MFun

March 25th, 2021 at 12:43 AM ^

Can we move past Nico Collins please? 

High potential. Didn't do much here sadly. Not necessarily his fault but comparing everyone to Nico is absurd. He could be a solid NFL player but if he says no talent gap, he trippin'.

ERdocLSA2004

March 25th, 2021 at 12:32 PM ^

Yup.  Harbaugh is a great coach and no talent gap.  Actions speak louder than words though, Nico.  We know why you opted out and don’t blame you one bit, but don’t think you’re fooling us with all of this smoke.  The best players on the best teams still played in 2020 and it wasn’t by accident.

rob f

March 24th, 2021 at 4:38 PM ^

Is "Dustin Schutte" the only writer for the entire Saturday Tradition website is it just a generic screen name for their generic writers?

I clicked on over a dozen articles on that site and "Dustin" wrote 'em all! 

outsidethebox

March 24th, 2021 at 4:38 PM ^

It certainly includes a statement regarding coaching. The scoreboard and the breadth, length and depth of the futility in this "rivalry" is more reflective of the coaching staff talent gap than the player talent gap. And today the buck still stops at the top. There are days when, watching the quality of Juwan and his staff, my leash for Jim get more than short. 

ThadMattasagoblin

March 24th, 2021 at 4:46 PM ^

I'd say the difference between Juwan and Harbaugh are that Juwan can recruit at the same level as Duke and Kentucky while Harbaugh is nowhere close to Alabama or Ohio State. On the court, adjustments seem to be made after halftime like in the BTT Maryland game and LSU game. In football, the team seems to play the same or worse after halftime like in the 2016 Iowa game or 2020 MSU game.

roosterbaan

March 24th, 2021 at 5:21 PM ^

limited data on Juwan with only 1.75 seasons and many key players having been developed and recruited under Beilein, but can't argue with this analysis given the the data we have. We do need to acknowledge that Harbaugh was handed a rebuilding effort, but Juwan was handed an ascendent program. Also key pieces -- primary rival in basketball (MSU) had peaked a decade earlier but primary rival in football (OSU) has been on a consistent rise that has spanned two decades. 

jcorqian

March 24th, 2021 at 10:07 PM ^

I don't get this point.  Football has 85 scholarships, while basketball has 13(?).  Football has I believe 11 coaches that can recruit, and basketball has 4 coaches.  85 / 11 vs. 13 / 4, not even close in terms of numbers / effort level.  Lot easier to amass talent just statistically.

OneEyedMooseSm…

March 24th, 2021 at 10:41 PM ^

Truth.  Look at the results, look at the principal actor in each program.  I've written and re-written this comment a few times trying to get my words right, but I know what I see, and I see competency, family, credibility, process, and end-game results on the Blue Hoops side with Coach Howard.  I don't see that on the other side.

MichiganExile

March 24th, 2021 at 5:49 PM ^

What metric could we possibly use to try and prove there isn't a talent gap between Michigan and OSU in football? Unless we are taking the whole of their histories which is probably a bad idea since they still have more Heisman winners and claimed national titles, including a better overall winning percentage at this point. Just looking at the past 20 or so years it looks like this:

Recruiting rankings - gap

NFL draft picks - massive gap

On-field performance - historically massive gap. 

That's why the statement that there is no talent gap is incorrect. I hate writing it just as much as any Michigan fan hates reading it, but let's not be delusional. 

 

mooseman

March 24th, 2021 at 8:11 PM ^

Than many programs, yes. But there is little doubt the amount of talent entering OSU is above Michigan as rated by third parties. That's not to defend development or utilization of that talent. A 5 star guy at Michigan is a big deal. At OSU it's pretty commonplace. Since 2017, for instance, 16 for OSU. 4 for Michigan.

MichiganExile

March 24th, 2021 at 10:45 PM ^

Correct, coaching is performed on talent. They start with more talent and it gets better at a greater rate than Michigan. The gap that is already present based on recruiting only gets wider based on coaching. I'm glad we can agree. 

mgoblue0970

March 25th, 2021 at 10:16 AM ^

We don't agree.

What coaching at Michigan have you seen in the last 10 or so years that takes the existing talent and develops it (to OSU levels)?  

You're just going around in circles now.

Nico's whole point is Ohio State not head and shoulders above Michigan.  Starz aside, if that's true, then why cannot Michigan beat Ohio State more than once in the last generation.

Hint:  It's not a fucking spot.  It's coaching.

Coaching matters.  e.g., Mork Dantini, like him or not, didn't rake in near the classes Michigan or Ohio had but still won.

jethro34

March 24th, 2021 at 4:57 PM ^

With all due respect to Nico, this is beyond false. In case there is someone here who still doesn't believe that, take a look.

2020, the highest rated UM recruit would have been the 8th best in OSU's class (Henning)

2019, very good UM class. Daxton would have been #2 in OSU's class. Hinton would have been #4. Charbonet would have been #6.

2018, Aiden Hutchinson was our top recruit. Great player. Would have been astonishingly the 14th highest ranked recruit in OSU's class. Freaking 14th.

2017. DPJ was rated almost as high as Daxton. Would have been 4th highest in OSU's class. Aubrey Solomon would have been 5th, barely, and Ruiz would have been 8th.

I think I can stop there. Even our absolute best classes, they still have better top end players. Our decent classes? They destroy us. Over that 4 year stretch we barely have any players who would start on either side of the ball. So UM recruits would essentially fill out the 2-deep. When our starters would almost exclusively be their backups, how are we expected to win?

So yes, while there have been plenty of coaching and development shortcomings, the answer is talent, talent, talent.