3 Michigan OL's in PFF's Top 10 "Returning" BIG10 OL's

Submitted by Ezekiels Creatures on June 4th, 2023 at 3:06 PM

 

https://twitter.com/PFF_College/status/1665382148906586113

 

The guy at #1 was a walk on at Cincinnati who followed Luke Fickell to Wisconsin. He spent March to August of the 2020 lock down gaining 55 lbs in the weight room at his high school.

 

Great to see 3 Michigan players so highly rated. Here's to 2000 for Blake Corum this season!

 

 

olm_go_blue

June 4th, 2023 at 3:47 PM ^

Love me some Corum, but with the 10 touches he'll get (per JMFH), split with Edwards) not sure the math works...even with 6 ypc he will be lucky to crack 1k. And I hope that's the case, because that means he won't have as much wear and tear. Heismans are awesome and very hard to come by, but not as great as national championships, we need the best to play in January.

And I get it was a tongue in cheek comment, very cool post and thanks for sharing! GO BLUE!!

Ezekiels Creatures

June 4th, 2023 at 9:43 PM ^

I mean, all of these are nice ideals. But I don't think Corum's carries are going to be cut down in half from last year. He is a monster player. He has to get the ball more than last year, not less. I know there is the 50/50 talk. But I don't think that ideal is going to happen. He should be getting 25+ carries a game. And I don't thin JJ has improved that much where he will get that much more. It's just hard to believe a Jim Harbaugh team will change to be that.

energyblue1

June 5th, 2023 at 8:46 AM ^

970 plays in 13 games is a 74.6 play per game avg in an offense that ran, ball control ie kept the clock running.  In offense with closer to 50/50 balance from the 60/40 run/pass split.  That play ratio can easily go to 80 plays per game with clock and pace or stay the same.  Citing the last three games didn't mean a lot as how those games played out.  Osu didn't run effectively until the 2nd half and the first half essentially was big plays, not long drives.  Purdue was a bit different as well as the defense was on the field a lot of that game so t.o.p. at 55 snaps 20 less than avg was in part due to Purdue's offense working to control the ball and keep our offense off the field ie purdue had 84 offensive snaps to our 55.  Or osu had 77 offensive snaps to our 60.  Just how the games went vs their offenses.  

olm_go_blue

June 5th, 2023 at 3:15 PM ^

Good insights, well thought out response. I don't know exactly how it will play out, and I have no insight beyond what I've read lately, but I it seems like Corum won't get enough carries to be in the Heisman running. If UM keeps winning, I don't care if it's 10 or 15 or 20. I feels to me like it would be closer to the 15 range.

energyblue1

June 5th, 2023 at 1:47 PM ^

And somehow with a run dominated offense 600 rushes to 370 passes we still avg'd 74.5 plays per game.  With a more balanced approach it's reasonable to expect at least 70 plays per game and if we speed up the pace even a bit we can get more plays per game.  Hence why i do believe the staff still wants about 75 plays per game to get enough snaps for the offensive weapons.  

energyblue1

June 5th, 2023 at 8:48 AM ^

Blake Corum is getting minimum 20 carries per game.  Maybe a few less the first few games.  The work load between Edwards and Corum will be evident in B10 play.  I'm expecting about 20 carries per game each, and expect the hot hand to get the series.  

Blue Vet

June 4th, 2023 at 3:47 PM ^

Thanks for posting. Fun rankings.

But aren't rankings down to the tenths an indication of how innumerate we are? An innately subjective assessment doesn't get more specific by using tenths. Is there any plausible way that Huber is 1/10 better than Drake?

NeverPunt

June 4th, 2023 at 4:18 PM ^

Keep in mind PFF grading for OL was a mess last year. Our guys are very good and the line should roll again this year but I wouldn’t use PFF for proof of that, personally 

gustave ferbert

June 4th, 2023 at 4:27 PM ^

Wow.  

Where does the Sherrone Moore O-line Era rank in Michigan history?  

Michigan bred offensive lineman seemingly for decades.  But I can't recall the backups grading out like this.  

Double-D

June 4th, 2023 at 4:38 PM ^

Zinter behind Jones makes very little sense. Keegan behind Duplain?

Jones was a sixth man when he returned last year and is fighting to start this year. It’s a good problem to have but I’m not sure this list has much credibility.  

XM - Mt 1822

June 4th, 2023 at 6:12 PM ^

Without cheating, the human male is generally only able to put on 6-8 pounds of actual lean muscle mass per year. You can certainly gain more weight than that, and I’m sure there are variances, but anybody who gained 30 pounds or, in that kids case, 50 pounds did not put on 50 pounds of muscle. If they did, it was absolutely positively the joy of chemistry.

LeCheezus

June 5th, 2023 at 12:04 PM ^

I'm a fan of your posts in general but these are utter horseshit numbers pulled out of your ass without any qualifiers.  If you revise to add "on an already heavily trained, top end athlete" then at least it's somewhat reasonable.  Your average high schooler with decent genetics can put on 20-30 lbs of muscle in a year starting "untrained" - they have hormones that can match low end users.  Half a pound of muscle per month as a max, otherwise you're on drugs?  Come on, man.

XM - Mt 1822

June 5th, 2023 at 1:16 PM ^

i did qualify it with 'generally' and 'variances'.  a high schooler who is still growing is a big qualifier, and even then 20-30 lbs is a huge stretch.  mature athletes can't put on 30 or 50, or even 20 lbs of pure muscle in a year without chemicals.  see: the steiner brothers, tony mandarich, arnold, lee haney, and thousands of others as examples.   except out also a fighter or wrestler who drastically cuts weight - they can get 20 lbs heavier in a day or two after the bout, but it ain't muscle.  

King Tot

June 5th, 2023 at 7:18 AM ^

This is "great" but did the blog not establish that PFF OL ratings are hot trash? I am pretty sure they ranked MSU OL as better than ours the last two years.