Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 2 days ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 3 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 3 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 936 views
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 7 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    15 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    89 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    58 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    38 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    32 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  • Lacrosse Falls to #7 Hopkins 10-9
    23 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    56 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • SIAP: Jay Feely prom "controversy"
    36 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    56 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    15 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    81 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    38 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    39 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    32 replies
  • OT: RIP Verne Troyer
    58 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • Baseball's win streak at 19 after 11th inning walkoff over PSU
    16 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Michigan Mercies Maryland, Softball Wins 12-1 (5 inn.)
    18 replies
  • ‹‹
  • 2 of 7
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    124 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  • Nebraska football
    105 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Is this the "Dark Age" of the B1G?

61 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
October 25th, 2011 at 4:33 PM
#1
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
Is this the "Dark Age" of the B1G?

We living in the lowest "down period" in Big Ten history during my lifetime.

How far has the conference fallen from the 2006 UM/OSU game that pitted #1 against #2 and had the two teams BARELY miss a rematch in the National Championship game (over an SEC team no less)?

Pretty far.

What happened:

For a variety of reasons, both OSU and UM have been the best programs at recruiting talent.  High quality talent is highly corelated with national titles.  The two schools usually finished first and second in the B1G and around the top 10-15 nationally in recruiting.  When the two teams were headed by Carr and Cooper/Tressel, they used that talent to each win national championships and keep in the top 5-10 in the rankings.  

Of course, we know what happened to UM with the coaching changes and vastly different schemes.  UM still pulled in talent, but the coaching may have been suspect and the transition was brutal.  It now seems to be turning itself around, but it lasted long enough for UM to have some of its worst seasons ever.

As for OSU, they kept winning the B1G and even getting national respect to be placed in the NC game a couple mroe times.  At least they got there and seemed like serious contenders prior to the final game.  I don't think that is something you can say about any other B1G team.  But now, we see the transition and struggles of sanctions and coach turnover at OSU.  Their high level recruits still need to be focused and "coached up."

And in the wake of the two generally most-talented programs falling (UM four year ago and OSU this year), who has filled the power void? 

How about Wisconsin, MSU and Iowa?  Teams that have steady, quality coaching during the transition periods of OSU/UM.  (Sorry JoePa, but you are not the PSU coach in reality.)  While those teams may have won a game or two against the OSU/UM teams in the past, they have enjoyed a lot more success lately.

But, those teams are obviously limted by the talent level on their teams.  None of them recruit like a national title contender.  There are few to zero "differenc makers" whose athletic talent transcends the system run by the school and who are clearly better than the other players on the field.  These teams seem to just bulk up the lines and plug in quality (but not dynamic in their own right) players in the skill positions.  Solid football, but nothing to make any of them a threat to legitimately contend for the National Championship.

IMO, you need both top-level talent and high quality coaching to be a nationally elite team (legit top 5 at the end of the year) in any given year.

Either MSU, Wisco and Iowa have to start recruiting like national powerhouse teams or OSU and UM need to find (or matintain) steady, high-quality coaching.  (I think the later is more likely than the former....and, of course, Nebraska could be a wild card in this equation).

Until that time though, a darkness has warshed over the B1G.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • B1G conference
  • football
  • Michigan football
  • Ohio State football.
  • Recruiting Rankings

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October 25th, 2011 at 4:36 PM
#2
Heiko
Heiko's picture
Joined: 08/19/2011
MGoPoints: 9972
"Warshed." Haha.

"Warshed." Haha.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 4:44 PM
#3
His Dudeness
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: -104
As to "warshed?" The Dude

As to "warshed?" The Dude abides.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 4:47 PM
#4
maizedandconfused
maizedandconfused's picture
Joined: 01/14/2010
MGoPoints: 4523
Hmm..

A darkness has warshed over the Big...

Nope..
2006
Bama was 6-7. 
Lousville was 12-1

Just sayin, a few years makes a significant impact on things

The biggest part of college football is that you can only sign players to a max 5 year deal with no chance of resigning them.

