A (Brief) Meta Psycho-Analysis: We're in crisis mode. Surprised?

Submitted by BluePants on

 

(mods: feel free to bump or delete).

Having just completed my undergraduate education at Michigan, double majoring in History and Political Science, I am now struggling to find ways to apply what I spent 3.5 years learning to everyday life.  (Hopefully, my smug COE and math-majoring roommates aren’t reading this right now…you were right, but who had more free time?).  As an avid reader of MGoBlog and fellow MFootball obsessive-compulsive, I have observed the perfect storm that began with The Horror and ended with that sporting event somewhere in Florida on New Years Day both on the field and on the internets.  After much musing, nail-biting, weeping, drinking, screaming, arguing, more drinking, xanax, drinking, and screaming, I think I’m numb yet clear-minded enough to really examine the pain that is Michigan Football since 2007, or rather, the mindset of those who obsess over it.

After reading countless threads and diaries, many of which were more focused on crucifying the OP for “idiotic” or “redundant” statements and wasting everyone’s time, I believe I have a pretty strong understanding of the state of the average poster/reader.  As I’ve been reading lately, I’ve thought to myself: “Self, where have you seen this before?”  And then it struck me.  At least a smidgen of my education was relevant.  Win.

I think we can all agree our program is in a full-blown “crisis,” and there’s nothing like a crisis to bring out both the best and worst in people.  The way we’ve reacted and dealt with the current “CC” crisis is classic (or clinical) for people dealing with active crises.  This post just explores our own behavior.  I found it funny, others may not.

With credit to David Winter at Michigan, I present “Hot Factors That Affect Perception,” or factors that affect our perception mid-crisis, as applied to Michigan Football.  Below are factors that affect perception during times of major crisis.   I’ve applied some generalizations of oft-repeated tropes read on this board to show how our behavior is very much indicative of a group in flux.  I’m not sure what I’m out to prove, as we kind of all know this is Very Serious Business.  This just proves How Serious it is, as it has clearly affected our reasoning & logic. 

You could take this as circular, I suppose: using specific criteria from crisis-analysis to prove we’re in a crisis, or vice versa.  Or you could just take it at face value, or I suppose you could call me an idiot (though that wouldn’t be nice).  This is not a Pro or Anti Rich Rodriguez entry, just an examination of answers & thinking on both sides of the spectrum.  (FWIW, I want another year of Rich Rod).

 

–Group membership and social identity

·      How often have we heard “this is Michigan”?  How often have we asserted our place as a major CFB power?  Isn’t that what’s driving a lot of this? 

·      No matter how much we acknowledge how bare the cupboard really was, how young our defense truly is, and that a major programmatic transition takes more than 3 years, many of us are still calling for Rich Rodriguez’s public sacrifice as a burnt offering to the ANGRY MICHIGAN FOOTBALL HATING GOD.

–Fear

·      “If we don’t act now, Michigan Football will forever be lost in a black hole of mediocrity.”  We say this, despite seeing obvious progress and having a record-setting year on offense.  Yes, we struggled against better opposition, but such is the case with gradual improvement.

–Stress- several subsets

·      Reduced complexity of thinking

1.     Not fully applicable to all, but very applicable to many posters.  I don’t think I need to spell this one out.  Read some of the threads and posts polluting the board here.

·      Distorted, foreshortened sense of time

1.     For those wanting to keep RR: “Only one more season, it’s not that bad.  We can make it through.”  Yet how much pain has every loss, every blown coverage, every UFR caused each of us?  One more season is an incredibly long time, whether we like it or not.

2.     For those wanting to fire RR: “We must act THIS INSTANT to hire Harbaugh.  If we wait another minute, every professional and collegiate team will scoop him up with a $100 million contract.”  We say this despite every report to the contrary that indicates he will not make an NFL jump yet and would kill 20 infants to come to Michigan.

