(Football) Most P5 scholarship transfers out, since October: Michigan tied for 9th with 17.

Submitted by CityOfKlompton on July 5th, 2021 at 7:57 PM

Per Pix Six Previews. Tweet for reference:

https://twitter.com/PickSixPreviews/status/1412167707605319682?s=20

Also noted: "Of these, all were within a year of a coaching change, except: UNC, TCU, Michigan.

UNC & TCU probably related to reaching new highs in recruiting class rank"

CityOfKlompton

July 5th, 2021 at 8:24 PM ^

According to 247's transfer portal tracker, these are the 17 players who have transferred out since October:

  1. Osman Savage
  2. Charles Thomas
  3. Zach Carpenter
  4. Will Hart
  5. Christian Turner
  6. Zach Charbonnet
  7. Luiji Villain
  8. Dylan McCaffrey
  9. Ben VanSumeran
  10. Adam Shibley
  11. Joe Milton
  12. Hunter Reynolds
  13. William Mohan
  14. Giles Jackson
  15. Willie Allen
  16. Gaige Garcia
  17. Cornell Wheeler

Also, please don't shoot the messenger. List and information can be taken however you please.

MaizeBlueA2

July 5th, 2021 at 8:41 PM ^

I think Savage was going to be a real player down the road (and not just because I love his last name for a LB).

Carpenter would start at C...that hurts, no question. 

I'm assuming Hart left because he lost his job to Robbins.

Turner would provide depth, I think he's going to do well...but our RB room is stacked. 

Charbonnet hurts a little, he's legit...it would hurt more if we didn't have Haskins, Corum, Edwards...coached by Mike Hart.  But he was a solid back.

VanSumeren hurts. But only because we lost out on his brother. Ben should've stayed at FB and should be starting this year with Mason gone.

Jackson hurts, because he took Worthy with him...and he was also a DANGEROUS return man. Hopefully Henning can have the same impact or better.

 

...literally everyone else was buried on the depth chart unless there were crazy injuries. They should've left.

But those 7 guys above, there's at least some impact to them leaving. In order, IMO:

  1. Carpenter - high/medium 
  2. Jackson - medium
  3. Hart - medium/low
  4. Charbonnet - medium/low
  5. VanSumeren - low
  6. Turner - low
  7. Savage - low/no impact

...the other 10, no impact whatsoever. 

 

4th phase

July 5th, 2021 at 10:06 PM ^

I would have liked to have Thomas and Mohan stick around to develop and see what you get in a year or 2. Their impact would be low according to your scale. 
 

Also still don’t like qbs leaving, would rather have kept mccaffrey and Milton but I understand they wanted a different opportunity. 

Dizzy

July 6th, 2021 at 11:38 AM ^

If good players transfer because they're worried about getting enough playing time, that's a good sign for their position group. I think we'll be pretty good at WR and RB this year, for example.

Also, players that get passed by guys who are younger than them should probably transfer. It's good for everyone. They can go get meaningful playing time somewhere else and Michigan can bring in another recruit. 

If Michigan has more roster churn, they'll have more opportunities to find quality players, similar to the benefits of oversigning.

If Michigan can consistently bring in more players, let them compete, see if they find any diamonds in the rough, and let the rest transfer out, it functions similar to getting a bunch of late round draft picks every year. Most won't pan out, but that's okay. It's all about numbers.

Magnus

July 5th, 2021 at 8:44 PM ^

This is a weird list. I'm not sure where they're getting their information. Several of those players are walk-ons...but if they're including walk-ons, there are several guys missing. And it's not just walk-ons who played (like Adam Shibley), because Gaige Garcia redshirted.

So...I guess what I'm saying is that I don't trust these numbers.

CityOfKlompton

July 5th, 2021 at 8:49 PM ^

Yes, I thought the same. Google searches brought up stories of some of these walk-ons earning a scholarship (thus technically a scholarship player), but others are a mystery.

Hunter Reynolds: https://wolverineswire.usatoday.com/2019/01/26/another-michigan-football-walk-on-added-to-scholarship/

Adam Shibley: https://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/wolverines/2021/02/16/michigan-football-adam-shibley-transfer-portal/6768644002/

Could not find any such information for Fakih or Garcia.

Harlans Haze

July 6th, 2021 at 2:34 PM ^

For the record, Ann Arbor is 120 miles further from Cincy than Bloomington. No matter what Carpenter said, there HAD to have been some football issues involved in his decision to transfer. I have no idea what those issues are/were, but if your personal reasons gained an extra 120 miles, you're not being completely transparent. Of course, that's is right. Just don't assume football was not involved. 

RedRum

July 5th, 2021 at 11:03 PM ^

The joke, your honed, is that COVID wasn’t around from Jan 2017 through Dec of 2019 (I know it was on this way up but very few deaths). The comparison is not relevant. 
 

no material per capita car deaths in the seventeenth century? Maybe they were safer drivers? In the nineteenth century planes must have been really safe as there were no aviation deaths. 


 

 

Qmatic

July 5th, 2021 at 8:35 PM ^

We lost two contributors (at times high level ones): Charbonnet and Giles. One OL who seemed in line for a starting spot. Two QBs: one who seemed the heir and the one who beat him out and lost his job. The only one who seemed to make the least amount of sense was Carpenter. Charbonnet was passed by Haskins and Corum and Edwards were to cut into his limited carries. Giles was a superb returner but seems to be passed as a WR. The ones leaving is more important than the quantity

StirredNotShaken

July 5th, 2021 at 9:43 PM ^

Whenever I hear dismissive attitudes towards transfers I like to imagine Brian Griese transferring in 1994 if the internet existed. "He was buried on the depth chart and had no chance to beat Dreisbach". Or Brady leaving in 1997: "He was a three star that couldn't win the job after three years, who needs him?!"

I'm not saying all (any?) of these guys are comparable to those two, but there is something to be said for keeping guys in the program for four or five years and having them break out as late bloomers. 

UMxWolverines

July 5th, 2021 at 11:18 PM ^

Well, the way it is now we either have to recruit better i.e. find guys that will be early contributors or keep guys in the program and mold them. Wisconsin is successful every year doing this, they have minimal transfers even in today's game. There's a reason we can't seem to build quality depth when guys leave all the time before their senior seasons either to transfer or leave for the NFL even though they're not picked early.