Home
i'm an actor, not a reactor

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Glossary
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
    • Hail to Old Blue
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Hoops Depth Chart by Class
    • 2017 Recruiting Board
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • MGoFlickr
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • User-Curated HOF
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
  • Schedule/Tix
    • Future Schedules (wiki)
    • Ticket spreadsheet
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @Misopogon (Seth)
  • @Aeschnepp (Adam)
  • @BISB
  • @EUpchurchPhoto
  • @FullOfTwitt (Fuller)
  • Hail to the Victors 2016
  • MGoFacebook
  • MGoPodcast
  • WTKA
  • Instagram

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • MMMGoBlueBBQ
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Zone
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • Illinois Loyalty
    • Illinois Baseball Report
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
  • Nebraska
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Max
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Hoop Math
    • John Gasaway
    • Luke Winn/Sports Illustrated
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg (Class of 2016)
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Matt Hinton/Grantland
    • Football Study Hall
    • Football Outsiders
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
    • CFB Stats
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Ann Arbor Observer
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • Bless You Boys
      • The Daily Fungo
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
    • Red Wings
      • Winging It In Motown
      • On The Wings
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Beveled Guilt

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 1 day ago
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 2 weeks ago
  • Fan Satisfaction Index End of Season Bball Survey
    OneFootIn - 2 weeks ago
  • How likely are we to revert to the mean?
    Bo Glue - 2 weeks ago
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 2 weeks ago
  •  
  • 1 of 2
  • ››
more
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 710 views
  • 14 Months Ago: The Fire Beilein Threads.
    stephenrjking - 91 comments
  • Thirteen unlucky minutes (TL;DNR-This is a bit of rant about the refs)
    docwhoblocked - 61 comments
  • It's time to avenge Villanova's 1985 NCAA tourney upset over Michigan
    Communist Football - 11 comments
  • This Month in MGoBlog History - April 2008: No Spring Game at the Big House! Hockey loses to ND in the Frozen Four!
    Maize.Blue Wagner - 6 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    31 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    4 replies
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    88 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    38 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    43 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    16 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    39 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    13 replies
  • Beaubien No-Hitter Clinches Sweep of Maryland, 8-0 (6 inn.)
    11 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 CB Enzo Jennings
    13 replies
  • New in-state offer: 2020 TE/DE Braiden McGregor
    11 replies
  • META : Drupalgeddon2. Unpatched Drupal servers being hacked
    11 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    82 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • OT - LSU Spring Game Currently on ESPN/SEC Network
    33 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Pep Hamilton on Shea: Can extend the play, make all the throws, plus other QB's
    88 replies
  • Michigan Vs Notre Dame in 131 days
    31 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • Baseball's win streak up to 20; beats PSU 14-2 for series sweep
    16 replies
  • WBB Hello: 2020 G/W Makailah Griggs-Zeigler
    4 replies
  • Game Day Condos - who's gonna buy one?
    81 replies
  • OT: Tigers at the 1/8th point
    38 replies
  • This Week/Weekend's Football Visitors
    55 replies
  • OT: Record Store Day 2018!
    38 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse apologizes
    43 replies
  • UCF Knights unveil 2017 championship banner
    82 replies
  • Chris Partridge Presser From This Afternoon, video
    13 replies
  • OT: Lazy Sunday NBA/NHL playoffs open thread
    39 replies
  • OT: Whose shirt did I buy? Also, thanks for the shirt
    43 replies
  • Michigan Football Hype Video 2018-19 Season
    32 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • Belleville coach Jermain Crowell mad at UM again
    244 replies
  • Police investigating Elysee Mbem-Bosse for death threat against Harbaugh
    224 replies
  • "Being Not-Rich at UM" Guide
    168 replies
  • Buckle Up
    159 replies
  • Semi-OT: What sports would you fix?
    158 replies
  • Elysee Mbem-Bosse disturbing tweets
    157 replies
  • Whats the Best Way to Make Flight Arrangements?
    149 replies
  • The Evolution of Commerce - What Industries are Dying, What's Thriving?
    148 replies
  • What past season would you have liked to see an Amazon-style documentary on?
    121 replies
  • OT - Jalen Hurts possibly looking to transfer
    121 replies
  • OT: best-selling musical artists by state of birth
    120 replies
  • Notre Dame Spring Game: analysis from M n B, video
    119 replies
  • No additional protest of Shea Patterson appeal by Ole Miss
    113 replies
  • NCAA changes rules to restrict James Doug Foug's super power
    107 replies
  • OT: MSU digs hole deeper, Engler adviser: Nassar survivor's claims of payout 'fake news'
    106 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

Support MGoBlog: buy stuff at Amazon

Changes to check down options in our passing game?

18 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
October 5th, 2012 at 1:45 PM
#1
iawolve
iawolve's picture
Joined: 11/03/2008
MGoPoints: 4624
Changes to check down options in our passing game?

I have read a number of different stories over the bye week about how we will be providing more check down options for Denard. Since I am not at practice, I have no idea if this actually will be the case or just some aspirational thinking coming after a disasterous passing performance.

This made me wonder about our check down options in the first place. It just seems like another route combination for Denard's reads. We do seem to have short routes already which I would consider a check down. What else should we add? The only thing we don't seem to do is regularly swing out the RB as an option, my guess is that is due to the need for addiitonal pass protection or confidence in their ability to catch the ball. 

Just wondering if anyone had any insight regarding an actual change to our route combinations in this regard.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard
  • football

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
October 5th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
#2
gotohail
Joined: 02/26/2012
MGoPoints: 1146
I got the feeling only

I got the feeling only certain receivers were live on certain plays. The others were blockers to give Denard more running options.



