Sankey (SEC Commish) thinks the season is in jeopardy.

Submitted by canzior on November 12th, 2020 at 7:52 AM

USA Today’s Wolken contends that SEC Commish Sankey’s frankness about the current state of the FB season is cause for concern. “He is the Dikembe Mutombo of swatting away hypotheticals, and his answers to most questions are meant to be as satisfying as 50-calorie beer. So when Sankey suggests that the college football season is in some real trouble, as he did Wednesday during a media conference call, it’s probably wise to pay attention.” Additionally, Wolken notes that “with the coronavirus still in charge, there’s no guarantee we won’t be [postponing or canceling games] again next week and the week after that.” He concludes: “We don’t remotely have control of this situation as a country, and we certainly don’t in college football. The fact someone as cautious as Sankey acknowledged how fragile the next month or so could be is a flashing red siren for the sport. The finish line of the season may not be that many weeks away, but getting there is going to be a white-knuckle ride.” 

This is interesting as we are seeing more games canceled. I don't know if there's a point at which anyone will say screw it, especially at this point but it is noteworthy that Sankey of all people thinks that this could be problematic. 

The article below points out that a potential SEC title matchup between Bama and Florida could be an issue as well. Alabama currently does not have an opponent the week before that game, but Florida is playing their rescheduled game against LSU. Many expect Florida to raise concerns about having to play the week prior while Bama does not and that is something that would have to be addressed by the league.  There are currently 3 SEC games postponed this weekend.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/secs-rash-of-covid-19-postponements-impacts-not-just-the-league-but-the-college-football-playoff-too/

michgoblue

November 12th, 2020 at 10:48 AM ^

I didn't realize that the "federal government" had the ability to set policy for Europe, South America, and the Middle East with respect to COVID.  Yes, the numbers in the US are out of control, but so are the numbers in most of the world.  This is a true second wave. 

The mistake that so many people make when blaming the federal government, state governments or just about anyone else for COVID running rampant is thinking that this virus can be controlled absent a complete and total lockdown (as in don't leave you house for an extended period other than scheduled trips to and from the grocery store or pharmacy, unless you are an essential worker).  Look, for example, at NY.  Our governor is perhaps the most pro-lockdown politician out there, and NY's restrictions are the tightest in the country.  Mask usage is pretty high in NY, restaurants cannot operate above 50% capacity (25% in NYC), and we still cannot have things like weddings, parties, etc.  Yet over the past month, our numbers are continually increasing and appear to be spiking.  The point is that we tend to think that the "government" can stop a virus like this, when it is simply impossible.  

I am not saying that we should put our heads in the sand about this, but for all of the things we are giving up, we may not be getting much, if any, result, especially as this thing drags on, because whether it is good or bad, COVID fatigue is a real thing; people are not going to avoid life for months on end, and in particular, kids desperately need to socialize, play sports, go to parties, etc. for their mental health and social development.  

jg2112

November 12th, 2020 at 11:24 AM ^

I applaud the countries that tried to do something about this. In those instances, they're locking down again, trying to protect their citizens, their hospital workers, etc. They're providing financial support to workers who have to stay home for the common good.

America isn't even trying.

COVID fatigue is real, I get that. But idiots aren't even wearing masks or pretending to be responsible human beings. And despite what some people are arguing, who is being prohibited from doing anything? Really. I can't go to a sporting event! I can't be in a bar after 10pm! Oh no, my freedom!

By the end of next week this country will have lost the rough equivalent of the city of Madison, Wisconsin to a virus because it couldn't bother to wear a mask and stay out of bars / restaurants. The country couldn't even lockdown for 4 weeks without filing lawsuits or whining about freedom. 

Now the projection is 500,000 dead by February. That's the population of Atlanta, Georgia.

NittanyFan

November 12th, 2020 at 12:50 PM ^

I'm not engaging in "jihad."  That is absurd.

My point is that the sentiment that I describe does exist.  The poster I was responded to said that it doesn't exist.  Which isn't wrong.  I've seen and heard it.

A few months ago, I read an Atlantic article that postulated "is there anyone who voted for the Democrat Presidential Candidate in 2016, and is planning to vote for the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2020?  We don't think so, we think the number of people like that is zero."

That author was living in a bubble.  I knew of about 10 people just myself who fell into that group.

