Home
supporting the Clint Eastwood State Fightin' John Waynes since 2011

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Brice's Recruiting
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Football Recruiting
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Get Yer Tickets

Find the best US sports betting sites on the web at onlinebetting.com. Sports wagering is getting more and more popular each year, so place your bets online today.

Enjoy online gambling? Why not try online poker or online roulette? Especially online roulette for real money. If you are going to play poker, then make sure you use the PartyPoker bonus code or PokerStars marketing code when signing up to these two poker giants.

If you're looking for online sports betting, Sportsbooks is your best option. Nothing else compares in variety and reliability.

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Always better to play free blackjack and free Flash slots online before making a purchase on any real online casino.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • Michigan Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 10 hours ago
  • The Blockhams in "TACKLING TECHNIQUE"
    Six Zero - 22 hours ago
  • College Football 101 (#100)
    cstalionsuofm - 1 day ago
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings: 5-21-12
    Ace - 1 day ago
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 2 days ago
  •  
  • 1 of 5
  • ››
more
  • Dear Mr. Woodson; Quit talking to Mark Snyder.
    Section 1 - 4,985 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings: 5-21-12
    Ace - 3,527 views
  • Nebraska Recruiting, Michigan and the rest of the B1G
    UMgradMSUdad - 3,031 views
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 1,662 views
  • Space, bitches...wallpaper edition...
    jonvalk - 1,580 views
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • Dear Mr. Woodson; Quit talking to Mark Snyder.
    Section 1 - 137 comments
  • College Football 101
    cstalionsuofm - 44 comments
  • Conference Champions Only? A Playoff Case Study
    stephenrjking - 38 comments
  • Choosing Playoff Participants: Poll, Committee, or Autobid?
    oakapple - 27 comments
  • College Football 101 (#100)
    cstalionsuofm - 15 comments
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • The real reason Michigan will be able to torture Ohio (spin off from Mgo.licio)
    8 replies
  • Commit Watch? Buckle Up
    78 replies
  • College Football 101 (#99)
    25 replies
  • Michigan has interest in ATH Darren Carrington
    33 replies
  • Michigan Profits $79K from Sugar Bowl
    22 replies
  • Bruce Feldman profile of William Gholston
    47 replies
  • OT: Suggest Crazy Names for Michigan Coaching Positions (a la Stanford)
    68 replies
  • SIAP: When do single game tickets go on sale?
    13 replies
  • Rich Maloney and Michigan Part Ways
    49 replies
  • OT - Stanford names OC position after Andrew Luck
    57 replies
  • Brandon, Hollis nominated for SBJ Athletic Director of the Year
    19 replies
  • College Football Resumes in 100 days
    16 replies
  • OT: More Big XII Expansion Info
    74 replies
  • Borges loves recruiting to Michigan
    51 replies
  • Cowboys Classic 8pm start, The Game with Noon start
    25 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • College Football 101 (#99)
    25 replies
  • Michigan Profits $79K from Sugar Bowl
    22 replies
  • Bruce Feldman profile of William Gholston
    47 replies
  • The real reason Michigan will be able to torture Ohio (spin off from Mgo.licio)
    8 replies
  • Commit Watch? Buckle Up
    78 replies
  • OT: Suggest Crazy Names for Michigan Coaching Positions (a la Stanford)
    68 replies
  • Rich Maloney and Michigan Part Ways
    49 replies
  • OT: More Big XII Expansion Info
    74 replies
  • Borges loves recruiting to Michigan
    51 replies
  • SIAP: When do single game tickets go on sale?
    13 replies
  • Brandon, Hollis nominated for SBJ Athletic Director of the Year
    19 replies
  • Michigan/'Bama Super Regional Softball Preview
    27 replies
  • Michigan has interest in ATH Darren Carrington
    33 replies
  • Su'a Cravens to Visit Michigan and Ohio State in the Next Week
    56 replies
  • ESPN: Coaches Fans Hate (refers to UM Fans hating Tressel and GRob)
    48 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Friday Afternoon "Whatcha Doing?" Open Posbang Thread
    252 replies
  • DAB: Alternate FB Uni Plan Forthcoming
    150 replies
  • MICHIGAN SOFTBALL: REGIONAL CHAMPS
    147 replies
  • Softball vs. Louisville open thread
    111 replies
  • OT: Champions League final discussion & live thread
    98 replies
  • Devin Gardner changes Number
    96 replies
  • Dallas Morning News: Big 12 Source said "We Might Be Moving Toward 4 Superconferences"
    96 replies
  • Scout revamps their player rankings
    95 replies
  • 5 star RB Davis to USC
    95 replies
  • OT: FSU to Big 12 talk picking up heat. Clemson and Georgia Tech in talks with big 12
    94 replies
  • Roy Roundtree to wear #21
    94 replies
  • FWIW Probable USC commit S'ua Craven has narrowed his list
    89 replies
  • OT-Pam Ward removed from ESPN college football coverage
    89 replies
  • OT: James Bond Skyfall Trailer Edit: & Top 5 Bond movies list
    88 replies
  • OT - Rosenberg to SI...Deservedly?
    80 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Former Michigan players see Wolverines 'torturing' Urban Meyer and Ohio State in coming years

