2023 ESPN Preseason SP+ Rankings: Michigan 3rd

Submitted by Laser Wolf on February 14th, 2023 at 8:37 AM

ESPN+ content: https://www.espn.com/college-football/insider/story/_/id/35651872/2023-college-football-rankings-every-team

Bill Connelly posted his preseason SP+ rankings for 2023 and Michigan is 3rd behind Georgia and Ohio State. Takes into account returning production, recent recruiting, and recent history to build out projections for the upcoming year.

Notable overall and offense/defense rankings below:

1. Georgia (6 offense, 2 defense)

2. Ohio State (1 O, 10 D)

3. Michigan (8 O, 4 D)

4. Alabama (5 O, 9 D)

5. Penn State (21 O, 5 D)

25. Wisconsin (46 O, 11 D)

27. Iowa (81 O lol Brian Ferentz, 1 D)

30. Minnesota (61 O, 7 D)

47. Michigan State (48 O, 47 D)

 

Laser Wolf

February 14th, 2023 at 8:39 AM ^

 A little surprised that Ohio State's offense is projected #1 while replacing Stroud, Smith-Njigba, and three starting linemen but I guess recruiting like golden gods has its benefits.

M-GO-Beek

February 14th, 2023 at 9:52 AM ^

I get that there is a statistical method here, but bad data in leads to bad data out. Statistics are best when there is a track record to base future predictions off of which is why there is so much volatility in SP+ the first 5-6 weeks of the season as the off season stuff falls out of the modeling and on field production takes it place. 

Amazinblu

February 14th, 2023 at 10:09 AM ^

The biggest variable - which really impacts any "performance" type ratings - is the roster.

And, there's a huge difference, IMO, between roster "stability" between the NFL and college football.  A college roster will "turn" completely in five years - most likely to a major degree in three or four.   The NFL doesn't face that issue.

The first year starters, or "new" players to the roster who will be playing a great deal are essentially unknown.

trueblueintexas

February 14th, 2023 at 12:03 PM ^

I agree roster is always important. I think systems play a bigger role in college than they do in the NFL. You can have sustained success in college because of a particular offensive system. Success being relative to the overall program. This allows for larger variability in the allowable talent. I.e. a high 3 star or low 4 star QB will probably put up bigger passing numbers in OSU's offense, than a 5 star will in Michigan's offense. It doesn't mean one QB is better than the other, or determine which team will win, but at the end of the season one team will have better offensive statistics than the other and can consistently do so with more variable talent. 

ak47

February 14th, 2023 at 1:12 PM ^

There is actually not that much volatility in the first 5-6 seasons specifically because he modeled that the system is more accurate to keep pre-season components in rather than having the data overreact to the small sample sizes of early season games. SP+ isn't bad data in at all. Its data specifically chosen after modeling millions of seasons to see what is most predictive. 

Just because people don't understand it or ignore what it says or is meant to do doesn't make it bad

Gulogulo37

February 14th, 2023 at 10:07 AM ^

Sure there's always that possibility they don't get people to step up, but teams like OSU, Georgia, and Alabama are usually quite low on his returning experience metric and they still always end up basically top 5. Is it a guess? I mean sure in some sense, but it's an educated one. I wouldn't count on OSU taking a step back this year.

s1105615

February 14th, 2023 at 11:19 AM ^

I think it’s a safe assumption, and more in line with the mean, for a team that loses Heisman caliber players to not be able to replace Heisman caliber play with fresh faces.  They may still be better than most, but it’s fair to say that QB play should be slightly less impressive at OSU next season, particularly early while McCord gets his feet under him.

 

The problem for OSU in particular, is that the fans, media, and probably their own locker room will have very little patience if that slight regression makes it mark by way of a loss.  It could snowball early for them if they drop a game like Maryland or Penn State in October.

Buy Bushwood

February 14th, 2023 at 12:27 PM ^

You're right in that Ryan Day could lose that locker room with a loss or two.  However, they still clearly have a Heisman caliber player.  But, I'm pretty convinced that their DC is their weak link.  If they can't coach up a better secondary, they're going to lose 2-3 games next year.  

ak47

February 14th, 2023 at 1:18 PM ^

Except for the part where over the last half decade OSU has gotten more efficient going from JT to Haskins and then from Haskins to Stroud. Of course there is a chance of fall off, nobody is arguing this will get every team right. The value of SP+ is that over 128 teams using these metrics is going to be more accurate on average than people just saying who they think is best.