This means, every 2-3 years the landscape of college football will shift. 

Also, B1G currently has 5 teams in the top 25.

What we don't have is one elite team that is undefeated. Other conferences super powers will fall, almost guarenteed. This can change next year. 

What bothers me the most about all of this is that a significant portion of the shift in power is the oversigning in the SEC.. its not fair they get essentially 5 scholarships to our 4.  And the media hype engine that is pumping the SEC full of coverage and kick backs.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:28 PM
(Reply to #5) #5
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147117
Not only do they get 5 for

Not only do they get 5 for our 4, but they get to pick the best 4 out of the 5, discard one, and do it all over again.  We have to live with the 4 we pick.  No dicards and re-draws. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 4:52 PM
#6
His Dudeness
Joined: 11/24/2008
MGoPoints: -104
Not if Jerry Kill has

Not if Jerry Kill has anything to say about it!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:07 PM
#7
JimLahey
JimLahey's picture
Joined: 01/18/2011
MGoPoints: 2478
I have to agree. Name me a

I have to agree. Name me a big ten team right now that wouldn't go into a bowl game and get absolutely waxed by LSU or Alabama. It wouldn't even be competitive football.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:18 PM
(Reply to #7) #8
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 15752
To be honest

I'm guessing there's not to many teams that wouldn't get waxed by Alabam or LSU if they were to play them in a bowl game.

In terms of the final score, PSU's margin of loss is better than anyone else Alabama has played (16).  The next closest is Arkansas at 24.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 4:37 AM
(Reply to #10) #9
Baldbill
Baldbill's picture
Joined: 04/09/2009
MGoPoints: 3579
Considering that PSU has not

Considering that PSU has not lost another game, they are looking pretty good right now. They have the inside track to win thier division. I fear Michigans game against Alabama next year.

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 8:07 AM
(Reply to #47) #10
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
Schedule

That has all been "schedule" so far.  I watch PSU a lot (for family reasons) and PSU does not look good.  If they win their division it says a lot about the weakness of the B10.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 27th, 2011 at 2:39 AM
(Reply to #48) #11
Muttley
Muttley's picture
Joined: 07/07/2009
MGoPoints: -74931
Exactly

It's rather maddening, but even w/ their crappy showing to date, tOSU is in more control of their destiny than we are at this point in time.

In a hypothetical world, if tOSU were to win out, all that would stand between them and a division title would be a PSU loss to one of Illinois, Nebraska, or Wisconsin.  Conversely, if we were to win out, we'd need MSU to lose two of @Nebraska (MSU is 4 point dog),  Minnesota (autowin), @Iowa (should be solid favorite), Indiana (autowin), and @NW (should be substantial favorite).

Of course, in the real world, we'll give tOSU a pasting on Nov 26.  And tOSU is likely to lose their home game vs Wiscy this Sat (tOSU is 7.5 pt dog).

And for those interested, Mich is a 14 point favorite this Saturday.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:30 PM
(Reply to #7) #12
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
Yeah, under that criteria

Yeah, under that criteria every conference is in a dark age.

Although I agree that the Big Ten isn't crazy good this year, there are five one loss teams in the conference, and only one of those teams has a loss to a team outside the top-15 (MSU to ND). Illinois is a two loss team who beat ASU, one of the top PAC 12 teams. Iowa is an overtime away from being a one loss team as well, their only other loss to Penn State.

That's not exactly what the SEC was last year, but outside of the top two teams, it compares pretty well to the SEC this year, or any other conference for that matter. In fact, if we don't get two BCS teams this year, we should have one of the best bowl seasons we've had in a while.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 6:24 PM
(Reply to #13) #13
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 15752
Bowl Season - Agree

Barring massive collapses, LSU and Bama are both in the BCS. I believe the Cotton gets first pick out of the SEC West and if Arkansas is 10-2 or even 9-3, they'll probably go to the Cotton. That pretty much leaves Auburn, South Carolina, Florida and Georgia for the 3 Big Ten match-ups.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:19 PM
(Reply to #18) #14
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
Capital One picks before

Capital One picks before Cotton, so Cap One picks Arkansas and Cotton probably gets Auburn.  But that's mostly correct.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:07 PM
(Reply to #13) #15
MGoBeer
Joined: 03/11/2011
MGoPoints: 2313
This makes the SEC Mordor and

This makes the SEC Mordor and Saban Sauron right?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:16 PM
(Reply to #13) #16
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
One loss teams this year...

