The end of "Ohio"?
Okay, I'll be that guy...
Is this the end of "Ohio" and "Beat Ohio"?
I suspect not, at least from the football program officialdom. They've drawn that line; I don't really expect them to back down.
But for common usage among fans? The ones that don't happen to be going to a Brady Hoke luncheon speech that day? What will any fan-on-the-street be thinking, when saying "Beat Ohio!" Will it be, "D'oh! That first-round tourney loss to a 13-seed?"
Is this the trashtalk-equivalent of Appalachian State? How long before Beilein and Brandon get a rematch with The Ohio University Bobcats?
March 17th, 2012 at 10:06 AM ^
But he does apparently have really good seats that the rest of us would die for. So...there's that.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:43 PM ^
I wish because I hate it, but no
March 16th, 2012 at 11:43 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:44 PM ^
Yeah, they HATE it.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:45 PM ^
I've sided with you on numerous things in the past...but not on this one...my suggestion would be to drop it
March 16th, 2012 at 11:46 PM ^
March 17th, 2012 at 10:08 AM ^
I said the same thing to one of my professors in school who went to Ohio. He was decidedly not amused by my suggestions. Apparently, it's tradition and as a Michigan fan, I need to understand that these are things they hold near and dear to their hearts. Or some BS like that.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:46 PM ^
I'll jump down the hole with Section 1 on this one. I hope the whole Ohio thing ends. I'll say it, I think it's stupid. It's juvenile and unnecessary. It doesn't add to the rivalry or anything, it just makes Brady Hoke as the coach and us as fans look dumb.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:49 PM ^
/flamebait
March 16th, 2012 at 11:51 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:55 PM ^
Were you here last fall? I'm pretty sure anything and everything Coach Hoke has done has made him look like a genius. 11-2 ring a bell? Sugar Bowl Champs? Top 10 defense? Beat OHIO for the first time in 8 years?? Nothing? The only thing that makes the fans look dumb is questioning Hoke at this point.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:02 AM ^
Yeah, I was here last fall. And 30+ falls before that. I think Hoke has been a great hire and has done a great job. I also think refusing to call them Ohio State is lame and, on the whole, reflects poorly on him. I don't see why I can't think both.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:26 AM ^
they're from Ohio...they're OHIO...what's the big deal?
March 17th, 2012 at 12:38 AM ^
We're back to the "I'm more MICHIGAN! than you" line of arguing.
This is the worst thing the Rodriguez era brought, that people have to whip their Michigan Man credentials out like a dick on the table to prove themselves.
If you root for Michigan, you emotionally respond to wins and losses, then it doens't matter if you were in the room with Bo, or you bought an M hat at walmart when you were 12 then went to Eastern, you can count yourself a Michigan fan and you shouldn't have to post your resume about why you're one of the real Michigan fans who get it.
We all know what Section 1's deal is, and despite his crackpot, tinfoil conspiracy theories about Carr, the administration, Brandon and the Freep (that one's only partially crackpot), he's stil a Michigan fan.
You can call his argument's stupid or ridiculous, but to set yourself up as a REAL MICHIGAN MAN, with the obvious connotation that everyone else isn't, is quite frankly imbecilic and the worst characteristic of Michigan arrogance. The whole universe of fans make the University and the athletics program what it is.
We all know what Section 1's deal is, and despite his crackpot, tinfoil conspiracy theories about Carr, the administration, Brandon and the Freep (that one's only partially crackpot), he's stil a Michigan fan.
a) I don't have any conspiracy theories about Lloyd Carr. None. I claim no information -- nothing -- beyond what I have read in Three and Out, just like everybody else.
b) I have little to say about Michigan's athletic and academic administration beyond what is obvious.
c) As to the Free Press and the general press war on Rodriguez (you brought it up); my general views are virtually all the same general views as those of John U. Bacon, Brian Cook, Jon Chait and Frank Beckmann.
Oh, and this; yes, I am still an alum, still a supporter of the University and its athletic department, still a Victors Club member and still an interested observer of the university's intercollegiate teams, hoping that all of the student-athletes excel.
March 17th, 2012 at 10:42 AM ^
All he's saying is the glory he enjoys is being created by the very people he's bitching about. He's not even asking for gratitude...just a big can of STFU.
March 17th, 2012 at 11:14 AM ^
March 17th, 2012 at 11:56 AM ^
You were really the 71st person to read?
March 17th, 2012 at 12:12 PM ^
I'm not into making Section 1 less of a Michigan fan, I just want it to be known that he was wrong and we, the asshole old guard, were right.
Now that is a fascinating and provocative statement. What was I wrong about? What were you, the asshole old guard right about? Be specific; don't hold back. I'd like to know all about those two things. Because all that I have ever claimed was that Rodriguez treated awfully and unfairly in the press and that the unfairness spilled over into his entire tenure in Ann Arbor. I know damn well that I am right about that. I am too smart, to pretend to be able to debate technical football and coaching techniques with anybody, and I am too smart to listen to anybody on MGoBlog who tells me otherwise.