    There's absolutely no way that ends up on a bulletin board somewhere

    0 comments
  • Former U-M tight end Bennie Joppru, 32, recovering from stroke

    best wishes

    2 comments
  • Michigan's Lewan maturing into a leader

    but what about the bike?

    1 comments
  • Relegation in College Football!

    amazingly, we don't go down in 2008.

    2 comments
  • Newest commit Copp discusses high-school football career, decision to pursue hockey

    “We’ve had season tickets (at Yost Ice Arena) ever since I was born,” he said. “It’s always been the dream to play there.”

    0 comments
  • FACES OF DESPAIR: BIG TEN MEETINGS

    "The wolf is the only constant, Adam. It takes care of its own and lives in the wound called the world. She rips it anew each day for the blood she needs to survive."

    0 comments
  • DTotD: An overhead kick to the throat in MLS

    Justin Meram didn't just score

    0 comments
  • Devin Booker blowing up, sticking to roots

    offer coming in a month, most likely

    0 comments
  • Versatile Nik Stauskas ready to do a bit of everything for the Michigan basketball team

    "I had so many Michigan fans and other people messaging me on Twitter and saying 'I hope you're ready to play point guard. I was a little bit worried."

    1 comments
  • Eso Akunne of Michigan Wolverines holds memories of mom close

    "Come home. We need to talk about mom."

    0 comments
  • Get Familiar: Michigan verbal Taco Charlton

    Enjoys things with "game" in the title.

    2 comments
  • Scouting Video: Derrick Walton at 2012 Spiece Run ‘n Slam

    sounds like all three Michigan commits are improving their stock so far

    0 comments
  • WTKA 1050AM Mott Takeover Schedule

    all of the people

    0 comments
  • Borges on Alabama game: Preparation 'has already begun'

    I'd hope so

    0 comments
  • Glen Steele tribute - YouTube

    one of the greatest names of all time #ofalltime

    1 comments

Early Enrolless/Class Size Solved!

67 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
December 9th, 2009 at 10:55 AM
#1
JC3
Joined: 07/17/2009
MGoPoints: 1299
Early Enrolless/Class Size Solved!

I know there have been numerous threads on this already, but those of you with a rivals account will notice one of the members got in contact with the Big Ten Director of Compliance.

Link($)

Nothing has changed, although you’ve never been able to “backdate” and count a student-athlete (SA) in a year in which they weren’t in attendance. What I suspect you’re thinking of is the fact that mid-year enrollees (except SAs receiving aid under the “mid-year replacement” rule?described below) count against the overall limit of 85, but may count against the initial limit of 25 in either the year of initial enrollment (if there’s room) or in the year immediately following.

-all of the above describe NCAA rules; the Big Ten rule is that at no time can you be in a situation where more than 3 scholarships over the limit have been offered. So, if I have room for 25 initial counters next year, I can sign 28; if I have room for 20 initial counters next year, I can sign 23.

