Rebirth of the CCHA official, set for 2021-22

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on February 18th, 2020 at 12:33 PM

Bowling Green—who owned the rights to the CCHA name and history once the original league dissolved after 2012-13–has officially announced that the 7 teams leaving behind the WCHA will play in the new CCHA. 
 

Those 7 members: Bemidji State, Bowling Green, Ferris State, Lake Superior State, Michigan Tech, Minnesota State, Northern Michigan. 
 

Seems to be the death blow to the WCHA whose remaining members are Alaska-Fairbanks, Alaska-Anchorage and Alabama-Huntsville. Lot of talk going on that both AK schools may lose their hockey programs. Sad. 

UMAmaizinBlue

February 18th, 2020 at 3:37 PM ^

The Big Ten has less than half of it's own conference - the rest don't even have hockey teams, and we include Notre Dame. IMO, the CCHA had much more grit given the fact the teams we played were in lower conferences in other sports like football/basketball, but they got to play with the "big boys" from the Big Ten.

I'm sure I'm just being nostalgic, but CCHA hockey >>>> Big Ten hockey. I'd much rather watch Michigan-Miami (OH) than Michigan-Penn State.

A Lot of Milk

February 18th, 2020 at 5:11 PM ^

Former Miami student, current Michigan one here

Miami has been garbage at hockey the last half decade. They fired their coach who took them on those Frozen Four runs and have not been competitive before or since then

I get the nostalgia factor, but I would rather play meaningful hockey games against good teams than play in a shit conference

Couzen Rick's

February 18th, 2020 at 12:44 PM ^

Also working against the Alaska schools are the unprecedented slashing of their budgets by the Alaska governor. It will be tough enough for the University system itself to survive, let alone the athletic programs.

stephenrjking

February 18th, 2020 at 2:07 PM ^

It's a double-whammy. I don't see how the programs survive. A real shame. 

The snarky response to this about them being in Alaska is, of course, a real factor in all of this--the Alaska schools have to pay the travel costs for teams that come to visit, and the teams that left the WCHA don't like the trip even without the costs, and I think that's understandable even if unfortunate. 

I was really excited that Penn State added hockey, and it's still a good thing... but all the shuffling that has happened since then has been bad. Unquestionably. 

BlueinLansing

February 18th, 2020 at 3:11 PM ^

"Oil payments" amount to about $2000 per resident at its high but average around $1,200.

The Alaska Permanent Fund as its called is also widely misunderstood.  And Alaska being "awash" in oil money is also widely misunderstood, hint, it is not.

 

Anyway the Gov. cut the higher education budget by 40% in one fell swoop after vetoing the state legislatures budget.  Alaska had a massive budget gap, surprise from tax cuts.   Ultimately its forcing the Sates University system into some very tough and harsh decisions, which includes possibly closing one of its campuses.  Athletics is at risk, no question.

Not to get political but it is indeed the old (or new) fight from Conservatives and their distrust of higher education coming to the ultimate climax.

 

 

raleighwood

February 18th, 2020 at 12:45 PM ^

I wouldn't mind seeing my Hockey Broncos come back to the CCHA.  They're competing well in the NCHC (currently in 3rd behind North Dakota and Minnesota-Duluth).....but it would be nice to see them play all of those teams from Michigan on a regular basis.

Wolverine In Exile

February 18th, 2020 at 12:51 PM ^

Yeah, the small schools that are playing up in hockey (Bemidji, Ferris, etc) can't subsidize AK schools like the old WCHA and old CCHA could, so probably deathknell for Fairbanks & Anchorage. Which is sad because they gave us MURDERDEATH HOCKEY BEARS IN JETPLANES.

But this makes sense to compact the league to that footprint-- If I was hockey emperor for the day, I'd:

* dissolve the NCHC & current WCHA

* Put all the U.P. teams and smaller Minnesota teams in a conference and call it the Superior League (7-8 teams)

* Put all the smaller L.P. teams (Ferris, WMU) + Bowling Green + UAH (they have good support in Huntsville for the program) + a revitalized Wayne St program + Miami OH and call it the CCHA (6 teams)

* Put all the Colorado teams (incl. AF) + AK team(s) + Arizona St + UNO + NoDak in a conference and call it the WCHA (7-8 teams)

N. Campus Tech

February 18th, 2020 at 1:52 PM ^

You are exactly correct about the subsidizing the AK schools. That's why one team was in the CCHA the other was in the WCHA, to share the cost burden. It was very expensive to fly your hockey team to Fairbanks and Anchorage. It could be done when the Michigans and Minnesotas of the world are chipping in. Ferris St and Bemidji St can't afford that.