...does not disprove the theory.  Let's see where everyone ends up.  There are no great teams in the B1G this year.  And my points was that the last couple years it had really only been OSU who looked like legit NC contenders.  Now that they are gone, no one does.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:22 PM
(Reply to #32) #17
WolvinLA2
WolvinLA2's picture
Joined: 11/13/2009
MGoPoints: 52761
Well, I guess I just

Well, I guess I just disagree. Even with their recent loss, I think Wisconsin looks as good this year as OSU has almost any year over the last decade.

But a conference isn't judged simply on the quality of their best team. The Big Ten isn't top heavy like the SEC or Pac 12, but 3-6 are as good as any conference, and the 1 and 2 aren't that bad either.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 9:18 AM
(Reply to #7) #18
ijohnb
Joined: 09/21/2009
MGoPoints: 51880
I think

it is a result of trying to beat "them" at their game as opposed to playing our (Big Ten) game to the best of our abilities.  I think that the conference has seen a movement toward spread and speed in an attempt to better compete with other conferences on a regular basis, top to bottom.  The Big Tens wheelhouse is power and size, ball control and very solid bend but don't break defenses.  No top tier Big Ten teams is ever going to blow out a top tier SEC team, but the focus for those that wish to compete should be to play Big Ten football (hate to say it, but MANBALL) as good as possible as opposed to being a watered down version of very good teams playing different styles. (As much as I wanted RR to succeed, M was never going to be anything but Florida-light playing that style of football with recruiting leftovers from the coastal schools.) 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:14 PM
#19
funkywolve
Joined: 10/08/2008
MGoPoints: 15752
2006

Instead of 2006, I'd say the high point of the big ten was probably the mid-90's to late 90's.  UM won a NC. Cooper had OSU in the Top 5 on a regular basis.  PSU was in the Top 10 quite a bit - should have won a share of the title in 1994, and I believe they were ranked #1 in 1997 match-up.  Alvarez had Wisconsin at a farily high level.  Tiller had arrived at Purdue and they were on the turnaround.  Mason was at Minnesota and he had them on the upswing.  Northwestern won back to back Big Ten titles in 1995/1996.  Saban was turning around MSU.

You had a number of teams that were upper echelon teams in the country (Rose Bowl wins in 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999; OSU won a Sugar Bowl, Michigan won an Orange Bowl, Penn St won a Fiesta Bowl) and a lot of solid to good teams throughout the rest of the conference. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:25 PM
(Reply to #8) #20
g_reaper3
g_reaper3's picture
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 2238
I would agree although extend it to 2002

94 had Penn St. undefeated and somewhat jobbed out of a share of the National Title.

97 had M with a share of the National Title

02 has Ohio with a National Title.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:14 PM
(Reply to #8) #21
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
You're right....

...that was the "high point" and it went down a bit after 2002 with a blip upward in 2006. (A last gasp of importance?) Since that time it has been a slide down nationally for the B1G.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:17 PM
#22
LSAClassOf2000
LSAClassOf2000's picture
Joined: 01/07/2011
MGoPoints: 81375
"Dark Ages"

The 5th to 9th centuries were a rough spot in Western civilization. I am pretty sure they would have burned Jim Tressel at the stake. 

Actually, you're basically right - there are a couple programs, ours included,  that will need to settle into their new coaching regimes before we really know how good the B1G really is. Right now, most everyone in the conference would get absolutely destroyed by the top SEC teams. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:22 PM
#23
g_reaper3
g_reaper3's picture
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 2238
The B1G has struggled against superelite teams for 40+ years.

