OT: 66% of NCAA Power 5 Conference HC Jobs have Turned over in 4 Years

Submitted by alum96 on

Quite amazing turnover when you think about it - in one presidential cycle half a decade 66% of Power 5 jobs have turned over.  42 of 64 jobs. 

Which is why if you are a Les Miles or Jim Harbaugh proponent and he stays "only" 6 years it wouldn't be so bad, he'd be in the upper 33% percentile for duration.

Even if you just go back just 3 seasons coached it is 36 of 64 (56%) jobs turned over.  That's astounding.

The Pac 12 has been hit ridiculously hard only 1 coach  have lasted 5+ years and that coach's team, Utah, was not in the Pac 12  five years ago.

The Big 12 has been the only relatively stable conference.

 

ACC - 8 of 14 (57%)

  • FSU
  • Clemson
  • Louisville - 2013
  • BC - 2012
  • NC State - 2012
  • Wake Forest - 2013
  • Syracuse - 2012
  • GA Tech
  • Duke
  • NC - 2011
  • Pitt - 2011
  • Miami Fl - 2010
  • VA Tech
  • VA

 

Big 10 - 11 of 14 (79%)

  • OSU - 2011
  • UM - 2014, 2010
  • MSU
  • MD - 2010
  • Rutgers - 2011
  • PSU - 2013
  • Indiana - 2010
  • Wis - 2014, 2012
  • MN - 2010
  • Neb - 2014
  • Iowa
  • ILL - 2011
  • Purdue - 2012
  • NW

 

Pac 12 - 11 of 12 (92%)

  • Oregon - 2012
  • Stanford - 2010
  • WA - 2013
  • WA State - 2011
  • Cal  - 2012
  • Oregon State - 2014
  • AZ - 2011
  • AZ State - 2011
  • UCLA - 2011
  • USC - 2013
  • Utah
  • CO - 2012

 

SEC - 8 of 14 (57%)

  • MO
  • GA
  • UF - 2014
  • SC
  • TN - 2012
  • UK - 2012
  • Vanderbilt - 2013
  • Bama
  • MSU
  • Ole Miss - 2011
  • LSU
  • Auburn - 2012
  • A&M - 2011
  • Arkansas - 2012

 

Big 12 - 4 of 10 (40%)

  • Texas - 2013
  • Oklahoma
  • Baylor
  • TCU
  • KSU
  • WVA - 2010
  • OK State
  • Texas Tech - 2012
  • Kansas - 2014
  • Iowa State

alum96

December 10th, 2014 at 10:56 PM ^

I used first season (Jimbo was 2010)

via Wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_footba…

The years above are sort of the "replacement year" so it is a bit confusing.  i.e. Hoke was replaced in Jan 2011, other coaches in that cycle were replaced in December 2010 but they all had their first year in 2011.  So I listed all the "Hoke year" guys as 2010 changes as most were hired before Jan 1.  Jimbo coached in 2010.

But actually now that I think about it - I'm off by a year, anyone who was hired in late 2010 or early 2011 has only been coaching 4 years or less - so it is 66% in 4 years (not 5) using that methodology.  Will edit.

WichitanWolverine

December 10th, 2014 at 10:37 PM ^

Good stuff. This kind of confirms what I've been thinking for awhile. When people say they want a coach to come in for 10-15 years and stabilize the program, that seems sort of nuts. It just doesn't happen that way anymore. And the same thing applies with Average Joe in the workforce. People rarely stay in one spot for more than 3-5 years these days.

Brodie

December 11th, 2014 at 4:42 AM ^

well, let's put some of this in context. From 1981 to 1984, in the B1G, you had:

 

Ohio State

Michigan

Iowa

Illinois

Wisconsin

Northwestern

Minnesota - 1984

Michigan State - 1983

Purdue - 1982

Indiana - 1983, 1984

 

In the SEC:

Georgia

Tennessee

Mississippi State

Auburn

Kentucky

Vanderbilt

Florida (fired their coach during 1984 season)

LSU - 1984

Ole Miss - 1983

Alabama - 1983

 

In the Pac-10:

Washington

Arizona State

UCLA

Arizona

Washington State

Oregon

Oregon State

USC - 1983

Stanford - 1984

Cal - 1982

 

In the ACC:

North Carolina

Clemson

Wake Forest

Maryland - 1982

Duke - 1983

NCSU - 1983

Virginia - 1982

 

In the Big 8:

Nebraska

Oklahoma

Mizzou

KSU

Oklahoma State - 1984

Iowa State - 1983

Kansas - 1983

Colorado - 1982

 

And in the SWC:

Houston

Texas

Baylor

Texas Tech

SMU - 1982

Arkansas - 1984

A&M - 1982

TCU - 1983

Rice - 1984

 

So what's the takeaway? Yes,there was alot more stability 30 years ago, but notice what this means in real terms... Jerry Moore's Texas Tech teams never won more than 3 games in this stretch, ditto Dennis Green at Northwestern. Vandy and KSU stuck with coaches whose winning percentages were under .300 for that entire stretch. It's not that there's no such thing as stability anymore, it's that the bottom feeders of the P5 are no longer content to spend year after year losing 9 games.

tolmichfan

December 10th, 2014 at 10:47 PM ^

This just confirms how much money has changed football. If your a coach and winning you are looking for the next bigger job, and the schools are going to fire you if you fuck up thier money stream by not winning imeadeatly.

MonkeyMan

December 10th, 2014 at 10:52 PM ^

Maybe this is stupid turnover- the bolded higher turnover teams have the most losses for the most part (which is why they are firing coaches) but it doesn't really seem to change their fortunes much. 

There is something to be said about consistency- not everybody can be a top contender but you can have a good program that is stable. I really think colleges don't get anything by paying big bucks for a new coach- there aren't that many Sabans out there. Not everyone can become a National Champ. 

Colleges could save a lot of money by hiring a cheaper up and coming coach from the lower ranks. Often they produce results as good as or better than the so called "big name" hire.

I think Nebraska will regret their move.

LSAClassOf2000

December 11th, 2014 at 6:48 AM ^

It would be interesting to develop a chart of average tenure for Power 5 coaches over the last 30 years or so just to see visually the change in behavior of programs over time. It seems like years ago a fair number of coaches spent a long time at "meh" programs and now there is considerably more discontent shown when such situations are allowed to continue. Everyone now is trying to be more than what they are and the playoff format will probably encourage a little more "win now" behavior. 

Two Hearted Ale

December 11th, 2014 at 7:56 AM ^

The NFL has been on the coaching carousel program for several decades. When Wayne Fontes was fired he had the most tenure of any NFL coach (10 or 11 years if memory serves, which it usually doesn't). Between 1969 and 2007 Michigan was pretty much insulated from "turnover". There were three coaches in that time but Moeller and Carr were internal hires and the rest of the staff stayed in place. I'm curious to what degree coaching changes have increased as it feels like an abrupt upswing in Ann Arbor.

lilpenny1316

December 11th, 2014 at 9:45 AM ^

Sumlin was hired after their last game in 2011, but Texas A&M was still competing in the Big 12 in other sports.  I'm just thinking that the coaching change would've happened regardless of conference so the Big 12 should get credit for the change.

Evil Empire

December 11th, 2014 at 11:03 AM ^

Frank Beamer has been at Va Tech since 1987. 

The next in the longevity game are Bob Stoops (hired 12/1/1998) and Kirk Ferentz (hired the day after Stoops).  Gary Patterson was elevated to head coach of TCU when Dennis Franchione left for Alabama after the 1999 season.

Those are the only four head coaches in D-I who were leading their current teams at the start of the 2000 seaon.