The scary similarity of 1994

Submitted by Buy Bushwood on June 7th, 2023 at 10:04 AM

As the season is nearly upon us, this is the best Michigan team, on paper, that I can remember since.........1994.  Spoiler alert, the incredibly talented 1994 team essentially sat on a whoopie cushion and finished 8-4, broke many Wolverine hearts, and taught me a great lesson about expectations and the emotional burden of serious fandom.  I've been a serious fan since 1990, my freshman year, and 94 was my first year of real adulthood, with ties to the football season being a meaningful emotional bridge back to college.  While I don't think the 2023 team has any chance of flopping to that degree (due to schedule as much as anything else), 1994 is my standing cautionary tale about the ways in which a team of destiny can go off the rails and make it look easy.  I would assert three pathways to potential doom, all of which converged on the 1994 team: injuries, luck, losing the locker room. 

To set the stage for those who weren't there, or those who have forgotten, the biggest offseason news (not unlike Blake Corum's bombshell of 23') was that Tyrone Wheatley, regarded as the most explosive RB in the nation, announced he would return for his senior season. Michigan immediately became a National Title contender and the B1G favorite.  Michigan also had several other returning stars and would go on to have 3 first-round draft picks (including future HOF CB Ty Law), a veteran senior QB, Todd Collins, who would be a second round draft pick.  The OL was good, with a first-round tackle, Rod Payne, an excellent center, Jon Jansen, future #37 pick at RT, a good TE.  The defense also had several excellent players, highlighted by Law and steel-trap tackler Steve Morrison at LB.  Kicking was an issue that turned out not to be an issue as sophomore Remy Hamilton emerged from nowhere to be a stalwart.  

The 1994 schedule was a gauntlet, of the type that we will, sadly, never see again, due to the unquenchable thirst for Benjamin Franklins by all major programs.  The non-conference schedule was Boston College, Notre Dame, Colorado.  The latter two were preseason top-10 teams.  For younger fans, please process that......two top-10 non-conference foes, and the third being against a historically good program (BC) with many significant upsets in it's resume (fortunately, most were against ND, ha ha).  This was truly a schedule worthy of a National Championship run, and Ann Arbor was brimming with excitement.

Out of the gate, the season immediately delivered the worst possible news: Tyrone Wheatley suffered a shoulder injury in practice and would not be available for the first games.  Panic buttons were pressed and doom ensued.  A uncomfortably close grinder victory at home vs. BC in week 1 didn't help.  However, in week 2, at ND, the team rallied for an amazing final drive, moving 60 yards in 39 seconds to set up a dead-center Hamilton FG, snatching victory from the jaws of defeat.  It was an incredibly emotional victory against a bitter foe who had seemed to pull out exactly these kinds of heartbreaking wins over the previous 7 years (ND was recently 5-1-1 against UM coming into this game). Lou Holtz tears were delicious.  Another feather in the confidence cap emerged from this game as well, not dissimilar to the RB tandem of 2022-23.  That is that, in place of Ty Wheatley, Tim Biakabutuka had emerged as a very good backup, albeit he was more of a quick slasher than the homerun threat of Wheatley.  But only good had come thus far.  

Directly following on ND, highly-ranked Colorado, led by former Michigan DC Bill McCartney, came to Michigan stadium.  McCartney had slowly built up a bottom-dwelling Colorado program by recruiting high-end talent to Boulder. One of the first things he asked his AD when arriving was to schedule UM, because Bo had taught him that to be the best one needed to play the best (I grew up in Colorado and watched his amazing resurrection of this program), though through some questionable recruiting (noting that Rae Carruth, future wife murderer, was the #2 receiver, among other unsavory characters).  Colorado would finish the season 11-1 and ranked #3, and looked formidable, having absolutely crushed #10 Wisconsin the previous week, having done so without their best DT who was suspended for the game (more unsavoriness).  However, the counterbalance of hope for UM was that Tyrone Wheatley was returning.  Everyone knows the last play of this game, and the devastating luck that handed victory to an inferior Colorado team, and fortunately wouldn't be repeated until Sparty in 2015 (Sparty wasn't even as lucky as Colorado).  Michigan started slowly, ground out 9 first-half points, and trailed 14-9 at the half.  However, UM adjusted well on both sides of the ball, and scored the next 17 points, and had CU on the ropes late, 26-14.  UM had multiple chances to put this game away, including electing to kick a FG on a 4th & short deep in CU territory.  UM also had a 3rd and short late, again in Colorado territory, to run more clock, and Moeller elected to hand off to FB Che Foster, for his first carry of the game, who proceeded to fumble.  Nonetheless, CU, absent a miracle, had no shot to win this game.  

