Ghost of Bo

May 2nd, 2010 at 8:54 PM ^

Could we win just ONE face-off, fellas?! Just one?!

We need to win some draws, look for break-outs, and spend some more time down on their end in the second period.

Pavel and Jimmy have saved our asses thus far.

Ghost of Bo

May 2nd, 2010 at 8:58 PM ^

Amen.

That seems to be San Jose's gameplan: take a dive, shoot the ref a dirty look, skate down the ice with indignation in an attempt to earn boos from the crowd, and repeat until you have a power play.

I fucking hate this strategy and hate their fans for creating such a whiny atmosphere. This ain't hockey. Leave the begging to NFL wide receivers.

Geaux_Blue

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:05 PM ^

not great. but good. the passing has lapsed back into how it looked for a lot of games in the Phoenix series and they haven't thrown bodies around like they have. ridiculous number of PKs contributes to some of this but they're not playing 140x better because of the rest like some hoped. san jose doesn't exactly look mindblowing but, well, a pessimistic assessment is often better than a sunshine blowing one.

goblueUM2012

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:10 PM ^

I'm sorry if it seems like I'm just complaining but I cannot stand this announcer. When the wings get a soft penalty no big deal but now all he is talking about is the "apparent" boarding. Come on man, YOU ARE TERRIBLE.

exmtroj

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:14 PM ^

God, these announcers SUCK!  "The referees are gonna say it went in..."  Yeah, no shit genius, the puck clearly hit the back of the net. 

TrppWlbrnID

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:17 PM ^

i do not KNOW much about hockey, i grew up watching, but admittedly only really tune in for the playoffs and the real "nuts and bolts" working of the game escapes me.  so, can someone help me out in understanding why many red wings playoffs games i have seen over the past few years have the shot total going something like 45 to 20 but the wings will more often than not lose.

are "shots" not important? is this just how the wings play? is detroit's defense that much better? what stat should i look at in a box score scenario to see how the game was played?

BlueAggie

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:27 PM ^

Not expert, but my opinion is that not all shots are created equal.  It's probably better to look at scoring chances.  A one-timer from the slot is significantly more dangerous than an unscreened shot from the blueline.

Shots are often a decent measure of puck possesion.  Lots of possession = lots of shots.

Geaux_Blue

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:30 PM ^

but they've been, at their core, a team whose goal tending has been beaten by blue line wristers classically. you will see a RW goalie absolutely destroy a great shot on a break away and then just absolutely fuck up a "dump-in" wrister from 30 feet out and it will be the game decider

NFZ

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:21 PM ^

what is with all the penalties on us. I believe Bettman has established a conspiracy to keep us out of the finals cuz we are to kick ass.

Geaux_Blue

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:22 PM ^

San Jose's goalie was screamed at for not being a "team player" and getting in on the core diving principles the Sharks had been practicing

after that penalty he yelled to the bench "how's that?"

Geaux_Blue

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:33 PM ^

shows the Sharks player in front of the ref cross check and punch the Wings player in the back of the head as he skates away. no call. lulz

Geaux_Blue

May 2nd, 2010 at 9:36 PM ^

my god do the mets suck. guy gave up a walk which forced in a run. then he gave up a grand slam home run. then he had Polanco double. then he gave up a home run.

 

mind you, these are consecutive at bats.

went from 5-3 Mets to 10-5 Phillies in 4 at bats.