Baumgardner reviews Gattis debut positively

Submitted by wolverine1987 on September 4th, 2019 at 11:32 AM

Nick Baumgardner (now at The Athletic) reviewed Gattis' debut as a play caller and OC very favorably. Behind paywall (I recommend spending the $ for the Athletic) but here's a relevant quote:

"Michigan went through a lot of experimentation Saturday. The dual-quarterback stuff got in the way. Some things worked better than others. The second half featured very little through the air (only seven pass attempts). When Gattis was running the full offense in the first half, and Michigan wasn’t messing around with gadget packages, it all worked..... In one day, Michigan got dynamic looks with its run game on tape, explosive plays out of 12 personnel, a handful of RPOs, various actions in the screen game and more. That’s a lot for opponents to think about."

 

https://theathletic.com/1179697/2019/09/03/michigan-film-study-josh-gattis-offense-is-attacking-from-all-angles/?source=dailyemail

 

 

Bodogblog

September 4th, 2019 at 12:59 PM ^

Look at it in terms of pain avoidance, which is how DC's are trained to see the world on many levels.  It's on tape, so even if it failed in this other game, if they run it against you and it kills, you're dead with your head coach.  You can't say "Well sure they did it against MTSU, but it sucked, so I didn't prepare for it."  You'll be fired.  You can certainly prioritize the things that worked, but it's on tape so you have to cover it and think about things that can come out of it. 

lilpenny1316

September 4th, 2019 at 1:02 PM ^

I assumed we were throwing a whole bunch of stuff on film for opponents to have sensory overload.  Then hit them with something they haven't seen.

I wonder if the 2 QB stuff will be solely Patterson/McCaffrey until the Wisconsin or Iowa game and then it turns into either Patterson/McCaffrey with Milton.  Just a little something to throw off the defense.

los barcos

September 4th, 2019 at 2:30 PM ^

Seriously??  Can we stop with this? 

In the SAME thread, the Board both: (1) cheered at *not showing* anything new to future opponents so they come unprepared, while also (2) cheered at showing *new* things to future opponents so they prepare for the wrong things.  That's some serious 3d chess right there.      

Every year -- we're like Charlie Brown trying to kick the football, and every year we get to OSU and realize, yes, that's all we had for the Pepcat.

 

Indy Pete - Go Blue

September 4th, 2019 at 11:56 AM ^

 This article was well written. He shows that Michigan has multiple options on basically every play. His film breakdown shows just how versatile some of these play calls are.  We are going to see a lot of big plays this season.  Gattis is off to an excellent start, and he is putting in the foundation for an explosive offense. Sure, splitting Dylan McCaffrey out wide seems questionable at best, but everything else shows great promise...

DelhiWolverine

September 4th, 2019 at 11:58 AM ^

Nick's article was great and I'm looking forward to reading more from him in The Athletic. But I really can't wait to read the UFRs so I can know all the details on what actually happened. Hitting F5 quite a bit at work this morning. Come on, UFR!

Blue-Ray

September 4th, 2019 at 12:01 PM ^

If you're one of the people who'd rather have Dylan at quarterback over Shae, following that same line of thinking, you have to like this offense. 

If you're not, you should still like this offense more than what was displayed the previous 2 seasons. Not very profound. I know. 

Hail2UM83

September 4th, 2019 at 12:06 PM ^

I'm not a fan of the 2 QB system at all. Nick saw what I saw, drive killing plays. Stick with Shea and really open up the playbook. This team could be really exciting come November.

Hail2UM83

September 5th, 2019 at 12:21 PM ^

I'm just not sure why everyone wants to see both of them on the field. Dylan broke his collarbone last year and last time I checked LB's love to hit WR's or anyone going for the ball across the middle. The last thing we need is to have Shea get hurt and have Dylan already on the bench with another injury. This could literally derail an awesome season and puts our goals of winning the Big Ten and beating those savages in Columbus in jeopardy.

mgobaran

September 4th, 2019 at 1:13 PM ^

Which is stupid, btw. A trick play loses all of it's effectiveness if it's foreshadowed so badly us fans can see it coming. Wisconsin knows what we can run off the 2 QB look already, and can start planning for the counters they can expect off it. Instead we could have waited until week 4 to show the formation at all. Then first time both are on the field, double pass their ass to a free 6 points. In other words, can't promise tomorrow, but I promise tonight, dale. 

UM Fan from Sydney

September 4th, 2019 at 12:20 PM ^

The haters simply refuse to think rationally. So many people seem to think UM was going to come out in GAME ONE with nothing but hurry/no huddle offense, scoring 65+ points. There was no need to do all that in game one against MTSU.

mgobaran

September 4th, 2019 at 1:05 PM ^

If anything I feel like we were playing TOO fast at the beginning of the game. Shea was a little too aggressive putting his body on the line after already getting the first down. Seems like it cost him some sore ribs to go with the lost fumble. Then the defense was over-aggressive at the start, and having that aggressiveness used against him. Seems like teams know Don Brown defenses are going to start a little too hot. Early misdirection often burns us. Forget the offsides that gave them the free play, we had three guys in the backfield running uncontrollably at the QB. Dwumfour and his cast wasn't the only reason we wasn't tackled in the backfield. Even our offensive 2nd drive seemed to be too rushed, getting to the line and running plays right away instead of the doing the "check with me" stuff that getting to the line so early allows for. 

DelhiWolverine

September 4th, 2019 at 1:23 PM ^

If anything I feel like we were playing TOO fast at the beginning of the game. Shea was a little too aggressive putting his body on the line after already getting the first down. Seems like it cost him some sore ribs to go with the lost fumble. Then the defense was over-aggressive at the start, and having that aggressiveness used against him.

It's almost as if they all were super amped up because it was their first game of the season in front of 100,000+ fans at night or something.

JPC

September 4th, 2019 at 12:21 PM ^

The first half offense of Gattis' debut looked better than just about anything Michigan rolled out after Jed left.

There were execution problems but the scheme was really good. That two point conversion was absolutely great and would have been an easy walk in had they executed it properly.

The only real issue I had with it was the amount of punishment that the QBs seemed to take. Hopefully that was execution too.

lilpenny1316

September 4th, 2019 at 1:15 PM ^

I love speed in space.  But please tell me we'll remember I-formation, power football on the goal line.  I didn't like staying in the shotgun inside the 3-yard line.  I hope it's still in the playbook for Wisconsin and beyond.

lilpenny1316

September 4th, 2019 at 1:15 PM ^

I love speed in space.  But please tell me we'll remember I-formation, power football on the goal line.  I didn't like staying in the shotgun inside the 3-yard line.  I hope it's still in the playbook for Wisconsin and beyond.

mgoDAB

September 4th, 2019 at 1:41 PM ^

Reading this quote, one thing I’ve wondered about is “saving the playbook” for the big opponents on the schedule actually beneficial? On one hand, you are saving those plays, but on the other you’d be putting more on tape thus giving the opposition more to prepare for and more assignments.