Michigan didn't drop too far in the polls and had the nation's sympathy.  They held serve at Kinnick and against Sparty, before facing the PSU team that was finally, in year 2, realizing their promised prestige when joining the B1G (PSU would finish 12-0 and #2). The team still seemed focused and driven to win the B1G and let the chips fall where they might nationally with the Hail-Mary loss.  These teams were very similarly built and were evenly matched on the field.  Both teams had control at points in the second half before making mistakes to allow the opponent back.  UM had the ball last, down 7, drove to near midfield before facing a 3rd and short.  I remember a sense of terror at seeing a single back formation, with no FB to pick up any penetration, watching a CB blitz off the edge for a 2-yard loss.  A pitiful 4th-and-3 pass failed and that was the ballgame.  

After this, there was a palatable sense of a failed season.  Two heartbreaking losses to teams in thetop 5, both nailbiters, at Michigan Stadium, had taken an obvious emotional toll on the team, coaches, fans.  This was, as perhaps younger fans don't know, against a backdrop of talented UM teams of the previous 25 years coming up just short of elite greatness.  That sense of doom had fully returned, only half-way through the season.  Three top-5 games in the first 6, a 4-2 record. The team dropped to #11, and, with PSU looking so dominant, it seemed hard to see the season unfolding with anything but a second-tier bowl bid. A season with such great promise was on the edge of a cliff, if not over it.  

Any doubts about the intentions of the football gods became absolute crystal two weeks later when Wisconsin visited.  Michigan was sluggish and it was clear that Wisconsin was both more capable and more motivated than their recent bottom-dwelling history. This was a new era for them, and perhaps the first statement win by a Barry Alvarez team.  Michigan's starting QB was also injured and removed by a hip pointer, and we never really effectively moved the ball after that.  An embarrassing 19-31 home loss ensued, and any doubts that the team had more-or-less quit on the season were now erased.  The return of the most spectacular UM RB, and a plethora of other talent, were all for naught for a 5-3 squad.  

UM would stare down weak competition for two more weeks to get to 7-3 before making the trip to the Shoe to face a middling #22 OSU.  Nonetheless, UM had no stomach for a fight, and lost a humiliating 6-22 game to a grossly inferior, but highly motivated, Buckeyes squad.  This would be the first of John Cooper's 2 wins against us, en route to the wonderful 2-10-1 performance of his tenure.  

With the season for all purposes over, we drew a weak WAC champion in the Breadcrumbs Bowl sponsored by estate of Marie Antoinette.  We won a relatively close game against a grossly overmatched team that at least was interested in hanging around, and the most promising UM team of my fan lifetime farted to a close at 8-4.  Gary Moeller would be fired for disorderly conduct the following spring and the Lloyd Carr era would begin with two more 4-loss seasons, though none with the kind of wasted firepower of the 1994 team (Lloyd would perfect wasting firepower later in his career).  

Lessons:  High expectations are balloons waiting for the needle.  One needs luck, a bounce here and there, to get to the mountaintop. This team could easily have been 7-0 when facing Wisconsin, rather than 5-2, with a failed season already logged.  The Gods are happy to deliver pivotal injuries without cause or comment.  Even great teams can quit on seasons and make a mess of things. These are kids, with incomplete frontal lobes, raging with emotion, which is why we love college football.  Thanks for reading.  

Comments

Booted Blue in PA

June 7th, 2023 at 10:28 AM ^

Its good to be grounded but damn man... we finally kicked the daily bpone appearance from the blog with two fantastic seasons.  can we leave it in purgatory until an actual on field collapse justifies its reinsertion?