When someone expresses a sentiment of "these people don't exist", it's sometimes the case that they are living in a bubble.  

In this particular case, I think BlockM is living in a bubble.

 

BlockM

November 12th, 2020 at 2:33 PM ^

You seem incapable of understanding that when people say "no one" they don't mean literally zero people. You make the same hyperbolic claim with respect to case counts: "What, you want the goal to be ZERO cases?! That'll never happen!" 

It's tiresome, and normally I'd say disingenuous, but you do seem very committed to the bit.

NittanyFan

November 12th, 2020 at 5:20 PM ^

Then don't use the word "no one."  You are the one who used unprecise language, not me.

As for the "zero tolerance" folk, those folks have been around since Day One.  Many of them still remain.  Missouri has 1 person test positive for COVID?  Cancel Missouri's football game this weekend!

BlockM

November 12th, 2020 at 12:57 PM ^

lol, ok dude. You're telling me that people who not only believe COVID is serious, but also are taking every possible precaution, are getting offended because others are calling out the fact that many millions are in fact *not* taking this seriously? 

a) The comment "America isn't taking this seriously" is obviously factual based on the comments of our commander in chief. (It's definitely, finally dying out!) How would you describe our country's collective response? We're allowing tens of thousands of students and fans in to football games and have restaurant dining rooms and bars open all over the country.

b) If someone's feelings are hurt based on these comments, I would remind them that their feelings aren't particularly relevant.

michgoblue

November 12th, 2020 at 12:27 PM ^

JG2112, let me respond to your points:

I applaud the countries that tried to do something about this. In those instances, they're locking down again, trying to protect their citizens, their hospital workers, etc. They're providing financial support to workers who have to stay home for the common good.  America isn't even trying.

RESPONSE:  This is a false narrative for two reasons: (1) The US is doing a ton to fight this pandemic.  First, the US has been fast-tracking vaccines and treatments since the beginning, has invoked the defense production act to manufacture ventilators and PPE and has been providing states whatever resources the states ask for, including state of opposite political parties (see, NY, where the federal government sent a navy hospital ship and outfitted the Jacob Javitz Center as a hospital, neither of which were even needed or used by NY); (2) because of the US' unique federal / state divide, there is a limitation on what the federal government can do.  The federal government does not have the authority to impose national mask mandates, curfews or even safety guidelines on states - that is for the state government.  The federal CDC has been issuing guidance since the beginning, but it is up to individual states to make their own rules.  That is the difference between us and almost every other country.  

COVID fatigue is real, I get that. But idiots aren't even wearing masks or pretending to be responsible human beings. And despite what some people are arguing, who is being prohibited from doing anything? Really. I can't go to a sporting event! I can't be in a bar after 10pm! Oh no, my freedom!

RESPONSE:  Actually, a lot is being prohibited if you live in a lockdown state.  If you own a gym, restaurant, bar or personal service business, you have pretty much been put out of business by some of the restrictions.  Bars make much of their money after 10.  If your business is adjacent to sporting events or concerts, you have been put out of business.  Now let's talk about kids.  Kids are either learning remotely or on a hybrid model.  As a parent of 2 boys and a member of my school board's planning committee, the devastating effects of this cannot be oversold.  The remote / hybrid education is complete shit, and the kids are suffering socially and emotionally.  As are many adults, which is why substance abuse, depression and calls to suicide hotlines are up through the roof.  Turns out that these "freedoms" and fun pastimes that many of us enjoy actually are pretty important for society.  Also, some states are now banning gatherings of 10 or more for Thanksgiving.   Seems like a minimal sacrifice, unless this is the last Thanksgiving gathering for an elderly grandparent (which, last year was for both of my then-living grandparents, who died in April from COVID).  

By the end of next week this country will have lost the rough equivalent of the city of Madison, Wisconsin to a virus because it couldn't bother to wear a mask and stay out of bars / restaurants. The country couldn't even lockdown for 4 weeks without filing lawsuits or whining about freedom. 

RESPONSE:  You are assuming that simply wearing a mask and staying out of bars would prevent the spread of this disease.  That is not the case. Back in May, NY released detailed data showing that 64% of people who came to the hospital because of COVID hadn't left their homes in weeks.  I think that we are way overestimating the effects of masks and lockdowns.  Note, I am completely pro-mask.  At best, it reduces spread.  At worst, it is a waste, but since it is only a minimal inconvenience, it pays to just wear it for the next few month.  

