Line Trending Against Michigan

Submitted by UMFan1780 on December 6th, 2023 at 7:50 AM

Most bets are on Alabama, not just with the spread, but on the money line. I’m not saying this game is going to be easy, but I do think Michigan has a better chance to win than Alabama. However, the vast majority of the public (and the majority of the pundits) are predicting Alabama, with a great deal of confidence to boot. Is that just based on their name? Recency bias for beating Georgia? I mean, 11 days ago it took a miracle for them to beat a 6-6 Auburn team. What am I missing?

https://sports.yahoo.com/bettors-are-heavily-backing-alabama-to-beat-michigan-in-the-rose-bowl-160957331.html

The Homie J

December 6th, 2023 at 9:42 AM ^

This is one of those situations where this year's teams and all the stats are likely correct in that Michigan is a slight favorite, but all the past evidence and "feelingsball" tilts heavily in Alabama's favor.  I'm fine with that, as I myself somewhat want to see it before I believe it.

I have more hope than most due to how even we played Bama in 2019 with a much worse team than this year, but Saban with a month to prepare is a brutal challenge, especially in the playoff where Bama rarely loses.

If we win this one, boy howdy is it gonna feel great

rice4114

December 7th, 2023 at 12:54 AM ^

Performance in the post season. One is a master the other its his only remaining flaw (talking point). You dont put money against someone with Saban's record. It should be fun. I think if you look at SP+ numbers and see Michigan with an advantage its also important to look at who may have held their offense back in a matter of speaking. UM couldve opened up a lot more plays whereas Alabama was doing everything they could to survive these one score games. We might have a lot of data points that UM purposefully never put on the table.

lmgoblue1

December 6th, 2023 at 9:51 AM ^

I was at that silly game. I had 3 quarters to really admire Jerry's world. The Alabama fans were great-they had every reason to gloat. Now we have come full circle. I want to see Michigan win. It will be complete then. I didn't think it would take 11 years but in retrospect that's about right. This is our time, and we are going to WIN!

 

GO  BLUE!!

meeashagin

December 6th, 2023 at 12:22 PM ^

Yes, although Michigan is power rated much better than the field this year I believe if we played Texas/Wash we'd be such large fav that we'd get most of the action. And will.

I think SEC/Alabama is the biggest factor. I mean we should be a 5-9 point fav vs Bama if you went off power rankings alone.

Personally, Michigan offense vs Iowa (specifically oline) is the only thing giving me pause. Beyond that in my mind when I think about how this game plays out I expect a close game in which Alabama just like OSU trails Michigan the whole game.

GRBluefan

December 6th, 2023 at 7:54 AM ^

What am I missing?

The fact that Alabama is incredibly talented, incredibly well coached and has a history of showing up in huge games?  Also, that their opponent, while also incredibly talented and well coached, has a history of not exactly showing up in big (post season) games.  

UMForLife

December 6th, 2023 at 9:01 AM ^

Sorry you feel that way. I am just trying to tell you that this year's team on both sides and the coaches deserve evaluation based on what they have done this year. Not a fan of using TCU game or Saban's infinite championship runs to put down our chances. If that means I am being obtuse, so be it. Not my intent.

berto714

December 6th, 2023 at 8:16 AM ^

It’s the same coaches though, and Saban has a long history of doing this with his different teams year after year. Not to mention that for Michigan, most of the key players on the team are the same ones who didn’t show up last year against TCU. Not saying I agree with the logic or not but we should be realistic about Saban’s track record, especially with 3+ weeks to prepare.

BoxLunches

December 6th, 2023 at 1:32 PM ^

I guess it is which part of Saban’s history you are looking at.

I like to cherry-pick and remember that Saban was a mediocre football coach until 1999. His time at MSU was erratic—He would lose to an awful Gopher team and then go and knock off Ohio State. His 1999 season got him the job at LSU, well, that along with a pretty bad year for Mike Shula, but he was very unremarkable as a BIG10 coach.

He did master the SEC Art of the Money very quickly. Now everyone can do that. His team is deep, but so is ours and I think Harbaugh is the better coach.

 

rice4114

December 7th, 2023 at 3:49 AM ^

Its not this Bama teams or any Saban teams midseason basic SEC game valley we are worried about. Its the late season/post season peaks that are the problem vs our typical times to peak under Jim Harbaugh. Sabans most recent example being beating number 1. Thats a helluva peak to be coming off of.

mGrowOld

December 6th, 2023 at 9:38 AM ^

I found this very interesting

"Nearly 80% of the money bet on the spread is taking Alabama plus the point, and a staggering 93% of the money wagered on the money line is on Alabama to win outright."

And yet the spread has only moved .5 points, opened at Michigan -2 and currently sits at Michigan -1.5.  Usually when the early money pounds one side of the line Vegas starts moving the line to attract interest for the other team and balance out their bets.  And yet as of now they're not doing that.

That tells me Vegas is OK with having a massive inbalance favoring Alabama.  Which also tells me the guys who make a shit-ton of money by not paying out bets like Michigan to win/cover or they'd be taking steps to hedge their losses.

sum1valiant

December 6th, 2023 at 12:38 PM ^

The line not moving is proof that none of the sharpest books love Alabama nearly as much as the general public. If a sharp grouped moved on this line, the line itself would be moving along with it.  The fact that it’s sat out there for 3 1/2 days likely means that a lot of groups are waiting for the public to bet it down so they can get better value on Michigan.  

sum1valiant

December 6th, 2023 at 3:48 PM ^

There were never any 2.5’s at big books. I know the articles (like this one) that are looking for storylines are using 2.5 to paint their picture, but there’s not an amateur on the planet that has a 2.5 either way. 2’s were available, but even those disappeared rather quickly. Very few books show a 1 now, and I’d be willing to bet that this ends at UM -1/1.5. If sharps were going to move heavy on Bama, it would’ve already happened. This slow trickle will likely never move it ~3 points, and very unlikely it’ll move through as big of a number as the ML