Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (45)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • LIGHT IT UP, AGAIN. WALLPAPER
    jonvalk - 2 hours ago
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 16 hours ago
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 3 days ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 5 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 6 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,504 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 736 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 559 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 479 views
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 441 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Using Rivals' Star Ratings To Look At Big Ten Football Recruiting: 2002-2013
    LSAClassOf2000 - 16 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 9 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    32 replies
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    18 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    83 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    200 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    37 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    55 replies
  • UMich NFL draft history, Part III
    3 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • OT: Game of Thrones
    57 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Real Estate / Renting / Land Contract gurus
    18 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    83 replies
  • 5 star 2013 DT may not be enrolling at Notre Dame
    32 replies
  • 5-Star DT Andrew Brown Planning Visit
    70 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    200 replies
  • Shane Morris signed pylon on ebay
    45 replies
  • Question about M receiving great Jim Smith
    36 replies
  • Trey Burke Combine Measurements & Comparable Players
    27 replies
  • OT: Guy pretends to be All American for Ohio...gets busted
    37 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Updated Rivals100
    38 replies
  • OT: Georgia Tech is Also Bad at Photoshop
    27 replies
  • OT - Kickstarter opportunity to create new college football video game
    42 replies
  • OT- Miguel (not that Miguel) kicks fan in head at Billboard Music Awards
    55 replies
  • Rajin Cajuns Invade AA for some Red Hot Softball (EDIT: Fri 2pm & Sat Noon)
    30 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs Hawks Game 3 Open Thread
    200 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    114 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • Prayers for Moore, Oklahoma
    83 replies
  • ESPN 30 for 30 on the Bad Boys
    77 replies
  • Michigan Softball vs. Cal Open Thread
    75 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • The B1G List: Ranking the State Fossils of the Big Ten

    This list is completely arbitrary and not a genuine analysis of the relative merits of state fossils.

    0 comments
  • Trey Burke turns to inner circle to prepare for NBA draft

    will be michigan's highest pick in a while

    1 comments
  • B1G assistant coach salaries on the rise

    money has to go somewhere

    0 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. is motivated by his critics and doubters, and supremely confident in his ability

    I am only motivated by people who have no opinion about me.

    0 comments
  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

Early Enrolless/Class Size Solved!

67 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 9th, 2009 at 10:55 AM
#1
JC3
Joined: 07/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1316
Early Enrolless/Class Size Solved!

I know there have been numerous threads on this already, but those of you with a rivals account will notice one of the members got in contact with the Big Ten Director of Compliance.

Link($)

Nothing has changed, although you’ve never been able to “backdate” and count a student-athlete (SA) in a year in which they weren’t in attendance. What I suspect you’re thinking of is the fact that mid-year enrollees (except SAs receiving aid under the “mid-year replacement” rule?described below) count against the overall limit of 85, but may count against the initial limit of 25 in either the year of initial enrollment (if there’s room) or in the year immediately following.

-all of the above describe NCAA rules; the Big Ten rule is that at no time can you be in a situation where more than 3 scholarships over the limit have been offered. So, if I have room for 25 initial counters next year, I can sign 28; if I have room for 20 initial counters next year, I can sign 23.

Twitter l Contact 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • Early Enrollees
  • Michigan football
  • recruting

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 9th, 2009 at 10:59 AM | so this gets rid of the "maxiumum of 25 freshmen" thing right? (Score:1)
tdumich
Joined: 11/07/2009
MGoPoints: 0

this says we can sign 28 this year and, assuming everyone qualifies, have them all on the roster under scholarship next sept??

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:06 AM | No. There would only be room (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

No. There would only be room for 25 to enroll.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:05 AM | tdumich (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I don't think so. You may not have more than 25 "initial counters" in the fall. You can sign 28 in February, but basically 3 of them have to be gone by August. At least that's the way I interpret what's written.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:08 AM | Right. Just to add on, the (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

Right. Just to add on, the mechanism for trimming the class would either be kids not qualifying, or if more than 25 qualify, grayshirting at least one kid, which would mean that he'd enroll in the 2011 class.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:09 AM | no, i don't think so (Score:1)
tdumich
Joined: 11/07/2009
MGoPoints: 0

bc it says they can count towards either year. we only signed 22 last year and witty didn't make it in. therefore, we can sign 28, count a maximum of 3 to last year, and bring in 25 for next year.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:21 AM | I read it your way tdumich... (Score:1)
brose
brose's picture
Joined: 02/19/2009
MGoPoints: 953

I am no attorney, but I believe that as long as we get 3 early enrollee's, we (the U of M football team, which I am no part of) can sign 28 total.

