SEARCHBITS XXIII: HARBAUGHING ON ACE'S GAME HARBAUGH Comment Count

Brian

THE VERB REPLACED IS "STEP," YOU DEGENERATES

3SyDoQi[1]

Via MGoUser Red_Lee

A BRIEF FOLLOW-UP ON "IT'S DONE." Ace debunked it yesterday; let me add my voice to the chorus of No Way. I am sure Marcellus Wiley does have serious people telling him it's a done deal. I have that. Many other people have that. There are many people saying it. That does not mean it's true. Done means pen to paper, press conference scheduled. That does not describe Harbaugh's situation.

I would triple that skepticism in re: Paul Finebaum's report of same. It's not done.

This is why it's a coaching fiasco—no matter the outcome. It's a circus and will always be a circus.

FWIW. Alejandro Zuniga compiled the full text of Wiley's assertion:

B5QHOA3CQAAjlw6[1]

BUT IT SOUNDS PRETTY GOOD YOU GUYS. I continue to get stuff too vague to Report but seemingly credible that indicates Michigan's AD is extremely confident this is getting done, with the current focus on handling buyout issues with San Francisco and an announcement by December 30th.

I fully believe many people in the AD and a big community of Harbaugh friends and acquaintances think it's all over but the shouting. I don't know if I believe they're 100%right, if you get my drift. Someone can always come in with a Godfather NFL offer. Going to be a long 8-10 days coming up.

SCHEFT SHIFT PART II. In the meantime I'd rather have randos coming out of the woodwork to say it's happening instead of it's not happening. It is also good when previously-adamant NFL guys are beginning to say it's possible. Ace mentioned Adam Schefter's apparent shift from "no way" in a lengthy Facebook post. First:

49ers HC Jim Harbaugh’s family and friends have been encouraging him to take the Michigan HC job, but he is torn because his heart is in the NFL, per sources close to the situation.

That's pretty good news, especially since I find the idea that Harbaugh's heart is in the NFL to be questionable at best. This is a guy who can't help quoting Bo about every press conference.

The rest of Schefter's post is a mixture of obvious bunk and interesting bits. Schefter asserts Michigan might not be able to wait, which is nuts. They are fully prepared to wait on Harbaugh until the 28th. They told their players they should expect a coach when they come back on January 4th. It is a a recruiting dead period (you can call but no face to face meetings) until then and if they have a good shot at Harbaugh—they do—they'd be insane to move on before he responds to an offer. Schefter also makes the bonkers assertion that "some have pointed out that recruiting would be a challenge," which may stand as the nuttiest thing said about this coaching search.

On the other hand, Schefter reports that:

  • Harbaugh's agent "has a good sense of realistic NFL options already," though this directly contradicts an assertion earlier in the post.
  • Harbaugh's wife is okay with a return to An Arbor.

So I don't know how seriously to take anything specific in there. The overall thrust is a guy going from utterly dismissive to serious, though, and that's a big move.

In smaller moves, Sam Webb incremented his current percentage($) from 60% to 65%, and Joe Pequeno, the reporter in Arizona who put the 49 million number on twitter, has it at 70%.

large[1]

via EDSBS

WHERE THE EXTREME SKEPTICISM MAY BE COMING FROM. NFL guys talk to agents, mostly. They've been adamant it isn't happening. Therefore: agent probably the reason NFL guys are so adamant. (That and NFL-level arrogance.) Agent likely has a vested interest in being adamant because he wasn't Harbaugh's agent when he was in college and might not be if he returns there. Dunn does not represent college coaches.

This isn't necessarily to say he's acting in bad faith, but he may be inclined to tilt towards something personally beneficial to him, and also to make NFL teams snap at the bait.

NO. Mike Florio reports that Harbaugh turned down a larger offer from Michigan than he got from the 49ers back in 2011—$5.2 million a year in fact. That is false. Negotiations with Harbaugh never got that far. That number was drawn up out of thin air by an agent: you can tell because the great and powerful NFL didn't pay him more than Michigan was offering when that's chump change to them.