Twitter // MaizeNBrew

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • Early Enrollees
  • Michigan football
  • recruting

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
December 9th, 2009 at 10:59 AM | so this gets rid of the "maxiumum of 25 freshmen" thing right? (Score:1)
tdumich
Joined: 11/07/2009
MGoPoints: 0

this says we can sign 28 this year and, assuming everyone qualifies, have them all on the roster under scholarship next sept??

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:06 AM | No. There would only be room (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

No. There would only be room for 25 to enroll.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:05 AM | tdumich (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 22748

I don't think so. You may not have more than 25 "initial counters" in the fall. You can sign 28 in February, but basically 3 of them have to be gone by August. At least that's the way I interpret what's written.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 21

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:08 AM | Right. Just to add on, the (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

Right. Just to add on, the mechanism for trimming the class would either be kids not qualifying, or if more than 25 qualify, grayshirting at least one kid, which would mean that he'd enroll in the 2011 class.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:09 AM | no, i don't think so (Score:1)
tdumich
Joined: 11/07/2009
MGoPoints: 0

bc it says they can count towards either year. we only signed 22 last year and witty didn't make it in. therefore, we can sign 28, count a maximum of 3 to last year, and bring in 25 for next year.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:21 AM | I read it your way tdumich... (Score:1)
brose
brose's picture
Joined: 02/19/2009
MGoPoints: 882

I am no attorney, but I believe that as long as we get 3 early enrollee's, we (the U of M football team, which I am no part of) can sign 28 total.

If anyone disagrees, please repond how td and I are misreading this.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:41 AM | That is the way I read it as (Score:1)
BigBlue02
Joined: 06/29/2009
MGoPoints: 1695

That is the way I read it as well. If we sign 28, as long as 3 of them enroll early, from what I understood the reasoning, we could date 3 of them to last year's class.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:10 AM | This is a post on rivals (Score:1)
bcsblue
bcsblue's picture
Joined: 11/14/2008
MGoPoints: 447

This is a post on rivals board and there is much more. I know this is whac to steal someones post, but maybe people can interpret this. Here it is: from poster ( chadwal85 and anison)

Here is the very informative explanation from Chad Hawley, Big Ten Director of Compliance:

Nothing has changed, although you’ve never been able to “backdate” and count a student-athlete (SA) in a year in which they weren’t in attendance. What I suspect you’re thinking of is the fact that mid-year enrollees (except SAs receiving aid under the “mid-year replacement” rule?described below) count against the overall limit of 85, but may count against the initial limit of 25 in either the year of initial enrollment (if there’s room) or in the year immediately following. Here’s a very basic example:

University A’s fb team has 80 student-athletes (SAs) on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year. Joe Prospect graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University A in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11.

Financial aid rules are fairly nuanced, but here are some of the basics relating specifically to football that will allow you to be informed when chatting with friends:

-football is a “head count” sport, which means that if a SA gets $1 or a full-ride, he counts as 1 against the limit of 85.

-unless a SA meets an exception that exempts him from counting (e.g., medical non-counter, exhausted eligibility SA), that SA will always count against the limit of 85 in the year in which the aid is received.

-in general, an “initial counter” is a SA who is in his first year of receiving aid in a sport.

-the initial counter limit is 25, but the overall limit of 85 is always in play, so for example, if I will be returning 65 guys on scholarship in 2010-11, I only have room for 20 initial counters in 2010-11.

-initial counters who enroll in the fall count against the initial limit (up to 25) for the academic year in which they enroll; except as described under the midyear replacement rule below, initial counters who enroll mid-year may count against the initial limit in either the year they enroll or in the following year.

-there is something called a “midyear graduate replacement.” This may actually be the source of confusion because under the “midyear replacement” rule, the SA who is receiving aid for the first time at mid-year has to count against the initial limit in the following academic year. The “midyear replacement” rule is only used, though, when a team is at its limit of 85 and someone counting against the 85 has recently graduated?the SA receiving aid for the first time at midyear is then “replacing” the SA who counted against the 85 in the fall but has now graduated.

