[Bryan Fuller]

Unverified Voracity Isn't Backtracking Comment Count

Brian July 19th, 2019 at 1:32 PM

Harbaugh speaks! Harbaugh's 15 minutes at the mic at Big Ten Media Days have come and gone with a couple of items of note. One is that Harbaugh declined to elaborate on the Media Kerfuffle Of The Week:

On his comments about Urban Meyer's controversy that follows him and if he would add any context

No, I don't see any -- no context you should know about. I don't think it was anything that was anything new or anything of a bombshell. It's things that many of you all understand and have written about.

A second is that Harbaugh came out in favor of a one-time transfer:

My opinion is that every student-athlete should have a one-time ability to transfer and not have to sit out a year, and then if they were to transfer a second time, then the previous rule that we had, where you had to sit out a year of eligibility, and with that, I would also keep the graduate transfer rule that we have in place right now, where you can graduate and transfer and become immediately eligible.

FWIW, many NCAA sports already have this rule.

And finally:

On Michigan being picked as the favorite to win the Big Ten East and conference title game

I think that's where I would pick us.

All righty then.

Oh, one last item:

This is almost certainly a bad idea. There are limited ways in which this can be a good idea.

Neutral site games are bad. Neutral site games when you have the largest stadium in the country are worse. If this is something like Washington moving a home game to Vancouver because their AD has been infected with Pac-12 disease, whatever. If it's Michigan playing someone in France, hard pass.

I guess a one-off with Syracuse in Toronto wouldn't be the worst.

[After THE JUMP: Rutger offers up some batting practice]

This, on the other hand… eh. Basketball and wrestling will face Rutgers at Madison Square Garden this season. These are both technically Michigan home games getting moved. This is unlike a couple of previous events where teams moved home games to extreme consternation because:

This is the third time Michigan has done one of these double-headers and the second time they've spent a basketball home game to do so. The next time needs to be on the opponent; this is otherwise fine.

Rutger is specialized in dropping letters. I am offended at this as an internet content generator:

I don't need your charity, Rutger. I've got jokes! Stop grooving obvious ones down the middle. There's no art in that. Now, the cannon…

44905343385_3df8e6735b_k

[Patrick Barron]

…that is something you can work with.

Bill Connelly at the mothership. The S&P+ purveyor has moved to ESPN, and previews both halves of the Big Ten. His Michigan section will be familiar to most people who read this site. The disintegration of MSU's offense makes for some paragraph, though:

The Spartans' offense has grown more and more hopeless for a while. After leaping to 12th in Off. S&P+ in 2014, it fell to 30th in 2015, 55th in 2016, 72nd in 2017 and 112th last fall. After a brief slip, the MSU defense, Dantonio's calling card, was as good as ever in 2018. But the offense was an outright detriment. MSU scored 13 or fewer points in five of six losses and exactly six in each of the last three.

There's a difference between having a plodding, physical and not-that-creative offense and having one that can't actually pull off being plodding and physical. Michigan State has, for a while now, been a team that wants to run the ball but can't, and things hit a potential low point last season. The Spartans ranked a ghastly 122nd in marginal efficiency. Their running backs averaged just 3.8 yards per carry.

And Dantonio went full Hoke in response:

So you fire your offensive coordinator and bring in a bright, young, energetic new guy, right? That's what's supposed to happen?

Nah, Dantonio just gave everybody a different job.

Quarterbacks coach Brad Salem is now running backs coach and took over as offensive coordinator. Co-coordinator and RBs coach Dave Warner is now quarterbacks coach. Co-coordinator and tight ends coach Jim Bollman is now offensive line coach. Offensive line coach Mark Staten is now tight ends coach. Assistant DBs coach Don Treadwell is now receivers coach, and receivers coach Terrence Samuel is now assistant DBs coach.