Looking at only the teams that were in the Big Ten at the time, the conference has two national titles (mythical as they may be) since 1968 (M 97, Ohio 02). 2 titles in 42 seasons. I think USC, Oklahoma, Alabama, Miami, Nebraska, Florida all have more themselves over that stretch. And Penn State (pre Big Ten), ND, Florida State and Texas all have 2. It really comes down to Southern teams plus ND and Penn State.

I know this sucks as a Michigan/Big Ten fan but it is the harsh reality. It would be interesting to know the bowl record of the top team in the Big Ten each year. I know Michigan's is poor when they have gone to the Rose Bowl as Michigan's top team (4-12 I think) and OSU is 1-2 in the Title game.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:31 PM
#24
ChiCityWolverine
ChiCityWolverine's picture
Joined: 07/08/2011
MGoPoints: 3126
How it can change IMO

The first step is getting the "national brand" programs to be unquestionable top 25 teams all year, every year. Ohio State was there for most of Tressel's tenure, but Michigan fell off post Lloyd, Penn State has been up and down both recently and over the past decade, and Nebraska just reached that level last year. The key for this lies in the coaching staffs. Pelini at Nebraska and Hoke at Michigan appear to be laying a foundation for years to come, but Ohio State and Penn State, while still littered with talent (mostly on defense), have big coaching decisions to make in the near future. IMO, both schools need new, big-time head coaches to take the helm.

The B1G's "upper middle class" needs to keep making strides. Wisconsin and Michigan State are the class of the conference in 2011 and, unsurprisingly, they've done it with two established coaches who've turned the programs into proven winners without the benefit of high recruiting rankings. Iowa has been up and down under Kirk Ferentz, but has been relatively strong in bowl games. Ferentz needs to regroup from the recent turmoil around the program and return the program to at least 08-09 form (if not 02-04).

These programs need to beat the SEC in New Year's Day bowl games. The "national brands" need to recruit at a national level and win a BCS Championship. A Heisman winner, the occasional contender from Northwestern or Illinois, and some exciting B1G Championship Games would be icing on top.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:37 PM
#25
lhglrkwg
lhglrkwg's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 27681
Unfortunately, if we're

Unfortunately, if we're hoping MSU, Iowa and Wisconsin to recruit nationally, we're going to be disappointed. The only big ten teams that recruit nationally are M, OSU and Penn State and thus they are probably the only big ten teams that have the chance to be legitimately top 5-10 year in and year out

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:15 PM
(Reply to #15) #26
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Nebraska

What about them? I otherwise agree with your post but I think you have to include Nebraska, probably ahead of Penn state.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:19 PM
(Reply to #31) #27
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
For me...

Nebraska is the wild card (insert Charlie Kelly gif here).  Not sure how well they will recruit in the new conference or even how much talent they had recruiting-wise in previous years.  Not currently an elite team (based on Pellini's record against good teams) but solid.  If they adapt well, they could "be something" against the B1G.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:48 PM
(Reply to #31) #28
lhglrkwg
lhglrkwg's picture
Joined: 07/03/2008
MGoPoints: 27681
Oops

Forgot that they were in our conference. Yeah I suppose Nebraska too but not at the level of M or OSU

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:54 PM
#29
michgoblue
michgoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2009
MGoPoints: 20962
Bright Future

I agree with your post 100%, but I think that the future is bright for the B10.  Why?

A.  The Top Tier

1.  DOes anyone really believe that Fickell will be the HC at OSU after this year?  No.  Sanctions or not, OSU will go out and get itself a top coach who will return OSU to powerhouse status within 2-3 years tops.  Hell, they still have as much 4-5 star talent as most schools outside of the SEC.

2.  Michigan is "returning to glory."  Let's not debate the RR era, other than to say it didn't go well.  Who cares why.  Hoke is obviously a good fit and is doing great things in recruiting.  With his 2012 class as a starting point, by 2014 (not saying it won't happen before then, but it will take that long for the 2012 kids to be upper-classmen) we should be elite again.