-all of the above describe NCAA rules; the Big Ten rule is that at no time can you be in a situation where more than 3 scholarships over the limit have been offered. So, if I have room for 25 initial counters next year, I can sign 28; if I have room for 20 initial counters next year, I can sign 23.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:31 AM | Apparently (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

New shit has come to light. I retract my previous statements.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:13 AM | No, it says we CAN'T (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 22748

No, it says we CAN'T "backdate" players. They can only count for the semester/year for which they initially enrolled. So if a guy enrolls in January 2010, he can't count for the 2009 class.

That being said, I wonder if "enrolled" means when the kid STARTS classes or when the kid SIGNS UP for classes... If he can count for the year in which he SIGNS UP for classes, then perhaps January enrollees could count for '09. Thoughts?

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 21

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:17 AM | Well considering that the school year (Score:1)
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 09/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4708

Is Fall to Summer (09-10) if they would enroll within that year then they should be counted for that years class. Whereas if they enroll after classes end in May then they should be counted toward the next years class (as most football players do that enroll in the summer).

That's my interpretation of the rule.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:36 AM | Semantics (Score:1)
Lutha
Lutha's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 4053

I agree. Most of the confusion stems around the use of the term "backdating."

Whereas we see an early enrollee as part of the 2010 class according to recruiting parlance, if the player enrolls in Jan, he is technically a student in the 2009-2010 class and therefore isn't backdated.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 20th, 2009 at 1:35 AM | Exactly!!! (Score:1)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3439

This is exactly what is confusing everyone. A student who enrolls in January 2010 is enrolling in the 2009/2010 school year. Per the NCAA rule, his scholarship can be counted in the 2009/2010 class (which is what everyone keeps calling "backdating") or the 2010/2011 class.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:18 AM | Magnus (Score:1)
me
me's picture
Joined: 12/26/2008
MGoPoints: 2264

read this part again:

"University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11."

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:02 PM | so is it like this? Say we (Score:1)
white_pony_rocks
white_pony_rocks's picture
Joined: 02/16/2009
MGoPoints: 762

so is it like this? Say we sign 28 players but we can still only offer scholarships to 25 of them for next year. We'll say that grimes and hankins commit and decide to enroll early. While they count towards this class in signings, they don't for scholarships, they count towards last year. So we sign 28 and actually offer 27 of them scholarships, 2 counting towards last year (Grimes and Hankins) and 25 for this coming year (all other recruits whether they enroll early or not)

Soon to be the #1 fitness and training center in AA

http://www.annarbortrainer.com

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:23 AM | Other way (Score:1)
Wolverine96
Wolverine96's picture
Joined: 08/28/2008
MGoPoints: 1576

I am reading it the opposite way. If a recruit enrolls during the 2009-10 "Academic" year, his scholarship can going against either the 2009 class or the 2010 class.

Using Tate Forcier as an example, if there was room in the 2008 recruiting class, his scholarship could have counted against those numbers.

Therefore we have the opportunity to count early enrollees against the 2009 class so long as we do not exceed the number of scholarships available at that time. The good news, if I am understanding the rule correctly, is that we should be able to sign 28 guys and count a least one or two against the 2009 class.

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and things with... molecular structures. "

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:37 AM | quasi "back dating" (Score:1)
c williams
c williams's picture
Joined: 07/15/2009
MGoPoints: 34

I understand it this way as well.

I believe the original comment about no "back dating" implied that you can't have an August enrollee count towards the previous year just because you didn't use all your 25 that previous year. Futher, I agree that it does imply as Wolverine 96 states, "if a recruit enrolls during the 2009-10 "Academic" year, his scholarship can going against either the 2009 class or the 2010 class."

So, I guess you can quasi "back date" players by having them enroll early in January. It's curious how this would then work moving forward for an early enrollee counted against the previous cap who then stays around after a redshirt for a 5th season.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:18 AM | I read that you can do it. (Score:1)
bcsblue
bcsblue's picture
Joined: 11/14/2008
MGoPoints: 447

I read that you can do it. The last sentence of this paragraph.

