DT76

March 8th, 2017 at 4:17 PM ^

A lot of jet fuel on that thing just waiting to go, jeezus. How it affects their play tomorrow, I don't really give a shit. Glad they are all safe.

robpollard

March 8th, 2017 at 4:18 PM ^

I was worried about freaking *driving* to work in SE Michigan today, due to downed power lines, tree limbs falling, grabage cans skittering across the road.

Yet someone thought it was a good idea to try and takeoff around 2-3pm, when winds were at their highest and gusting at up 55 MPH? Severe wind gusts during takeoff/landing are near the top of the list for danger in flight (which, generally speaking, is much safer than driving).

Wait until this evening when the winds die down. This looks like a chartered plane -- use some of that sweet Michigan cash and delay the trip a few hours.

TheDirtyD

March 8th, 2017 at 5:45 PM ^

For an airline crew to encounter winds at this rate. It's fairly normal to see these winds during the winter months at most airports. A few years ago I remember landing in a 52 kt winds which had a 37 kt crosswind component at O'Hare on about 2 inches of snow. These charter companies don't fly nearly the same amount of hours that the airline crews do so I think your seeing that play a factor in this. Most of these charters used to be flown by airlines themselves however the shortage of pilots have made airlines reduce the amount of charters flown.

jmblue

March 8th, 2017 at 4:21 PM ^

Could the BTT reschedule some of the games tomorrow?  If we can't get there as planned, is it fair to ask us to play at noon?

 

robpollard

March 8th, 2017 at 4:27 PM ^

The wind is supposed to significantly die down by this evening. Michigan (and any other team) should be able to catch a flight around 7-8pm.

While not ideal, that's plenty of team for them to physically be there for a 12pm game tomorrow. Whether they will be "off" because of the travel plan changes, who knows? But TV contracts are lined up, tickets have been sold, etc.

ChalmersE

March 8th, 2017 at 5:59 PM ^

I read somewhere they're busing to D.C. If that's the case, even with decent traffic, they're not getting there until the wee hours of the morning. I'm guessing they're staying at the Hyatt Regency, which is a couple of blocks from the Verizon Center, but still. I can't see how anything would be prejudiced by swapping the noon and 2 pm games, but Big Ten. Edit: now hearing that they may not go until the morning. If so, have to believe, schedule will be changed. I would think it could also impact Friday tip - if they move to Thursday evening, then expecting either team to play again at noon . . .

stephenrjking

March 8th, 2017 at 4:28 PM ^

Wow, that's terrifying. I am glad everyone is safe, though it sounds like someone did get at least a little bit banged up. Could have been a lot worse.

Also if I am the owner of a plan manufacturer that a competitor with the builder of plane they just crashed in, I am going to hire Derrick Walton to create a plane and/or marketing strategy to destroy their rival once and for all. 

What a bizarre day. I'm glad everyone is well enough that we can discuss basketball implications about this, but seriously: how does this affect the team tomorrow? Friday if they make it that far?

Swayze Howell Sheen

March 8th, 2017 at 5:24 PM ^

this paragraph is pure gold:

"Also if I am the owner of a plan manufacturer that a competitor with the builder of plane they just crashed in, I am going to hire Derrick Walton to create a plane and/or marketing strategy to destroy their rival once and for all."

there is so much in there that made me laugh. It reminds of the whole "t-shirts in ohio" thing.

 

pinkfloyd2000

March 8th, 2017 at 4:29 PM ^

Get in, everyone. I'm driving this team to D.C. tonight.

 

Seriously, tho -- wow. I'm glad no one was hurt. Like others in this thread, though, I'm wondering why the attempt to take off was even made, knowing what they knew about the conditions. 

ndscott50

March 8th, 2017 at 4:30 PM ^

They are all lucky to be alive. It looks like the landing gear collapsed after the plane left the runway.  That implies some speed and a quick stop.  We will have to wait for more details but I would imagine the effects on the body would be similar to being in a car accident.  Having been in a couple you tend to wake up the next day very sore from the impact.  It could be very difficult for this team to play a game at 12pm tomorrow. Not to mention having everyone spend twelve hours on a bus after being in a crash like that.