If anyone disagrees, please repond how td and I are misreading this.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:41 AM | That is the way I read it as (Score:1)
BigBlue02
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1853

That is the way I read it as well. If we sign 28, as long as 3 of them enroll early, from what I understood the reasoning, we could date 3 of them to last year's class.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:10 AM | This is a post on rivals (Score:1)
bcsblue
bcsblue's picture
Joined: 11/14/2008
MGoPoints: 457

This is a post on rivals board and there is much more. I know this is whac to steal someones post, but maybe people can interpret this. Here it is: from poster ( chadwal85 and anison)

Here is the very informative explanation from Chad Hawley, Big Ten Director of Compliance:

Nothing has changed, although you’ve never been able to “backdate” and count a student-athlete (SA) in a year in which they weren’t in attendance. What I suspect you’re thinking of is the fact that mid-year enrollees (except SAs receiving aid under the “mid-year replacement” rule?described below) count against the overall limit of 85, but may count against the initial limit of 25 in either the year of initial enrollment (if there’s room) or in the year immediately following. Here’s a very basic example:

University A’s fb team has 80 student-athletes (SAs) on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year. Joe Prospect graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University A in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11.

Financial aid rules are fairly nuanced, but here are some of the basics relating specifically to football that will allow you to be informed when chatting with friends:

-football is a “head count” sport, which means that if a SA gets $1 or a full-ride, he counts as 1 against the limit of 85.

-unless a SA meets an exception that exempts him from counting (e.g., medical non-counter, exhausted eligibility SA), that SA will always count against the limit of 85 in the year in which the aid is received.

-in general, an “initial counter” is a SA who is in his first year of receiving aid in a sport.

-the initial counter limit is 25, but the overall limit of 85 is always in play, so for example, if I will be returning 65 guys on scholarship in 2010-11, I only have room for 20 initial counters in 2010-11.

-initial counters who enroll in the fall count against the initial limit (up to 25) for the academic year in which they enroll; except as described under the midyear replacement rule below, initial counters who enroll mid-year may count against the initial limit in either the year they enroll or in the following year.

-there is something called a “midyear graduate replacement.” This may actually be the source of confusion because under the “midyear replacement” rule, the SA who is receiving aid for the first time at mid-year has to count against the initial limit in the following academic year. The “midyear replacement” rule is only used, though, when a team is at its limit of 85 and someone counting against the 85 has recently graduated?the SA receiving aid for the first time at midyear is then “replacing” the SA who counted against the 85 in the fall but has now graduated.

-all of the above describe NCAA rules; the Big Ten rule is that at no time can you be in a situation where more than 3 scholarships over the limit have been offered. So, if I have room for 25 initial counters next year, I can sign 28; if I have room for 20 initial counters next year, I can sign 23.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:31 AM | Apparently (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

New shit has come to light. I retract my previous statements.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:13 AM | No, it says we CAN'T (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

No, it says we CAN'T "backdate" players. They can only count for the semester/year for which they initially enrolled. So if a guy enrolls in January 2010, he can't count for the 2009 class.

That being said, I wonder if "enrolled" means when the kid STARTS classes or when the kid SIGNS UP for classes... If he can count for the year in which he SIGNS UP for classes, then perhaps January enrollees could count for '09. Thoughts?

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:17 AM | Well considering that the school year (Score:1)
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 09/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4708

Is Fall to Summer (09-10) if they would enroll within that year then they should be counted for that years class. Whereas if they enroll after classes end in May then they should be counted toward the next years class (as most football players do that enroll in the summer).

That's my interpretation of the rule.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:36 AM | Semantics (Score:1)
Lutha
Lutha's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 4307

I agree. Most of the confusion stems around the use of the term "backdating."