3.  Nebraska - Nabraska is a national name capable of regularly reeling in top recruiting classes.  Pelini is a solid - albeit unstable - HC.  Once they get some depth (much like us) and a QB who can throw, they will be a regular top 15-20 team, with the potential to push us and OSU at the best team in the conference every year.

With the expected improvements in all three of these teams, that top 3 matches up against any conference other than the SEC (oversigning rabble-rabble).

 

B.  The Second Tier

4.  Wisconsin is on the right track.  No, they are not yet super-elite.  But, they are on the right track.  Since his arrival, BB has done a solid job of bringing in good recruits and coaching them in solid fundamentals.  Wisco will always have a 320+ pound average OL, which will allow them to hang with most teams.  They will never be a national power, but I can see a situation where they are consistently ranked in the top 15-20.

5.  PSU - I love me some Joe Pa, but he is the only thing standing in the way of PSU being a serious player, again.  How do you go out and recruit when everyone is wondering whether the HC will be alive the next day.  Once he steps down, I see PSU rising back to the level of Wisco - regularly top 20, with occasional top 10 seasons. 

 

C.  The middling Tier

6.  MSU (ha, I put you in a crappy tier even though you beat us - take that Sparty) - I puke in my mouth as I write this, but Tressel Junior is doing a very good job in East Lansing.  No, they will not win any sportsmanship awards and no, they are NOT a national recruiting team (contrary to what they believe), but they are playing solid B10 football.  But, it is not going to last.  No attempt to discuss RR, but a lot of their success is related to their ability over the past 3-4 years to pull in top in-state talent.  For better or worse (either because the media made it impossible or because of his focus, who cares) RR was not successful in recruiting in-state, so MSU was the beneficary of this a windfall of talent.  Hoke has already put an end to that.  Once their current crop of players moves on, I see MSU returning to mediocrity.  But, that said, they are still capable of turning in 9-3 seasons from time to time.

7.  Iowa - what can I say?  Boring, poor recruiting, and perennially between 7 and 9 wins.  A true middling tier team.

8.  NU - Fitzgerald is doing good things, a top academic institution that could regularly see 7-9 wins.

After that, it gets dicey, but  in 2-3 years, I expect us to have a VERY strong top 5 teams.  How many conferences have more than 5 good teams in a given season?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 5:56 PM
#30
redhousewolverine
Joined: 08/17/2010
MGoPoints: 1036
I hope not. Rome never came

I hope not. Rome never came back. Also, I think many people would argue the Big Ten has been slipping into the dark age since TSIO won the national championship. I know many people that would argue, somewhat successfully, that the Big Ten isn't as relevant as it used to be. Obviously the SEC has passed the Big Ten as the premiere football conference. Some could argue that the Pac 12 or Big 12 are past the Big Ten, but that is far more controversial. Personally, I hope that it is more of a decaying and aging Greece, revitalized by an outside force, Macedonians, with new weaponry, new strategies, and a new innovative general. O wait, shit that didn't work this time.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 6:34 PM
#31
Charlie Chunk
Charlie Chunk's picture
Joined: 05/02/2011
MGoPoints: 887
What goes around comes around

I have to agree with you with the hopes that my theory is correct.  You can't keep a good program down.  Michigan is heading in the right direction and so is MSU, Wisc, Neb.  No telling where Ohio ends up. 

I think the Pac 12 is doing the same thing as the B1G.  It's a cyclical thing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 6:58 PM
#32
Steve in PA
Steve in PA's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5421
It's all about coaching/recruiting

I think it goes in cycles where older or more experienced coaches have their teams playing at their peak potential, then they retire, move on, or try the NFL.  Right now Satan and Les are having prison sex with the SEC, but after those two the SEC isn't any stronger than the B10.  See the post about them signing 5 kids to every 4 other teams sign.

Throw in geography and realize that the good coaches in the major conferences are all from or have roots in the midwest.  Satan, Miles, Stoops, Meyer, Pellini, etc.