Buy Bushwood

June 7th, 2023 at 10:52 AM ^

This is just narrative musing.  I'm too old (and busy with kids) now to be as emotionally vulnerable as I was in 1994 to the tides of 20-year-olds on 100 yard field (though not as invulnerable as I would wish).  Reading Alex's review of the 1993 Rose Bowl reminded me of how incredible Tyrone Wheatley was, and how excited I was for the 1994 season when he returned.  It also reminded me how much luck can involve itself despite the best laid rosters. But I do feel (as last year's OSU game shows) that Harbaugh is a magician at getting the most out of players, and have full confidence in the next man up.     

mvp

June 7th, 2023 at 11:35 AM ^

I started at Michigan a year before you (with the Rocket Ismail game as my first...), so I'm almost exactly the same age.  I'm in almost the same spot, too.  I do worry about what could go wrong.

Until the dark days (call it the decade of 2011 to 2020) it seemed like things were simple:  If Michigan was ranked in the top 5 preseason they would likely underperform (because math and statistics); if Michigan was ranked 15th or below, they would outperform (for the same reasons -- back then we typically had top-10 talent).

Your comment about not being as emotionally vulnerable truly resonates.  But that being said, after the long winter of our discontent, the two OSU victories, the two Big Ten titles, and the two playoff appearances felt amazingly good.

As I've started to think about this season, I do think about how little separates bad from good from great.  The 1997 season, rightfully remembered as great, also balanced on a knife-edge before going our way.  And even *that* felt like it had been a LONG time coming, even to someone who was really only an all-in fan for 8 years at that point.

I'm hopeful.  I'm even optimistic.  But I'm also realistic.  National Championships are hard.  And rare.  What I'm most excited about is that I'm so proud to have this group of coaches and players representing our university.  Hopefully the game results follow.

RealElonMusk

June 7th, 2023 at 11:17 AM ^

Well Mr. Glass is half empty - the comparison is not great:

1)  Michigan has a close to optimal schedule in 23 vs tough schedule in 1994

2)  Harbaugh + Staff > 1994 staff

3)  We have 2 top 10 RBs + Cabana + other options

4)  Best QB in Harbaugh era

5)  Almost Woodson CB 

6)  Deepest Offensive & Defensive lines since 1990.

 

PhillipFulmersPants

June 9th, 2023 at 12:22 PM ^

Agreed it is hard, but it's not uncommon. Great teams do it frequently. Georgia recently. Alabama has been doing it for a better part of a decade.  USC in the Carrol era had enormous talent and expectations and largely met them year to year. OSU in the Meyer era largely met them during his tenure, even despite key injuries at quarterback in the title year.

I guess "met them" is all relative, so perhaps better to say none of those teams (that I recall) had a year where preseason expectations and talent level were met with a ’94 Michigan type 4-loss season.  

Michigan may not make the playoffs or championship game, let alone win it, of course. But I think the chances are better to reach the playoffs and perhaps go further than to have a '94 type year. More than anything, what Harbaugh, his staff and players have proven to me is they have little concern about what’s happened before. They know they’re not tied to failures of teams past (even their own performance during the Covid year) and can make their own history. 

Buy Bushwood

June 7th, 2023 at 12:32 PM ^

I'm very excited and will be taking my kids from DC to the OSU game, and a Lions Thanksgiving game.  Just a realist.  And I already got my title in 97', so my life is house money at this point.  As to your points.

1. Agree.

2. According to whom?  Moeller was a very good coach and the DC eventually won a title at UM and is in the college football HOF.  We have a great staff, but so did 94'.  The one prop I will give Harbaugh over Moeller, is that his teams fight to bitterest of ends.  I think he instills more fortitude in his players.  

3. So did they. Wheatley and Biakabutuka. Arguably better.  Biakabatuka was the 8th pick in the NFL draft, and Wheatley the 17th.  It's a different era, but that is certainly up to the Edwards/Corum level. 

4. Absolutely.  And he is better than Todd Collins, who threw a nice ball, but didn't prove to be a confident leader, like JJ

5. Maybe you missed that Ty Law is in the NFL HOF and was a first-round draft pick after 94'.  That is up to Will Johnson sophomore level.  

6. I do think this OL is likely better, but the 94' OL was quite good.  Rod Payne was the best center in my UM fandom until Olu and Ruiz.  Jon Jansen was the RT.  The DL this year has great potential and should be better than 94, but needs DE's to emerge.  However, I take issue with your premise.  The deepest DL I've ever seen at UM was 2016, and it's not even close, with 2006 being a distant second.  If this year's DL is at even 06' level, we'll be amazing.  