On the other side of the conference, a wide-open race with six contenders. And Illinois. Minnesota comes in as the most inexplicable team of 2018:

Fleck's second Minnesota team did all of the following things:

• Beat eventual MWC champion Fresno State (which finished 16th in S&P+)
• Destroyed Purdue 41-10
• Destroyed Wisconsin in Madison 37-15
• Destroyed Georgia Tech in the Quick Lane Bowl 34-10

The same team also did this:

• Lost at Maryland 42-13
• Lost at Nebraska 53-28
• Lost at Illinois 55-31

Minnesota started 3-0, lost four straight games by at least 16 points each, then won four of six to finish the season.

The Gophers are starting a right side of the line that goes 370 and 400.

Mike Locksley would prefer not to talk about Josh Gattis. He fielded a few question about his former colleague and didn't like it:

Gattis recounted on Jim Harbaugh’s Attack Each Day podcast in January that Alabama coach Nick Saban chewed him out for leaving the Crimson Tide for the Terrapins’ job before Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh called with an offer. According to Locksley, at least publicly, that wasn’t the case.

“I never thought that Josh was going with me,” Locksley said. “He was a guy that I considered. I was happy that he was given the opportunity that he was given at Michigan.”

Then, expressing annoyance at multiple questions about Gattis, Locksley vouched for the coach who actually is his offensive coordinator, recently fired East Carolina coach Scottie Montgomery.

“I’m also happy that I got Scottie Montgomery,” Locksley said. “He is my offensive coordinator, has called played before. Has been a part of winning programs — Duke, the Pittsburgh Steelers — played in the league, you name it. I want to spend a little more time talking about Scottie Montgomery and the job he’ll do running the system that I ran at Alabama 100-percent of the time and developed all of the weekly schemes.”

Locksley has a history of getting mildly cross, so that's not a huge surprise.

More realignment, intramurals edition. PJ Fleck asserted that more Big Ten realignment is "inevitable":

“Change is inevitable,” Fleck said. “I think we all know that. I think that the East and West have been around for a while. I like it, I like the division of it. But I don’t think it will stay the same. I think we’ll change it at some point because change is coming somehow, some way. And I think people are going to want to move it around, and shake it up a little bit.”

Seems pretty speculative, though. Scott Dochterman brings up a potential MSU/Purdue flip, citing MSU's run under Dantonio, but if Brohm stays around and Dantonio heads into retirement after another couple of indifferent years that move might backfire. It would also lock Michigan into an annual MSU crossover game. Net effect: Michigan plays Purude annually and gets even more reduced exposure to the rest of the West. No thanks.

Also here's a thing:

In the last two seasons, a midlevel West Division team has toppled East Division Ohio State in regular-season play by at least four touchdowns.

I wonder if that's why the Big Ten hasn't had a playoff team the last two years.

Man exists. PFF is featuring various players in the run-up to the season, and can confidently assert that Cole Chewins was certainly a human being in pads:

 

If that's the guy you're highlighting off the MSU OL… welp.

Etc.: Shea Patterson lawyer and all-around NCAA irritant Tom Mars is hired by… the NCAA.

Comments

Mgoeffoff

July 19th, 2019 at 1:44 PM ^

Gotta love 11W's Dan Hope asking JH what they need to do differently to beat OSU.  Troll much Dan???

stephenrjking

July 19th, 2019 at 4:22 PM ^

What, exactly, is an OSU beat reporter going to ask Harbaugh? "How do you like your tackles this year," to get a list of every tackle on the roster and a word salad about how they're "working hard" or "in there" or "coming strong" that is totally useless in an OSU publication?

This is a question that literally EVERYBODY IN THE COUNTRY has for Harbaugh, including basically everybody who writes for or reads this blog. I can't get upset at an OSU guy asking about it.

There's an easy solution to this: Beat Ohio.

MaizeBlueA2

July 19th, 2019 at 1:46 PM ^

Did Harbaugh hint or say that the neutral site game is a Michigan home game?

I see everyone jumping off the ledge, but isn't there a chance that it could be a home game for the other team and Michigan still has a normal home schedule?

Sure, for Michigan fans in whichever region of the opponent - it would suck. But it's not lost revenue.

What if it's vs. Notre Dame in Ireland or somewhere in Europe, but it's part of the ND Shamrock Series and it's their home game? I'll take Michigan vs. ND in London if it's ND's turn to host.

