CoverZero

September 14th, 2019 at 12:26 PM ^

OSU looks impressive.  I knew they would, Day is a good coach.  Hate to say it, but OSU has had better coaching for the past 15 years, and still do.

RobM_24

September 14th, 2019 at 12:36 PM ^

The difference is that Dobbins can go up the gut against IU and not get touched until the LB level at the earliest. ZC has to shake guys at the LOS when he runs up the gut against Army. I wish our OLine could finally get to a point where we could rely on 5 yards up the middle whenever we wanted it against non-Top25ish teams. Oh, the good old days.

bostonsix

September 14th, 2019 at 1:38 PM ^

We still dont know if those starting tackles can pull in this new offense. But, ZC will get better with his vision as he gets more comfortable with this level of competition.

Shea just needs to know when to give or pull, in spread option scenarios, it's more on the QB whether or not the RB gets tackled for a loss or runs for 5+ in those scenarios. 

Any who, we're lucky to have ZC because he turns a TFL into 3 yards almost every time. He is going to be special to watch these next few years.

RobM_24

September 14th, 2019 at 12:30 PM ^

I don't see a scenario where we keep OSU from running all over us. We couldn't stop them from running when we had guys like Taco, Wormley, Glasgow, Hurst, etc etc.. Dobbins and Fields are tough to stop on the ground.

MaineGoBlue

September 14th, 2019 at 12:51 PM ^

My guess is that we beat Illinois with a better QB.  And yes he will play much better for Illinois then he did at Michigan, he’s got zero pressure.  A lot of guys play better under no pressure than in the limelight of a blue blood program with a rabid fanbase that boos every single QB since Lloyd Carr left.

I’m happy to see him succeeding.

PutDaTeamOnMyBack

September 14th, 2019 at 1:46 PM ^

In what world can someone say that they'd rather have Peters than Shea as of today? It's like they are discounting an entire season's worth of data we have on Patterson plus the implication of Peters sliding to 3rd string last year. Unless you think there is some anti-Peters underhandedness going on with the coaching staff (in which case, your mind is already made up), I simply don't see how anyone can arrive at this conclusion.

Peters will (I hope) play better for the Illini than he did for Michigan. Of course. He only played, what, 3 games?, for Michigan behind a horrendous offensive line. When given the opportunity he looked like an average RS Freshman. He was fine. He's had 2 years to develop and is more used to the college game. I have no doubt will be better and look forward to seeing him play.

But let's not forget that Shea was near the top of the conference at QB across several categories. The Shea criticism through 2 weeks is warranted, but I'll need far more data on both Peters and Year 2 Shea for me to go so far as to say that I'd rather have Brandon. 

spider-sal

September 14th, 2019 at 3:47 PM ^

You still say that now after the loss? Peters is erratic as hell. Threw a few decent passes but the majority were way off the mark despite having receivers superior to their competition. Plus he still doesn’t protect the ball very well.

i think he’s a guy that can make all the throws but the game is just too fast for him.