University A’s fb team has 80 student-athletes (SAs) on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year. Joe Prospect graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University A in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University A is now at 81 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and !!Joe may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room) or 2010-11.!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:19 AM | From what you've posted, if I (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1664

From what you've posted, if I have interpreted it correctly(that's a long shot) is that we can sign 28 if and only if we have 3 ee's counting towards last years count since we only had 22 in that class. Those three plus the 25 counting towards this years class must meet the required 85 scholarship limit by the deadline meaning that we would have to have enough players graduating or not receiving their 5th year to get to that number of 85. If those criteria are met then we could presumably have 28 players in this class.

My head hurts!

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:31 AM | PLUS (Score:1)
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 07/25/2008
MGoPoints: 1953

There has to be least 3 scholarships open or opening under the 85 that were not due to "mid-year" graduation in order for the EE to be counted in the previous class...no idea if that situation exists or not...

Meeechingan Football 2011:  Now featuring ManBall™

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:33 AM | Weren't we under the limit of (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1664

Weren't we under the limit of 85 even after last years class therefore have the room for them to be counted towards it or am I still missing something?

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:11 PM | I don't know how that (Score:1)
BleedingBlue
BleedingBlue's picture
Joined: 07/25/2008
MGoPoints: 1953

I don't know how that specifically works as I'm sure that there were walk-ons awarded all of the 85 scholarships (I don't think there is any way they would not give kids the money). Scholarships last 1 year (fall and winter semester minimum I assume).

With that being said:
Assuming the team was up to the max 85 limit by awarding the scholarships to walk-ons, from what it says above, it's my understanding we would need to have at least 3 people that were on scholarship in the fall leave the team/release their scholarship for a reason other than mid-year graduation in order for 3 EE's to count toward the 2009 class.

Meeechingan Football 2011:  Now featuring ManBall™

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:33 AM | The way I read it, we can sign up to 31 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 231

but have only 28 enroll. Three early enrollees can be counted towards the 2009-10 class (assuming three enroll early). Then we are can still take on 25 and be under the 85 limit (I haven't done a count of this but that's my understanding of where we are in overall body count). So, under Big Ten rules we can sign up to 28 players to fill the 25 slots. That gives us total 31 signees to fill 28 slots. It allows you to factor in the possibility of attrittion of up to three signees due to ineligibity, pro baseball, whatever. NCAA rules would not limit how many you sign to fill the 25 slots (see Alabama).

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:52 AM | Disregarding the 85 limit, (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

Disregarding the 85 limit, wouldn't we hypothetically be able to take as many enroll 30 if we counted 2 EEs from last '09 to '08, and Stonum from '08 to '07?

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:33 PM | I don't think we an enroll more than 28 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 231

Our 2009 class was 22 (according to an earlier post) so that leaves three early enrollees that can be counted in the 2009 class. Add that to this year's enroll limit of 25 (out of potentially 28 signees) and that gets you to 28. I don't know if we can retroactively assign Forcier, Stonum or other early enrollees from last year and reassign them to a previous class or how much room was in the previous class. I suppose it is possible though. If the class gets real big, it starts to limit how many we can take on in the class of 2011 because of the overall 85 limit.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:47 PM | Our 09 class signed 22, but (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

Our 09 class signed 22, but Witty didn't enroll, leaving four open spots to start. In addition, we had seven early enrollees. Depending on how things worked out with Witherspoon, Hill and Stonum that year, we could have counted back anywhere from one to four. That would leave our 09 class with anywhere from four to eight spots we could count back to.

The real issue is the 85 limit.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:33 PM | I don't think we an enroll more than 28 (Score:1)
rdlwolverine
Joined: 09/28/2008
MGoPoints: 231

Our 2009 class was 22 (according to an earlier post) so that leaves three early enrollees that can be counted in the 2009 class. Add that to this year's enroll limit of 25 (out of potentially 28 signees) and that gets you to 28. I don't know if we can retroactively assign Forcier, Stonum or other early enrollees from last year and reassign them to a previous class or how much room was in the previous class. I suppose it is possible though. If the class gets real big, it starts to limit how many we can take on in the class of 2011 because of the overall 85 limit.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 20th, 2009 at 1:46 AM | Initial Counter Limit is 25 (Score:1)
psychomatt
Joined: 08/25/2009
MGoPoints: 3439

You cannot sign above 28 because the initial counter limit is 25 (see full version of Chad Hawley's comments) and the B10 rule allows three over.