Whereas we see an early enrollee as part of the 2010 class according to recruiting parlance, if the player enrolls in Jan, he is technically a student in the 2009-2010 class and therefore isn't backdated.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 20th, 2009 at 1:35 AM | Exactly!!! (Score:1)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440

This is exactly what is confusing everyone. A student who enrolls in January 2010 is enrolling in the 2009/2010 school year. Per the NCAA rule, his scholarship can be counted in the 2009/2010 class (which is what everyone keeps calling "backdating") or the 2010/2011 class.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:18 AM | Magnus (Score:1)
me
me's picture
Joined: 12/26/2008
MGoPoints: 2265

read this part again:

"University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:02 PM | so is it like this? Say we (Score:1)
white_pony_rocks
white_pony_rocks's picture
Joined: 02/16/2009
MGoPoints: 940

so is it like this? Say we sign 28 players but we can still only offer scholarships to 25 of them for next year. We'll say that grimes and hankins commit and decide to enroll early. While they count towards this class in signings, they don't for scholarships, they count towards last year. So we sign 28 and actually offer 27 of them scholarships, 2 counting towards last year (Grimes and Hankins) and 25 for this coming year (all other recruits whether they enroll early or not)

Soon to be the #1 fitness and training center in AA

http://www.annarbortrainer.com

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:23 AM | Other way (Score:1)
Wolverine96
Wolverine96's picture
Joined: 08/28/2008
MGoPoints: 1577

I am reading it the opposite way. If a recruit enrolls during the 2009-10 "Academic" year, his scholarship can going against either the 2009 class or the 2010 class.

Using Tate Forcier as an example, if there was room in the 2008 recruiting class, his scholarship could have counted against those numbers.

Therefore we have the opportunity to count early enrollees against the 2009 class so long as we do not exceed the number of scholarships available at that time. The good news, if I am understanding the rule correctly, is that we should be able to sign 28 guys and count a least one or two against the 2009 class.

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and things with... molecular structures. "

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:37 AM | quasi "back dating" (Score:1)
c williams
c williams's picture
Joined: 07/15/2009
MGoPoints: 34

I understand it this way as well.

I believe the original comment about no "back dating" implied that you can't have an August enrollee count towards the previous year just because you didn't use all your 25 that previous year. Futher, I agree that it does imply as Wolverine 96 states, "if a recruit enrolls during the 2009-10 "Academic" year, his scholarship can going against either the 2009 class or the 2010 class."

So, I guess you can quasi "back date" players by having them enroll early in January. It's curious how this would then work moving forward for an early enrollee counted against the previous cap who then stays around after a redshirt for a 5th season.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:18 AM | I read that you can do it. (Score:1)
bcsblue
bcsblue's picture
Joined: 11/14/2008
MGoPoints: 457

I read that you can do it. The last sentence of this paragraph.

University A’s fb team has 80 student-athletes (SAs) on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year. Joe Prospect graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University A in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and !!Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11.!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:19 AM | From what you've posted, if I (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1669

From what you've posted, if I have interpreted it correctly(that's a long shot) is that we can sign 28 if and only if we have 3 ee's counting towards last years count since we only had 22 in that class. Those three plus the 25 counting towards this years class must meet the required 85 scholarship limit by the deadline meaning that we would have to have enough players graduating or not receiving their 5th year to get to that number of 85. If those criteria are met then we could presumably have 28 players in this class.

My head hurts!

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:31 AM | PLUS (Score:1)
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 07/25/2008
MGoPoints: 1995

There has to be least 3 scholarships open or opening under the 85 that were not due to "mid-year" graduation in order for the EE to be counted in the previous class...no idea if that situation exists or not...

'Murica & Footbaw: That's what Michigan Does

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:33 AM | Weren't we under the limit of (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1669

Weren't we under the limit of 85 even after last years class therefore have the room for them to be counted towards it or am I still missing something?

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:11 PM | I don't know how that (Score:1)
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 07/25/2008
MGoPoints: 1995

I don't know how that specifically works as I'm sure that there were walk-ons awarded all of the 85 scholarships (I don't think there is any way they would not give kids the money). Scholarships last 1 year (fall and winter semester minimum I assume).

With that being said:
Assuming the team was up to the max 85 limit by awarding the scholarships to walk-ons, from what it says above, it's my understanding we would need to have at least 3 people that were on scholarship in the fall leave the team/release their scholarship for a reason other than mid-year graduation in order for 3 EE's to count toward the 2009 class.

