Indiana Snowflakes: The Offense

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on November 24th, 2019 at 12:00 PM

This will be the thread for your hot takes and snowflakes regarding the offense and offensive playcalling in our game versus Indiana.

WestQuad

November 24th, 2019 at 8:28 AM ^

It's always disappointing to not win the B1G, but I'd rather lose to Wisconsin away and PSU away than MSU and ND at home.  If we beat OSU then this season is a huge success.   (Adding a bowl win against a top opponent would help too.)

If we lose to OSU this season is what was predicted, but with a little hope.   If we lose to OSU and lose a bowl game, the 'fire Harbaugh' crowd will get louder.  

taistreetsmyhero

November 23rd, 2019 at 6:49 PM ^

This offense can beat OSU. Some people seem to be confused about what happened last year. The defense is going to give up a lot of points to OSU. What they need is an offense that keeps them in the game. This offense is clicking at the right time. I believe.

RJWolvie

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:59 PM ^

Upvoted MadHatter, b/c awesome take, but “all we need is our best run game, our best pass game, [and our best defense & special teams] and we win”? Cool: We so got this!

Seriously, though, against their best team since the Ntl Champs, maybe better: we have an appreciable chance? I agree & After how the year started: I’ll take it and be up about it!

JHumich

November 23rd, 2019 at 6:51 PM ^

Nico and DPJ finally getting to do Nico and DPJ things.

Running game a concern, but enough to keep them honest.

Shea decent overall, but the stats are better than the UFR will bear out.

michgoblue

November 24th, 2019 at 10:23 AM ^

I think that most of us realize that Brian is not an NFL or D1 coach, and that his UFR does have some real and obvious limitations. He admits as much (that he often has to guess who screwed up a play or what the intent of a play was). 
 

But, in terms of drilling down and analyzing a player’s performance over the course of a game, or analyzing why an entire aspect of the game is struggling, the UFR gives a really thorough analysis. 
 

Much as we would all like to, most of us can’t just pick up the phone and say, “Hey Jim, can you take a few minutes and explain to me in detail why our running game struggled this week, because o really want to know.” And ESPN is certainly not putting out that level of analysis.  Like many, I sometimes disagree with Brian’s conclusions. It’s not infallible but it’s way better than anything else available. 

Stinky McStinkerton

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:25 PM ^

Our running plays seem to take hours to develop. Haskins, Charbonnet, and for god-knows-why-he-is-playing Tru Wilson are going to have to step it up to get ANY yards. I don't think OSU has to respect our ground game unless Shea is en fuego

LKLIII

November 23rd, 2019 at 10:56 PM ^

I’m not an X’s & O’s guy, but it seemed today there was a lot fewer read option type plays where Shea ran—or even really tried to present himself as a run threat. 

I suspect they’ll have more read option or designed QB runs next week to force OSU to respect that, which loosens up the regular run game. 

BlueMk1690

November 23rd, 2019 at 6:52 PM ^

I said early on, we should score 40 on these guys because really their D struggled all day to stop us. The fact we didn't really came down to self-inflicted problems.

Of course it is nice to see us actually running something that looks like it's out of the current decade and run it pretty decently at that. Now Indiana's D is miles, miles away from OSU so it will require a much better effort next week for sure.

BlueMk1690

November 23rd, 2019 at 7:56 PM ^

I don't think you got the point. The point is that 39 points on this Indiana D given that they couldn't cover our receivers for shit isn't some massive overachievement. OSU put 51 on them. We did a solid job on offense, but we could have really put this game away much earlier if we cut out some of the mistakes.

I'm not normally someone who puts everything into the context of OSU, but given that they're next week's opponent it seems like as good a time as any to put these things into context.

BlueMk1690

November 23rd, 2019 at 8:16 PM ^

OSU was like their first Big Ten game of the year. I don't know on what count you could possibly say they're better today than they were then. They held UConn to 3 points the week after OSU. UConn sucks of course, but I just don't see this massive trend of improvement. Their schedule changed. Sure, early season MSU put 40 on them, but then fairly mediocre MD and Nebraska put 28 and 31 on them respectively a few weeks ago too.

Let's face it - D isn't their forte. An offense with a pulse will put 30 on them with ease. We put 39 on them. Our offense has a pulse, no, more than that. Our offense is actually pretty decent now. The fact that this is now seen as 'negative talk' shows how weird people here get when they talk themselves into delusions of grandeur.