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything."  B. Simpson

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:24 AM | bouje and me (Score:1)
Magnus
Magnus's picture
Joined: 07/17/2008
MGoPoints: 22748

I think you guys are correct. Bcsblue's post was more informative than the original post, and based on bcsblue's post, I agree with you guys. The quotes that were in the original post weren't the whole story, and that's what I was basing my reading on.

+1 to both of you.

Twitter - Recruiting Update: May 21

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:27 AM | I mean basically it just sounds like nothing has changed from (Score:1)
bouje
bouje's picture
Joined: 09/30/2008
MGoPoints: 4708

the original statement of how EEs work. Which is IMO the way that it should work. To take away EE a team like Michigan which has been decimated with attrition is screwed and can never get back on track.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand"

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:29 AM | co-sign. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

co-sign.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:35 AM | "backdate" (Score:1)
BoyBlue
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8

I think you got caught up in the part where they said you can't backdate a player who isn't enrolled in that academic year. But an early enrollee IS enrolled in the 2009 academic year as the winter '10 semester counts towards the 2009 academic year. This is not then "backdating."

So a class of 28 is allowed because of the early enrolling of at least 3 (Pace, Robinsons, White, Miller, Others, I am not sure). HOORAY! Now it appears we don't have to Peace or Barnes a kid, and I hope we don't. Subject to academic reasons this class should be huge and talented.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:46 AM | "Now it appears we don't have (Score:1)
osdihg
osdihg's picture
Joined: 12/09/2008
MGoPoints: 82

"Now it appears we don't have to Peace ... a kid"

Excellent pun potential.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:39 AM | It would make sense that (Score:1)
Fresh Meat
Fresh Meat's picture
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 1755

It would make sense that would could sign 28 and count 3 of the EE towards last year's count given how we have been recruiting. As people have stated before, if we could only sign 25 some of the activities of the coaches in recruiting would seem not just weird, but kind of dumb. But in light of this information, the recruiting strategy makes perfect sense, which IMO, makes it more likely that we can in fact sign 28.

I've been called the songbird of my generation, by those who have heard me. THAT GOOD

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:39 AM | Let's try making it more concrete: (Score:1)
Logan88
Joined: 01/05/2009
MGoPoints: 2404

I've merely substituted the specific for the generic in the compliance guy's example...

University of Michigan fb team has 78 student-athletes on scholarship during the 2009-10 academic year(I believe the current count is 78). Ricardo Miller graduates from h.s. early and enrolls at University of Michigan in Jan. 2010 as a scholarship fb player. University of Michigan is now at 79 scholarships (out of 85) for the 2009-10 academic year and Ricardo may be counted against the initial limit of 25 for either 2009-10 (if there’s room, which in UM's case there would be as only 21 enrolled in the 2009-2010 class) or 2010-11.

So...it looks like UM CAN sign 28 as long as 3 enroll early to count against the 2009-2010 year (aka as the 2009 class which only enrolled 21, 4 short of the 25 allowed per year). Provided, of course, that we do not exceed the 85 team total.

We ARE Michigan....COME GET SOME!!!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:47 AM | Great thread (Score:1)
Lutha
Lutha's picture
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 4053

This is the best "news" we've received in a while. You guys have totally made my day.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:38 PM | Thank You! (Score:1)
maineandblue
maineandblue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1118

Was waiting for someone to express some excitement.

Whooo frickin Hooo!

This class could have the quality AND quantity to take Tate and fellow frosh to the promised land as juniors or seniors, in my humble and hopeful opinion.

I don't know where this idea--that the B10 no longer allows EEs to count towards the academic year they enroll (aka the previous recruiting year)--started, but man am I thrilled it's erronious!

