January 5th, 2020 at 5:29 PM ^

After a technical foul, the other team gets 2 free throws and then the game is resumed at the point of interruption. For Howard's technical foul, MSU was bringing the ball up the court. So MSU shot the tech free throws and then got the ball out of bounds to continue their possession. For Izzo's technical foul, UM was about to shoot free throws. So they shot the tech free throws and then proceeded with the free throws from the regular foul.

Scoman169

January 5th, 2020 at 6:08 PM ^

This explains it.  

NBA for as long as I can remember was 1 free throw and the game just picks up where it left off.  

College must've changed the rule, and it may have been a while ago, but I never realized it. Crazy! 

Thanks guys!

bcnihao

January 5th, 2020 at 7:31 PM ^

Bringing up a painful incident, but . . . .  Remember the NC game against UNC, when--with time running out--Chris Webber had the ball and called a time out that the good guys didn't have? It was a technical foul, with the result that UNC was awarded 2 foul shouts and possession.  Which doesn't seem to fit with the very reasonable explanations others have offered here.

Edit:  Sorry; didn't see snarling wolverine's comment before I posted.

Boner Stabone

January 5th, 2020 at 8:42 PM ^

I was glad they Teed him up.  He goes angry elf Miles Finch at least once a game.  Glad to see the refs are not letting him get away with his shenanigans anymore.  He had the same thing happen in the Duke game earlier in the year.

Also, I think his son Steve who entered the game at the end may be shorter than his dad.  How does a 5'7" kid like that even sniff the court at the DI level?  My 5 year old son might be able to take him in one on one right now.

CursedWolverine

January 6th, 2020 at 9:59 AM ^

I mean it's literally because Izzo is his Dad. He averaged less than 5 minutes and 2pts per game a small school so it's not like normal walk-ons who are typically star-ish level in high school:
https://www.maxpreps.com/athlete/steven-izzo/p3tL2c5oEeeT-Oz0u-e-FA/basketball/stats.htm

But more power to him, when your Dad has an all-consuming career like that, it's got to be cool to to spend 20+ hours a week with him.