I don't think we'll ever see PAC12 dominance or see the Big12 be more than a two trick pony, but I can see the B10 coming back in time.  It would be interesting to revisit this in 5 years. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:35 PM
(Reply to #20) #33
PurpleStuff
PurpleStuff's picture
Joined: 04/21/2009
MGoPoints: 15963
Coaches and money

The SEC is paying big bucks for proven coaches.  Nick Saban and Steve Spurrier had both won national championships before getting hired by their current school.  Petrino won a BCS bowl and had two top-10 finishes at Louisville.  Houston Nutt took Arkansas to three SEC championship games before being hired at Ole Miss.  Miles was a head coach in a major conference for four years.  Even a guy like Gene Chizik was the defensive coordinator for a national championship team at Texas and an undefeated team at Auburn.  Mark Richt was the offensive coordinator at FSU for a decade (they never lost more than two games in that time).

Compare that with the resumes of the guys in the Big Ten, and you see a fairly big difference.  Bielema was a DC for two years at Wisconsin when they had fairly decent success.  Ferentz was a position coach in the NFL who had a three year stint as the head man at Maine.  Danny Hope was the HC at Eastern Kentucky for 5 years and never a coordinator.  Fickell is a career assistant who had never even been a coordinator on his own.  Pat Fitzgerald was a position coach.  Only Wilson and Pelini were even big time coordinators (at OU and LSU respectively).  A guy like Dantonio (three years as DC at OSU, then three years as HC at Cincinnati with a .500 record) looks freakishly overqualified compared with most of the other hirings.

Ron Zook is the only guy who had run a big time program before he got hired and for all the hand wringing when he got hired, Brady Hoke probably has the best head coaching resume of any of the post-Paterno hirings among current coaches.

The SEC probably has a similar advantage over every other conference.  I can't help but think that makes a difference.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 9:42 PM
(Reply to #24) #34
Steve in PA
Steve in PA's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5421
Yes $$ too

Looking at last year's salaries, there were 4 coaches in the B10 making less than the lowest reported SEC coach.  It's an arms race for sure.  I still think that except for Satan and Les, they are overpaying for what they are getting.  

Is Joker really worth the same $$ as Bielema?  How about Dooley or Nutt?  They would be the 3rd highest paid coaches in the B10 last year. 

 

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2010-coaches-contracts-database.htm

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:07 PM
#35
althegreat23
althegreat23's picture
Joined: 05/30/2011
MGoPoints: 2078
I would have to agree. In my

I would have to agree. In my opinion, the Big Ten needs Michigan and Ohio State to be elite to be at its best. Then you have top 20 programs like Iowa, Wisconsin, and Penn St. to provide depth.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 8:30 AM
(Reply to #44) #36
GunnersApe
GunnersApe's picture
Joined: 11/19/2009
MGoPoints: 6663
Just what I heard.

When PSU was an independent it was said that the refs were "friendly" to PSU at home and it made it tough to win in Happy Valley, thus inflating there recorded.   

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 10:51 AM
(Reply to #50) #37
Steve in PA
Steve in PA's picture
Joined: 08/10/2009
MGoPoints: 5421
Not a rumor

Very true.  I went to those games.  If you can find them, watch some replays.

The deal was that bad refs didn't get invited back.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 12:45 AM
(Reply to #22) #38
Steenie
Steenie's picture
Joined: 09/04/2010
MGoPoints: 251
Nothing new to add here

The B1G needs a strong Michigan and OSU. As much as I love what's been going on in Columbus right now, it's in our long term interest for them and us to have solid programs.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:15 PM
#39
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 30564
What if 2006 was an illusion?

Michigan and Ohio were the class of the conference in 2006, but Ohio got manhandled by Florida in a game that wasn't as close as the score looked, and Michigan got thoroughly outplayed in every facet of the game by USC.  

If I were a national fan instead of a Michigan fan, I would be saying without a shred of doubt that the reason Michigan and OSU were undefeated going into their game was because their conference sucked.  Michigan and OSU simply took care of business against medoicre competition.  