Buy Bushwood

June 7th, 2023 at 3:38 PM ^

I would rather have Harbaugh, without question.  But, those record comparisons?  I think that's a bit of cherry-picking.  Harbaugh is not a 24-3 coach at UM, and was thoroughly outcoached in several UM/OSU games (for which we're blaming DJ Durkin and Don Brown).  Hopefully, he's got his bearings now, and it isn't just the Ryan Day effect.    

DennisFranklinDaMan

June 8th, 2023 at 11:42 AM ^

Yeah, that makes me laugh. As if Harbaugh had nothing to do with the results in his first five years in the program.

Also, Moeller choked in close games? Like the 1994 Notre Dame game? Like the 1988 Hall of Fame Bowl Game victory over Alabama? He didn't win all of them, but he didn't lose all of them either, so what are we talking about?

And as much as I like Corum and Edwards (I actually am completely alone, I believe, in preferring Edwards, honestly), I'd take Wheatley and Biakabatuka any day of the week.

I love this team, and I'd definitely take JJ over Collins, but ... Moeller definitely had talent on those teams.

Buy Bushwood

June 8th, 2023 at 12:35 PM ^

Don't forget Moeller's incredible gameplan and victory in the 1993 Rose Bowl.  He was an offensive genius. While Bo had finished 0-3 against ND, Moeller left Ann Arbor 2-2-1 (and should have won the tie in SB).  He did about as well as he could have in years 1-3.  He only lost 5 games, after all.  Those included the Rose Bowl against Co-national champion Washington, and the loss to #1 FSU.  But years 4-5 were dismally underperforming.  Not sure if that was bad luck or something going on with the decline of the program.  

jmblue

June 8th, 2023 at 1:22 PM ^

Yeah, that makes me laugh. As if Harbaugh had nothing to do with the results in his first five years in the program.

Not sure I follow this point.   Harbaugh inherited a program that had gone 46-42 (.523) over the previous seven years, including 5-7 the season before.  In his first five years he went 47-18 (.723), a huge improvement.  The only real problem was going 0-5 against OSU, though given that OSU was a perennial top 3 program nationally, it was understandable.  He did need to eventually get over that hump, and thankfully he did.

RealElonMusk

June 12th, 2023 at 4:04 PM ^

I chose that comparison because Moeller walked into a fully operational Michigan team while Harbaugh had to rebuild and it took 5 years.

I totally disagree on him being outcoached versus OSU-  he brought in Brown and Michigan was able to stop Meyer's OSU offense very effectively-  He should have replaced Don Brown 1-2 years earlier because a new defensive approach for Ryan Day's pass focused offense.  

Vote_Crisler_1937

June 12th, 2023 at 7:58 AM ^

Strength of schedule is being understated in all of this. Moeller & Co were amazing in many ways. But you can’t run a gauntlet schedule of top 5 to top 20 teams week in and week out and expect to win such a high variance game as college football. 

The program has finally started to figure this out and adjust. Yet some fans are still pining for the 1994 type schedules that my Spartan friends are demanding Michigan have again. 

Even the last 2 seasons had their Illinois game and Nebraska fumble moments to preserve them. 

jmblue

June 7th, 2023 at 11:33 AM ^

I don't quite see it.  The '94 team had something to prove after going 8-4 the previous year ... and ended up not proving anything.  

Todd Collins, for all his talent on paper, never quite put it together.  His two years were marked by lots of killer losses, where we often had a chance to do something in the final minutes and didn't (the ND game being a happy exception).  

This team reminds me more of the 1988-92 teams.  We've got most of our guys back, coming off a couple of great seasons.  We have an elite QB.  We'll see if we can climb the final mountain.

DetroitDan

June 8th, 2023 at 9:54 AM ^

Todd Collins was my 2nd favorite UM QB of all time, after Tom Brady and slightly ahead of Brian Griese.  He was really good, IMO.  I remember him being just about perfect, and never being at fault for a loss.  Michigan QBs were good every year for a stretch there.  Fall off began with Navarre I believe, and even Henne wasn't of the same as the 90s QBs.

jmblue

June 8th, 2023 at 1:29 PM ^

I think he was one of the most talented QBs we've had, and threw a prettier ball than Grbac, but there was something not entirely right about the passing game when he was starting.  He threw just 13 TD passes his senior year, against 10 picks.  We were involved in a lot of close games, but outside of the ND game, we couldn't seem to capitalize in pressure situations.  (That ND team finished 6-5-1, so they weren't too good in the clutch either.)