A FOLLOWUP ON THE ROSS BIT. Yesterday I mentioned the Miami Herald reporting that the Dolphins were not suitors in the Harbaugh sweepstakes. I forgot to remind you that that's one of our main canaries here: if Ross gets involved with the Dolphins that's a sign the dream is dead. So far so good on that front.

PLAN B? Sam says that the ever-fluctuating Les Miles Realism Monitor is at low ebb($). IE: he doesn't seem like a realistic option. Up next would probably be swings at Stoops and Mora and then it's Mullen or a wild card with dubious qualifications.

????????

MATTISON RETURNS? We've heard DJ Durkin's name as a possible DC before, and now Sam mentions Greg Mattison as a possible… linebackers coach($)?

It sounds nutty, but Michigan did sign Mattison to a contract that lasts through 2016 last March. For Michigan the cost of not keeping Mattison is whatever the buyout is plus whoever the new coach is—close enough to Mattison's current deal that you may as well keep him. Meanwhile Mattison was planning on retiring in Ann Arbor before Hoke got axed and if Michigan's amenable he may still want to follow through on that plan. At this point in his career, I doubt he gives a crap about job titles, and Michigan could name him associate head coach or whatever. Would be good for continuity, recruiting, and Swag Mattison memes.

A BRIEF NOTE ON TIES. A clarifying note on the lead bit from yesterday: it doesn't mean anything—it was just a friend of the Harbaughs sending him some ties as a wink-wink joke. Somehow the receipt got loose and several people sent it to me, which I thought was funny. I thought it was clear this was just a "look at us we're crazy people" joke; if that was not clear it should be now.

One thing it's not: a "complete fabrication($)." That's what Tom Beaver called it, which is rich from a guy who spent the duration of TomVH's career at this blog implying that Tom was stealing his scoops from Beaver. Probably thinks he's stealing from him at ESPN now. Anyway, I have multiple independent pictures of the receipt, which I won't post because it has personal information on it and this is fundamentally trivial. But just ask yourself: when's the last time Beaver had anything checkable?

Beaver should stick to mangling the English language beyond recognizability and let the people with sources who exist outside their own head handle things.

ETC.: Wheatley on coaching in the pros versus college. Harbaugh's probably worth the money. Niners Nation poll on Harbaugh's future has Michigan as most likely option… and contract extension with 49ers #2. May not be scientific. Jamie Morris says his gut tells him Michigan will get Harbaugh.

Comments

poppinfresh

December 20th, 2014 at 2:41 PM ^

is the only job thats not being mentioned here as threat the dallas job? 

 

demarrco's hurt, they lose the last two and miss the playoffs, jerry gets salty and fires garrett

then offers harbaugh big money for america's team.  now i know, talk about being micromanaged and not sure the money would be there... but would dallas be a last minute game changer?

Dallas Walmart…

December 20th, 2014 at 2:58 PM ^

On top of Jerry being overinvolved, he has a vested interest in Jason Garrett being successful.  Since that was Jerry's pick as coach, if Jason succeeds then Jerry is looked at as a "football" guy, not just a "marketing" guy.  Or at least that is what literally all the sports talk radio people in Dallas have concluded.  Garrett isn't going anywhere this year.