In the only difficult nonconference games for either team, Ohio beat Texas in a rematch, and Michigan beat a mediocre ND team.  Really, the Big Ten was weak, with only the Big Two and the little nine that year.

I think the B1G is better now than it was in 2006, becuase there is more balance and they have more teams capable of playing good football.  It might suck from our point of view because Michigan isn't dominant, but it is better for the league and for college football when there is some degree of parity.  

Could the B1G have some better teams?  Sure.  But there are five B1G teams in the BCS top 25 right now.  That certainly doesn't constitute a "dark age."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:35 PM
(Reply to #23) #40
althegreat23
althegreat23's picture
Joined: 05/30/2011
MGoPoints: 2078
ND was overrated, but they

ND was overrated, but they were top 3 when we played them and played in a BCS Bowl

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:11 PM
(Reply to #23) #41
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
The point is....

that the B10 had two teams poised to be in the NC game that year.  OSU had won only 4 years earlier and no one thought they would get beat by Florida like that.  (Theories have been that the biggest OSU/UM game of all time was the climax of the season for both schools.)

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:56 PM
#42
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 10801
Until you get everyone on an

Until you get everyone on an equal footing and eliminate oversigning of recruits, it is difficult to compete with the best of the SEC.  Over a four to five year period, they have the equivalent of an additional recruiting class.  It is sanctioned cheating and it says a ton about the NCAA that they allow it to take place.

Even Wisconsin's O, which when clicking is pretty impressive, might not look so great against Bama or LSU's defense.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:20 PM
(Reply to #26) #43
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
But...

... since the decline of OSU/UM, no B1G team has even threatened to be in the NC game.  Both the B12 and Pac10 have done that recently.

EDIT: supposed to be in response to post that LSU and Bama would dominate all.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 7:57 PM
#44
bluebyyou
Joined: 09/07/2009
MGoPoints: 10801
Until you get everyone on an

Double...sorry.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:24 PM
#45
Indiana Blue
Indiana Blue's picture
Joined: 09/19/2010
MGoPoints: 4916
Something I think gets overlooked ...

is the change in style that has occurred in the SEC over the last 6 years or so.  In the early 2000's everyone talked about the SEC's "speed" and now  Alabama is essentially playing "B1G" style football.  Face it  -  Saban was B1G, Miles played B1G under Bo ... and these teams are great at what ... DEFENSE.

The other part is the fact that they absolutely cheat on recruiting.  The oversigning and "medical" redshirts are now legendary and the SEC is going to do absolutely nothing about it.  So if the NCAA doesn't have a problem with it - then neither should the B1G.  Hell - the B1G let tsio cheat for years  -  finds out and then does nothing to them!  Jim "no balls" Delany is worthless.  The B1G should adopt a system where every team can medically redshirt 5 offensive and 5 defensive players every year / s.

Go Blue!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 12:22 PM
(Reply to #36) #46
Onas
Joined: 06/30/2008
MGoPoints: 418
Plus, the NCAA lets SEC teams

Plus, the NCAA lets SEC teams pay their recruits so long as the funds are laundered through the kid's parents, a la Cam Newton. The NCAAs compliance in this has shocked me.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 8:47 PM
#47
Jasper
Jasper's picture
Joined: 12/30/2010
MGoPoints: 1955
half correct

"... now  Alabama is essentially playing "B1G" style football."

Yes, but they're playing it *really* fast. It would be Big Ten style football only if their linemen needed to be timed with sundials.

EDIT: Intended as a response to Indiana Blue .....

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 9:05 PM
#48
M-Dog
M-Dog's picture
Joined: 07/06/2008
MGoPoints: 147117
A conference's perception of

A conference's perception of strength comes from 3 places:

 - September non-conference games,

 - Bowl games,

 - National championship games.

As far as September non-conference games go, this is becoming more and more meaningless.  Everyone is rushing to have 7-8 home games against squids.  There are simply less and less compelling home and home cross-conference games to judge by.