BlueKoj

June 12th, 2023 at 9:51 AM ^

Maybe '91 & '92 but it's difficult to compare Michael Taylor and first-year Elvis to this year's JJ. '88 - '90 just don't seem the same. It's very tough to compare then to now for me. I had B1G and Rose Bowl championship aspirations every year (national championships weren't as much on my mind due to Bo's stance and the reality of my fandom since the 70s).

mikewein

June 7th, 2023 at 12:24 PM ^

This was my Freshman year. I still remember how quite 100,000 people were at the end of the Colorado game.  Also how a friend was upset when they sold a ticket for a later game in the season, not because the missed the game, but because the coupon on the back for Wendy's was worth more than they sold it for

Other Andrew

June 12th, 2023 at 4:45 AM ^

My sophomore year. We were planning out Rose Bowl trip during the second half of the CU game.

And yes, the silence was absolutely stunning. Nobody said a single word (I mean nobody not just my small group) until we passed bongo man on the way home and he gave us a tiny laugh. 
 

PSU was one of the best football games I’ve seen in person. More than living up to the cliché of a heavy title bout. And it’s no wonder the team couldn’t really come back from those two devastating losses.

And for those above talking about Corum and Edwards being better than Wheatley and Biakabatuka, I can say you should look into it a bit more. Wheatley is up there with Denard and Desmond as one of the most exciting players in program history. Case un point, IIRC he entered that PSU game at halftime (UM down 17-3) and like a bolt of lightning put us back in the game on a devastating TD run. Without the injury he would have had a Heisman campaign season.

Vasav

June 7th, 2023 at 12:29 PM ^

A buddy of mine and I've been talking this theme - how anything short of beating OSU and winning the Big Ten would feel like a letdown, and how not winning a playoff game again would feel frustrating, and how unfair that kind of is. We remembered more recent seasons with high expectations - 2016, where we came close but nope 3 times, or 2007, where we got thwacked 3 times and best not mention the one before those.

Sports are a cruel mistress. Football isn't as wacky as hockey or even soccer (let alone baseball) - but one bad game can define a season even more than in those sports. CFB relies on 20somethings and teenagers. The difference between 10-2 and 12-1 is phantom inches, KW3, Kinnick at night, Erick All, Taylor Martinez pushing for more yards...and even 13-0 with 11 blowouts saw the difference between champs and also rans being 3 FGs in Q4 and a muffed opening KO.

I guess I take hope in the fact that this team HAS throttled its opponents in the last couple of years. We've been 5-2 in games decided by a TD or less - and 1 of those, we never trailed, the other we didn't trail the entire second half. 3-2 in close games isn't exactly lucky - this program has been ELITE, running roughshod over one of the 3 best divisions in CFB, and other than that Rutgers game, hasn't really tussled around with bad teams. We may have bad halves, but the other close games were against solid teams. 1994 Wisconsin, 2007 Appy, 2016 Iowa, heck even 2018 Florida in the bowl game - those all seem like something that this group won't let happen. To beat this team you need to be lucky AND good. There are teams that can do it - Rutgers under Schiano, Penn St in Happy Valley, Maryland in the trappiest of trap games, Nebraska at night - come and get us. This is what we're here for. 

LeCheezus

June 9th, 2023 at 10:42 AM ^

The only thing I'd disagree with is the 2018 Florida bowl game.  I think all top programs are at risk of a blowout when the season ends with a bad loss and a bunch of players opt out of the bowl game.  Even more so if you're playing a team having a "we're back" year and their whole roster plays in the game.

You make great points about how much has to go right to win a national championship.  How does '97 go if we have a great dual threat QB leading a competent team on the schedule?  The very next year Syracuse went up 35-0 in Michigan Stadium with Donovan McNabb.  How does 2016 go if OSU gets called for a single live ball penalty?

The main difference I see these days compared to the late Bo/Moeller/Carr years is that it finally seems like the old "expectation for the position" mantra that leads to the attitude that we can just out execute any opponent regardless of their strengths and weaknesses is mostly gone.  Sure, we'll still run Duo 8 times in a row if you keep both safeties back, but that's different than running repeatedly into stacked boxes.