·      Reduced number of perceived alternatives

1.     “If we don’t hire Harbaugh, there are NO OTHER FOOTBALL COACHES IN THE WORLD.”  “Harbaugh or Rodriguez are the ONLY OPTIONS.”  I know some of are saying “they’re probably the two most viable options,” but there’s a lot of us saying “they’re the only options, if we don’t have either of them as a coach, the Big House will spontaneously crumble.”

–Dissonance reduction

·      Very clearly taking place.  “Just one more year of RR, we’ve already made this transition.  Even if we’re losing, we just need one more year.  We need to see if this works (despite obvious shortcomings).”  We keep saying “just one more year” to justify our sunk costs into this transition, even as many realize it’s just not working.

–Influence of language and metaphors

  • Pretty clear here.  Atomic bombs, sirens, “Decimated Defense.”  We’ve created our own abbreviations and labels for threads discussing our coaching situation, and we’ve often talked more in terms of life & death than college football.

 

While I could have combed through the board for examples, regular readers will recognize all of these pretty quickly.  I didn’t feel like calling specific users out with quotes, or spending several hours rereading painful threads.  If anyone is studying Psychology/Political Psychology on a graduate level, feel free to expand this and go deeper.

UM Fan NY

January 3rd, 2011 at 1:28 PM ^

is going to be on the svp show after the break. i'm sure he'll provide another 'i hear harbaugh' tidbit that will increase the panic level to defcon 35.

pasadenablue

January 3rd, 2011 at 1:30 PM ^

That was a lot of text and I just woke up, so if I read it all, my eyes are gonna hurt all day. However, I will say this: As a fanbase, we are one of the most sensitive and skittish out there. We don't get angry and break shit (ala sparty). We'd rather whine and bitch (as you can see from the sheer number of CC threads). I suppose what redeems us is that we're a very academic group. We understand rationality and reason when we see it. And we have good leadership.

Laveranues

January 3rd, 2011 at 1:33 PM ^

More like critical condition.  And not the fake critical condition where they say "critical" but really mean "bad, but likely to survive" but like 50/50 that the program will die and be reborn as a Purdue analogue (if that hasn't already happened).

IronDMK

January 3rd, 2011 at 1:45 PM ^

Yeah, I read it and there was a lot of thought put into it.  It was a lighthearted (I thought) view of the nuances in the Mgoblog community.  Well done.

profitgoblue

January 3rd, 2011 at 2:00 PM ^

I'm not familiary with Mr. Winter's teachings so please forgive my ignorance.  That said, I think some of us (me alone?) have been employing numerous avoidance techniques (some much, much more annoying than others, I admit) to simply get through the past 5 weeks and get to this point where the discussion would actually be useful.  I like to think of the last 5 weeks as "premature e-CCulation."

jtmc33

January 3rd, 2011 at 2:01 PM ^

I am not, and will not be, in crisis mode as long as everything goes exactly as I expect.

To learn what it is that I expect you will all have to patiently anticipate my OP titled:  "CC:  My opinion on what should happen" 

dieseljr32

January 3rd, 2011 at 2:10 PM ^

I don't feel like I am in a crisis mode.  I feel as though this board is in crisis mode though.  I think that maybe we feed on each other's panic making it worse then it actually is.

Obviously, the state of the program is not in a good place but I think we all fear that somehow we will turn into a horrific program which honestly, I don't think will happen.  You can't take decades of success and then suddenly become a lower tier program. We may suffer bumps and bruises but in the end things will work out.

ST3

January 3rd, 2011 at 2:26 PM ^

I was 1 credit shy of graduating in 3.5 years, so I took an intro to Geology course and 3 grad courses that I applied to my Master's degree. In this time of a jobless recovery, grad school is not a bad option. I was CoE and my roommate was double major in Communications and Economics. We graduated in '92 during another recession. Neither of us had good job prospects. He joined a temp agency for a couple years before going back to law school. I stayed at UofM for grad school. I'm not sure what you do with a History/Poli Sci double. My sister was a history major and went to Med School. I guess I'm saying broaden your search. Your UofM degree will get you in the door at a lot of places.