Michigan is consistently getting more penalties than their opponents

Submitted by Maizen on

Penalties-Yards

UM: 7-55   UF: 5-45

UM: 7-68   UC: 4-30

UM: 7-72   AF: 3-29

UM: 7-57   PU: 8-82

UM: 7-53   MSU: 11-81

UM: 16-141   IU: 5-55

UM: 6-59   PSU: 1-10

2016: (Notable B1G games)

UM: 5-48   Iowa: 3-24

UM: 6-45   Wisco: 3-30

UM: 7-59   OSU: 2-6

UM: 7-80   PSU: 2-13

I don't even remember the last time Michigan's DL drew a holding penalty. Obviously UM needs to play with more discipline, but there is a fairly consistent pattern emerging. Very hard for me not to believe there isn't a bias against Harbaugh and Michigan. 

blueblueblue

October 22nd, 2017 at 8:38 AM ^

People who believe this systemic bias shit probably have a lot of Breitbart and Alex Jones in their browsing history. Occam tells us that they are getting more penalites because they are committing more penalties. Sure, some penalties by other teams go un-called. But that doesnt mean that UM is not committing a bunch of penalties themselves. The reason UM is being called for more is that they are not being coached to an adequate degree to commit less. Simple as that. 

kevin holt

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:36 PM ^

You're missing half the point. I don't care that we got CALLED for penalties. Nobody really said those weren't legit. The problem is the no-calls on them. 0 penalties on their offense and defense means, according to you and Occam, that they didn't commit any, which is absolute horseshit.

Germany_Schulz

October 22nd, 2017 at 8:58 AM ^

Thanks for posting this.  I'm so frustrated with refs hating on Michigan it is absolutely ridiculous. This is not just 'fans being upset after a loss' - you've PROVEN that there is a bias.

There is NO WAY that PSU didn't have at LEAST 3 holding penalties not called during the game.  Is PSU offensive line THAT much better than Hurst, Mone and Gary???  

It is just sickening that observable bias is shown, and no answers for it.  

Stats don't lie.  

 

blueblueblue

October 22nd, 2017 at 9:19 AM ^

Stats dont lie? You must not be a scientist. Stats tell a mere slice of reality. They are abstractions from the complexity of life. They simultaneoulsy both aid our understanding and narrow it.

All that the data above tell is is that one team seems to be continually getting more penalities than the teams it plays. There is no reason there. To know if this is an actual bias, we would have to, first, look at a larger sample size, then look at trends more generally, and perhaps look at what happens when the teams we play play other teams. In other words, more data are needed to provide reasons. 

BoCanHam15

October 22nd, 2017 at 9:33 AM ^

Do you really believe that stuff you say? What the f$&@ is discipline? For your simple counter argument there is visible proof and simple common sense that proves a discipline changes. Rules change and sometime they change in order to handicap others. Do you believe that PSU was disciplined to tackle Hurst? Do you believe it didn't happen? Well there is proof of the latter. Discipline doesn't explain away the truth.

Kstuds

October 22nd, 2017 at 9:27 AM ^

Just measuring penalties for and against us doesn’t tell us the whole story. You could make an argument that we reach our DBs to play more physical, or we teach our OTs to block a certain way, in which case we are taught to commit more penalties. I’m not saying that’s the case, but someone could make that argument. What would be more telling is the average number of per game penalties our opponents commit in a given year and how many they get called for in their game vs us. Are our opponents routinely getting called for less penalties vs us than they do throughout the season??? I have 3 kids to deal with this morning so I can’t do the research. Any one else?

NashvilleBLUE

October 22nd, 2017 at 9:54 AM ^

I think a better way to truely see if Michigan is getting shafted is for someone to look at each opponent's average penalties per game (quantity and yards) and then compare that to what they had against us. 

Then, although not as useful, you could compare the average penalty yards of each opponent's oppenent and then see that compared to our pentalty yards verse them.

I know there is no way to eliminate bias from my own perception of the terrible calls, but good gravy, it sure feels like we are getting no calls. There were 4! grounding calls in the last 2 games that were textbook calls and none were called.

Frieze Memorial

October 22nd, 2017 at 10:19 AM ^

I'd love to see these numbers with self inflicted penalties (false starts, delay of game etc) taken out. I think we seem a bit undisciplined but there have been some real and persistent reffing problems.

LandryHD

October 22nd, 2017 at 10:33 AM ^

His 49er teams were the same way. A lot of delay of games, false starts, illegal formations and for some reason a lot of offsides or encroachments on one player (can't think of his name right now) that I'm sure is coachable.

Putt4Birdie

October 22nd, 2017 at 11:27 AM ^

the Ref look at Harbaugh like, " your team doesn't pay

its Mafia Tribute Tax , tough shit...."

 

Whoever the Crime Family/Families are who

influence the Refs for College Football, ask again,

maybe they'll start paying to make it fair? 

 

Somebody? We ( U of M ) have tons of Money, right?

 

I'm half kidding,  but not really...

 

 

Germany_Schulz

October 22nd, 2017 at 11:34 AM ^

My point was if you look at what Maizen showed, it is clear that we're nearly doubled the penalties over a season and a half (and against strong opponents; psu, osu, msu, wisc ~ avg only 3 penalties per game against Michigan) at nearly 7 penalites per game for big yardage.

And further, I don't think our team has crummy players that hold more than other schools, we're just being CALLED for them more. 

The refs ARE against Michigan.  If we all agree there is "holding on every play" - why is Michigan being called twice as much as their competition for it? 

 

DHughes5218

October 22nd, 2017 at 5:38 PM ^

Do you really think there is a conference wide conspiracy to punish Michigan? Seriously? The stats that show we are penalized more (most of the time), in your mind, proves the conspiracy and not that we actually commit more penalties. Basically you are saying Michigan is the victim of the largest, most serious, sports conspiracy in the history of football. Jim Delany, or some other high ranking person in the league office, is risking everything he has in an effort to hold Michigan down. I saw Gary get held on a couple of plays when there was no flag thrown, but in all likelihood the official either didn't see it or felt it didn't impact the play enough to warrant a flag. The alternative that you subscribe to is too absurd to be real.

MGoBlue96

October 22nd, 2017 at 1:04 PM ^

The lack of holding called against UM's opponents has been a pattern the last 2-3 years, we have had NFL caliber player d-lines and you are seriously telling me that they are only held a handful of times over that timespan, give me a fucking break. UM's opponents have held the shit out of the d-line over the last 2-3 years and for the most part got away with it even when it is obvious and is right in front of the official.

Victor B

October 22nd, 2017 at 2:33 PM ^

The offense was gifted the ball back on a holding call against MSU as they were trying to run out the clock. Sorry to interject facts into the equation.