As far as bowl games, the B1G has not actually done that bad here.  Because we are a popular conference, we tend to play "up" a level since 2 B1G teams usually make it to the BCS.  That does not help the bowl record much, but we have had some streaks of success, especially against (surprise) the SEC.

As far as NC's go, the top of the ticket has really hurt us.  The B1G has been damaged by OSU losing 2 in a row in humiliating fashion.  It's not fair, but it feeds the perception of the top B1G teams being weak.  Reputation-wise, the B1G would have been better off if OSU had not played in those NCs at all. 

Let's see how the addition of Nebraska and the divisional alignment of 12 teams helps out.

It adds a national power and it has the top B1G teams playing competitive football into December.  Pushing the regular season-ending games back until after Thanksgiving will aslo help.  No more 40+ day layoffs until bowl games. 

When we play "up", there is now one more quality team to fill the gap.  Think Nebraska now instead of NW against Auburn on New Year's Day a couple of years ago. 
 
September is meaningless and there is not much we can do on the NC front given our damaged reputation until they come up with a true playoff.  But I do think the bowl situation can and will get a lot better.
 
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 8:11 AM
(Reply to #40) #49
RowoneEndzone
RowoneEndzone's picture
Joined: 09/27/2008
MGoPoints: 3543
Agreed.  I think the thing

Agreed.  I think the thing that hurt us the most was the 40+ day layoff.  Think about that!  It is impossible to stay sharp for over a month without games and you never know what team was going to walk out of the tunnel.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 25th, 2011 at 9:22 PM
#50
HoldTheRope
Joined: 11/04/2009
MGoPoints: 221
It was hard to have

It was hard to have perspective at the time, but it's pretty obvious that 2006 was sort of a mirage...the Big Ten had three pretty good teams (people sometimes forget that Wisconsin was 12-1 that year, including a close bowl win against Arkansas), but after that what did we have? I still maintain that if the bowl matchups were switched (i.e. Michigan had drawn Florida and OSU had gotten USC) the results would've been different. I'm not saying that either Michigan or OSU would've won in that scenario, but for some reason I don't think Michigan gets blown out against that Gator team. Florida was good that year but there's no way they were objectively 27 points better than OSU. That was honestly one of Tressel's worst single game coaching jobs IME, and Troy Smith spending the 50 or so days before the game on the Big Boy diet didn't exactly help. 

Oversigning aside, the SEC's recent string of national title teams has won them their current national reputation, and deservedly so. National titles have been rare for the Big Ten, and until the conference can win one again things probably won't change. The Big Ten hasn't been the premier conference since, what...1999? Either way, it's been a while. The reality is can any of us say with a straight face that any Big Ten team other than Michigan or Ohio State is capable of winning a national championship? Wisconsin's best chance in forever was this year and they've already blown it. As somebody else already mentioned, the disparity in coaching quality is just as big of a factor as oversigning of the concept of "SEC speed." 

The first step is just winning bowl games, period, and unfortunately I think things look pretty grim for the conference this year come bowl season. 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 9:44 AM
#51
Ohioblueblood
Ohioblueblood's picture
Joined: 09/03/2009
MGoPoints: -661
not even close

I actually thing this is a great year for the big ten. Yea ohio is waaaaay down but Penn State has solid D Msu is well, we saw, Wisonsin is looking goood and Michigan is better than expected. I think were doing just fine this year, but Espn will spin everything to the SEC...

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 10:48 AM
(Reply to #54) #52
PeterKlima
Joined: 08/24/2008
MGoPoints: 4360
The only "good teams" that ...

....the Big Ten has beat so far are other B1G teams, which may not be that good.

The bowl games showed last year how far behind Wisco (lost to TCU) and MSU (huge blowout) were to the other conferences and OSU did well but has imploded since.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 26th, 2011 at 12:29 PM
#53
BlueHills
Joined: 10/31/2010
MGoPoints: 4145
It's not worth worrying over

It's not worth worrying over this stuff. Things go in cycles.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.