Per Chengelis: Darryl Stonum indefinitely suspended

Submitted by JJB2 on

Tom shows the following:

 

RT @chengelis Michigan receiver Darryl Stonum has been indefinitely suspended from the football team per Brady Hoke
 

No details on what for.  Hope it's not for long.

Note:

This may go back to when he was arrested in 2008 for impaired driving.  It the past he has not  always fulfilled his probation duties per an article last year from sbnation.com:

 

From May 15, 2009, through June 1, 2010, according to court records, he committed probation violations such as leaving the state without consent, failing to submit to random alcohol testing nine times in a 63-day span, failing to complete additional alcohol testing and failing to report for probation on multiple occasions.

At his June 2 review, according to court documents, 15th District Court Judge Julie Creal sentenced Stonum to enter jail at 1 p.m. June 4 and be released at 7 a.m. June 7.

Kal

May 7th, 2011 at 12:33 PM ^

Really? Hemingway, Roundtree, and Stonum are a great trio of receivers, but the dropoff after those 3 is steep, in both talent and experience.

Magnus

May 7th, 2011 at 12:36 PM ^

Without Stonum, we have practically zero receivers who are threats to beat a defense deep.  Hemingway can go get jump balls, but he's also not very fast.

Magnus

May 7th, 2011 at 12:52 PM ^

Nothing I have seen from Stokes suggests that he can be a big play receiver.  He typically looks like just another guy out there, although I do like him better than a couple of our other receivers.

Speed Kills

May 7th, 2011 at 12:51 PM ^

The Odoms/Gallon duo have more than enough ability to make up the slack, agreed on the deep ball threat diminishing, but if anything (at least in my view) Odoms is a more successful/reliable outside the numbers WR than Stonum.

WHY DID WE TAKE AWAY DEVIN LUCIEN'S OFFER!?!? FUUUUU.

Speed Kills

May 7th, 2011 at 1:13 PM ^

Only included Gallon b/c he made lots of nice plays during Spring ball and I think he'll contribute while DS is out, but Odoms will be the beneficiary  of the majority of reps and targets. Plus, Odoms is a much better downfield blocker than Stonum. Not the worst position group this could happen to...how is Gallon OT??

Magnus

May 7th, 2011 at 1:16 PM ^

It's not off topic as far as completely irrelevant.  However, Gallon is somewhat irrelevant, since the discussion was (IIRC) about the team lacking a deep threat.  Five-foot-eight kids who look like undersized running backs aren't typically deep passing threats.

TESOE

May 7th, 2011 at 3:34 PM ^

/s.  The fact that DR's arm doesn't fit the O doesn't make this less a loss.  The long ball is a part of the Borges playbook regardless of QB.  Likely  DR won't be short on the deep routes though.  It's too early to say how this is going to play out.

Magnus

May 7th, 2011 at 3:30 PM ^

As someone pointed out above, it's tough to beat a defense deep when a) the routes aren't called and b) your quarterback is very inaccurate on the deep ball.  Regardless, Stonum is probably the fastest receiver on the team and was originally recruited by a staff that knew a little something about wide receivers.  If there's a deep threat on the team, he's probably the biggest one.

mgoblue52

May 7th, 2011 at 1:06 PM ^

This is completely hypothetical since I don't know the severity of his offense, but if it is indeed another offense similar to a DUI, Hoke needs to come down hard.  We laugh at Mark Dantonio's discipline with repeat offenders, so we need to lay down the law on repeat offenders.  I really hope it's not that bad, but I'm not too optimistic.

ryebreadboy

May 7th, 2011 at 1:13 PM ^

The question is, how hard is hard enough?  Apparently straight-up NCAA violations warrant five games.  Michael Floyd got one.  Beating up some dude in a Colorado bar and evading arrest gets you two practices.  What's a second DUI worth?  Three games?  Eight practices?  No wings on his helmet?

 

I mean whatever happens, there are going to be people who aren't happy unless he's kicked off the team, and there's going to be people who think it's too harsh.  It'll never be just right.  We should try for an MGoConsensus.

go16blue

May 7th, 2011 at 12:24 PM ^

Thats not kicked off though, right? Although if it actually was a DUI, this would be his second, which would probably lead to some harsh punishment.

ryebreadboy

May 7th, 2011 at 1:02 PM ^

Indefinitely suspended in May does not imply done for the season.  I mean, seriously?  We don't even know what the offense was.  For all we know he failed biology and has to retake it, and has been suspended until he gets a passing grade in Spring class.  C'mon now.  Let's not inflate things until we know what we're looking at.

Even if it is an alcohol-related offense or something, he'd probably miss two or three games, do his court-ordered community service or whatever, and be good to go.

Togaroga

May 7th, 2011 at 1:57 PM ^

The implication is that it has something to do with breaking laws or probation.  In the ESPN article Quotes Hoke as saying that Stonum will have to "fulfill all his commitments he has to the legal system and our program."

No guessing game from me, but I'm confident it has nothing to do with failing a class.

gater

May 7th, 2011 at 12:31 PM ^

Hopefully this can be corrected by some 5am running of the stadium stairs, Carr style. 

 

Edit: Saw the update. Ouch.

West Texas Blue

May 7th, 2011 at 12:29 PM ^

Well darn.  UM Football had been riding such a good wave of momentum and positive news.  DIsappointed in Stonum for getting into this situation; as a senior, he should know better.

GehBlau

May 7th, 2011 at 12:44 PM ^

@chengelis: Hoke: "We will provide the appropriate support and counseling in order for him to learn and grow from this mistake."
 
Sure doesn't seem like grades to me, but it also doesn't seem like he is on his 3rd DUI/alcohol related arrest (cough, cough..ND...cough) and will hopefully be able to suit up this season. I hope whatever trouble he was/is in resolves itself and he grows from it, seems like a good kid to me.

JJB2

May 7th, 2011 at 12:31 PM ^

fooling around with this at all.  Short ropes.  

The first time he was arrested, RR suspended him for just one game.   Doesn't that seem pretty soft or is it typical?

 

njv5352

May 7th, 2011 at 12:33 PM ^

If this rumor is actually true that it is indeed his second DUI, then he needs to find somewhere else to play. I am sorry if it offends anyone, but I want our program to be held to a high standard. Allowing repeat offenders on such serious offenses the chance to continue to play is a reward for poor behavior. I understand that they are 18-23 year old kids, we need someone to hold them accountable and either they will become men or let them move on. We cannot complain when other programs turn a blind eye to such behavior and not want better from our program. As an alumnus it is things like this that I hate to see.