Now the projection is 500,000 dead by February. That's the population of Atlanta, Georgia.

RESPONSE:  The projections in March were for 2.5 million dead this year alone in the US.  I don't put much stock in projections. 

blueheron

November 12th, 2020 at 12:38 PM ^

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah ...

A challenge if you're in the mood. I'll give you the benefit of hindsight.

In one hundred words or fewer (which will be challenging for you), explain exactly what should have been done, and when. You're not allowed to just repeat the talking points of Scott Atlas.

michgoblue

November 12th, 2020 at 12:48 PM ^

Let me issue the same challenge to you:  What could the FEDERAL government have legally (keep in mind the concept of states' rights) done differently that you believe would have drastically shaped where we are now?  Can't say mask mandate - even President-Elect Biden recognizes that this is not something that he can do.  Can't say lockdowns - that is not up to the federal government.  

Also, "blah, blah, blah, blah, blah" is the equivalent of saying "I have no intelligent response to your arguments."  

blue in dc

November 12th, 2020 at 2:12 PM ^

Here are just a few of the things we could have and should have done at the federal level.

1. Gotten better testing in place more quickly.    On February 16, the US had tested about 2.4 out of every million.   South Korea had tested about 155.   By March 1, we were at 5.6 per million, South Korea was over 1900.   Because we couldn’t test we didn’t realize how big a problem we had in places like New York.    This also means that once we realized how bad the problem was in New York, we over reacted in other places.    More testing would have let us have a more targeted response.   A more targeted response would have had less economic impact and would have caused less Covid fatigue.

2. Not downplayed the problem- we should have been gearing up for a major problem, ramping up production of PPE etc in January.   With better testing from #1, we could also have taken the lowest cost social distancing measures more quickly reduced business travel, more working from home etc.). 

g_dubya

November 12th, 2020 at 1:07 PM ^

"Back in May, NY released detailed data showing that 64% of people who came to the hospital because of COVID hadn't left their homes in weeks."

As I have already posted elsewhere, that is not what the data said.  It was people who had predominantly been at home, explicitly not 'hadn't left their homes in weeks.'  At this point, your misrepresentation seems to be intentional.  You should stop it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/06/ny-gov-cuomo-says-its-shocking-most-new-coronavirus-hospitalizations-are-people-staying-home.html

blue in dc

November 12th, 2020 at 1:10 PM ^

I’d suggest you read a bit more about how Germany was so successful before you tout how much we’ve done.https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2522

Like the US, Germany shares responsibility for health issues amongst local, state and national government, yet somehow they’ve managed to have less than 1/5 the deaths per capita of the US.   This is is large part because at the national level they were serious about providing states a workable testing infrastructure, at the local level, they were serious about using testing and tracing to identify outbreaks and control them.

Realizing the linkages between contact tracing and the number of cases, they put in place metrics such that as cases rose and contact tracing became less feasible, more measures were put in place.

With regards to the New York study, some context is important.   Deaths in New York peaked in mid April.  The survey data was from a 3 day survey released where the results were announced on May 6.  By that point the worst had passed and cases were quickly declining.  Not sure how you use that information to jump to the conclusion that social distancing and mask wearing don’t work.  

 

thisisme08

November 12th, 2020 at 1:26 PM ^

You say "states rights" but then POTUS issues statements decrying State's who have implemented, I'm going to bold this for you, those steps which it believes work best for them 

This and other examples are what people are referring to when they say that the US has done an absolute shit job.  You do not get to have your cake and eat it too.   

gruden

November 12th, 2020 at 1:28 PM ^

You do realize many deaths attributed to covid were actually something else, right?  You also realize hospitals have a financial incentive to cite covid as cause of death, even when it's something else. 

The most susceptible population to the virus are those with serious co-morbidities.  For them it makes sense to isolate.  For healthy people, it is house arrest.

A 99.9% survival rate causes many to question why we're so eager to destroy the economy, which is also a major human issue.  People who lose their jobs (and later their homes) are also at severe risk for many serious problems and health issues.

I just wonder how much has to be given up before people realize the 'cure' is worse than the disease itself.  For most people that is the case. 