What if it's Stanford in Australia? (Please no, because of the impact on the players)

Or against Cal in China or Japan? 

What about Cincinnati in Paul Brown Stadium? Technically that's still in Ohio, thus - foreign.

What if it IS Washington in Vancouver?

Again - I have no evidence to say that any of this is true...I'm just wondering why it's been ruled out. If they're playing on foreign soil, both teams will make a big announcement about it - not just the home team.

Ramblin

July 19th, 2019 at 2:14 PM ^

I immediately thought "Michigan vs. Notre Dame in Ireland."  That will always be a "sort of" home field advantage for the Irish, but I'm ok with that.  Great publicity.  I wouldn't even be too concerned about foregoing a home game for that.  

Win the big ten, beat ohio, go to playoffs.  I think it is that simple now and into the foreseeable future.  Out of conference "neutral" site game with big name opponent overseas with tons of media coverage?  Gotta be worth it for recruiting?   

 

True Blue Grit

July 19th, 2019 at 2:51 PM ^

I really don't see a U-M game on foreign soil as a significant benefit to Michigan.  Other than in Canada, is American college football really that popular elsewhere?  If it's in place of a home game, then it's an even worse idea.  The lost revenue and higher travel cost just don't make sense then.  

oriental andrew

July 19th, 2019 at 5:11 PM ^

Upvote for sharing the insider info, not for the content of said info. 

I'm a bit torn on this. Michigan is just one of those teams that has a global brand and could be a draw. Service academy could certainly also be a draw, particularly for military stationed in western Europe. 

Regardless, I assume it'd be in Wembley. 

LKLIII

July 19th, 2019 at 5:50 PM ^

Thanks for the info, but man that would be a terrible idea.  Let me count the ways:

  1. Giving up a home game.
     
  2. Playing a service academy yet again, which includes almost zero up side, but almost always comes with a heaping side of downside in the form of:
  • Opponent likley running the tripple option, forcing our D to burn time preparing for an offense that likely won't be used by another opponent that year.
     
  • Opponent is not viewed as strong enough for the team to get much credit if Michigan wins the game, but will be stronger than a tomato can nonconference opponent.  Thus, the odds of losing are marginally higher (espeically if in a unique enviornment), yet Michigan will still get lambasted if they managed to lose.
     
  • Opponent likely uses chop blocking & other techniques, essentially playing Russian Roulette with our player's knees.
     
  • Jetlag will take a few days to acclimate & recover from, thus making the game itself & the practice the week following most likley less efficient/sub-par physical performances.  Even making the bye week immediately after a London game, you're burning a good 2-3 days of the bye week just recovering from jetlag.

 

Playing a one-off away game against Syracuse in Toronto--fine, as Brian said.  Playing almost anybody else more than a 5 hour flight & more than 3 time zones away--BAD idea.

 

 

MadMatt

July 19th, 2019 at 4:36 PM ^

When they decide the domed stadium in Atlanta needs to be replaced, against Georgia (or really any team from one of the States in the old Confederacy; Ole' Miss would be especially piquant) in that stadium, and then blow it up as soon as possible after the game.

We can call it a preview of the next game against MSU in East Landfill.

Ramblin

July 19th, 2019 at 4:31 PM ^

Bad idea in and of itself, but even stranger in the international setting.  Look North Korea, our service academies are weak and unable to compete with state universities! Of course that is not the real story, but it could be perceived that way internationally?  Just a strange thing to do.  Wouldn't think the military would want to put a likely ass kicking on public international display?

 

Ramblin

July 20th, 2019 at 12:00 AM ^

I should be really clear.  Thank god for our service academies and the students that attend them.  I have nothing but respect for those brave/smart enough to attend any of our military schools.  My point was simply that the focus of these institutions is not football.  Thank god for that.  However, that is clear to Americans.  It might not be as clear to others.  It's either going to be an embarrassing loss for Michigan (unlikely, but bad for U of M) or and embarrassing loss for our Military academies (likely, and bad for America).  Just a bad idea any way you slice it imo.