'Murica & Footbaw: That's what Michigan Does

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:33 AM | The way I read it, we can sign up to 31 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 266

but have only 28 enroll. Three early enrollees can be counted towards the 2009-10 class (assuming three enroll early). Then we are can still take on 25 and be under the 85 limit (I haven't done a count of this but that's my understanding of where we are in overall body count). So, under Big Ten rules we can sign up to 28 players to fill the 25 slots. That gives us total 31 signees to fill 28 slots. It allows you to factor in the possibility of attrittion of up to three signees due to ineligibity, pro baseball, whatever. NCAA rules would not limit how many you sign to fill the 25 slots (see Alabama).

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:52 AM | Disregarding the 85 limit, (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

Disregarding the 85 limit, wouldn't we hypothetically be able to take as many enroll 30 if we counted 2 EEs from last '09 to '08, and Stonum from '08 to '07?

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:33 PM | I don't think we an enroll more than 28 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 266

Our 2009 class was 22 (according to an earlier post) so that leaves three early enrollees that can be counted in the 2009 class. Add that to this year's enroll limit of 25 (out of potentially 28 signees) and that gets you to 28. I don't know if we can retroactively assign Forcier, Stonum or other early enrollees from last year and reassign them to a previous class or how much room was in the previous class. I suppose it is possible though. If the class gets real big, it starts to limit how many we can take on in the class of 2011 because of the overall 85 limit.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:47 PM | Our 09 class signed 22, but (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

Our 09 class signed 22, but Witty didn't enroll, leaving four open spots to start. In addition, we had seven early enrollees. Depending on how things worked out with Witherspoon, Hill and Stonum that year, we could have counted back anywhere from one to four. That would leave our 09 class with anywhere from four to eight spots we could count back to.

The real issue is the 85 limit.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:33 PM | I don't think we an enroll more than 28 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 266

Our 2009 class was 22 (according to an earlier post) so that leaves three early enrollees that can be counted in the 2009 class. Add that to this year's enroll limit of 25 (out of potentially 28 signees) and that gets you to 28. I don't know if we can retroactively assign Forcier, Stonum or other early enrollees from last year and reassign them to a previous class or how much room was in the previous class. I suppose it is possible though. If the class gets real big, it starts to limit how many we can take on in the class of 2011 because of the overall 85 limit.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 20th, 2009 at 1:46 AM | Initial Counter Limit is 25 (Score:1)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3440

You cannot sign above 28 because the initial counter limit is 25 (see full version of Chad Hawley's comments) and the B10 rule allows three over.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:24 AM | bouje and me (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 27442

I think you guys are correct. Bcsblue's post was more informative than the original post, and based on bcsblue's post, I agree with you guys. The quotes that were in the original post weren't the whole story, and that's what I was basing my reading on.

+1 to both of you.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 20

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:27 AM | I mean basically it just sounds like nothing has changed from (Score:1)
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 09/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4708

the original statement of how EEs work. Which is IMO the way that it should work. To take away EE a team like Michigan which has been decimated with attrition is screwed and can never get back on track.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:29 AM | co-sign. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

co-sign.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:35 AM | "backdate" (Score:1)
BoyBlue
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8

I think you got caught up in the part where they said you can't backdate a player who isn't enrolled in that academic year. But an early enrollee IS enrolled in the 2009 academic year as the winter '10 semester counts towards the 2009 academic year. This is not then "backdating."

So a class of 28 is allowed because of the early enrolling of at least 3 (Pace, Robinsons, White, Miller, Others, I am not sure). HOORAY! Now it appears we don't have to Peace or Barnes a kid, and I hope we don't. Subject to academic reasons this class should be huge and talented.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:46 AM | "Now it appears we don't have (Score:1)
osdihg
osdihg's picture
Joined: 12/09/2008
MGoPoints: 84

"Now it appears we don't have to Peace ... a kid"

Excellent pun potential.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:39 AM | It would make sense that (Score:1)
Fresh Meat
Fresh Meat's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 1756

It would make sense that would could sign 28 and count 3 of the EE towards last year's count given how we have been recruiting. As people have stated before, if we could only sign 25 some of the activities of the coaches in recruiting would seem not just weird, but kind of dumb. But in light of this information, the recruiting strategy makes perfect sense, which IMO, makes it more likely that we can in fact sign 28.

I've been called the songbird of my generation, by those who have heard me. THAT GOOD

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:39 AM | Let's try making it more concrete: (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2906

I've merely substituted the specific for the generic in the compliance guy's example...

University of Michigan fb team has 78 student-athletes on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year(I believe the current count is 78). Ricardo Miller graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University of Michigan in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University of Michigan is now at 79 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Ricardo may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room, which in UM's case there would be as only 21 enrolled in the 2009-2010 class) or 2010-11.