I say this as someone who has had a couple family members contract the disease and have symptoms, so I know it's real and what it does.  I also know it doesn't do this to the vast majority of people.  There is way too much hysterics going on.

blue in dc

November 12th, 2020 at 2:52 PM ^

1.  Just because people who had co-morbities doesn’t mean that they somehow didn’t die of covid.   In almost al, of those cases, Covid was the precipitating factor.   If you jump off a building, that is the event that led to your death, even if it is hitting the ground that actually kills you.

2. Not sure where your 99.9% survival rate comes from, but that implies that only 1 out of every thousand people who get Covid die.   This translates to 1000 out of every million.  Over 1000 per million have died in 7 US States.   Therefore I’m pretty sure it can’t be right,

3.   There are very few places that people are literally being confined to their houses if they don’t have suspected or confirmed cases.   If you do have a suspected or confirmed case you aren’t being quarantined for your own health, you are being quarantined to prevent  the spread to others.

NittanyFan

November 12th, 2020 at 11:43 AM ^

Yep.  As Dan Patrick would say, "you can't stop the virus, you can only hope to contain the virus.  Although ...... that may not be truly possible either."

Pfizer has already, of course, released their vaccine efficacy numbers.  Moderna will as well within days.  That's the hope at this point.  I do expect approval prior to the end of CY 2020.  

There is a little bit of irony in this --- their efficacy results have been sped up because of the recent surge.  If case numbers stayed low, it would then take considerably longer to test out a vaccine candidate's efficacy.  

ftroop

November 12th, 2020 at 5:09 PM ^

Obesity rate of 42% vs 25% would account for some of that, different criteria for counting 'rona deaths may account for more, NY deaths skew the US average.  What Germany really did that quashed their first outbreak is locking down the borders.  Had we done that for New York and New Jersey in March, we'd be having a whole different conversation now.  But Cuomo had a fit when Trump even suggested he was thinking about it.

Michology 101

November 12th, 2020 at 12:20 PM ^

"Mask usage is pretty high in NY, restaurants cannot operate above 50% capacity (25% in NYC), and we still cannot have things like weddings, parties, etc.  Yet over the past month, our numbers are continually increasing and appear to be spiking."

Well, New York mask usage is pretty high in public settings. Though I disagree with what you stated about parties. I mean, maybe parties are suppose to be against the rules, but many people are still having lots of rather large private parties and get togethers in New York.

Some of those gatherings are shown on social media and the people usually aren't wearing many masks if any at all. 

Though this isn't just a New York problem. Some scientists have suggested that large private parties and get togethers helped spike things in this country.

It's the main reason why they're asking people not to do that for Thanksgiving.       

michgoblue

November 12th, 2020 at 12:33 PM ^

I don't disagree with this.  I live on Long Island and yes, people are gathering indoors, without masks, in fairly large numbers.  But if that is the case, and people are going to gather anyway, then why force shutdowns of restaurants and other businesses that are closing by the hundreds daily?  That's one of my biggest issues with the whole covid response:  Sure, it would be much better if we could lock the entire country down for 4 weeks just to get this thing completely under control, but after 8 months of this shit, that just is not realistic.  People are going to gather, whether in restaurants or in private homes.  The sooner we realize that, and shape our response to this reality, the sooner we can make the right choices to bring this under control without all of the devastating unintended consequences.  

mackbru

November 12th, 2020 at 3:53 PM ^

1) You can reduce the spread by simply wearing a mask, which many people/idiots still don't do. (Thank you, Mr. outgoing President)

2) You can limit the spread with comprehensive testing and tracing. Which the government isn't really doing.

3) A vaccine will come. We just need people to abide by restrictions thru this winter. Which most people won't do.

No, we can't eliminate the virus. But we can mitigate it, especially with a vaccine likely coming by early next year. People will die no matter what. But sending the message that there's nothing we can do, as Trump has done, will account for countless more deaths. And it's shameful. You don't just throw up your hands and say, Oh, well, carry on. Literally no health organization advocates this bullshit approach. 

MGoBlue96

November 13th, 2020 at 2:37 PM ^

Federal government could actually provide covid relief like before, which would help facilitate actual discussion of lockdowns at a state level. Without that aide lockdowns just are not on the table for states. And sorry if you really don't think lockdowns would help that is just an ignorant stance. State of Michigan lockdown we had before reduced cases dramatically.