Now, we should all just cheer for our boys. That cannot be very controversial at this point, can it?
Only because a couple of years ago, getting "the asshole old guard" to "just cheer for the boys" was a bit of a chore. And that is why it remains controversial at this point. It is a controversy precisely because of people like you, who have been a bit selective about your cheering.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:31 PM ^
March 17th, 2012 at 10:14 PM ^
...Van Bergen definitely said it better, and with more authority, than I could.
I remember reading RVB's comment about where were the Michigan Men in the past, and weren't RR's teams wearing the same helmet. He certainly had a point, to our great shame.
I agree with that.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:47 PM ^
BEAT BOTH OHIOS
March 16th, 2012 at 11:48 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:48 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:48 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:54 PM ^
Too soon + too late + double post = on time?
March 16th, 2012 at 11:48 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:58 PM ^
Although I think Section 1's thread is pretty dumb, and I completely against this loss forcing us to change out approach to our archrival, I think it's a little harsh to say he'd rather revel in victory of being right than have Michigan win. Yes he might be more prone to boasting at times, is extremely stubborn and, honestly, can be at times, but that doesn't mean that he would rather be wrong than have Michigan win.
Someone made the same accusation to Brian after UTL, and Brian freaked out at the guy. And it's clear why, he—like Section 1—an opinionated person, who can be stubborn when wrong and can be boastful when right. However, that doesn't mean he doesn't love the Univeristy and it's teams with all his heart. The same goes for Section 1. He might be being that guy, but my money is that on the other side of the series of tubes, he's not smiling about this game.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:03 AM ^
March 17th, 2012 at 12:08 AM ^
I completely agree with you here, FWIW.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:13 AM ^
It's just that I had Ohio University advancing in my NCAA-pool bracket. After the way Michigan played against Ohio State, I thought the team was slumping.
But I also had Mizzou as a final four team, and Duke and Wichita State advancing to the Sweet Sixteen.
Shows you what I know.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:17 AM ^
Seriously man? I'm sticking my MGoBlog-neck out here trying to support you. You're not making it easier.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:22 AM ^
...to a Final Four?
Or is that Wichita State was overrated?
March 17th, 2012 at 12:27 AM ^
Nah, I had Wicheta St. as a "cinderella team" in a couple brackets of mine, making it to the Elite 8 and beating Kentucky, and making it to the sweet 16 in my other two. I was rather unhappy to see them get eliminated so early. Thats the tournament. I'm just happy I didn't have Mizzou or Duke to the final four. I made sure to text a good high school friend who is at Duke now, thanking him for making our loss not the worst of the night (although I guess by then Mizzou had already lost).
March 17th, 2012 at 12:06 AM ^
I personally dislike the "Ohio" moniker because it feels childish. Plus it is a backwards slap to Ohio U. But I think that rooting against Michigan is too low for any of the longtime posters.
Part of me thinks that this thread would have still popped up even if we won.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:14 AM ^
Eh. I'm not really supporting the thread. I honestly like "Ohio" a lot, and I will keep using it. I however, am against someone questioning another's fandom. Section One wouldn't be here if he didn't like the team. I too was half expecting this thread, especially if we lost. But it's a perfect storm being created by someone who is as loud and inflamitory as he is, and the Board being in a terrible mood looking for someone to crucify. I've seen it on most threads tonight. People are pissed, and they will yell at people. I just think it's unfair to question a guys fandom from this—it was definitely ill advised though. But we shouldn't be trying to qualify eachothers fandoms, that's stupid in my opinion.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:48 AM ^
I agree with your belief to not question Secton 1's loyalty.
Hopefully everything will look better in the morning for everyone.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:49 PM ^
lamer that poor John Beilein had to pick it up. It's. . . just. . . not. . . inspired.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:50 PM ^
March 16th, 2012 at 11:56 PM ^
people over at the cbs board are also saying the same thing. But more than anything it's a trivial tame waster that somehow engages people endlessly here. Grade school hurhur stuff. Doesn't speak well for people here that they get off on it so much; five-six years ago you'd never have seen people going round and round about anything so goofy here.
March 16th, 2012 at 11:58 PM ^
March 17th, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
It's funny BECAUSE it pisses them off so much. It's weird that calling them by a name that they spell out as their main school cheer is so offensive to them. It makes no sense. So, the fact that they find issue with it is stupid and funny.
And it's no different than OSU calling us "The School Up North".
For what it's worth, it doesn't piss us off as much as you think it does. And, after reading this thread, it seems like it pisses you guys off more.
March 17th, 2012 at 12:18 AM ^
Oh my god it's all Hoke's fault. If only he had never come up with this, then the Bobcat players would have no motivation for the game, and we would have won by 50!
March 16th, 2012 at 11:54 PM ^
Hopefully