However I could be wrong.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:08 PM
#3
umfan323
Joined: 01/19/2011
MGoPoints: -99997697
I say it won't matter

Denard is a gambler he will still throw terrible passes in a effort to get the ball down field.... Its in his nature

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
(Reply to #3) #4
profitgoblue
profitgoblue's picture
Joined: 09/01/2009
MGoPoints: 19557
Take your pick:

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:22 PM
#5
triguy616
triguy616's picture
Joined: 10/02/2010
MGoPoints: 879
At first I thought you were

At first I thought you were talking about checks at the line, ie audibles.  I was going to say, I've seen about as many Denard checks as Denard throwaways.

I doubt we'll see a lot of check downs.  Even though you might think that would be a staple of a West Coast offense, with Denard's running capability, that should be the check down.  Also, with Denard's struggles with throwing to the defense in the face of pressure, I would think the RB will most likely be blocking instead of running a check down route.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
#6
Tyang
Joined: 09/14/2011
MGoPoints: 412
His check downs are run to

His check downs are run to the left, run to the right, and run up the middle. And chuck it out of bounds!

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
#7
death by trident
death by trident's picture
Joined: 08/31/2011
MGoPoints: 6071
I think if Denard had "gotten

I think if Denard had "gotten away" with some of the back foot throws against Notre Dame, and Michigan would have won (as they really should have), the Purdue game would probably be a trap game.

However, we lost and Denard's decisions are going to be highly influenced by his Notre Dame performance.  I don't think we're going to see Denard go all gunslinger unless we can't get the running game going.  The tight ends are going to be his best friends if he is getting pressure, that should be his check down, especially with Purdue's semi-bad linebackers/safeties.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:33 PM
#8
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
I really think I think they

I really think I think they should just make the automatic 'check-down' be a run.  Give him two reads, then run.  Until they then start rushing three with a spy at the LOS, that should be the plan.  And if the D then tries to do a passive rush with a spy, that gives Denard time and no one in his face, and he's usually actually pretty good then.  That's when you let him read third or fourth routes.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:36 PM
#9
Dizzo
Joined: 08/15/2010
MGoPoints: 945
I think the best checkdown to add would be...

I think the best checkdown to add would be Jack Kennedy.  Just put him 2 yards past the first down marker, 5 yards out of bounds, and tell Denard to "check down" to him if nobody is open and he can't scramble.  

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 3:15 PM
(Reply to #9) #10
iawolve
iawolve's picture
Joined: 11/03/2008
MGoPoints: 4624
Actually that is a great idea

Throwing it away is not aways a bad thing.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 6:39 PM
(Reply to #12) #11
cozy200
cozy200's picture
Joined: 01/02/2011
MGoPoints: 2407
This ^

I pray for these often

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
#12
ken725
ken725's picture
Joined: 10/26/2008
MGoPoints: 27659
I know this is different from

I know this is different from a checkdown, but what about "hot receivers."  I know in the NFL they always talk about the hot route when the blitz gets to the QB.  Do we have that kind of system in our offense?

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
(Reply to #10) #13
FreddieMercuryHayes
Joined: 12/29/2010
MGoPoints: 35030
I believe we do.  On one

I believe we do.  On one occasion in the ND game, and LB blitzed and left the short middle wide open.   Roundtree immediately slanted to the open space and Denard was on the same page hitting him in the open zone for a nice gain.  When they're not on the same page, you get the WR running one route, and the QB expecting a different one, which may then result in the pick-6 in last year's MSU game.  Denard threw into the blitz, probably expecting the WR to go straight to the vacated zone, but the WR went a different way, and the ball went right to an MSU player.  Don't know who was 'wrong' on that play, but they both have to be on the same page for it to work.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 3:25 PM
#14
Blue boy johnson
Joined: 03/15/2009
MGoPoints: 6350
From who?

 

I have read a number of different stories over the bye week about how we will be providing more check down options for Denard.

Links to articles? I haven't seen any of this stuff. Thanks<

 

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 4:47 PM
#15
stephenrjking
stephenrjking's picture
Joined: 03/15/2012
MGoPoints: 20051313
Changing checkdowns won't do

Changing checkdowns won't do anything. Denard's checkdown is often supposed to be "run really fast downfield," something he has quite a talent for, and he almost never uses it. The poster above got painted as a troll, but he is basically accurate--Denard's nature is to make the throw.



Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 5th, 2012 at 9:21 PM
(Reply to #15) #16
death by trident
death by trident's picture
Joined: 08/31/2011
MGoPoints: 6071
Well...

Splitting hairs here, but

Denard is a gambler he will still throw terrible passes in a effort to get the ball down field.... Its in his nature

is a lot different to a reader than

Denard's nature is to make the throw.

The way you said it is much more eloquent, and a lot less offensive. There are truths in both statements, but one reads "he sucks" and the other reads "he tries."

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
October 6th, 2012 at 12:28 AM
#17
Wolfman
Wolfman's picture
Joined: 07/23/2008
MGoPoints: 8099
Really don't think they need to add a thing

I think our entire coaching staff should have been aware of how ND would attempt to defend us and probably true for most of their opponents. They knew we were going to try to pick on their inexperienced corners because that is the perceived weakness of their defense.

This was proven to be true within the first couple offensive series. Our passing game should have changed immediately to pop passes and screen passes with Mante and his lbing friends would have been good for oh, about 35 to 40 yards, if not all day.  Don't think Al will make this mistake again. I think instead of more checkdowns, simply watching how their defense is going to defend us, much like Mattison does watching their offensive plan unfurl w/in first two series should result in change in playcalling and don't put additional pressure on players where its not needed. Simply changing playcalling should prove adequate after defense shows its strategy, which in ND's case was early and lasting.

Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.