Ranking Big Ten Teams through 4 weeks
September 28th, 2009 at 5:36 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:41 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:45 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:50 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:18 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:12 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:43 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:45 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:51 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:57 PM ^
September 29th, 2009 at 12:07 AM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:23 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:47 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:47 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:49 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:50 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 5:56 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:01 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:18 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 8:10 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:24 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:05 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:09 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:41 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:19 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 8:50 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:08 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:10 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:19 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:28 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 6:36 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:26 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:20 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:20 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 7:57 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 8:54 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 9:27 PM ^
- Iowa - They have the best defense in the league and have beaten the best teams, including a solid Arizona team. The first week appears to be a fluke now.
- OSU - Also a strong D, but they haven't really proved they are that great.
- PSU - Their weaknesses seem a little deeper than OSU, especially on the OL
- Michigan - This high out of lack of better options. They at least have a win over a ND team that looks medium to alright.
- Wisconsin - Also out of lack of options. They've got a running game that helps.
- Indiana - I've thought they've been undervalued since week 1. They showed why last week. They have one of those teams that plays good but comes up short again and again. It's like Washington last year, way undervalued when you look at all the close losses early in the season. If UDub played IU's schedule, they'd been 4-7 or better last season. That's where I see Indiana this year.
- Michigan State - If they could eliminate the Sparty No! moments, they'd be ahead of Wisconsin and Michigan. Instead, they keep having them. They keep low.
- Purdue - Also undervalued. They were my upset pick last weekend and it almost happened. Offense is looking pretty good.
- Minnesota - Pass to Decker only takes you so far. They don't have the play-makers on D.
- Illinois - They are falling apart, both play wise and injury wise. Whole lot of bad in Champaign.
- Northwestern - How can any of you not put NU at the bottom. Struggles against EMU, loses to Syracuse, loses to Minnesota. I've been high on NU more than most over the last few seasons, but I can't muster anything good this year.
September 28th, 2009 at 10:22 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 10:02 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 10:14 PM ^
September 28th, 2009 at 11:45 PM ^
BigTen |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IOWA |
OSU |
PSU |
MICH |
WISC |
IND |
MSU |
PURD |
MINN |
ILL |
NU |
ACC |
|||||||||||
VT |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
MIAMI |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
UNC |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
GT |
W |
W |
W |
L |
W |
L |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
CLEM |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
PUSH |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
FSU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
W |
L |
L |
L |
NCST |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
PUSH |
W |
W |
L |
L |
UMD |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
WF |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
BC |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
DUKE |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
UVA |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
BIGEAST |
|||||||||||
CINC |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
USF |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
WVU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
CONN |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
W |
L |
L |
L |
PITT |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
W |
W |
L |
L |
RUTGERS |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
SYR |
W |
W |
W* |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W* |
L |
L* |
LOU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
BIGXII |
|||||||||||
TEX |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
OKLA |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
OKST |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
KAN |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
MIZZOU |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L* |
L |
NEB |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
TAMU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
TTECH |
W |
W |
W |
L |
W |
L |
PUSH |
W |
L |
L |
L |
BAYLOR |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
PUSH |
ISU |
W* |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
KSU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
COL |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
PAC10 |
|||||||||||
USC |
L |
L* |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
OREGON |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L* |
L |
L |
L |
CAL |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L* |
L |
L |
UCLA |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
L |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
L |
STAN |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
PUSH |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
ZONA |
W* |
W |
W |
PUSH |
PUSH |
L |
PUSH |
W |
L |
L |
L |
AZST |
W |
W |
W |
L |
W |
L |
PUSH |
W |
L |
L |
L |
OS |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
WASH |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
WSU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
SEC |
|||||||||||
FLORIDA |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
BAMA |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
UGA |
W |
L |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
LSU |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
AUBURN |
W |
W |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
SOCAR |
W |
W |
W |
L |
W |
W |
L |
W |
L |
L |
L |
OLEMISS |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
PUSH |
L |
L |
L |
ARK |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
PUSH |
PUSH |
W |
L |
L |
L |
TENN |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
W |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
L |
MSU |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
L |
UK |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
VANDY |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
W |
PUSH |
Looking it over,
W |
L |
PUSH |
% |
|
ACC |
79 |
46 |
7 |
.632 |
BIGEAST |
52 |
36 |
0 |
.591 |
BIGXII |
58 |
67 |
7 |
.464 |
PAC10 |
50 |
50 |
10 |
.500 |
SEC |
54 |
68 |
10 |
.443 |
TOTALS |
293 |
269 |
34 |
.521 |
That's not that bad. It puts us even with the PAC10, and pretty much on par with most of the expectations when compared to the other BCS conferences. Like I said, I admit that these are just like, my opinion, man. Take them for whatever that might be worth.
September 29th, 2009 at 12:21 AM ^
September 29th, 2009 at 12:38 AM ^