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:44 AM | Pardon my ignorance, (Score:1)
Maize.Blue Wagner
Maize.Blue Wagner's picture
Joined: 10/23/2009
MGoPoints: 596

but if an early enrollee is counted in the class of the previous year, do they lose a year of eligibility? For instance, if Tate had been counted toward the class of '08 would he only have two years of eligibility left? Or would '08 have to be considered a red-shirt year?

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:56 AM | That's a really good (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

That's a really good question. I don't think we have a solid answer to that.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:08 PM | Eligibility (Score:1)
BoyBlue
Joined: 12/19/2008
MGoPoints: 8

No they do not lose a year of eligibility nor does it count as a redshirt year. I am not sure why, but since they never had an opportunity to compete in a game they don't lose eligibility. In essence they get a head start on the rest in their class by getting a semester of academics in and a spring practice as well.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:45 PM | I'll buy that (Score:1)
maineandblue
maineandblue's picture
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 1118

I think you answered your own question: you do know why!
It wouldn't make sense to lose a year of eligibility if you were never eligible to play a game.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:49 PM | I'm not sure that's true. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

I'm not sure that's true. Supposedly once you enroll you have five years to play four. Especially if you get to practice with the football team, I doubt you can have it both ways.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 2:37 PM | I always thought it could be (Score:1)
DeuceInTheDeuce
DeuceInTheDeuce's picture
Joined: 10/29/2008
MGoPoints: 680

I always thought it could be broken up by academic unit (semester, trimester etc.).

For instance, EEs that enroll for the winter term, say January 11, 2010, have until the the start of winter term 2015 to finish their 4 playing years. This date will be after the fb season, thus EE's don't lose a year.

On the other hand, I may have just made this up years ago because it was the only way it made sense to me. 50/50

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 3:12 PM | Agree with above (Score:1)
Wolverine96
Wolverine96's picture
Joined: 08/28/2008
MGoPoints: 1576

You have 5 years of eligibility from the date of enrollment. Because the football schedule does not cross semesters, a player who enrolls in January will still have 5 football seasons to complete his eligibility.

This is why you do not have early enrollees in other sports such as basketball as the schedule spans two different semesters.

"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and things with... molecular structures. "

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 5:11 PM | Thanks for the clarification. (Score:1)
mejunglechop
mejunglechop's picture
Joined: 07/09/2008
MGoPoints: 6262

Thanks for the clarification.

Galileo was also chastised.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 7:13 PM | How would this (Score:1)
Captain
Captain's picture
Joined: 06/12/2009
MGoPoints: 11290

How would this impact the January bowl game I expect us to be playing in 5 years from now?

If an EE enrolls in January, takes a redshirt, and completes his fourth season at the end of his fifth year, is it possible that his eligibility might expire before the bowl game?

Colors That Float

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 12:48 PM | I read somewhere, can't (Score:1)
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2134

I read somewhere, can't remember where, that your elligibility is for a number of athletic seasons, not academic years. I'll keep looking for the link I read that at so take that for what it's worth (unverified voracity).

So, since Witty, for example, wasn't on the team for the 2009 season he still has 5 seasons of elligibility left in football even if he enrolls in the winter term of the 2009-2010 academic year.

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 2:01 PM | double post (Score:1)
MCalibur
MCalibur's picture
Joined: 07/16/2009
MGoPoints: 2134

double post

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:51 AM | I know Witty and Miller will (Score:1)
MWW6T7
MWW6T7's picture
Joined: 09/15/2009
MGoPoints: 1664

I know Witty and Miller will be enrolling early but who are the others?

EDIT: Sorry, did not see the posty above that states the answer I was looking for.

"Tequila on the reg, chicks on the reg, fashions on the reg.  Living the life most men can only dream of" - Kenny Powers

  • Login or register to post comments
December 9th, 2009 at 11:53 AM | There is a whole thread (Score:1)
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 12796

There is a whole thread devoted to this, but off the top of my head:

Pace
Miller
Witty
M-Rob
Jackson
White

Not sure who else, but I think there were a couple more. Needless to say, it will be at least the three we need.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.