MGoBlue96

November 13th, 2020 at 3:11 PM ^

You know what would be worse for kids than all those things you listed? The traumatic experience of losing a parent or grandparent, etc to Covid. The reality is we could go without lockdowns if the majority if people were not being selfish and doing the basics correctly, but that is just not what is happening. The problem is without aide from the federal government for workers lockdowns just are not going happen, so yes saying the federal government can't do anything to help is simply incorrect.

Njia

November 12th, 2020 at 10:51 AM ^

Intentionally failed to control.

I think the virus is stupefying even those governments that intentionally attempted to "control" it, as well. This reminds me of something I once heard a former astronaut, Story Musgrave, say, "We used to say we were going to 'conquer space.' This is a fallacy; space conquers us."

MFun

November 12th, 2020 at 2:42 PM ^

You sound like someone who is always blaming external forces on your problems. 

The federal govt or any govt is not responsible for what happens to you. 
YOU ARE.

Stay away from people and wear a freakin' mask if you have to be around them. Wash your goddamn hands and don't touch your face. Stay home if you can.  

 

MGoBlue96

November 13th, 2020 at 3:51 PM ^

Really? You want to look at the impact the first Michigan lockdown had on the spread? Literally went from some of the highest case numbers in the country to some of the lowest due to the first lockdown. And yes masks when worn by both parties do in fact help alot. Your post is ignorant nonsense, though sadly alot of the country falls in that same camp at this point. We literally have reached a point as a country where people are ignoring basic scientific facts.

bronxblue

November 12th, 2020 at 10:27 AM ^

Sure, there are people with no actual skin in the game who would be fine if their entertainment options were more entertaining.  But a lot of fans thought it was a dumb idea to play football this year.  And at least with UM and PSU they've done a decent job not getting guys sick.  The fact Wisconsin is coming to town having missed multiple games and having 20+ guys get COVID, including their HC, is depressing and a sign some people didn't take a pandemic that has killed over a quarter of a million people in this country all that seriously.

nappa18

November 12th, 2020 at 9:29 AM ^

Thank you Ohio State. As an aside, a buckeye stalwart living near me always mentions whenever we chat that Michigan is still and will be a pretty good “football school” but that OSU is a top 3 football “program of all time”. So yesterday I responded I am so glad my son and daughter are graduates of a world class highly ranked elite institution of higher learning then a middle of the road average school academically speaking. 
 

Get this: true, he tells me I don’t have my priorities in order. Huh! This is only the tip of a very  large iceberg weighing down this country. Sad. And a bit disconcerting. Maybe even scary. Don’t even get me started on his thoughts about cancelling the college football season due to state of covid now.

ldevon1

November 12th, 2020 at 9:40 AM ^

For all this prowess OSU claims, they haven't done a lot in this playoff era compared to Alabama, Clemson, and Oklahoma. They've kicked to B1G asses, but other than 2015 they shouldn't be talking about being a top 3 program. Oklahoma has been there more than them. Hell they haven't had much more success than ND. 

hammermw

November 12th, 2020 at 9:32 AM ^

For the most part I agree, but playing devil's advocate, if they would have started 9/6 as originally planned with bye weeks built in, I think they would have had a much better chance of completing a full season. Trying to play 8 or 9 consecutive weeks without byes was probably not the best idea.

The other thing is cases were pretty low when the Big 10 cancelled. They missed to opportunity to get in a few weeks before cases started to explode again and timed it just right to come back when cases were exploding all around the country.

ESNY

November 12th, 2020 at 10:08 AM ^

I'm not sure the lack of byes will have a big impact, unless every team in the league is off in a given week and can use that as a way to make up games. To be honest, with hindsight, the best move would've been start on time and then play 8 straight weeks as the further we get into fall, the worse it is getting. The ACC has played 7-8 games and the SEC has played 6.  If they played without byes and started in early September, its likely most teams could've gotten their whole season in

lhglrkwg

November 12th, 2020 at 10:00 AM ^

I remember all the people crowing about the Big Ten was obvious wrong and were being a bunch of elitists when the SEC and ACC kick started and nothing happened in the first 24 hours. Big Ten is looking fairly wise at the moment which should have been apparent from the getgo

Frankly the whole country is a covid mess again. We all got distracted by football and especially by election season, now it's heading in the wrong direction in a hurry. Biden's gonna have his hands full with this