Don

June 7th, 2023 at 12:49 PM ^

"and steel-trap tackler Steve Morrison at LB"

Morrison was a very capable linebacker, but he had no business being on the field on the final play against Colorado. Did DC Lloyd Carr think they were going to run the ball or throw a screen pass? He was useless on that play, as the video shows him arriving far too late at the end zone to do anything.

Buy Bushwood

June 7th, 2023 at 12:59 PM ^

Very true.  Two years later (I was at the game in Boulder) with the shorter Hail Mary redux that Woodson batted down.  Lloyd had at least learned something, because he blitzed a LB rather than only rushing 3.  Sixty-five yards away, I'd bring 6 and drop 5 before I'd bring 3.  

One of the problems of course was that no one had any idea that Kordell Stewart could throw the ball 70 yards, which led to defenders being unprepared as they race back.  He should never have had as much time as he had to run around and get a clean throw with a running start.  

HonoluluBlue

June 7th, 2023 at 12:58 PM ^

Tyrone Wheatley had two absolutely incredible long TD runs in that PSU game. He had all the talent in the world. When he was healthy and on his game he was an absolute beast.

Billy Ray Valentine

June 7th, 2023 at 1:18 PM ^

Nice write-up. I was a freshman in '94, but I had been an obsessive Michigan football fan for the previous decade. I was in the stands for Colorado. It will forever haunt me. I can't imagine what it was like for the actual team.

Intangibles can be both understated and overstated. By their mere nature, intangibles cannot be quantified. The Colorado Hail Mary is arguably the most devastating, disheartening, gut-wrenching play in Michigan football history. We reference BPONE quite frequently on this site, but the Colorado Hail Mary triggered peak BPONE. IMHO, the promise of the '94 season ended when Michael Westbrook caught the ball in the endzone with time expired. 

Your write-up accurately pinpoints several moments in the '94 game in which Moeller could have severed Colorado's jugular. Championship football teams slice their opponent's jugular when they have the chance. BPONE football teams turtle. I admit that there's a limit -- see Michigan running the Philly Special in last year's Fiesta Bowl.

My point is that the 2023 incarnation of Michigan football needs to play confident, aggressive, and smart, from start to finish. If there's a lesson from '94, this is it. We have talent. We have depth except at CB. We have culture. We have coaching. We have experience. We have a manageable schedule. Fergodsake, we won in frickin' Columbus last year, and we return many of our team leaders. As the wise sage Mitch McGary so eloquently once wrote, "Win the Game!" 

schreibee

June 7th, 2023 at 3:33 PM ^

To say that season's promise ended on the Hail Mary isn't even hyperbole, as 2 teams went unbeaten in '94. And the next team in the rankings lost only 1 - and that to 1 of the unbeatens! 

And that team, as was noted, is the team that completed the Hail Mary! So even if Michigan ran the table after that game, 3rd was the highest they could finish.

So yeah, if we harbored NC dreams in '94 they ended on that play...

HighBeta

June 7th, 2023 at 1:30 PM ^

"High expectations are balloons waiting for the needle".

Well, young man, you can wallow in your BPONE but I'll bet you a dollar that Team 144 finishes with a record better than 8-4. And, unlike some other geriatric contributors hereon who are too tight and/or too proud to admit their mistake(s), I will even double my payout if I fail to humbly acknowledge my miscalculation to every member of this august community of MGoBloggers. 😉

Winner gets to direct which charitable org gets the $.

We on?

🙂

schreibee

June 7th, 2023 at 3:38 PM ^

Wow did you miss the point of this reminiscence Beta!

If Michigan loses 2 games it'll be a disappointment, forget 4. And in the spirit of the post, for any harboring NC dreams, even 1 L will probably be too many!

It wasn't about 4Ls, it was about disappointment! 

NittanyFan

June 7th, 2023 at 1:45 PM ^

Maybe my recollection is off (still in High School), but were there really 2023-level expectations for the 1994 Michigan squad?

#5 in the pre-season, which is respectable.  But most of the national attention was still focused on Florida, ND and FSU.  And not undeservedly, unlike Michigan none of them had lost 4 games and finished in 4th place in their conference the year before! 

Yes, U-M was the B1G favorite but they were far from an overwhelming favorite --- Wisconsin, PSU, OSU and even Illinois (!!!) had a lot of support too.  From day 1, it felt like a multi-team horse race for B1G supremacy.