B1G hockey ruined college hockey.

MIMark

February 18th, 2020 at 1:51 PM ^

Good for all those programs. That is a solid conference. Some of those programs have been ranked in the top ten in recent years. That will be a competitive conference.

1408

February 18th, 2020 at 4:27 PM ^

The "not in the B1G" argument does not hold any water when we have ND in the conference for hockey and JHU for lax.

Regional rivalries were the key to college hockey which the B1G whiffed on.  People care more about Minnesota vs. UMD than they do about Minnesota vs. Michigan.  Illinois is not going be some sort of panacea for the conference.  I'd rather watch U of M vs. Lake Superior State as would most fans.

 

NittanyFan

February 18th, 2020 at 2:52 PM ^

Lots of talk about the Alaska schools, but I see Huntsville isn't included here either.  They'll need a landing spot.  I don't think they could make it as an independent.

lhglrkwg

February 18th, 2020 at 3:46 PM ^

Well, it seems we're getting back closer to where things should have gone post-Big Ten formation. Unfortunately, all the big non-B1G schools panicked and scooped up all the best of the old WCHA and CCHA in the aftermath. Now we're kind of gravitating back to what we should've had which is a smaller WCHA (NCHC) and CCHA. (Honestly, I wonder if the NCHC will buy/take the rights to the WCHA)

Seems like the Alaska schools are being taken off life support. It just seems so unlikely that they exist in 5 years time. I'm a little surprised and a little not surprised Huntsville isn't invited into the CCHA club. No one has ever seemed particularly interested in going out of their way to help them.

Now I have to imagine Miami and Western are going to move back to the CCHA. Travel costs and regional rivalries should draw them home. Maybe not immediately, but soon enough. That would leave the NCHC small and then who do they invite ASU? Bemidji or Minnesota State? Seems likely it all washes out to Big Ten, old WCHA, and old CCHA which is where we should've landed in the first place post-PSU

Wolverine In Exile

February 18th, 2020 at 4:00 PM ^

One of UAH's problems is that it is extremely expensive and inconvenient to fly into Huntsville airport. If UAH was theoretically in Atlanta or Nashville, I think some of the smaller CCHA footprint schools wouldn't grouch so much. It's impossible to drive to for the traditional CCHA footprint schools within a weekend series format. 

potomacduc

February 18th, 2020 at 3:58 PM ^

This thread title had me hopeful.

I wholeheartedly agree that the old CCHH >>>>>>B1G Hockey. I pay 10% as much attention to college hockey as I used to. Certainly other factors are at play, but B1G hockey does nothing for me.

Vasav

February 18th, 2020 at 5:56 PM ^

I am really sad for the Alaskan schools, and while I don't blame the W/CCHA schools for ditching the expensive mid-majors, I do blame the Big Ten for causing this shakeup.

I wish the Big Ten would add the Alaskans, but I know they wont. I also secretly hope Washington and Oregon make programs go D1, and then start a PCHA with UAA, UAF and ASU. Also know this won't happen.

Poor damn nanook.

Team 101

February 18th, 2020 at 6:53 PM ^

I find it ironic that there is so much nostalgia for CCHA hockey when the reason that FYS and we were there in the first place was that some administrators decided that the cost savings were more important than playing against the more elite programs in the old WCHA. 

AK_Blue_Nanook

February 18th, 2020 at 7:37 PM ^

Seeing Michigan and the other large schools come up to Fairbanks was one of the highlights of my time as a student at UAF. Was definitely cool seeing the teams come up to visit small town Fairbanks in -20F temps. Unfortunately, I graduated just before the epic hockey bear videos. UAF hockey is the only sport up there (besides riflery) and losing it will crush the students and fans. 

As for UAA, they used to be a giant in college hockey in the 80-90s. Sad to see both the state's teams struggle. We even lost the Alaska Aces ECHL team several years ago and now the Sullivan Arena sits quietly most days. 

Regarding the PFD, it really doesn't help much with cost of living up here. They've been capping the free checks at $1,600 or so the last few years so they can take the rest to help pay for state government. We tend to make more in salary to offset the higher cost of living but it's not like we're swimming in cash. BP just sold all of their North Slope assets and it's become easier and cheaper to get oil out of the ground in Texas than to work in AK. Lots of challenges for the lawmakers up here though none want to make tough choices. 

Don't cry for us up here though. Hawaii is a quick 6 hour flight away.