Glad they are genrally OK but very concerned about putting them on the basketball court within 24 hours of this incident.

ndscott50

March 8th, 2017 at 5:19 PM ^

You are assuming it slowly slid to a halt.  Once the gear hit the grass it could have stopped very quickly.  30mph to 0 mph in 5 seconds is no big deal.  If it happened in 1 second it would be like a car crash. The comment that people were banged up implies some amount of force was exerted on the passengers.

stephenrjking

March 8th, 2017 at 5:22 PM ^

You think the gear just gently lowered the plane to the ground? The post you're responding to suggests that the gear collapsed upon leaving the runway. The amount of force required to collapse the gear is pretty harsh; that sounds a lot like a car accident to me. Not a fatal 60 mph head-on wreck, but a hard fender-bender for sure. That would have been a hard and scary hit.

Tacopants

March 8th, 2017 at 5:42 PM ^

The plane rolled about 1000 ft past the end of the runway. The only major jolt wwas probably the ditch that collapsed the nose gear.

All in all the only people that were hurt most likely weren't belted in and suffered their injuries when the plane started braking hard, compounded by the jolts as it went onto the grass. Anyone wearing a seat belt should physically be fine.

robpollard

March 8th, 2017 at 5:00 PM ^

An older plane, but plenty of them still in service. Seats well over 150 passengers when configured for regular travel (may have fewer seats, for more room for bigger passengers such as basketball players, for charter flights).

Don't know if we have any pilots on the board, but it would be interesting to know if this plane, typically, would differ in the type of tech & capabilities it has for dealing with wind gusts / shears versus planes built in the last 10 years or so.

Tacopants

March 8th, 2017 at 5:51 PM ^

It's an MD-83, virtually identical to the ones that American just retired or the MD-87/88s that Delta still flies.

 

Not sure yet why takeoff was rejected. If it was wind shear related there's really no advantage a new aircraft has vs an older one.

pinkfloyd2000

March 8th, 2017 at 4:50 PM ^

Yeah, it's from a 247 article, but -- 

 

No major injuries were sustained in the accident and the team will make their way to Washington D.C. by bus due to the severe weather in the area.

In reply to by StraightDave

bluebyyou

March 8th, 2017 at 9:20 PM ^

They may not have an aircraft available on short notice.  Another problem is the equipment is on the plane and can't be touched because the accident is being investigated.

rob f

March 8th, 2017 at 5:09 PM ^

TV station's 5pm News. Our team---and the entirity of U of M, for that matter---is very fortunate that this didn't turn out worse. BTW, first thing I did to get more information was to click on MGoBlog. As expected, here it was. Thanks.

pinkfloyd2000

March 8th, 2017 at 5:45 PM ^

I'm no aviation expert, but it sounds from that write-up that the takeoff was aborted at just about the last possible opportunity (plane was at "high speed."). I can't even imagine how freaking scary that would have been. I've been aboard a plane before that had some slight slippage during the taxiing process, but, thankfully, nothing remotely close to what happened here.

 

Wolvie3758

March 8th, 2017 at 5:39 PM ^

this was the extent...could have been catastrophic...Like some others I fear this will really affect them tommorow....how could it not?  on the other hand maybe it will make them appreciate the game more and play the B!10 tournament lights out!!!!!

TheDirtyD

March 8th, 2017 at 6:05 PM ^

The pilot is most likely the reason to blame. The crew most likely rejected above V1, V1 is takeoff decision speed. You don't reject above V1 unless the wings are gone, not even if the engines fail. The team was using Ameristar Airlines as a charter they don't exactly attract the best quality pilots.