Michigan v Marquette

Submitted by uncle leo on

My fellow M go basketball fans, looking forward to this one? I really don't know a ton about Marquette this year, but both teams are 2-0. Game is at MSG.

Marquette has had a strong knack recently of being a very average Big East team, but are coming off a pretty solid season last year. They have one guy at 6-11, after that they are about as short as Michigan.

uncle leo

November 17th, 2016 at 9:32 AM ^

Don't play. Donnal is tall but plays like he's 5'7. 

In terms of rebounding acumen, Michigan will always be "short" I suppose. Will give it to DJ Wilson though, he's playing like he cares about the glass.

ijohnb

November 17th, 2016 at 9:44 AM ^

beat Howard in much more convincing fashion than we did.  So you have the common opponent to base it on.  However, I am going to go out on a limb with this one.  I know, I know this is a crazy idea with a Beilein team, but I think if we make our three pointers we will win, and if we don't we will lose.

The Fertile Oc…

November 17th, 2016 at 10:05 AM ^

How can you come to a conclusion like this almost 12 hours before the game even starts? Out of the four squads in the 2k Classic, I'd reckon that Michigan is more likely than any other to have a large amount of fans in attendance. 

True, it's a pretty meh assortment of teams, and lots of tickets are still available on the secondary market - at a very cheap price currently - but I still think there will be proportionally more M fans than Pitt, Marquette, or SMU fans. 

ReegsShannon

November 17th, 2016 at 10:36 AM ^

It was the same for IUPUI as well. Even more concerning is that the student section attendance may be even worse than normal attendance. 

http://www.mgoblue.com/tickets/students-bkm-season-plan.html

Aaaaand the Izzone has been planning a trip to Crisler for months because of how cheap tickets are. The fanbase has very much checked out.

The Fertile Oc…

November 17th, 2016 at 10:43 AM ^

This is not a fair comparison. Tons of M fans/alums in NYC metro area who rarely get to see a live game, so when they play in NYC, there is usually a heavy turnout. I was at the Penn State game at MSG last year and thought the crowd had a healthy amount of maize and blue.

 

Obviously this is all speculation. I do suspect the attendance will be generally pretty low, but I also think that Michigan fans will account for the majority of the crowd. 

wolverinefan30

November 17th, 2016 at 9:55 AM ^

The only way I see us winning this game is if we are able to keep Fischer at bay and outrebound them. The last few years we have gotten our asses kicked by decent power conference teams and that has been mostly because of our lack of rebounding.

uncle leo

November 17th, 2016 at 10:02 AM ^

But I always feel like Michigan struggles early against crappy competition and then plays really well in these tougher non-conference road games at neutral sites.

I'd be surprised if this game was 4-5 points either way. It's always tough to prepare for Michigan's offense if you haven't seen it often.

ReegsShannon

November 17th, 2016 at 11:16 AM ^

Eh, that team started slow because of a tough schedule and injuries rather than actual poor play. McGary was playing through injury and then the team had to adjust when he got knocked out. They lost on the road to a top 15 or so Iowa State team, at Duke and to #1 Arizona by 2 points. They lost to Charlotte on a last-second gamewinner, but Charlotte was hot (they were in the Finals of that tournament after all) McGary was out for the season, GRIII missed the second half with injury and Stauskas was playing through an injury as well. 

They still beat a couple other decent teams and then crushed any other inferior competition.

charblue.

November 17th, 2016 at 4:04 PM ^

tournament and both teams shot terribly in that game anabling Charlotte to hang around and eventually win. A bunch of guys were either bunged up or not playing to their capabilty and it was the end of a slog of a tournament. In any case, that game turned out to have no impact on the season.

Erik_in_Dayton

November 17th, 2016 at 10:08 AM ^

...I think Marquette will probably run Michigan out of the building tonight.  But I think Michigan will be better by the end of this year than they were by the end of last year.

LSAClassOf2000

November 17th, 2016 at 10:25 AM ^

I don't have the schedule in front of me, but this is a 9:30 PM start, right?

I am kind of intrigued by this game as an early test against decent competition, something that I think we will need - win or lose - to gauge this team at least a little bit. I am also intrigued by the upcoming game with Virginia Tech in a couple weeks in the Big Ten / ACC Challenge. 

Wolverine Devotee

November 17th, 2016 at 10:43 AM ^

7pm games are the Noon games of basketball to me.

8pm I groan, 9 or later is when I get pissed because it ends so fucking late. Then you have to unwind and try to go to bed.

If it's a big win, you're over the moon and can't sleep. If it's a loss, you toss and turn and can't sleep. 

Thankfully I don't work tomorrow so LET'S BE OVER THE MOON!!

ijohnb

November 17th, 2016 at 1:54 PM ^

I actually agree with him on.  Tonight the game will start at 10, it won't end until just after midnight.  It will take a good hour for me to fall asleep, contemplating how the game unfolded.  So I am looking at falling asleep around 1 AM with a firm wakeup time of 4:45 AM. That sucks.

brettsoz

November 17th, 2016 at 10:46 AM ^

with at least 10 other alumni. I don't think the crowd overall will be large, but a Thursday night in NYC should bring a solid Michigan crowd. Barclays usually had a good showing, and MSG is way easier to get to for a lot more people.

Walter Sobchak

November 17th, 2016 at 11:29 AM ^

This would be a big win for this team. They've shown flashes this year. My bet is DJ starts, we hold them to 1ppp, and we get out with a narrow win.

uncle leo

November 17th, 2016 at 1:45 PM ^

Doesn't play.

Donnal- Plays about a foot shorter than his listed height.

Irvin is a career 4.5 or so rebounder. Never been that great of a defender.

I don't think Robinson can defend anyone or get a rebound to use that height.

Height-wise, they aren't "short." However, this team is as guard-oriented as it always has been and will likely get crushed on the glass again unless others step up.