Gulogulo37

February 14th, 2023 at 3:44 PM ^

Exactly. Do people really think this is the first time a team loaded with talent every year lost a bunch of guys? It's literally like this every year for programs like Osu, Bama, Georgia. Could there be a big drop off at QB for Osu? Sure. I hope so. But not banking on it just because it's a new starter. Whoever starts will be surrounded by loads of talent.

Buy Bushwood

February 14th, 2023 at 5:14 PM ^

Who's old enough to remember Peyton Manning leaving UT having never won an SEC title, and suddenly, the very next year, Mr. nobody Tee Martin, right out of the wrapping paper onto the field, leads them to a national title?  Now, as much as OSU leans on the passing game, and Ryan Day doesn't seem like he really knows how to coach anything else, I'd say that seems unlikely, unless the guy waiting turns out to be incredible.  

NittanyFan

February 14th, 2023 at 2:25 PM ^

PSU finished in the Top 10 in both 2016 & 2019, seasons where (1) Franklin was the coach, (2) Franklin was the coach the preceding season, (3) they didn't finish in the Top 10 the prior season, and (4) they were starting a new QB (McSorley and Clifford respectively).

It's not completely ridiculous - there is some precedence.

Amazinblu

February 14th, 2023 at 9:06 AM ^

Three B1G teams in the top five.  And, all three in the same division of the conference.

It would seem a lot of eyes will track how those teams perform.  And, to no one’s surprise - Michigan’s games against Penn State (which I assume will be a night game White Out), and the season finale against the Buckeyes - are the most challenging games on the schedule.

rob f

February 14th, 2023 at 9:52 AM ^

I had thought that we were going to be adopting "permanent" daylight savings time this year, but just found out the bill, after passing in the Senate last year, has stalled (surprise, surprise!) in the US House of Representatives.

Latest Updates: Daylight Saving Time | Sleep Foundation https://www.sleepfoundation.org/sleep-news/latest-updates-daylight-saving-time-legislation-change

mfan_in_ohio

February 14th, 2023 at 11:57 PM ^

Permanent daylight savings would be a mess. Grand Rapids would have sunrise after 8 am from mid October to mid March, and after 9 am for most of December and January. I walked to school starting in 3rd grade, and it seems pretty ridiculous to send an 8 year old walking to school well over an hour before sunrise.

Leaders And Best

February 14th, 2023 at 12:39 PM ^

That's not how the current contract works. The contract is split between FOX and ESPN, and ABC/ESPN will have their share of weekends where they get the first pick of games. FOX has the first pick of weekends every year though, and that is why The Game is on FOX every year.

PSU-Michigan has actually been on ABC/ESPN most years during this current deal. Last year was unusual because the ND-OSU game was in the Big Ten inventory so ESPN probably used one of their top picks on that game.

WeimyWoodson

February 14th, 2023 at 9:18 AM ^

If recent history continues, it won't be shocking to see whoever OSU's QB is this year throw for 4,000+ yards. I just hope that they have the same game attitude as CJ when he plays against Michigan. 

steviebrownfor…

February 14th, 2023 at 11:46 AM ^

If I know Ohio State, they will steamroll their schedule with little resistance.  We'll hear their fans chirp all season long about how the new QB (forget his name) is an obvious improvement over Stroud, and all the kinks have been ironed out from the previous year.

Then in November we'll beat them again and they'll be left scratching their heads.

4th phase

February 14th, 2023 at 9:53 AM ^

The final 2022 SP+ preseason ranking top 10 with final 2022 post-season in parenthesis

1. Alabama (2)

2. Georgia (1)

3. OSU (4)

4. Oklahoma (20)

5. Clemson (14)

6. Michigan (3)

7. Notre Dame (37)

8. Texas A&M (35)

9. Ole Miss (18)

10. Tennessee (5)

 

So seems like it's usually pretty good at the top, getting 4 of top 6 and 5 of the top 10 correct.