Then the season starts.  Sure, Colorado was a disappointing result.  But ultimately: "Michigan goes 1-1 in their games against ND and Colorado."  If you told someone that in late August, it wouldn't have surprised anybody, if anything there was probably some relief that it wasn't 0-2 (which was always on the table)!  

Had their chance against an truly-elite-in-that-year PSU team, and that was probably U-M's best single effort of the year.  But even if they win that one - do they really go 3-0 against Wisconsin, Illinois and OSU down the road?  Call it the "football Gods" if you will, but as I recall Wisconsin really wasn't a fluke win for the opposition

Seems like there's a vast difference between the expectations before 1994 & 2023.  So I disagree with your premise right from the get-go.

Billy Ray Valentine

June 7th, 2023 at 1:55 PM ^

I disagree with OP's use of the word, "scary," but I don't disagree that there are apparent similarities that can be useful for this year's team. As I said, it was a good write-up. There are important lessons to be learned from '94. 

I agree that 1-1 would have been either a "relief" or acceptable, but the devil is in the detail. We didn't lose at Notre Dame, which would have been a recoverable loss. We lost at home in the most devastating fashion imaginable despite outplaying Colorado for most of the game -- certainly the 2nd half. I'd love to see (I'm lying. I actually wouldn't) a win probability chart for the '94 Colorado game.

 

NittanyFan

June 7th, 2023 at 2:03 PM ^

It didn't have a 65-yard Hail Mary to end it ---- but the 1994 Michigan @ ND game somewhat similarly featured the eventual-winning-team having the ball at their own 16 yard line with 0:46 to play. 

That's a win probability chart with the same shape in the last minute.  The shape just isn't as dramatically large.

I get it, Colorado was very tough.  But I'd argue a 1-1 record was Michigan's deserved result, in the aggregate sense, for those 2 games.

Billy Ray Valentine

June 7th, 2023 at 2:12 PM ^

Same shape, yes. Same steepness, no way.

Teams routinely kick winning FGs after last-minute drives. Serious question -- How many road Top-10 teams in college football history have beaten a higher-ranked Top-10 team with a last second 65-yard Hail Mary, when trailing by 5? That's ~5% compared to ~.001%.

(I'm just kidding here) The odds might be on par with Penn State, playing in Happy Valley, losing to a Brandon Peters-led Illinois team in a 9(!!!) OT game.  

NittanyFan

June 7th, 2023 at 2:32 PM ^

The Colorado question can also be re-framed as: "what percent of college-football teams win games when they are on the road, outgain their opponents by 29* yards overall, but are -1 on turnovers?"

I'd guess that's in the 25%-50% range.  I suppose Bill Connelly could answer that question better.  But while everyone remembers the final play, I think it gets forgotten that CU wasn't vastly outplayed that day either.

--------------

* CU outgained Michigan 511-415 on the game.  Even if the 67-yard Hail Mary falls incomplete, CU ends the day with a 444-415 yardage edge.

NittanyFan

June 7th, 2023 at 5:54 PM ^

In the 4th Quarter of that game, Michigan still had 62 yards gained, made 4 1st Downs, and had multiple drives that reached Colorado territory. 

Yes, they did while throwing all of 1 pass in the quarter (which was complete).  But Michigan was still moving the ball somewhat, it's not like they had 8 total yards and 0 first downs. 

I do think the "turtling" narrative and the "Colorado was simply an inferior team" (quoting the OP, who, I'm sorry, has multiple incorrect facts in his post: the Che Foster fumble wasn't on a 3rd-and-short and Michigan going for a TD instead of the FG would have hardly put the game away - it just would have made it a 10-point game with 22:00 left to play) narratives get significantly overplayed.  I thought that even at the time, as a then 15-year-old, FWIW

A bigger issue, IMO --- Michigan had THREE false starts in that 4th quarter alone.  That's not turtling, but it's absolutely too many unforced errors, and that's purely on U-M.  

http://websites.umich.edu/~bhlumrec/athdept/fbstats/1994/1994colo.pdf

EGD

June 8th, 2023 at 1:03 PM ^

Michigan's problem back then was they never seemed to get out of September unscathed. Either they'd lose to ND or else they'd beat ND and lose to some Florida team. So Michigan generally didn't get deep enough into a season with an undefeated record for national media to really look at M as a national title contender. But at the time of the Colorado game, M had already defeated ND and Boston College (who was the first team out of the preseason AP top-25). Had M had closed out the Colorado game with a win then I have to imagine there would have been pretty serious national buzz. When they lost, it became like just another year when M is contending for a Big Ten title and a Rose Bowl appearance but isn't really in the national title hunt.

