Meta: Brian's Wikipedia Page

Submitted by imdeng on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Cook_%28football_blogger_and_author%…

I guess this page needs the attention of people who are good with Wikipedia editing and who would like Brian's accomplished career as a college sports blogger and writer to get its rightful place in the respository of all human knowledge that is Wikipedia.

BTW - the page will get deleted pretty soon unless it gets some decent content. Wikipedia editors have become merciless recently in purging pages they deem not good enough or about people not important enough for Wikipedia.

mgokev

October 6th, 2010 at 6:15 PM ^

Someone could add a picture.  Or something about his propensity for playing with power tools when drinking.  Or maybe something legitimate like how long he has run the site, web traffic information, guest appearances on the radio, podcasts, etc.

Did he also do stuff for AOL at some point?

jmblue

October 6th, 2010 at 6:30 PM ^

I love this site, and I'm sure Brian's a great guy.  But honestly, I think the only people who would think to find his wikipedia page would already know who he is.

maiznbob

October 6th, 2010 at 6:30 PM ^

mantioning the fact that he holds the record for longest field goal in University of Michigan History and that on the very next play he sacked the kick-off return man from Texas Southern for a seven yard loss.

Geaux_Blue

October 6th, 2010 at 6:33 PM ^

but jump on adding his old archived stuff available in the boxes to the left. his editorship of the Maple Street book should be an item as well. save the jokes and bs and it might stay up.

nicknick

October 6th, 2010 at 6:41 PM ^

"MGoBlog" is probably a more notable topic than Brian is at this point in time, and might be an easier place to start. This is being blunt, and not dissing Brian; I hero-worship him as much as the next MGoReader.

jeag

October 6th, 2010 at 8:15 PM ^

Speaking of Wikipedia, it no longer recognizes Brian's 1999 Ray Guy Award. As long as such historical truths are irresponsibly deleted by overskeptical mods, Wikipedia will never be a credible source.

Noleverine

October 7th, 2010 at 12:33 AM ^

I recently got to thinking, after spending some time on other team's boards (not trolling, but looking at both mod- and user-generated content, and I have realized something profound...

We are very lucky to have Brian and other contributors to this board.  Their intelligent analysis of Michigan sports, as well as University business, has made it easy to love and learn about Michigan.  For those of you who remember, this site used to be a hobby of Brian's.  A passionate hobby, but he would work on this in his spare time.

I have been reading this blog since before I went to U of M, and as an out-of-state fan he has consistently made my research and pure obsession for Michigan football much easier.  SO, I wanted to take this time to personally thank him, and say Michigan sports would be just like every other site without his dedication and passion.

 

Brodie

October 7th, 2010 at 5:28 AM ^

Speaking as a sometimes serious Wiki editor, a page on Brian would never work. There are no independent sources (ie. most of what we know about him comes from his own site) and not a lot to establish notability (not the subject of a profile in any notable publication, etc). MGoBlog itself is probably big enough for an article, but Brian will always be deleted. He just doesn't meet BLP (Biographies of Living Persons) standards as outlined by Wiki policy.

Blazefire

October 7th, 2010 at 7:31 AM ^

If I go out and self publish "The unauthorized biography of Brian Cook", wherein I report that he is actually a secret agent chinese midget with a bizarre attachment to a certain Kermit the Frog doll, then I can create a wikipedia page with that info.

But If I create a nice wiki page with no supporting evidence other than what the guy himself says to be true, that gets deleted. Foolish.

Brodie

October 7th, 2010 at 4:47 PM ^

You'd still have to establish notability and someone would probably delete it anyway based on the single source. I mean, there are dozens of "biographies" of Davy Crockett filled with absurd tall tales and yet his Wiki page is 100% accurate. I've read some prominent historians' opinions on Wikipedia... the general consensus is that the problem isn't false information, it's the writing style which often doesn't meet encyclopedic standards.

CRex

October 7th, 2010 at 8:50 AM ^

Beside the picture of Hotty Toddy, there is also this little gem:

The  Hotty Toddy  mascot  concept  has  been   inspired  in  part  by  the  past  performances  of  former  Ole   Miss  cheerleaders  led  by  stuntman  Ty  Cobb.    Cobb  and   other  Ole  Miss  cheerleaders  evolved  into  the  Bud  light   Daredevils  acrobatic  team and  served  as  the   inspiration  for  many  of  the  modern-­‐day  pro  mascot   personalities
Yes, a mascot in part inspired by Bud Light. Now that just screams top tier academic institution. I wonder if he'll carry around a dirty thirty as well.