Desmond Howard On UM's Top Rivalries

Submitted by MGoVoldemort on

Desmond says that Sparty is Michigan's third biggest rival. Obvious comical reaction by Sparty fans to immediately follow is obvious.

 

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130906/SPORTS0201/309060090/ESPN-analyst-Desmond-Howard-Michigan-State-Michigan-s-third-best-rivalry?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE

 

"You don't really judge yourself — and no disrespect to Michigan State, but they don't have the national appeal that Notre Dame has," Howard said. "I don't think anybody's fooled by that, right?
 

MGoVoldemort

September 6th, 2013 at 3:47 PM ^

Kal Fisher · Pizza Boy at Mellow Mushroom

I don't know why this is news. Everyone knows Michigan and Michigan State don't care about each other. Michigan State's rivals: 

1 - Notre Dame. 
2 - Wisconsin. 
3 - Ohio State. 
4 - Michigan. 

Not a slight on Michigan, but -- other than a couple decent years in the 90s -- they haven't been nationally relevant since Hitler was running the show in Germany. Further, games against Notre Dame, Wisconsin, and Ohio State have been far more entertaining, and the fans that comprise those fan-bases are enjoyable and fun to talk sports with. Michigan's just sort of... there... They're not really important, but they are the other premier institution in the state of Michigan so you have to take that for what it's worth.

Space Coyote

September 6th, 2013 at 3:51 PM ^

But I think most fans would disagree in recent years. ND/UM was huge when Desmond played for Michigan. And back then I would have put ND ahead of MSU as well. But this year, and the past few years, I'd put MSU ahead of ND. ND would be a close third though.

Wolverine Devotee

September 6th, 2013 at 3:57 PM ^

And historically, Michigan-Minnesota has been a good one. Until Bo came here at least. The amount of carnage I wanted to see on the field at the Humpty Dump in 2006 was unholy. Losing the Jug in 05 still hurts.

WingsNWolverines

September 6th, 2013 at 3:58 PM ^

as our 3rd biggest rival behind MSU and OSU in my order and especially since MSU's past 4 year streak from 2008-2011 it goes OSU, MSU, ND. I have to disagree with Mr Heisman on this one. Beating State is more important to me than beating ND especially with that being a divisional game.

outwest

September 6th, 2013 at 4:05 PM ^

From a west coast perspective I see the order being OSU, ND, then MSU. Being so far removed from the region, means that most fans out here don't see the MSU rivalry as being a big deal. OSU and ND are on TV every weekend, on ESPN highlights, and have traditionally been more relevant than MSU. I agree that the ND means the least as far as B1G championship, but I would rather see Michigan beat OSU and ND over MSU.

LSAClassOf2000

September 6th, 2013 at 4:15 PM ^

"You measure yourself nationally when you go up against a Notre Dame, an Ohio State. I don't think I'm telling you guys anything you didn't know." - Desmond Howard, in the article

People might debate the rank order of rivalries in recent times, but I think what he says here has been consistently true when it comes to how well a program is doing as a whole, throughout the process of recruiting, developing and ultimately playing games. 

 

BOX House

September 6th, 2013 at 4:31 PM ^

I really do think it depends on whether or not you live in Michigan, and how much interaction you have with Michigan State fans. A lot of, if not the majority of, my friends are State grads, which definitely makes the rivalry a little more meaningful in my eyes. I know a lot of out-of-staters who obviously wouldn't have the same experiences, though.

BeatOSU52

September 6th, 2013 at 4:50 PM ^

I am cool with Desmond voicing his opinion but I have really gotten sick of all this talk about ranking Michigan's biggest rivals and who is a rival and who is not.  People are making it bigger deal than it has to be.  Here's the bottom-line:

1.  Ohio St is Michigan's biggest rival.  Period.

2.  Michigan State is a very BIG rival.  Anyone that tries to say it not is full of it.  Yes Michigan has much better history and tradition, but that doesn't automatically mean it's not a big rival.  Anyone that doubts this, just needs to live in the state of Michigan and see how  much our two fanbases don't get along and are always bickering back and forth.   And I hate Sparty as much as anyone here, believe me, but it got really annoying when I would hear our own fanbase downplay this rivalry last year when Sparty had beaten us 4 years in a row (thank god that streak has ended, though)

3.  Arguing over if ND and MSU is a bigger rival just seems pointless to me.  ND is and probably always will be more relevant at the national level than MSU, but MSU is an in-conference and in-state rival.  Both are big rivals.

Dr. Explosion

September 6th, 2013 at 4:54 PM ^

Who does it hurt to lose to most? For me, that means OSU, MSU, then ND. I'm over a loss to ND pretty quick. The others... they haunt me. Those 4 years State owned us were pretty depressing and don't get me started on OSU. (Shudders)

WolverineHistorian

September 6th, 2013 at 5:03 PM ^

Why does the media keep asking former players to rank the rivalries? So Sparty can have as much bulletin board material come November? Rankings change throughout the years. When Desmond was playing for us, Notre Dame was actually hated more than Ohio State. (OSU was a step above mediocre in those days and ND was at their peak.) If Spartan fans want to get all bent out of shape, fine. But this topic has gotten old. All three schools are evil and all three must die....or be beaten on the field. I'll leave it at that.

4godkingandwol…

September 6th, 2013 at 5:22 PM ^

I don’t consider to be a rival he who prefers to succeed in the recesses of mediocrity, rather than accept the chance of failure for the opportunity to taste the glory of victory... so yeah, to hell with notre dame.  Straight to hell...

MGlobules

September 6th, 2013 at 5:29 PM ^

If you ask me which rival I HATE most, MSU might be tops. But I see OSU and ND as greater rivals in the sense that they have fielded better teams, made for better games. (The WL records tend to bear this out, I think.) The bitterness in the MSU thing almost overshadows the game. 

Personally, the little brother thing has reached the point of diminishing returns, though. I wish Hart hadn't said it in the first place, I wish Dantonio hadn't been so juvenile and little brothery in his response, and I wish that Denard hadn't stirred the pot the other day. 

French West Indian

September 6th, 2013 at 6:27 PM ^

...Michigan's two biggest rivals are clearly Harvard and Illinois.  Ohio State is kind of big too but I'm not sure I'd place them above USC & those classic (and often heartbreaking) Rose Bowl games.

And isn't Central Michigan MSU's biggest rival?  East Lansing & Pointe Pleasant are practically neighbors so they must hate living with each other.

charblue.

September 6th, 2013 at 7:32 PM ^

The only time the Spartans have risen in Michigan interest as a rival is when they've made themselves a threat of derailing your season. 

Michigan State is a state rival. Ohio State is a conference championship rival. And Notre Dame is a national rival, a program which copied itself after a Michigan. 

When Brian Kelly suggests that the ND-Michigan series is some kind of limited regional rivalry, he just demonstrates his own ignorance of  the competition. 

The reason these schools are rivals are because of their history in competition, and dealing with Michigan as a football mentor. 

I mean MIchigan is the leader and the best for a reason. And these other schools came after because Michigan taught them how to play the game. This isn't legend, it's fact. 

Here is another fact, ND hasn't won in Ann Arbor since 1993. Now, that might be a reason not to want to continue playing this series every year.