M-Wolverine

September 1st, 2011 at 7:31 PM ^

With the "offense knowing where they're going" and all that...but how many really bad weather games are barn burners, and how many are low scoring or sloppy? I don't know that at Purdue last year it made our offense look better.

dahblue

September 1st, 2011 at 5:31 PM ^

As an weather nerd (yes, I even took meteorology at UofM) and big Michigan football fan, I've been watching the date carefully.  The forecast has gone from sunny to rain...to sun...to rain...to rain early and then sunny...and now sun early and then rain.  The good news is that we have 2 more days for the pattern to change twice more.

go16blue

September 1st, 2011 at 5:49 PM ^

I would hate to see lightning, but outside of that weather is irrelevant. It's a football game, the players can suck it up and so can the fans. Honestly, rain would help us more than WMU and their "high powered" passing attack. Either way, weather reports are meaningless, at least until tomorrow.

Edit: weather.com says chance of rain is 40%, and even your forecast says 60%, so it's no sure thing.

ijohnb

September 1st, 2011 at 6:47 PM ^

in the second quarter.  Did wonders for the against Central in 06.  That one was tight before the "lightning in the area"

icefins26

September 1st, 2011 at 8:36 PM ^

As another weather nerd, it all depends on when the cold front goes through. It won't be a washout regardless but as of now, most of the activity looks to be south of 94...

david from wyoming

September 1st, 2011 at 9:05 PM ^

Lol wut? At two days out, there is no chance of predicting a storms locations well enough to say something like "most of the activity will be south of highway XX" You would have a hard time predicting that 4 hours away from kickoff.

david from wyoming

September 1st, 2011 at 11:45 PM ^

Okay, I'll call you out on this. I'm a phd student in atmospheric sciences, I've been an intern for the NWS and I've been teaching college level weather course for 4 years now. Maybe I'm wrong and misread your first post, but if you think the NWS can predict the fluid dynamics that precise almost 48 hours in advance of a storm, you're nuts. If the low sets up 10 miles in a different direction, the storms will be 10 miles in a different direction. Any small change in the initial conditions of the model run would shift the center of the low by at least 10 miles. If you don't trust me, check the different models. They all show different locations for the low.

 

There is a 60 percent chance of rain currently after 4pm Saturday in Ann Arbor. If you try to say anything more than that, you are talking out of your ass.

icefins26

September 2nd, 2011 at 8:07 AM ^

I too have my undergrad in Meteorology.  I took my post to mean that most of the thunderstorm activity looks to be south of 94, as in the SPC has outlined areas from 94 southward into northern Ohio.  I'm not doubting we won't get precipitation but I know for a fact since it's a frontal system (and not low pressure) that it won't be an all-day rain regardless.  It all comes down to timing with the front and where the best set-up will be.  And as of right now  (and the last 3 days) it looks to be south of 94 where the most thunderstorm activity will be.  As you know though, things can change.  We shall see.

/nerded

pinkfloyd2000

September 1st, 2011 at 11:40 PM ^

For you weather geeks:

 

AS AN UPSTREAM COLD FRONT WILL SOUTHWARD THROUGH THE AREA
OVERNIGHT ON FRIDAY...BRINGING THE POTENTIAL FOR SHOWERS AND
THUNDERSTORMS FRIDAY NIGHT THROUGH SATURDAY NIGHT. THE TIMING AND
COVERAGE OF INDIVIDUAL ROUNDS OF PRECIP CONTINUES TO BE
UNCERTAIN...BUT THE PATTERN HOLDS THE POTENTIAL TO PRODUCE A HEFTY
AMOUNT OF RAIN. THE SAGINAW VALLEY AND THUMB REGION STAND THE BEST
CHANCE OF SEEING THUNDERSTORMS INTO LATE FRI EVENING...MAINLY IF ANY
SUBSTANTIAL CONVECTION GETS GOING TO OUR NORTH AND WEST.
OTHERWISE...MAINTAINED CHC POPS AS THE FRONT SAGS SOUTHWARD
OVERNIGHT FRIDAY IN THE PRESENCE OF A WEAK LOW LEVEL JET. THE
FRONT WILL THEN STALL OVER THE SOUTHERN THIRD OF THE CWA BY
SATURDAY MORNING AND BECOME INCREASINGLY PARALLEL TO THE MEAN FLOW
ALOFT.

WITH THE MOISTURE AXIS OVERHEAD ON SATURDAY CLOUDS WILL
LIKELY LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE INSTABILITY. AREAS NEAR AND
SOUTH OF THE SFC FRONT WILL STAND THE BEST CHANCE FOR ACHIEVING
MODERATE INSTABILITY...AND CURRENT GFS PROGS OF 0-6KM BULK SHEAR
OF 30+KTS SUGGEST THAT ORGANIZED CONVECTION REMAINS A POSSIBILITY
ON SATURDAY AFTERNOON...MAINLY I-94 AND SOUTH. CONVECTION MAY
DEVELOP ONCE AGAIN LATE ON SATURDAY AHEAD OF THE MAIN TROUGH AXIS
AND UNDER DECENT SUPPORT FROM THE RIGHT ENTRANCEOF A 120KT JET. THUS...TRAINING
OF THUNDERSTORMS AND A SUBSEQUENT HEAVY RAIN THREAT DOES APPEAR TO
BE A POSSIBILITY AT THIS POINT...ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE ZONALLY
ORIENTED STALLED FRONT...PWATS AROUND 2 INCHES...AND THE
INCREASING LIKLIHOOD FOR MULTIPLE ROUNDS OF CONVECTION. OVERALL...THE
FORECAST HAS BEEN TRENDED TOWARD THE WET SIDE FOR THE PERIOD
BEGINNING FRIDAY NIGHT AND ENDING SUNDAY MORNING...BUT DOES NOT REFLECT
THE FULL POTENTIAL OF THIS PATTERN GIVEN CONTINUED
UNCERTAINTIES.

 

pinkfloyd2000

September 2nd, 2011 at 10:02 AM ^

The NWS lowered the rain chances during the day to 20 percent, and upped the rain chances at night to 70 percent. Obviously, a slower moving system than originally forecast. It looks like we might be just fine here -- it'll be hot, of course. NWS is saying 91 for the high.