Rug Dog

December 20th, 2014 at 7:56 PM ^

This would never happen in a thousand years.  I'm a Cowboys fan and I can tell you Jerry would never ever look at Harbaugh (and Harbaugh is too smart to go to JerryWorld).  All he does is hire pushover coaches (Save Bill Parcells, which he walked due to Jerry being a control freak) and we all know Harbaugh is not a pushover.

evenyoubrutus

December 20th, 2014 at 2:51 PM ^

My snowflake about Wiley's report: if Harbaugh truly signed a non-binding MOU, this is clearly the "handshake deal" that everyone has theorized/reported.  While he technically can always change his mind, I believe (read:hope like hell) he has already told Michigan and his close friends he has already made up his mind.  What's preventing him from pulling the trigger now opposed to a week from now is contract/buyout stuff with SF that could cost him and UofM millions or thereabouts.  OTOH his gosh darn agent would prefer he stay in the NFL because he perceives it as a far more lucrative venture (regardless of after-tax pay, his agent still gets his commission).  His AGENT is the one who is spreading the rumors that he is torn, etc, hoping that he can put an offer-he-can't-refuse in front of Harbaugh so he doesn't go back to Michigan.  Just my theory/snowflake but I think it fits with everything we know.

iamtjeff

December 20th, 2014 at 2:58 PM ^

You're right MOUs, and term sheets as they are often called, usually only contain a summary of the material terms (imagine 2-7 pages).  From there, the parties will go about drafting the substantive agreements (imagine several documents from 8-20 pages), which are a great deal more robust. The substantive agreemnets may include everything from how his salary will be paid out to performance bonuses to monies available for assistances, use of a private jet, etc. Some stuff of the private jet use and academic issue variety will likely be agreed to on a handshake or through policy/process flow changes within the university. I'd be surprised to see those details in an agreement that will become public information. FOIA!

Term sheets often allow the parties to do due diligence but do have an end date. That said, I can't imagine UM will allow this to carry on beyond Jan 1st. 

evenyoubrutus

December 20th, 2014 at 3:10 PM ^

I am not a lawyer (sounds like you might be) but I used to do MOU's all the time for my job- it involved activities that bridged partnering organizations together, and the reason we did MOU's instead of contracts was because both parties already knew that they wished to work together, and the MOU simply put in writing what was already agreed upon.  The MOU isn't meant as a loophole to get yourself out of something, but rather protection to ensure that what you have verbally agreed upon already is going to actually occur.  Basically, if Harbaugh has stated: "provide me with x, y & z and I will be the coach" and Michigan went out and got him x, y & z then it is all but a done deal.

iamtjeff

December 20th, 2014 at 3:31 PM ^

Damn, I gave it away.

But you're definitely right. Like anything else, MOUs come at different stages and can be introduced in a variety of ways. Some use MOUs as the initial offer. In that case the MOU may be a reflection of what the parties discussed or what the offerring party thinks is fair. The approach taken reflects the leverage position of the parties. JH definitely has the leverage here since he is clearly Plan A. 

But also consider whether the MOU is the draft form or execution form. Draft versions are usually subject to revisons based on negotations. Execution versions may or not be revised; if so, it's probably because previously unknown info is introduced. The parties may agree to leave the term sheet as-is and just pull the new info into the substantive agreement(s).

Also consider that in complex transactions, a MOU may cover terms that are covered in different agreements, thus they serve as a temporary "agreement" to cover the material terms until the various other docs are prepared. In your case, the parties may have used an MOU as a longer term agreement because the partnership was less complex, i.e. could be covered in one document. 

I've never drafted agreements covering a head football coach hire of a major insitution, but I imagine there is more than one document involved. There's likely a main agreement from which a few others flow. 

 

 

Chris-sirhC

December 20th, 2014 at 2:49 PM ^

Will I get negged to death if i edit down the chat trancript from THE EDGE OF THE INTERNET (http://www.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?&user=tmccanna12&user2=Michigan&pass2=novak&&page=4) this morning and create a topic?

It's not like every rumor under the sun hasn't been posted and the sources get explained throughout the conversation.

I only ask because it's going to take a while to edit it down to an acceptable length, and I don't want that work to be in vain.

Thanks

redsoxaa

December 20th, 2014 at 4:09 PM ^

The people over there come across as credible, but if people post it here then Mgoblog is on the line.  People won't care where it came from.  People over there are all itshappening.gif but they are basing this on sources that can't be confirmed.  I think they have the right of it, but we need patience.