NittanyFan

June 8th, 2023 at 2:08 PM ^

That's fair ---- if Michigan beats Colorado, I suppose October 1994 becomes VERY much like October 1997. 

Nebraska, Florida State and Florida all undefeated in the Top 5, the latter 2 having a game on the docket in November (Florida drops an SEC game well before meeting FSU, however).

Michigan and Penn State also undefeated in the Top 5, but with no path to a decisive National Title game with any of the 3 above --- but at least they have their own game coming up.

Does a U-M win over Colorado mean the Michigan/PSU 1994 result is different?  I'd argue "no" --- much like their 1997 match-up, one team was just better.  Yes, Michigan/PSU 1994 was close down to the end, but I think it's a bit forgotten that game was nearly a runaway that could have looked like the 1998 Syracuse game.  PSU moved the ball very well in the 1st half.  First 4 drives for each team, U-M scores 0 on each but each PSU drive made it inside the Michigan 11, but only 1 TD and 3 FGs.  Michigan gets the offense going from there (as elite as PSU's 1994 offense was, their defense wasn't) but if it's already 24-0 or 28-0 instead of 16-0 those inevitable points probably don't feel like much.

Anyway, it's an interesting discussion - but that 1994 Michigan team always felt (to me) like one with a ceiling of "very-good-but-not-elite that would lose 1-2 games somewhere."  

That, of course, isn't the ceiling for the 2023 team.

Buy Bushwood

June 12th, 2023 at 9:01 AM ^

UM had a terrible first half, true.  But they quickly took the lead in the second half and had opportunities to take a larger lead later.  At the end of the day, the yards were almost totally even.  Had Moeller had a better first-half gameplan, that game might have looked the opposite, with PSU looking to maintain contact with UM.  We lost, they were marginally better- no question.  But 10/10 times I doubt that game play out the same way.  We had as much talent as they did.  

EGD

June 12th, 2023 at 10:23 AM ^

I agree, I remember that 1994 Penn State @ Michigan game and I don't think M's loss in that game had anything to do with a hangover from the Colorado game. I do think M sleep-walked through the Wisconsin and OSU games that year and while they might still have lost those games regardless, with the lack of motivation they didn't even give themselves a chance.

Considering the '94 Penn State team went undefeated and beat Michigan at home, it's hard to say they weren't "just better" that year. But I think those teams were pretty evenly-matched in terms of personnel and so forth. Remember that Penn State had an extra week to prepare for M (not to mention the preceding two games were against bad Rutgers and Temple teams) and Paterno always made really good use of those bye weeks. Whatever made the difference, h/t to Penn State for winning the game on field but I it was a close game and I think rightfully so.

In terms of Michigan's ceiling that season, remember that it was really getting blasted by FSU and Washington in the 1991 season that showed Moeller the need to get faster and more athletic on defense. So M started to recruit more speed and athleticism, but hadn't really brought much of that to the field by 1994. So I tend to agree--with M's limitations on defense that year, they were probably bound to lose at least a game or two. Or four, as it turned out.

Tex_Ind_Blue

June 7th, 2023 at 1:52 PM ^

"The 1994 schedule was a gauntlet, of the type that we will, sadly, never see again, due to the unquenchable thirst for Benjamin Franklins by all major programs. " 

--- I am perfectly happy with not running such a gauntlet. Times have changed in the B1G. Now the B1G schools are more deliberate with scheduling to shoot for the national championship. I am fine with it. 

AlbanyBlue

June 7th, 2023 at 2:00 PM ^

There's nothing at all wrong with the quality of this post. But why would anyone write it at this point in Michigan football history?

This team is flying high, coming off two statement seasons, stacked on both sides of the ball, and imbued with a clearly positive and team-focused football culture. Why would anyone make a comparison to a Michigan team coming off a disappointing 8-4 record?

Nope, I don't think it's scarily similar at all. And this just smacks of BPONE rearing its ugly head. Look, I have been as negative as they come in the early Harbaugh era. But after the last two years, BPONE is gone, replaced by an attitude of optimism about this team (see above).

So, yeah, it's a well-written post, but I 100% disagree. We have a lot to look forward to this season.