Question for the board: Can Kwity Paye be a solid DT option for us

Submitted by Bo Harbaugh on October 29th, 2020 at 10:35 PM

So I went back and watched the Minnesota game and liked a lot of what I saw on both sides of the ball, but DT and quick middle of the pocket penetration still seems to be an issue for us. Obviously, I worry about us having a game or two where we get run all over for like 6 yards per carry.  CB will probably also be an issue, but a good D-line can help mitigate a lot of issues in the secondary.

Anyways, I noticed Paye lining up over the guard on a couple plays when it was most likely a passing down, and he was getting a great jump and penetration. He had a sack on one of these, and a QB hurry on another. He is listed at 6'4, 270 pounds, btw. So...I'm not an expert here and get that he may be a bit tall and his leverage is better for a DE, but is it possible that Paye can take some more snaps on the inside if we have DT problems? 

Can his explosiveness help to blow up the middle of the line and help stuff out run plays?  I get that he is elite on the edge (but so is Hutchinson), so is it possible that it could it help the team if he takes more snaps over the guard and center, particularly on short yardage/run situations?

Megumin

October 29th, 2020 at 11:19 PM ^

I like Upshaw quite a bit actually. Think he's going to step up once Paye and Hutchinson get drafted. That being said, it's probably more advisable to have Hinton or Jeter get the reps and hope they step up, and keep Paye where he's most dangerous.

A lot of core guys on the line are going likely going to move on next season (Paye, Hutchinson, Kemp), so these guys need to emerge anyways as at least rotational pieces.

WolverineinIN812

October 30th, 2020 at 8:15 AM ^

I think what the poster was saying was, once Paye and Hutchinson are gone, Upshaw will himself step up and be a decent replacement--not that Upshaw is going to exceed what Paye and/or Hutchinson provide.  Those guys are legit potential All-Americans so it's going to be hard to replace them for sure.

Mgotri

October 29th, 2020 at 11:03 PM ^

Guy!guys! I’ve got this great idea. I saw a guy playing out of position for a couple plays last game and obs he’s gonna be great even though he’s a senior at his current position and thirty pounds too light. Let’s do it!

NeverPunt

October 29th, 2020 at 11:46 PM ^

It seems like Brown’s been schematically papering over the DT situation as best he can so I think if Kwity was the answer they’d have already gone that way. His upside is probably much larger at DE so there’s an opportunity cost there. Decent thought experiment but I don’t see the payoff being large enough to risk the change. 

stephenrjking

October 29th, 2020 at 11:52 PM ^

No, of course not.

You don't take someone who is really good at something and move them to a spot where they are not as good. That removes a really good player from one position to get a replacement-level player at another. Every team we played would breathe a huge sigh of relief if they did that. It just isn't an idea people would consider.

Kind of a hyper-caffeinated version of the whole "Bredeson to tackle" talk that was discussed literally every season of his career because there were rumors of him competing for the tackle position in his freshman year training camp. Then he went to guard, a natural position for him, a position that he played well, and there was never any chance he would move. But people still brought it up every year. 

crg

October 30th, 2020 at 6:54 AM ^

In general, I agree with you - yet there are certainly circumstances where the end result (two replacement players of moderate skill at those positions) may still be better than the alternative (one outstanding player at their regular position and a bad replacement player at another position).

This is probably not one of those scenarios, but any good coach would likely try whatever player movement possible to maximize the unit performance.

Joby

October 30th, 2020 at 12:35 AM ^

As other posters have mentioned, Paye is too light to be a full-time DT, and we’d be trading an All-American level DE for a serviceable (at best) DT. 
 

I found it quite hopeful that the four DTs who had significant snaps all had nice plays when they were single blocked vs. Minnesota (which wasn’t often). If they can create a little havoc when single blocked in future games, it could punish teams that double Paye and Hutchinson like OSU did last year. I know MSU’s O-line is not very good, but this weekend should yield some more data about whether or not the DTs can win when single blocked. If they can, we’re in business. 

JonnyHintz

October 30th, 2020 at 8:16 AM ^

Very promising. If you’re going to double a DT, you’re leaving two borderline All-Americans either singled up or requiring a RB/TE help to block them, meaning significant numbers advantage for the Michigan D. If you choose to double the DE’s, it’s nice knowing the DTs showed flashes of penetration and playmaking ability.

outsidethebox

October 30th, 2020 at 7:18 AM ^

Objectively, the DTs did fine-held their own. The concern discussion regarding shoring up the defense would more appropriately be about the LBs and safeties. The front four was regularly requiring/occupying 6 blockers-even seven...or 8 if you include the QB. So the question for me is "Why weren't Michigan's other 7 playing against 4 or 5-or even 3 more effective?".

pdgoblue25

October 30th, 2020 at 9:29 AM ^

I'm never on board with taking a player who's great at his position, and forcing him to be mediocre while playing out of position.

See:  Ben Mason

Just pray that the DTs make progress game by game.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

October 30th, 2020 at 9:56 AM ^

It’s a generally valid question and some Mgobloggers have even joked about J Glasgow at DT after the UW game since Brown tinkers with front 7 alignments so frequently.
1. I think people are overly negative about the DTs. Jeter, Hinton and Julius did OK in Minny. Brown clearly opted to give some yards on the ground instead of passing and a lot of yards were caused by poor run fits/contain by LBs and Paige.

2. Paye setting the edge on running plays is equally important to DT penetration or holding the interior POA. Plus, his effectiveness would rapidly diminish with high snap count at DT.

3. The frequent stunts on pass downs also equate the DT position to DE since Paye will end up rushing against the tackle gaps. Assignments have much less bearing on alignment in passing downs.

 

Harlans Haze

October 30th, 2020 at 3:51 PM ^

Brown has shown, that on obvious passing downs, he's going to go with 4 (sometimes 3) pass rushers. That's usually all DE-type players. That being the case, one or two of them is gonna line up inside. It appears that Welschof might be part of that package, so you do have an interior-oriented player involved. It's all about putting players in position to succeed.