OT: Examples of innovative coaching

Submitted by crg on
One of the aspects I most enjoy about football (college more than pro, but not exclusively) is the use of strategy and innovation to mitigate an opponent's advantage in some aspect(s) of the game. This can include one-time "trick-plays" to catch an opponent off-guard I just found this example that didn't work, but could have: http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=18031299&ex_cid=espntw&sf42209240=1 If anyone else has any nice examples they've seen over the years, please feel free to share with the rest of the class.

turd ferguson

December 7th, 2016 at 8:56 AM ^

I wonder if they drew that up after getting burned by a kind of similar (and also fun) play a year earlier --

[EDIT: Sorry, it looks like the NFL has YouTube-only protections or something. The link below just takes you directly to the YouTube clip.]

Magnus

December 7th, 2016 at 10:04 AM ^

I truly think the best example(s) of "innovative" coaching that negate a team's deficiencies are the various forms of triple option. Even RPOs, in my opinion, aren't as effective as the triple options run by Navy, Georgia Tech, Air Force, etc. The athletes at the service academies have no business hanging with FBS talent, but Air Force is usually decent and scares a lot of good teams, GT has had good years, and Navy pulls off upsets like Houston. It's not "innovative" in that it's new or never-before-seen, but it is in the sense of playing to your strengths/against other teams' weaknesses.

mgobleu

December 7th, 2016 at 11:00 AM ^

I think "innovative coaching" is one day going to become a bit of an antiquated idea, as contrary as that sounds. The triple option is all about adaptability based on what the defense is giving you, rather than the coach calling the play, the play is the play, and if we execute better than the defense we win the down. (Although I'm still a fan of this model, i.e., "we're going to run it down your throat and it's up to you to stop us"). The "innovative coach" is the coach that can train his players to recognize defenses and situations, and to adapt pre-snap or even during the play without input from the coaches themselves.

Hugh White

December 7th, 2016 at 10:47 AM ^

I think the most far-reaching example of strategizing by an innovative coach is Fritz Crisler who understood that a slight change in the wording of the NCAA substitution rules allowed him to organize his team into an entirely defensive-minded platoon and an entirely offensive platoon.  Fritz thought it was the best chance for his team of mostly underclassmen to stay in a game against the overpowering Army squad.

micheal honcho

December 7th, 2016 at 12:00 PM ^

I'm always fascinated by the success of these systems. As old and "antiquated" as they are they still work.

Same with H.S. teams. With probably 80% of HS teams running some variation of "spread" football its fun to see a team running a "T" or option style offense often come in and just BLAST a spread team into oblivion because players & coaches don't know how to deal with it. IMHO they have forgotten how to defend these "antiquated" offenses and by the time the start to figure it out, its too late. They're down by 20+ points and the opposition is now in "grind it out" mode just eating clock.

I always wonder, at the highest level(NFL) if a team ran(part time) a system like one of these, just for a critical drive or in a big game, would there be enough knowledge/instincts on an NFL roster(coaches & players) that know or remember the disciplines to best defend it? Would there be enough O-lineman that have the knowledge of how to block it?

The quick hitting nature of these systems(no holding) combined with the downhill style of blocking and patience(4 yds is a win) just makes for a real difficult adjustment for defenses that are so used to "basketball on grass". One of the local HS teams has won 4 state titles running a Dead T offense and it just fascinates me how difficult it is to stop. In an era of spread & shred they are consistently the top offense in the state in yds gained, pts scored, least penalized etc. and I just LOVE to watch them and the difficulty they present in preparation for teams.

WestQuad

December 7th, 2016 at 12:55 PM ^

In the 87 Fiesta Bowl PSU stopped a crazy good Miami team with "Disguised Zone Coverage." * They had no business being in that game.

 

Testaverde, who was intercepted just nine times all season, turned the high-powered Miami offense into a far more efficient unit this year. But Penn State challenged the Hurricane offense with a strategy that was as effective as it was expected. Disguised Zone Coverage 

The Lions tried to unnerve the Heisman Trophy winner with different types of blitzes. Rather than expose its defensive backs with one-on-one coverage when the blitzes were on, Penn State usually employed zone coverages, keeping three defenders deep to defend against the long pass. Underneath, the Lions often inserted an extra linebacker. In the line, the Lions shuttled in fresh players.

*It sickens me that one of the best defensive feats ever was orchestrated by Jerry Sandusky.  (edit: sorry about the weird font.  Can't fix.)

 

funkywolve

December 7th, 2016 at 5:33 PM ^

Wasn't really play calling but the quick substitutions he did at Purdue after a play.  Eventually a rule was implemented that allowed the defense time to subsitute if the offense had done so.

Bert:  another example of not so much play calling but working the rules to one teams advantage.  When they implemented the rule that said offsides on a kick off by the kicking team meant that the kicking team had to re-kick, Bert worked the rule to Wisky's advantage against PSU.  There must have been something like 10-15 seconds left in the first half after Wisky scored.  So on the kickoffs he had one player blatantly run offides before the kick.  They did it like 2 or 3 times until the clock ran out and it was halftime.

Spurrier at Florida.  The year Florida won the NC.  In their regular season game against FSU, FSU was continually getting to the Gator QB.  The Gator QB (Wuerfel - ??) took most of the snaps under center in the regular season game.  Prior to the Sugar Bowl, Spurrier re did the plays so they were almost all out of the shotgun giving the Gator QB a little extra time to see the field and throw the ball.

Mr. Elbel

December 7th, 2016 at 3:54 PM ^

That one Kansas play where the dude laid down in the blue endzone while wearing a blue jersey and blue pants. Except it's Kansas so they still didn't get past midfield.

Modernmanshustl

December 7th, 2016 at 4:33 PM ^

I feel that it's not so much trick plays as varying formations and personnel groupings. Our defense comes to mind in how DB hid blitzes and subbed in and out linemen for different packages and allowed the players to go full steam more often. I think we see this on offense as well with our multiple TE sets and will only build on this with the more talent we have coming in. We also saw this against Ohio in that we had to game plan against where and how they lined up Samuel in order to get him mismatches. Also how our opponents would try and get talented rbs in 1on1s with our inside backers.