So...it looks like UM CAN sign 28 as long as 3 enroll early to count against the 2009-2010 year (aka as the 2009 class which only enrolled 21, 4 short of the 25 allowed per year). Provided, of course, that we do not exceed the 85 team total.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:47 AM | Great thread (Score:1)
Lutha
Lutha's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 4307

This is the best "news" we've received in a while. You guys have totally made my day.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:38 PM | Thank You! (Score:1)
maineandblue
maineandblue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1228

Was waiting for someone to express some excitement.

Whooo frickin Hooo!

This class could have the quality AND quantity to take Tate and fellow frosh to the promised land as juniors or seniors, in my humble and hopeful opinion.

I don't know where this idea--that the B10 no longer allows EEs to count towards the academic year they enroll (aka the previous recruiting year)--started, but man am I thrilled it's erronious!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:44 AM | Pardon my ignorance, (Score:1)
Maize.Blue Wagner
Maize.Blue Wagner's picture
Joined: 10/23/2009
MGoPoints: 718

but if an early enrollee is counted in the class of the previous year, do they lose a year of eligibility? For instance, if Tate had been counted toward the class of '08 would he only have two years of eligibility left? Or would '08 have to be considered a red-shirt year?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:56 AM | That's a really good (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

That's a really good question. I don't think we have a solid answer to that.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:08 PM | Eligibility (Score:1)
BoyBlue
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8

No they do not lose a year of eligibility nor does it count as a redshirt year. I am not sure why, but since they never had an opportunity to compete in a game they don't lose eligibility. In essence they get a head start on the rest in their class by getting a semester of academics in and a spring practice as well.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:45 PM | I'll buy that (Score:1)
maineandblue
maineandblue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1228

I think you answered your own question: you do know why!
It wouldn't make sense to lose a year of eligibility if you were never eligible to play a game.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:49 PM | I'm not sure that's true. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

I'm not sure that's true. Supposedly once you enroll you have five years to play four. Especially if you get to practice with the football team, I doubt you can have it both ways.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 2:37 PM | I always thought it could be (Score:1)
DeuceInTheDeuce
DeuceInTheDeuce's picture
Joined: 10/29/2008
MGoPoints: 767

I always thought it could be broken up by academic unit (semester, trimester etc.).

For instance, EEs that enroll for the winter term, say January 11, 2010, have until the the start of winter term 2015 to finish their 4 playing years. This date will be after the fb season, thus EE's don't lose a year.

On the other hand, I may have just made this up years ago because it was the only way it made sense to me. 50/50

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 3:12 PM | Agree with above (Score:1)
Wolverine96
Wolverine96's picture
Joined: 08/28/2008
MGoPoints: 1577

You have 5 years of eligibility from the date of enrollment. Because the football schedule does not cross semesters, a player who enrolls in January will still have 5 football seasons to complete his eligibility.

This is why you do not have early enrollees in other sports such as basketball as the schedule spans two different semesters.

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and things with... molecular structures. "

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 5:11 PM | Thanks for the clarification. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6419

Thanks for the clarification.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 7:13 PM | How would this (Score:1)
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 11602

How would this impact the January bowl game I expect us to be playing in 5 years from now?

If an EE enrolls in January, takes a redshirt, and completes his fourth season at the end of his fifth year, is it possible that his eligibility might expire before the bowl game?

Colors That Float

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:48 PM | I read somewhere, can't (Score:1)
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2181

I read somewhere, can't remember where, that your elligibility is for a number of athletic seasons, not academic years. I'll keep looking for the link I read that at so take that for what it's worth (unverified voracity).

So, since Witty, for example, wasn't on the team for the 2009 season he still has 5 seasons of elligibility left in football even if he enrolls in the winter term of the 2009-2010 academic year.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 2:01 PM | double post (Score:1)
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2181

double post

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:51 AM | I know Witty and Miller will (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1669

I know Witty and Miller will be enrolling early but who are the others?

EDIT: Sorry, did not see the posty above that states the answer I was looking for.

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:53 AM | There is a whole thread (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 17635

There is a whole thread devoted to this, but off the top of my head:

Pace
Miller
Witty
M-Rob
Jackson
White

Not sure who else, but I think there were a couple more. Needless to say, it will be at least the three we need.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.